numbersinarow

There is no way to decide stance-independently objectively that death is worse, but why is death better? From the reasons to die, you can find something you care about, and persevere to make sure that your reason to live comes to life, you could persevere even in the most extremely excruciating circumstances, let alone what you're in now.

ld. If you truly believe that the one atom you have chosen as your object of meditation contains everything you need, then you will get everything period, assuming you have done this successfully enough. Life is like a lucid dream, if you think something you want is somewhere out there, you can run for ages on pointless roads that lead nowhere and go through countless obstacles, which, just like in real life, will last until either the life or the lucid dream ends. There is no end to those obstacles and no end to the chasing. Once you accomplish some kind of trophy that trophy could mean extremely little in terms of your daily pleasure/pain ratio a week later. It's all about yourself and not the accomplishments. Focusing on just one spot feels like an extremely effective form of meditation for me. In a world in which absolute satan makes sex and money completely impossible to attain in order to make you desire them to the last of your heart's final degree (see user emotionalmosquito) and become infinitely attached to them, I wouldn't be surprised if you could develop supernatural powers using this kind of meditation. But even if you could, the benefits that we know for a fact are real are integral to the human condition, they are arguably better, and they are fundamental to the reality of creatures.

"So I just focus on that one spot until I defeat myself." Even if that was the case, you would be identifying with a process who's end you can't see. There is merely the mind and it's functioning progressing and you experiencing that.

The fact that your English is SO BAD that you think this is a sentence is hilarious.

This is a thread focused on listing and discussing the most important things that the system wants to instill in you, and optionally what the opposing (contradicting) reality is. Not in the style of a rebuttal, but simply in the form of stating the reality of the situation unbiasedly. "Russia has broken the unbroken rule of peace created after WW2 by trying to conquer another country." Western imperialism has overthrown many countries around the world and installed puppet governments. To deductively contradict the quoted statement, all Putin would need to do is install a puppet regime in Ukraine and pretend like it's not conquest. America and Britain are by far the most violent countries and the worst offenders in terms of violating the boundaries of others since WW2. "Netanyahu is the next Hitler." Hitler is currently, actually, being saluted by brainwashed jihadists. The best explanation for the double standard against Israel is anti-semitism, which Hitler had plenty of. "People partying at the edge of a concentration camp are completely innocent, Hamas killed innocents." Whether someone partying at a concentration camp is an "innocent" is completely subjective, but you certainly shouldn't let the mainstream decide for you. "Russia, an alleged military superpower, is losing to a small country." Ukraine is the largest country in Europe (If we don't count Russia) and has a cutthroat military of zealots, not only that but there is video footage of United States troops directly being involved in the war. There are also trillions of tons of propaganda about how badly humiliating this is and how Russia is underperforming, all the while the United States lost to Afghanistan. Comparing this to US invasions, Russia has not underperformed. "When the US controls everything, that's called peace, when anyone rebels, that's called war." Yes but SHOULD it be?

https://stuffmenhavetodealwith.quora.com/?__ni__=0&__tiids__=155458572&__filter__=all&__nsrc__=notif_page&__sncid__=59781730314&__snid3__=80459162978#anchor

Vegans tend to be psychopaths/sociopaths. Look at vegan gains or at one of the worst psychological abusers in human history, who I won't be naming directly here. And nothing could be less truthful than convincing yourself you're morally superior despite not making an actual difference, while justifying your completely emotional decision with faux reasoning. The only way it could be different is if we had an objective holy book which told "thou shall be vegan."

So, you literally just thought to made an ideologically charged thread where you just pretend to ask a question, then try to boil it all down to your 5 year old level understanding of the topic. And the idea that it can't be used as a currency can be debunked with one google search about the deep web. Hope this helps. Imagine this being the way you interact with other humans. Make some friends, and stop being the most empty-inside nihilistic psychopath on the internet. Cheers.

Did I need to imitate someone else to have a girl obsess over me in high school? (If you know my previous posts to emo you know that I am doing the opposite of bragging with this.)

Just bluepilldom.

I'm not sure what people who are denying the blackpill are doing. They can't run forever. Your sexual success is pre-determined by your environment and genetics. More specifically, your level of opportunities to talk to girls and your looks.

Guy puts it very clearly.

Am I the only one questioning why a bunch of chimps on a large piece of dirt floating around space are capable of inducing metaphysical nasuea into each other with words, and why there are armies of the most fragile of them waiting to do this to you in case you say the smallest negative word about the system or hold a pessimistic worldview?

I had a dream that there was an alien object involving potential dangerous consequences that was being investigated by people, including me, somewhere slightly underground. There was a detective in my dream I was talking to. I forgot most of my interactions with him but he told me not to do anything with the object until he is aware of the new findings. The object was related to a black pen that could alter the air around it but also worked on a piece of paper. In another dream, I walked past some people, did something to anger a public couple, then entered a red tube-like corridor which separates that "outside" world from a sprawling, complex maze, which requires complex actions, extreme perseverance and books to get to the bottom of. My friend was in the red (or somewhat red but that was the memorable color) two-way hallway leading to it and sounded worried. ChatGPT interprets the things about the maze as me thinking I will need knowledge, skills, perseverance and effort in my life.

