numbersinarow

I wonder... are there examples of people with this condition, or a mild version of it which is what I think I might have, using it as a power?

But I'm just trying to copy men who get laid! Okay so what do we know about the winners of the system in a deterministic prison planet? 1. Impulsive. 2. Bald, fat, unintelligent. 3. Pre-societal. 4. Have opportunities beyond your imagination. 5. Have women validating them without having to be in a relationship with them.

"For he will go round and you will not go with him, but you will stay in place and go under, and your life paths will be revealed."

Knowing that you can get laid with zero game can help, or it can not. But either way it will help since you will know that if a girl doesn't want you, she will not change her mind, because the decision and the first impression are what matter.

ernatural powers. If you believe what has been tested, either by you or someone else, that's okay. But if you are believing people who claim there are methods of developing them, as opposed to just being given them, and are vague about it, or are okay with people not showing video footage, then you're going to need to evolve into orange from blue.

You're creating contradictions and think that they aren't exactly that because you fall back on your idea of what other people think relativity is.

Because your mind is filled with manufactured solutions to your situation.

You would want them on the hamster wheel and pointlessly wasting effort instead, if you were sexually successful.

So you either think women are inferior or you think men should conform to socially constructed gender roles. It wouldn't make you less attractive either, from her perspective you're just not approaching for whatever reason or because you didn't get to since she approached you first. If women risk way less by approaching, why infantalize them?

Why is the competition lower? Because women are conditioning anyone who isn't pre-determined to be someone with opportunities who at the same time meets a physical characteristic standard who at the same time is submissive to them, to think they have 0 worth to them. And they are in fact right, of course, you have ZERO worth to women as a male who wasn't pre-determined to be a winner in terms of sex. Come on man, you know they would reject you or anyone, that's how hypergamy and misandry work.

If you can't control what others do directly, it means there's always a 1% chance even under the most optimistic possible worldview that every woman irrationally hates you, as long as any form of irrationality or hatred exists. But is there a 1% chance in the pessimist's worldview that he will actually be able to get a gf? It's true too. It's just that it doesn't happen unless you have opportunities. What is my situation? (I've covered the specifics in my previous thread.) Cold approaching? No. Dating apps? No for multiple reasons. Cafes? Night cafes are filled 95% with men (who look like 2014-style failed rock band rejects). If you don't have women approaching you, for reasons which we know are exclusively bad faith or land on misandry or don't have a grasp of the fact that it's extremely socially inappropriate for a man to approach, because if you're in the winner category or observing it, then you're drawing conclusions which exclusively apply to it... then the reasonable conclusion is that you must change your worldview. Now it is a different type of agent who's intimacy you are seeking, one that isn't using free will in the way you thought. Full stop.

Both are wrong because the goodlooking girl might not be able to find a guy who meets the standards, remember, if women validate men who put in no effort and have nothing going on for them, then they encourage more men to become nihilistic or not try and overall women will be dealing with men who are worse. And the idea that the one you view as a 3/10 will view herself as a 3/10 is asinine, it's a confused view about what kind of a world you are living in. By definition others are also going for her since you are in a position where you want to, as well. Strategies where you "settle for" someone like going for gay men or becoming trans are strategies that make you part of a minority that has it's own struggles and therefore are counterprodutive, they are manufactured but are so out there that the propaganda hasn't worked. These strategies don't work because you are trying to get an a priori exigency to do something in the real world but if you get what you think you want, you will not actually be achieving your goal. One example can be wanting to get freely kissed/hugged without even having to flirt (which some others do get), or wanting an ideal relationship, but then instead getting something which makes you feel a completely different set of emotions.

A 5/10 (ironically in a leftist "matriarchy" and not, like you say, a conservative country) approaching a woman is not socially inappropriate... because of what? And if you agree cold approaching on the street doesn't work, then re-read the post to see the implications of that.

Some small island MAY put sanctions on the US.

Conjectured statement in 2028: "We conclude that the suicide rate in 1850 due to gender dysmorphia was the exact same as today, we assure you social contagion is a myth by anti-American actors."

You were convinced because the alternative is to say that physical characteristics and other things are extremely important. Are there flaws in your face or not? That's an extremely important question. Do you have opportunities or not? That's an extremely important question. Here's a rundown of why there might not be: Dating apps are a scam, the hypergamy is even more severe on them than in real life and that's saying something. Men outnumber women there 10 to 1. Going to bars only highlights the lack of opportunities in other places, but it's literally 95% men who look like they failed at the punk lifestyle. Cold approaching in the street is for socially unaware people. It's not even vaguely a good idea. I'm not going to cover other things because there being 0 opportunities for a socially isolated male is too obvious for it not to be itself a point of agreement which then has different responses, not something to be discussed itself. It would be obvious to you too if you tried. There's nothing you have to offer to self-interested social systems either. Now to add on top of this, imagine you were below average looking, and imagine someone telling you "just have game bro, these techniques will make you attractive," or "just magically create money out of nowhere to get an apartment in a big city for the sake of it's hyper-competitive nightlife where women have the exact same foundation and approach to finding people, but there will be even MORE of them to reject you, doesn't that sound good?"

