numbersinarow

But why is this in the dating sexuality relationships family forum?

The less aware you are. An intellectual thinks "this person here is a snake with a million different mind limiters and ideological trappings who would sway the audience against me or use logical fallacies/sophistry and make me look bad." not "I have my argument I am going to win it's so convincing!" There is no such thing as failure in the blue value system or the orange value system. Only satanists don't buy your amazing conversion tactics. Failures are only trivial things leading up to your success, there are no locked-in self-interested systems. Or that's what you're told.

No sorry it's my mistake to assume leftists wouldn't extend just-world-fallacy to the literal economic system if it helps them keep their idea of why the sexual revolution was a positive.

Not... even vaguely true. Women perceive men based on pre-determined physical characteristics. If you're disadvantaged in this way, or in some other way, you are "creepy." Otherwise you are living in a world where it never happens that a woman uses (made-up) creepiness as an excuse for insulting/repelling someone born with unattractive physical characteristics.

Women project the most negative possible qualities onto sex (unless it's a winner category individual), to the point of demonizing men because they themselves made up in their minds that the man is saying something sexual, based off of nearly no evidence, and think openly being a fragile narcissist about this is acceptable. ... Either way the original point stands, it's not unreasonable to assume a chunk of oversocialized individuals would kill themselves over this. Too bad because women do not consider this, only their own near-psychotic emotional reaction to perceived creepiness.

"Here's me going: I should do an approach today. Walk around town for ages, couldn't even find an attractive woman. " Didn't you know that moving to an area with opportunities, despite costing an incredible amount of money, effort etc. (keep in mind countless people are just struggling to get by) is completely in your control, incel? Yeah just move to an area with opportunities bro! Don't forget this is just God testing you bro! Lol...

Because both are pointless and are a result of projection onto others what you find attractive?

Absolutely next level at the automatically self-fulfilling bluepilled delusions here. "Well here's a factor that contradicts your worldview." "Oh okay well in my interpretation, doesn't matter how unlikely or likely, this actually either supports my worldview or is neutral at best." "You must simply be doing something wrong and saying suspicious things to girls, why? Because I am starting from my worldview being true, when in reality there is no bigger level of delusion than people buying what owen cook says/thinking cold approach works/thinking opportunity-blackpill and winner/loser categories aren't real."

Interesting, stage blue motivations were the key factor that helped him study 12 hours a day.

"I can't platonically interact with women and type excessively without someone projecting sexual intent on what I typed and harassing me over it." "You seem biased against women."

"You can’t fuck up" Hmm... but you can fuck up in relation to what you are trying to do. But more importantly why bother if it's unnecessary? If it's truly that, you must re-consider even talking about it let alone doing it, unless you basically want to resemble self-lying.

Women have free will and are responsible for their actions every last bit as much as a man is. If a woman treats another man better, then you don't want anything to do with her because if she is going to pay attention to you, she's going to be doing it in a way that is degrading AKA the opposite of what you want (if you're being honest with yourself). Do not leave any alternative to her having self-awareness and looking at things, not in a way in a child would where she just wants things for free, but in a way that a responsible adult intelligently engaging in a deal would. Otherwise you are creating a double standard that will collapse quickly because when you value common sense, you aren't going to value women's attitudes that don't fit into it, so may as well short-circuit the process and apply the same standard to women that you would to yourself.

Appeal to ignorance fallacy.

Do you realize that if you got this knowledge from a deep experience, someone else could have had a deeper experience where they saw the opposite AKA free will? Do you realize that if you saw it on psychedelics, now you would have to accept that if a group of people who come up with ideas while drunk and think those ideas are perfect, that now those are ideas that you would have to accept?

And ultimately it's a part of life that you have to accept that you can't really know, you can predict but you can't understand the minds of others. But you also are not trying to because you are affected by manufactured consent, so if a woman dates a guy who is fat, ugly, has a bad personality, is unintelligent, is someone who would be nauseating to homosexual men, who doesn't have "game" etc. you are okay with it. Nevermind that this woman would reject you or act like you are a bad person for being a stranger which simply means that you would be qualified for what the "other man" has ex hypotesi. And even if that isn't the case, she is perpetuating a world where you could be accused of sexual harassment for excessively talking to a girl for 5 seconds, while others, regardless of, let's say, even if they are better looking than you, are showered with validation from women + opportunities that you couldn't imagine. It's her choice to do this, her responsibility. But there are limiters on your mind so you can't think this way, and other limiters make you think that the initial limiters are good e.g. you outsource to public opinion or the fact that society does in fact exist and function on SOME level that it must be doing this specific thing right. When, in reality, it could of course be much better.

You don't understand why women go for men with no good qualities? If that was me I wouldn't be promoting PUA or "game gets you laid" ideas if I knew that I myself don't have the clear picture.

Is he going to tell you about how much pre-determined physical characteristics and winner/loser categories matter?

I am not supporting the red pill at all, only the idea that looks matter to women, which is an extremely obvious truth, which should be known regardless of if it's useful or not. Will this come as a purely depressing truth to some men? No because if you're at the level where it depresses you, it also prevents you from making stupid mistakes or wasting time.

This title and 48 replies. That's all you need to know about the state of the world.

The redpill is about "game," money and status. Maybe they mention looks but from my experience they never do. So literal research on hypergamy is fake? The entire world is fake and average looking men aren't repulsive to women? But you mean dates, not successful relationships or sex, in which case you might easily be right but that would show how much women use men for free stuff etc. If it's true, that's all that matters. Plus the blackpill saves people from disasters and wasted efforts, because women are in fact extremely visual.

This is a very shallow idea of your condition. If you don't have psychosis but are still "headless," it's extremely likely your mind's wish is to skip to the godhead, but you can't. But if you can live with it, then this turns into something which isn't a negative condition.

This.

GoodEmpanada thinks he can bring up the srebrenica example of retaliation against muslims being called genocide, while agreeing with that, to show that what Israel is doing should be called genocide (and that part is true). But if you are establishing that your source is comprised of liars and snakes who hold that kind of a double standard, then just don't use that source.

It is true. It is also probably more important that being male might be a threat to your survival in the future.