numbersinarow

Wonder what stage Coral music would sound like.

Evolutionary psychology disagrees. Why should I live for the sake of someone else, who themselves is a self-interested sociopath?

I wish I never made contact with a girl's skin, because then I could sort of be the ultimate example of how the world really is in terms of intimacy and relationships. So, it is the opposite. I've accepted the utter opportunity-lack. I've even had supernatural and psy experiences relating to it. I have seen the truth. But it's a trans-rational truth so I can't truly communicate it. But luckily I embody this truth on a daily basis. I can't think of heterosexuality without being mindblown. I can't think of a girl acting cruel towards one man and literally engaging in >sexual acts< with any other man (without clear differences), without being mindblown. I am living in a trans-rational reality and aware of it. I think others can see the absurdity too, to whichever extent it may be. If you're red-pilled, you are 100% right that the "unrealistic" things people think of are actually realistic. Casual sex? It's realistic. Cold approach day game asking for sex? It's realistic too. It is in fact a thing for the winners. Things like getting kissed/hugged without having to flirt happen. Just not to the losers. Now imagine the "loser's" life. (AKA there's no "unrealistic" only winners and losers.) This difference is necessarily the result of how girls use their free will, and absurd. Imagine the same lack of empathy that you receive, being received by men who are successful with women.

Zelensky has the most cutthroat military in Europe, the biggest country, over 100 billion in aid, an overwhelming amount of NATO troops from other countries, CIA intel... he also didn't last a year without threatening his own allies and threatened to blow up a nuclear facility.

Basically, if you only think you're 99% yourself, then the drives are still there, but the goals certainly aren't. If you're at 99.5% identification or so, then it's not so amazing but it's functional but just dropping down to 99% means that you see straight through to the meaninglessness and emptiness, every goal is accompanied by these things, not contained in them necessarily but certainly very closely fighting for space. It's worth mentioning that this is a very unique feeling and gives you complete certainty, but at the same time there can be something which breaks the indifference.

He's not even vaguely qualified, nor are we.

"God gave you the divinity of consciousness and you chose to shit on it, abuse it, misuse it, indulge in the pleasures of the flesh and point a finger to god." "Also I think I am smarter than metaphysical Christians, I don't care one bit for their morality or worldview, I am a free thinker."

"cuz your mind can be fogged and you won't be able to build an authentic connection with her," If you want to build an authentic connection, getting into the head-space of an asexual instead of your normal self seems interesting. "because somebody is having a low-quality urge" There is no objective metric to decide that, remove societal conditioning from your reasoning process (or at least give that idea a test-run).

An ever-present experience... or something else?

Men who get laid are making errors that you couldn't imagine making, and more. Meanwhile you could adjust every single aspect of your personality down to the last detail and it won't create opportunities, and it won't make women validate you the way they validate winners, and it will not make it so that you were kissed/hugged without even having to flirt with a girl, which others have had happen to them.

But why is this in the dating sexuality relationships family forum?

The less aware you are. An intellectual thinks "this person here is a snake with a million different mind limiters and ideological trappings who would sway the audience against me or use logical fallacies/sophistry and make me look bad." not "I have my argument I am going to win it's so convincing!" There is no such thing as failure in the blue value system or the orange value system. Only satanists don't buy your amazing conversion tactics. Failures are only trivial things leading up to your success, there are no locked-in self-interested systems. Or that's what you're told.

No sorry it's my mistake to assume leftists wouldn't extend just-world-fallacy to the literal economic system if it helps them keep their idea of why the sexual revolution was a positive.

Not... even vaguely true. Women perceive men based on pre-determined physical characteristics. If you're disadvantaged in this way, or in some other way, you are "creepy." Otherwise you are living in a world where it never happens that a woman uses (made-up) creepiness as an excuse for insulting/repelling someone born with unattractive physical characteristics.

Women project the most negative possible qualities onto sex (unless it's a winner category individual), to the point of demonizing men because they themselves made up in their minds that the man is saying something sexual, based off of nearly no evidence, and think openly being a fragile narcissist about this is acceptable. ... Either way the original point stands, it's not unreasonable to assume a chunk of oversocialized individuals would kill themselves over this. Too bad because women do not consider this, only their own near-psychotic emotional reaction to perceived creepiness.

"Here's me going: I should do an approach today. Walk around town for ages, couldn't even find an attractive woman. " Didn't you know that moving to an area with opportunities, despite costing an incredible amount of money, effort etc. (keep in mind countless people are just struggling to get by) is completely in your control, incel? Yeah just move to an area with opportunities bro! Don't forget this is just God testing you bro! Lol...

Because both are pointless and are a result of projection onto others what you find attractive?

Absolutely next level at the automatically self-fulfilling bluepilled delusions here. "Well here's a factor that contradicts your worldview." "Oh okay well in my interpretation, doesn't matter how unlikely or likely, this actually either supports my worldview or is neutral at best." "You must simply be doing something wrong and saying suspicious things to girls, why? Because I am starting from my worldview being true, when in reality there is no bigger level of delusion than people buying what owen cook says/thinking cold approach works/thinking opportunity-blackpill and winner/loser categories aren't real."

Interesting, stage blue motivations were the key factor that helped him study 12 hours a day.

"I can't platonically interact with women and type excessively without someone projecting sexual intent on what I typed and harassing me over it." "You seem biased against women."

"You can’t fuck up" Hmm... but you can fuck up in relation to what you are trying to do. But more importantly why bother if it's unnecessary? If it's truly that, you must re-consider even talking about it let alone doing it, unless you basically want to resemble self-lying.

Women have free will and are responsible for their actions every last bit as much as a man is. If a woman treats another man better, then you don't want anything to do with her because if she is going to pay attention to you, she's going to be doing it in a way that is degrading AKA the opposite of what you want (if you're being honest with yourself). Do not leave any alternative to her having self-awareness and looking at things, not in a way in a child would where she just wants things for free, but in a way that a responsible adult intelligently engaging in a deal would. Otherwise you are creating a double standard that will collapse quickly because when you value common sense, you aren't going to value women's attitudes that don't fit into it, so may as well short-circuit the process and apply the same standard to women that you would to yourself.

Appeal to ignorance fallacy.

Do you realize that if you got this knowledge from a deep experience, someone else could have had a deeper experience where they saw the opposite AKA free will? Do you realize that if you saw it on psychedelics, now you would have to accept that if a group of people who come up with ideas while drunk and think those ideas are perfect, that now those are ideas that you would have to accept?