numbersinarow

Entirely fill your head with "you are your own biggest enemy," "cold approach is good, I just need to be charismatic and goodlooking," "I can get a relationship, it can't be that I will go my entire life without having kissed, I just need to work on it." Then keep this quote from Nietzsche (that's right, not a pessimist philosopher, those weren't chosen for this because of their focus on general pessimism,) in the back of your mind: "Everything valuable is instinct—and consequently easy, necessary, free." Then walk around a town in a cold month with the mindset of cold approaching a girl. And not just that, but remember that the worst human beings imaginable have opportunities for sex and validation from women, and that others have been kissed/hugged without even having to flirt.

I completely agree, convince yourself that you chose this life and that you will get a new character creation screen where, for some reason, the overwhelming majority give themselves extreme disadvantages, in order so that you can... die and not get sex? Also your reasons for why it's not going to be (basically) just as hard in a big city are unconvincing. If you're going down this route, just try making a deal with entities that appear during trips instead of doing this.

They aren't respecting it in the slightest. People who rightfully point out rent prices are INSANELY unreasonable in an economic context against conservatives, will tell you that you need to self-improve in order to move out. Okay, with what? In order to go to college you will already need to have that money for moving, not even mentioning bizarre university costs in the US.

Joggers high is so incredibly rare, and I've only felt a mild version of it despite running tons of times and even doing extreme runs. It's not a feeling of numbness it's actually a good feeling just not very potent nor long-lasting. It's not unhealthy, definitely, you're not going to be suffering much if at all. I seem to be an extreme sprinter, it comes so easy for me but jogging just destroys me and I can't keep going despite wim hof breathing and pacing. Not all the time of course, I still have gone longer distances, but experienced runners high only once.

impossible to get girls, or that the world is comprised of only winners and losers, or something along those lines? Other than me, that is. The psy experience was definitely not so clear however I think that ultimately the gist of it was the notion that the elites take away the opportunities from the "losers" and therefore they aren't able to ever get sexual experiences because there aren't opportunities for it and a higher entity controls the minds of "potential sexual partners" and therefore they, in fact, aren't that. They are people, but also they are reflections of the nature of the world as opposed to your instinctive approach of thinking of them as potential sexual partners. The entities are using people in order to drive history in a certain course. For the second example... today, after meditating for an hour, I got into a mental state where I could clearly see no goal was better than another, there is nothing to be gained that has outside value not given to it by you. This is so incredibly different from only rationally knowing this, that during the experience I thought that this is truly what transrational means. Every situation is the same, being tortured and living your ideal lifestyle aren't different, and I remember starting to see the difference between rationally knowing this and being in a state of mind where you can experience it. If you can experience it, you start doubting that there really can be a goal, it appears to shift from "I can choose anything." to "It's already chosen for me, me choosing something would be silly." And this state of mind was achieved by me... how? Because the thought came to me during the meditation that nothing is possible and you should let go of everything. The meditation session allowed me to look at desires like intimacy from a clear perspective. Your ideas of people you are attracted to being attracted to you are not connected to the actuality of the potential interactions, and it's more severe than the difference between the map and the territory. And it's "impossible" to someone in an enlightened state, because it doesn't exist.

truly next level thread but no

Obviously not clicking on a tiktok link because tor has been permanently disabled on my computer spontaneously after I tried to use it in combination with a VPN. And without tor I just am not going on tiktok, the US government sees the mobile app as spyware. Either way the second most effective propaganda machine on the planet has been relentlessly trying to demoralize russian troops and brainwash you into thinking russia is either losing or underperforming. But maybe the effect has been too large on the russian population, or Ukraine and NATO troops are running out of steam and don't want to play the long game against Putin who would be controlling 33%+ of the world's wheat. Either way WW3 is a possibility.

No, it's equal.

Let's see if "Other people don't exist, your consciousness in the moment is everything" is true. If I say that to someone, yet at the same time of them being conscious I myself would be conscious, then is my consciousness wrong or lesser somehow, since theirs is truly everything and all there is? And hopefully nobody thinks this would be relatively true because then the wording would be utterly different, relativity is the very thing being dismissed here, as in there AREN'T other people for whom it would be relatively true.

Wrong, you chose.

