numbersinarow

By that logic, there aren't any women for you to get at that age, because paying for sex with an 18 year old while you're 40~ is nothing more than prostitution.

Intention technique and mantras basically just didn't work at all when it came to lucid dreaming so I decided to try FILD. On my first attempt I wasn't really getting the hang of it and couldn't succeed, but on my second FILD attempt (AKA a lucid dreaming technique relying on finger positioning and activity) it felt easier and I was able to pull it off. Now, you might be questioning this technique or thinking you'd rather do something else, especially if you have a bad case of insomnia and "don't want to have my fingers twitching on top of it" but the truth is that slight twitching could easily be occurring anyway, which, just like this technique, are unlikely to interfere with sleep, and if other techniques work, it's only because they were combined with FILD. For me, the fact that it works already on the second go makes it quite good. But it seems that the lucid dreams from FILD are different. There was a spontaneous one years ago that creeped me out, but none of them had wrong-feeling reality-warping. For example, in one I changed the color of a flying object, but here it was different, I couldn't change anything external without the effect being only similar to what I wished for or random, but could change locations or fly. This method, similar to what I've heard, makes it so that you have a part of your psyche present which can turn you lucid during the dream. But funnily enough the alleged seamless transition didn't happen from not sleeping to sleeping, it happened when waking up. It felt like waking up in such a way that I completely seamlessly went from the dream to being in bed simply imagining the further contents of the dream. At least it's completely seamless compared to regularly waking up. I think different techniques might be required during these dreams, unless I just got unlucky with this one. I'll try focusing on the environment and looking for what the events in the dream are pointing to, instead of trying to change them. A part of this could potentially be looking at a wall in the environment, and trying to make a track come out of it which has what I desire on it, as opposed to trying to create a new dream environment/setting myself. Reality-warping commands that worked in previous lucid dreams simply don't seem to function in lucid dreams caused by FILD, or at least cause a random effect that is different from what you wanted but vaguely follows it's footsteps. Feel free to share some advice relating to this.

There has been talk here in the recent months of environments that are unfriendly to finding a girlfriend. Allegedly, in these places, such as a town, people use their free will extremely differently than in big cities, and therefore view men as creepy, making things like cold approaching a bad idea in these environments. Regardless of this not being true, whoever is saying this is still right in that you will be viewed as creepy or lesser for reasons that all center in being a male. There are also men in these places who, not in someone's imagination, but in reality: kiss in public, have relationships, get validation from women and have sex. Unfortunately, it is now radically impossible to rid the males who get into relationships of the inferiority that allegedly comes with being male and which makes you "creepy" or worthy of being treated infinitely worse than a woman treats her female friends. Why can't the men who are grandiosely validated by women experience the same lack of opportunity and loneliness that disadvantaged men feel, and be shamed as creepy? Even if I was wrong and my perception was completely off and the men who are hated by women were ugly and lacked social skills, even then, women don't hate other women for those traits. Nothing can be creating these environments except the collective choice of society which involves some men being forced into loneliness and which bases itself on them being lesser for being male, but at the same time others who are also male should apparently have the greatest validation and pleasure despite potentially having really bad traits.

lol

Watch out for unhealthy manifestations of stage red such as this. Are you feeling down and completely frustrated, and are making up things to make yourself feel better, like unrealistic magical self-serving solutions? Then it's time to go back and "clean up." And yet the limited success I had with women came from me doing nothing, definitely not this. And now I am in a position where I could improve literally anything and would still have no opportunities. People like OP are better off just forgetting about sex and focusing on something else (at least for the long time being).

I like the first picture more, just pure empty cold indifferent depressing experience and the hanging rope showing you just a glimpse of hope. Only talking about aesthetics. (It's possible that people get to experience infinite heaven in the space between lives and only choose to start lives because they say "f it may as well get a challenge," but there are also infinite other possibilities.)

Oh, not so fast. Genetics are in fact an advantage and those come from "a great woman," and access to sex would make a man more productive. (By which I can only mean a hypothetical where the opportunity-lack was lifted.)

The losses suffered from that are potentially unnoticable.

Entirely fill your head with "you are your own biggest enemy," "cold approach is good, I just need to be charismatic and goodlooking," "I can get a relationship, it can't be that I will go my entire life without having kissed, I just need to work on it." Then keep this quote from Nietzsche (that's right, not a pessimist philosopher, those weren't chosen for this because of their focus on general pessimism,) in the back of your mind: "Everything valuable is instinct—and consequently easy, necessary, free." Then walk around a town in a cold month with the mindset of cold approaching a girl. And not just that, but remember that the worst human beings imaginable have opportunities for sex and validation from women, and that others have been kissed/hugged without even having to flirt.

I completely agree, convince yourself that you chose this life and that you will get a new character creation screen where, for some reason, the overwhelming majority give themselves extreme disadvantages, in order so that you can... die and not get sex? Also your reasons for why it's not going to be (basically) just as hard in a big city are unconvincing. If you're going down this route, just try making a deal with entities that appear during trips instead of doing this.

They aren't respecting it in the slightest. People who rightfully point out rent prices are INSANELY unreasonable in an economic context against conservatives, will tell you that you need to self-improve in order to move out. Okay, with what? In order to go to college you will already need to have that money for moving, not even mentioning bizarre university costs in the US.

