numbersinarow

The evidence of the incompetence of the secret service makes me think there's at least a 50% chance of this being staged. Plus the shooter missing seems off even despite being easily possible.

So we've cleared up that others have the will to power too. But what exactly are you saying is stronger within the enormously rich and egotistical person? Because the technical definition of "will to power" doesn't support the idea that some are stronger/more successful because that factor is stronger in them. (Wikipedia has it right). Other definitions are almost impossible to assume when someone hears the term.

Alright, this dream was interesting. So I was in a larger room from which I had to escape, which had a giant with 2 baby-like faces near it's chest area, with fire bursting from parts of it's body, and many adjacent rooms. In one of the rooms there was a person called mister X who had a type of poison he used on people, but unlike others his poison was somehow less versatile or had some kind of disadvantage when it came to using it, but was more lethal. He was wearing a face mask and didn't look creepy... but only in comparison with other things in that nightmareish dream. Some kind of entity told me to go straight for the throat when it comes to him. He pulled some kind of thing out from the back of his head and extremely lethal red-mist looking poison came out, the dream skipped to some other thing after that. I was also at the mercy of a psychopath surgeon in the dream and was in a purple ring in the sky, the psychopath kept giving me some kind of a bizarre choice and I was facing a very painful no-anesthesia surgery. Don't really remember the details but it's more clear in my mind than what I'm saying with this. That part of the dream felt pretty goddamn traumatic. And also was in a bathroom which looked basically like my bathroom in which I was taking care of a girl's younger sibling and was making some kind of a bed out of toilet paper for her to sleep in, the girl herself called in and said something about how her life plan is to get revenge on the person who, many years ago, desecrated her child after doing things to it and it being dead, to the point where necrophilia would be considered better to do to the corpse.

Time off and indulgences wire you to want them. Now you aren't a workaholic because you have more exposure to them than to work. Me being fascinated and craving to continue progress and self-actualization seems to have come out of nowhere, but in truth it's because it's only your subconscious mind which can be altered to this end, by working hard and succeeding. There are still cravings for other things, but the urge to progress more is the most important and strongest one.

The will to power is an alleged force which is more fundamental than the will to live, so everyone would share that, assuming it's real, not just the rich. But theirs is structured in such a way as to make them single-mindedly ruthless?

I'm not saying this was done, but if Trump faked the assassination because he knew Biden would look weak and lose even more support with his weak response to it, he's a genius.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOb2XsqYawk

I think it's just a failure to mimic Christian morality. In a world with no objective morality such as ours, veganism is unjustifiable. When it comes to health, it forces you to take supplements and even then can lead to issues, and is known to cause more brain fog than a more meat focused diet. Even if subjectively you felt guilt for eating meat, that would be no reason for veganism to be universally true and would therefore be an issue of you ridding yourself of the guilt.

It's true I haven't and that I probably don't like their type of game, as long as the game in question is closely resembling fromsoft games at least. But all footage I've seen of dark souls bosses on youtube features an unrealistic (AKA cartoonishly/overly designed to lose) bossfight. I can see the good aspects of these games but what is objectively a flaw if not a game taking itself seriously but at the same time being cartoonishly biased towards the player (regardless of what level of mechanical challenge is required of the player to win).

Never. As shores of infinity says, just being at stage coral makes everyday activities difficult.

If I am getting this correctly, you are literally saying Hamas offered a ceasefire from day 1, while at the same time spreading rhetoric about "from the river to the sea", which the alleged stage green supporters of minorities decided to mimic. You are also saying that Hamas doesn't have the inductive reasoning to know that, if you are 100% doing something awful enough and worse than 9/11 (due to the brutality) to the point where there is no possible world in which there won't be retaliation against the minority you claim to have helped with oct 7th, you absolutely wouldn't want ceasefire to make yourself look good, and make the oppressed minority look bad and give the UN more excuses? How is just this much strategy "baseless speculation"? Unlike baseless claims of Israel controlling or infiltrating the US, Hamas does in fact push the buttons of the mainstream effortlessly. You are getting close to claiming Hamas are saints at this point. The entire mainstream says Israelis, based on them being Israelis, and Israel, based on it's being Israel, is unqualified morally to defend itself. Who was Trump selling out to when he attacked Israel? He sells out to the mainstream, he wouldn't have encouraged vaccination and then immediately gone back on his claim after getting boo'd if there wasn't an overwhelming amount of propagandized-to people to sell out to. Almost no green person can think the UN is correctly enforcing some objective morality. The UN punishes people based on the circumstances in the world and it's own interests. "Yes, Jews were oppressed by Europe. That doesn’t mean Jews are currently oppressed in Europe now or that Israelis are being oppressed by Palestinians." This is not the topic. There are certainly still Nazis in Germany and Italy but what matters is that Jews were oppressed at the time, or right before the time, that current Israel was founded. So there you go, you just admitted that Jews are the absolute prime candidates to be supported by stage green. Instead we have blue leftists supporting people who throw LGBT members off buildings. This is relevant because you started talking about who they would be drawn to support. They aren't oppressed by the palestinians but they do happen to be an opposing party. Now on top of that, imagine this minority had to deal with undemocratic countries that were supremacists who believed they should die if they don't believe in the same religion as them according to their holy book. And when they retaliated, this minority was instantly met with insane amounts of hate. Who is green going to support? It's obvious. "they can’t be both oppressor and the oppressed " They can be.