The master (according to Nietzsche) sees only good and bad and therefore could never project evil into the world, because that's a concept from "good and evil" which Nietzsche says is the worse worldview. As for Nietzsche breaking a paradigm with a master morality, here's how I would put it: 1. Slave morality is created in opposition to a master's morality, AKA now the things the master wants are sins. Master morality already existed. But when you see this, you see that slave morality isn't so good. 2. The slave morality isn't there to be broken at all, only there so that people could hypothetically identify it better and re-locate the slaves, but the slaves and slave morality would be the same or at least we have no reason to believe it would be different. Although slave morality can be poison to a master, the slave fulfilled the hierarchies that Nietzsche praises better by having slave morality, not worse.

The argument works perfectly "against" people who think that either there is an objective metric to decide their family is more valuable, or are truly philosophically attached to it. What about subjective attachment? Well it's subjective so this argument doesn't work, their subjectivity isn't compelled or shares values with your argument which makes them rationally see a type of objectivity. Their subjectivity is there and self-consistent. Let's take an example, let's say you said "Your subjectivity, such as impulses and desires, truly is aligned with not pressing the button." then there is the ultimate counter-argument waiting, which is that both you and them know they would press the button, which is why you made the argument in the first place in order to dissuade them from it. And remember, if you have chosen the "I am moral in relation to this person therefore I will be actually moral by being consistent and being moral towards everyone." route, you have to remember that "everyone" includes the plants you eat and the bacteria your body kills.

Has anyone found non-scam biokinesis audio?

Women are "creepier" in a way that you think is objective but in reality it's not creepy at all because men don't see it that way. Women aren't prudish at all either, the reality is that they effortlessly validate the winner category individuals and actively hate loser category individuals. Whether the mechanism is them being asexual and feeling a "placebo" around winner category individuals or not, we can't know.

Yeah, there we go, Peterson's attitudes are squarely at blue and this channel owner himself argues in a blue way many times (whether it's in this video or not).

If you got out of blue at an early age, you will likely never truly understand a pre-rational mind and could even end up extremely traumatized due to a mistake springing from this fact.

They're much better off being nice then getting abused by women and becoming blackpilled, than being a redpilled guy blinded by his own success thinking he earned anything or did anything right besides being born and having opportunities. You are saying this yourself, except you are describing a "nice guy" with a secret agenda AKA you're describing the stereotype of a creep as opposed to an actual nice guy who truly WOULD suffer from letting the world walk over him.

Wonder what stage Coral music would sound like.

Evolutionary psychology disagrees. Why should I live for the sake of someone else, who themselves is a self-interested sociopath?

I wish I never made contact with a girl's skin, because then I could sort of be the ultimate example of how the world really is in terms of intimacy and relationships. So, it is the opposite. I've accepted the utter opportunity-lack. I've even had supernatural and psy experiences relating to it. I have seen the truth. But it's a trans-rational truth so I can't truly communicate it. But luckily I embody this truth on a daily basis. I can't think of heterosexuality without being mindblown. I can't think of a girl acting cruel towards one man and literally engaging in >sexual acts< with any other man (without clear differences), without being mindblown. I am living in a trans-rational reality and aware of it. I think others can see the absurdity too, to whichever extent it may be. If you're red-pilled, you are 100% right that the "unrealistic" things people think of are actually realistic. Casual sex? It's realistic. Cold approach day game asking for sex? It's realistic too. It is in fact a thing for the winners. Things like getting kissed/hugged without having to flirt happen. Just not to the losers. Now imagine the "loser's" life. (AKA there's no "unrealistic" only winners and losers.) This difference is necessarily the result of how girls use their free will, and absurd. Imagine the same lack of empathy that you receive, being received by men who are successful with women.

Zelensky has the most cutthroat military in Europe, the biggest country, over 100 billion in aid, an overwhelming amount of NATO troops from other countries, CIA intel... he also didn't last a year without threatening his own allies and threatened to blow up a nuclear facility.

Basically, if you only think you're 99% yourself, then the drives are still there, but the goals certainly aren't. If you're at 99.5% identification or so, then it's not so amazing but it's functional but just dropping down to 99% means that you see straight through to the meaninglessness and emptiness, every goal is accompanied by these things, not contained in them necessarily but certainly very closely fighting for space. It's worth mentioning that this is a very unique feeling and gives you complete certainty, but at the same time there can be something which breaks the indifference.

He's not even vaguely qualified, nor are we.

"God gave you the divinity of consciousness and you chose to shit on it, abuse it, misuse it, indulge in the pleasures of the flesh and point a finger to god." "Also I think I am smarter than metaphysical Christians, I don't care one bit for their morality or worldview, I am a free thinker."

An ever-present experience... or something else?