"Dealing with conservatives is like wrestling with a pig." That can be very true. Here is an example to hammer that home. Knowing that someone would rather shoot you or threaten to rape your family rather than admit their worldview is wrong COULD save your life in the future. If a fundamentalist, especially an american christian male, was somehow forced into thinking his worldview is refuted, he would turn more violent than anyone could imagine. It would be like watching a demon possessed animal. https://x.com/DrAllyLouks/status/1863386906769211575 Remember 2 things. 1. You will never relate to ideologically possessed people. They are far too different from you. 2. The reason behind their actions isn't because they are scared, extremely fragile, have their own version of the truth etc. it's just that they want as much as they can to give in to the impulse to be evil. This is not a demonization, and it can't be stressed enough. There are simply people who want to be evil.

Other than the behavior of vegans towards meat eaters which might show they are on the same sentience level as the precious animals they cry about you eating these are not examples of morality. You're using morality as just "this is better in x way." It definitely is relative. But this doesn't mean that someone who uses temporary justifications for what they do is even nearly as moral as someone with a moral system.

NO. IT. FUCKING. ISN'T.

The same problem you have that's getting you triggered over Leo's non-duality thing is the same problem your parents have with you, bro.

Does your friend talk about how life is unbearably boring and frustrating 24/7 and that the only cure is meditation? Are they consistent in doing so? No? Unbelievably: then they're not your friend.

Feels fucking perfect to cut off contact with false shepherds. They may appear blackpilled but they are in reality just there to keep you spinning around. I will never seek out anyone who doesn't align, 24/7, with the rejection of earthly """pleasures""" and the embracement of meditation. They've been given their chance but no longer. The demiurge's #1 goal is to keep you stuck. You are stuck when you think sex and money are possible, they're impossible. The system is rigged. If you're not acknowledging this and telling people to go straight to meditation then you're working for the system regardless of your intentions. It could be the case that the only true rejection of the system is honest attachment to these things and accepting full lack of hope, but for now I will see if spirituality is truly bullshit or not.

Everything is just too good to be true. Imagine the escape to painless eternity from a reality that is indifferent and fundamentally negative being just a simple action. Suicide, regardless of what you think about it, is like Christ. A Christ you know for a fact* is real.

Pretty funny.

So... notice how he keeps saying "THIS person engaged well" but then at the same time tries to discredit people who think that you can't actually challenge a subjective statement? Right, flexing knowledge of basic logical... oh wait. That actually tells you otherwise.

Ad hominem because you're an incredibly emotionally unstable example of someone arguing for veganism. What RESULT do you get by going vegan? Reduced suffering. But still suffering. You've failed. And you can't make an argument against it. After getting that previous absolute beatdown against your seemingly undeveloped brain I'm not sure why you keep going. I guess you're a glutton for punishment. I've demonstrated that all your arguments are wrong with practically zero effort and you immediately zero in on a technicality. Lmao. You didn't even capitalize "English" on top. The fact that you can't understand that saying "this is stupid" and quoting it then going on to show you have no argument against it, doesn't actually mean that it's bad, it means that it's a good argument. Otherwise you would not spend 10 hours saying pointless shit, you would actually take just 10 seconds to argue against it. You literally feel so defeated by me you have to fall back on appeals to popularity AKA thinking that someone reading this will somehow agree with you because they agree that you should vote? Your one vote won't change anything. This makes vegans look bad. I never claimed you're vegan. Are you legally illiterate? "Attack" and "challenge" are so obviously being used in the same context here that I don't know why you would ever feel the need to type the above (unless you're literally going insane, which, yeah, I wouldn't blame you for thinking that.) Impressive. And you do agree with me, you will see that if you read your own comment. You appealed to subjectivity riiiiight after saying that I'm not in the right for pointing out that there's no way to properly "challenge" a simple subjective statement. This could literally be said about anyone in response to anything. It's beyond childish how utterly dishonest you are. Oh so that literally doesn't address one thing I've said. We are talking about bacteria because in an analogy, you don't need EVERYTHING to be the same, you just need it to make sense. For example if someone used an analogy about slavery about something mundane, and it worked, someone like you would presumably unironically not be able to get it, would lash at the person you are talking to in the most comical, ironic, nonsensical way imaginable and claim, in your own profound ignorance, that they're wrong because they brought up something which isn't as severe (doesn't have every conceivable factor of the thing it's trying to explain to you). It doesn't actually need to be the case that you can change what happens to bacteria, but even on that point you're somehow wrong. You COULD end up transcending life and no longer killing those bacteria. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge that a meat eater could think about animals what you think about bacteria shows exactly what kind of person I'm wasting my time on. Not ONE attempt to actually address this. At least stick to one point instead of switching topics.

You are wrong and your body kills bacteria. Consuming other things to live is a fundamental fact of life. If you want to have subjective standards for what you care about, the way the typical vegan does, that's okay. Keep it to yourself (respectfully.)