-
Content count
446 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by numbersinarow
-
The redpill is about "game," money and status. Maybe they mention looks but from my experience they never do. So literal research on hypergamy is fake? The entire world is fake and average looking men aren't repulsive to women? But you mean dates, not successful relationships or sex, in which case you might easily be right but that would show how much women use men for free stuff etc. If it's true, that's all that matters. Plus the blackpill saves people from disasters and wasted efforts, because women are in fact extremely visual.
-
numbersinarow replied to Sugarcoat's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
This is a very shallow idea of your condition. If you don't have psychosis but are still "headless," it's extremely likely your mind's wish is to skip to the godhead, but you can't. But if you can live with it, then this turns into something which isn't a negative condition. -
This.
-
numbersinarow replied to Leo Gura's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
GoodEmpanada thinks he can bring up the srebrenica example of retaliation against muslims being called genocide, while agreeing with that, to show that what Israel is doing should be called genocide (and that part is true). But if you are establishing that your source is comprised of liars and snakes who hold that kind of a double standard, then just don't use that source. -
It is true. It is also probably more important that being male might be a threat to your survival in the future.
-
numbersinarow replied to Sugarcoat's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I wonder... are there examples of people with this condition, or a mild version of it which is what I think I might have, using it as a power? -
But I'm just trying to copy men who get laid! Okay so what do we know about the winners of the system in a deterministic prison planet? 1. Impulsive. 2. Bald, fat, unintelligent. 3. Pre-societal. 4. Have opportunities beyond your imagination. 5. Have women validating them without having to be in a relationship with them.
-
"For he will go round and you will not go with him, but you will stay in place and go under, and your life paths will be revealed."
-
Knowing that you can get laid with zero game can help, or it can not. But either way it will help since you will know that if a girl doesn't want you, she will not change her mind, because the decision and the first impression are what matter.
-
ernatural powers. If you believe what has been tested, either by you or someone else, that's okay. But if you are believing people who claim there are methods of developing them, as opposed to just being given them, and are vague about it, or are okay with people not showing video footage, then you're going to need to evolve into orange from blue.
-
numbersinarow replied to FourCrossedWands's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
You're creating contradictions and think that they aren't exactly that because you fall back on your idea of what other people think relativity is. -
Because your mind is filled with manufactured solutions to your situation.
-
You would want them on the hamster wheel and pointlessly wasting effort instead, if you were sexually successful.
-
So you either think women are inferior or you think men should conform to socially constructed gender roles. It wouldn't make you less attractive either, from her perspective you're just not approaching for whatever reason or because you didn't get to since she approached you first. If women risk way less by approaching, why infantalize them?
-
Why is the competition lower? Because women are conditioning anyone who isn't pre-determined to be someone with opportunities who at the same time meets a physical characteristic standard who at the same time is submissive to them, to think they have 0 worth to them. And they are in fact right, of course, you have ZERO worth to women as a male who wasn't pre-determined to be a winner in terms of sex. Come on man, you know they would reject you or anyone, that's how hypergamy and misandry work.
-
If you can't control what others do directly, it means there's always a 1% chance even under the most optimistic possible worldview that every woman irrationally hates you, as long as any form of irrationality or hatred exists. But is there a 1% chance in the pessimist's worldview that he will actually be able to get a gf? It's true too. It's just that it doesn't happen unless you have opportunities. What is my situation? (I've covered the specifics in my previous thread.) Cold approaching? No. Dating apps? No for multiple reasons. Cafes? Night cafes are filled 95% with men (who look like 2014-style failed rock band rejects). If you don't have women approaching you, for reasons which we know are exclusively bad faith or land on misandry or don't have a grasp of the fact that it's extremely socially inappropriate for a man to approach, because if you're in the winner category or observing it, then you're drawing conclusions which exclusively apply to it... then the reasonable conclusion is that you must change your worldview. Now it is a different type of agent who's intimacy you are seeking, one that isn't using free will in the way you thought. Full stop.
-
Both are wrong because the goodlooking girl might not be able to find a guy who meets the standards, remember, if women validate men who put in no effort and have nothing going on for them, then they encourage more men to become nihilistic or not try and overall women will be dealing with men who are worse. And the idea that the one you view as a 3/10 will view herself as a 3/10 is asinine, it's a confused view about what kind of a world you are living in. By definition others are also going for her since you are in a position where you want to, as well. Strategies where you "settle for" someone like going for gay men or becoming trans are strategies that make you part of a minority that has it's own struggles and therefore are counterprodutive, they are manufactured but are so out there that the propaganda hasn't worked. These strategies don't work because you are trying to get an a priori exigency to do something in the real world but if you get what you think you want, you will not actually be achieving your goal. One example can be wanting to get freely kissed/hugged without even having to flirt (which some others do get), or wanting an ideal relationship, but then instead getting something which makes you feel a completely different set of emotions.
-
A 5/10 (ironically in a leftist "matriarchy" and not, like you say, a conservative country) approaching a woman is not socially inappropriate... because of what? And if you agree cold approaching on the street doesn't work, then re-read the post to see the implications of that.
-
numbersinarow replied to Loveeee's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Some small island MAY put sanctions on the US. -
numbersinarow replied to Danioover9000's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Conjectured statement in 2028: "We conclude that the suicide rate in 1850 due to gender dysmorphia was the exact same as today, we assure you social contagion is a myth by anti-American actors." -
You were convinced because the alternative is to say that physical characteristics and other things are extremely important. Are there flaws in your face or not? That's an extremely important question. Do you have opportunities or not? That's an extremely important question. Here's a rundown of why there might not be: Dating apps are a scam, the hypergamy is even more severe on them than in real life and that's saying something. Men outnumber women there 10 to 1. Going to bars only highlights the lack of opportunities in other places, but it's literally 95% men who look like they failed at the punk lifestyle. Cold approaching in the street is for socially unaware people. It's not even vaguely a good idea. I'm not going to cover other things because there being 0 opportunities for a socially isolated male is too obvious for it not to be itself a point of agreement which then has different responses, not something to be discussed itself. It would be obvious to you too if you tried. There's nothing you have to offer to self-interested social systems either. Now to add on top of this, imagine you were below average looking, and imagine someone telling you "just have game bro, these techniques will make you attractive," or "just magically create money out of nowhere to get an apartment in a big city for the sake of it's hyper-competitive nightlife where women have the exact same foundation and approach to finding people, but there will be even MORE of them to reject you, doesn't that sound good?"
-
numbersinarow replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
^ An excellent example of stage blue. -
Yeah you debunked his excuses to not go to jail, jail is a nice place there's really no objective metric to decide that it's worse than being free... but the upside is him having a single conversation.
-
Even if this was the case, this would be a response to what? To women either not having good enough personalities, or having men enter emasculating relationships where they learn that women tend to have a mental illness called an extreme aversion to sex, if they haven't learned it already.
-
numbersinarow replied to Loveeee's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I just stopped seeing the original post to comment this. I absolutely don't see it anymore, not there. Only previous moments had it, precisely proving this moment is not infinity and that non-existence influences my experience.