Joggers high is so incredibly rare, and I've only felt a mild version of it despite running tons of times and even doing extreme runs. It's not a feeling of numbness it's actually a good feeling just not very potent nor long-lasting. It's not unhealthy, definitely, you're not going to be suffering much if at all. I seem to be an extreme sprinter, it comes so easy for me but jogging just destroys me and I can't keep going despite wim hof breathing and pacing. Not all the time of course, I still have gone longer distances, but experienced runners high only once.

impossible to get girls, or that the world is comprised of only winners and losers, or something along those lines? Other than me, that is. The psy experience was definitely not so clear however I think that ultimately the gist of it was the notion that the elites take away the opportunities from the "losers" and therefore they aren't able to ever get sexual experiences because there aren't opportunities for it and a higher entity controls the minds of "potential sexual partners" and therefore they, in fact, aren't that. They are people, but also they are reflections of the nature of the world as opposed to your instinctive approach of thinking of them as potential sexual partners. The entities are using people in order to drive history in a certain course. For the second example... today, after meditating for an hour, I got into a mental state where I could clearly see no goal was better than another, there is nothing to be gained that has outside value not given to it by you. This is so incredibly different from only rationally knowing this, that during the experience I thought that this is truly what transrational means. Every situation is the same, being tortured and living your ideal lifestyle aren't different, and I remember starting to see the difference between rationally knowing this and being in a state of mind where you can experience it. If you can experience it, you start doubting that there really can be a goal, it appears to shift from "I can choose anything." to "It's already chosen for me, me choosing something would be silly." And this state of mind was achieved by me... how? Because the thought came to me during the meditation that nothing is possible and you should let go of everything. The meditation session allowed me to look at desires like intimacy from a clear perspective. Your ideas of people you are attracted to being attracted to you are not connected to the actuality of the potential interactions, and it's more severe than the difference between the map and the territory. And it's "impossible" to someone in an enlightened state, because it doesn't exist.

truly next level thread but no

Obviously not clicking on a tiktok link because tor has been permanently disabled on my computer spontaneously after I tried to use it in combination with a VPN. And without tor I just am not going on tiktok, the US government sees the mobile app as spyware. Either way the second most effective propaganda machine on the planet has been relentlessly trying to demoralize russian troops and brainwash you into thinking russia is either losing or underperforming. But maybe the effect has been too large on the russian population, or Ukraine and NATO troops are running out of steam and don't want to play the long game against Putin who would be controlling 33%+ of the world's wheat. Either way WW3 is a possibility.

No, it's equal.

Let's see if "Other people don't exist, your consciousness in the moment is everything" is true. If I say that to someone, yet at the same time of them being conscious I myself would be conscious, then is my consciousness wrong or lesser somehow, since theirs is truly everything and all there is? And hopefully nobody thinks this would be relatively true because then the wording would be utterly different, relativity is the very thing being dismissed here, as in there AREN'T other people for whom it would be relatively true.

Wrong, you chose.

The master (according to Nietzsche) sees only good and bad and therefore could never project evil into the world, because that's a concept from "good and evil" which Nietzsche says is the worse worldview. As for Nietzsche breaking a paradigm with a master morality, here's how I would put it: 1. Slave morality is created in opposition to a master's morality, AKA now the things the master wants are sins. Master morality already existed. But when you see this, you see that slave morality isn't so good. 2. The slave morality isn't there to be broken at all, only there so that people could hypothetically identify it better and re-locate the slaves, but the slaves and slave morality would be the same or at least we have no reason to believe it would be different. Although slave morality can be poison to a master, the slave fulfilled the hierarchies that Nietzsche praises better by having slave morality, not worse.

The argument works perfectly "against" people who think that either there is an objective metric to decide their family is more valuable, or are truly philosophically attached to it. What about subjective attachment? Well it's subjective so this argument doesn't work, their subjectivity isn't compelled or shares values with your argument which makes them rationally see a type of objectivity. Their subjectivity is there and self-consistent. Let's take an example, let's say you said "Your subjectivity, such as impulses and desires, truly is aligned with not pressing the button." then there is the ultimate counter-argument waiting, which is that both you and them know they would press the button, which is why you made the argument in the first place in order to dissuade them from it. And remember, if you have chosen the "I am moral in relation to this person therefore I will be actually moral by being consistent and being moral towards everyone." route, you have to remember that "everyone" includes the plants you eat and the bacteria your body kills.

Has anyone found non-scam biokinesis audio?

Women are "creepier" in a way that you think is objective but in reality it's not creepy at all because men don't see it that way. Women aren't prudish at all either, the reality is that they effortlessly validate the winner category individuals and actively hate loser category individuals. Whether the mechanism is them being asexual and feeling a "placebo" around winner category individuals or not, we can't know.

Yeah, there we go, Peterson's attitudes are squarely at blue and this channel owner himself argues in a blue way many times (whether it's in this video or not).

If you got out of blue at an early age, you will likely never truly understand a pre-rational mind and could even end up extremely traumatized due to a mistake springing from this fact.

They're much better off being nice then getting abused by women and becoming blackpilled, than being a redpilled guy blinded by his own success thinking he earned anything or did anything right besides being born and having opportunities. You are saying this yourself, except you are describing a "nice guy" with a secret agenda AKA you're describing the stereotype of a creep as opposed to an actual nice guy who truly WOULD suffer from letting the world walk over him.