There are literally shops in vietnam that ban jews from entering but not americans, even tho america is, on top of invading vietnam, supporting israel in the current war. If you're going to rightfully oppose open air concentration camps, you have to double check that you're not supporting american exceptionalism through double standards.

Question for anyone who thinks there's no double standard against Israel. Do you think NATO has received as much hate for literally committing ethnic cleansing even according to a biased source like wikipedia, as Israel has for defending itself against a terrorist attack way worse than 9/11? The answer is, of course not, the mainstream left literally support NATO and would be supporting the war against hamas if it was done by the US directly.

A minority that is considered unqualified to defend itself based on how it was born against a terrorist attack that is way worse than 9/11 and is hated by the UN is not oppressed? Of course, Hamas has the option to push the buttons of the mainstream. If they think they're going to heaven anyway why not use the economical way of going to heaven that not only gets you to it, but also harms Israel. So, there is no doubting that they would want both benefits rather than just one, so they will choose to die in a fight against Israel and not kill the minority Christian population which would make them look far worse. If they don't want Hamas to get destroyed, that's as relevant of a thing to talk about as any. 0.2% of the global population and chased out of Europe by means of literal genocide... simply not good enough, because the mainstream conditions people to think that way. + I'm not talking about "Israelis are superior so they get to take the homeland that is objectively theirs." no, I'm talking about moral relativism. Of course the people in the open air concentration camp are oppressed too. But the second you look at actual green and not the mainstream, you see support for the downtrodden victims and indirect victims of oct 7th. not "This terrorist organization should just be let go, even tho the reason I believe that is because of the mainstream, which would also be supporting this 200% if the united states was directly fighting the war."

I really really hope that is the case. But since it's only lucid dreams that contain this issue I'm thinking it's an issue of individual power.

Green wouldn't support nazis. It's fine to support people who are less developed if you're being honest about it, but not if you're denying that destiny is right about Israel being the only party contending with the reality of the situation, and that it's dealing with people who think it's right to murder people who don't believe in their holy book. It's simply an oppressed minority going where it was driven off from by others using pure force, and oppressed by people using pure force. Focusing only on Israel's use of force is more stage blue (because it is based in american exceptionalism), than the textbook blue misandry you post.

No. If someone was asking if "fate" has influence on things then yes.

2029. AGI might wipe humanity out then.

Rid yourself of ad hoc fallacies and attachments. e.g. you see an example of a 3/10 guy getting girls, do you assume that now the reason you're still right about the world being fair and add a new proposition about how the reason 8/10s aren't getting girls because they are self-sabotaging, or do you accept new evidence?

How good is this day in terms of various categories, with important goals replacing them?

And I forgot the most important part which is actually going in with the attitude of caring about the victims of oct 7th.

Sure there are contradictions he makes but it pales in comparison to 1. Repressing one aspect of blue so much that you think it's better to support people who are diametrically opposed to your worldview AKA islamists than to support an oppressed minority taking back it's land. (Clarification: they're repressing the idea of a group's land-ownership and then it expresses itself through a double standard against Israel). 2. Being anti-semitic.

Ken Levine's twitter likes. Twitter made likes private by default as of recently, but you could see him liking brianna wu tweets calling out unreasonable stances on the left and him liking support for Israel. A clear example of healthy green opposing anti-semitism, supremacist attitudes and people who let the mainstream tell them to single out a country to boycott.

Why is it that after all of the greatest minds of humanity, whoever they may have been, we still have abuse and genocide?

They're more similar but they're not copy pastes. There's differences between them. When free will fully came online and primates became more intelligent, people bred for things not only based on instinct but also based on that free will, this has more diversity than the previous selection method. This is the explanation that makes the most sense to me.