^ An excellent example of stage blue.

Yeah you debunked his excuses to not go to jail, jail is a nice place there's really no objective metric to decide that it's worse than being free... but the upside is him having a single conversation.

Even if this was the case, this would be a response to what? To women either not having good enough personalities, or having men enter emasculating relationships where they learn that women tend to have a mental illness called an extreme aversion to sex, if they haven't learned it already.

I just stopped seeing the original post to comment this. I absolutely don't see it anymore, not there. Only previous moments had it, precisely proving this moment is not infinity and that non-existence influences my experience.

Completely right. I am not conscious right now it's YOU who is god and I who am imaginary. I also happen to experience the results of infinite rule-following coincidences that make the world function around me. If I leave something then return to it, the reason it's still there is coincidence. There is no point in saying "I am God, I have everything right here." and then communicating it to people. If they're conscious, you're completely wrong as can be. If they're not, you wasted your time in a way that I'm not inclined to say is authentic.

They'll just assume you're male and still harass you while pretending to support trans people.

It's beyond any level of parody how much the internet is controlled by either bots or humans that are controlled on a great level e.g. brainwashing. It's more likely that artificial intelligence is more advanced or that humans are being experimented on or manipulated by a supernatural entity, than that the are being paid off. Out of all of these, them being paid off is by far the least likely in my mind. If this is not satire, then this is taken for granted, but there is nothing outside to >interact< with, only locked-in self-interested systems. Even if you're above average looking (as opposed to let's say below average looking at which point we know because of hypergamy that your chances are non-existent unless you're in the winner category), you still don't have anything to offer to outside friend groups. All you will find "outside" is a meaningless, indifferent, asexual universe. But there hasn't been an example in your life where you managed to create something through this, and there won't be any point in a disadvantaged male's life where he will be able to create a relationship/intimacy through his beliefs. You're applying this supernatural ability exclusively to this issue, which we know is real because of severe hypergamy, complete monopolization of opportunities (for example by college) etc. This is nonsensical because if men are going to just accept that their life is one without women, then this is far more likely to radicalize them or for example help extremist islamist organizations to recruit them rather than just have them sit there and take it. I don't know how someone can say this because there's multiple problems with it. Why would they not TRULY avoid one man if he was a threat? Why provoke someone who is apparently an aggressive brute by doing something that disrespects them? Why assume he is a threat if you actually believed that outside of 95% male d3g3n bars there were opportunities to talk to women, as in why would he be a threat unless you felt subconscious guilt for your choices in men as a woman, and thought that others doing the same damaged society to the point where just walking down the street poses threats? You don't want to admit you're living in a world where a male has committed the original sin in the eyes of women.

https://9gag.com/gag/aA0A529 Is it acceptable that the man in the video has had 1% benefit in any kind of an interaction with any female? This is not about talking about the message of the video, however, showing him having a gf does not prove that Japan is better if that was his intention, because in fact it's utterly humiliating that a woman has to deal with someone who is below average looking, it's a sign of a decaying society. It's the opposite of what he's trying to prove. We know that the context of couples existing has arisen from others having no escape and no opportunities at all. A completely locked system where pre-determined winner category individuals take everything and loser category individuals (let's say a socially isolated below average looking man) are perfectly normally expected to have not kissed a girl at age 30, since there is no action or interaction that they can take outside of committing a felony, in order to get laid. Let's say I know about someone killing themselves and also I have a girlfriend. My hypothetical relationship couldn't exist without the context in which one of the possible factors is a person (AKA me) failing, which can mean having no opportunities at all and being looked at with looks of religious disdain by women for walking down the street, or for example, dying. Otherwise the success means nothing since it wouldn't be contrasted to anything. A couple in public is interacting with a pure dominance hierarchy, it's not about competition, it's, like I have said in the paragraph above, about someone else not having any opportunities and being "intrinsically not a winner." That person can also even further dig a hole for themselves by being ideologically possessed and believing owen cook or andrew tate or whoever, about how you can have any position except complete pessimism when it comes to success with women. Let alone the fact that people think someone who is 5'4, has a disabled voice etc. has the same chances as a male model, think about the fact that social circles and systems are completely self-interested and not there for YOU, but for themselves, and that you couldn't have anything to possibly offer to them, as proven by the fact that they are currently choosing the worst people imaginable instead of countless others. Ultimately, I don't think men can be lied to for much longer that their lowest point even compares to what men who get laid are. The question will no longer be "How can I Improve?" but "How could the men that women choose over me possibly go lower?" You can ignore societal issues and infantalize women while telling men their slightest flaw means they're the devil, but this will push the issue into a position where it's only solutions will be one side which finds the state of things unacceptable, going against some other side.

How much do you value this? Would you rather save an 80 "IQ" [Hypothetically speaking if IQ was real or accurate.] person who is a close 5 year friend, or a 200 "IQ" person who is a complete stranger? I'd save the stranger.