AerisVahnEphelia

I’m honestly fine if I’m the only one who enjoys my art. I usually do it for my own joy (narc+selfish combo). ((But yes some tokens for survival from it would be welcomed)) I already feel like I’ve had enough recognition to sleep very happily with what I do, and I don’t judge "my value" based on my “art.” It’s not me being mad or having remorse. It’s the same feeling you get when you see someone throw plastic in a forest: it’s me seeing something disgusting and mentioning it. The fact that so many people already like my stuff is enough for me. I even have a song with 1 million plays on YouTube. Even if it was a collab, I fully participated and was in the house with my friend while we built it. I gave him the full rights because, honestly, it was fun, and starting a name with him felt like a hassle. I gave him full rights, and I don’t think my friend even really made much with it. Honestly, I don’t care. As the most part of the idea was thought up by me, I feel like I know what I’m doing has a certain degree of mastery in my taste. Of course, I’d like to live from my “art” more. But marketing people stink. That was just a simple observation, of course I m not delusional about it and the state of the nature of our society.

you used to think fine of him if I remind. Always found him scammy ( I mean from 6 years ago ) I mean, better than you're seeing it clearly now. he still is a genius ( of bullshit ) case study in con man.

Pluribus. I don't want to spoil, it's from the creator of breaking bad, but COMPLETELY different. Main public : ultra high IQ, geniuses, stage turquoise, enlightened master I asked gpt to tell what it is about without any spoiler, so here is a gpt resume of the feeling :

My last ai video project https://x.com/VahnAeris/status/2063025967883313269 (prefered social media) https://www.instagram.com/p/DZOJRxVMgfS/

I've no work, does that mean I m dead ?

non sensical. how did nature create humans from rock & atoms ? 100% sure you've no clue on how nuclear energy work, cause if you did, you would be humbled.

Renounce wanting to be seen.

We see you in the next topic or you renounce your renouncing

I said we must bully uglyness, but that if AI gives you ugly output and you picked them to share them, it's on you, not on the AI.

I m mildly more funny than leo and less cringe by at least 10 points. I reckon that leo is advanced as much as me, I think I might be slightly more enlightened, but I'll be honest, I wouldn't have become better than him without him.

you preaching at the choir. I don't even know how someone can read that from me though, I don't believe llms have sentience or could get any. @zurew Nuclear energy is objectively good. Look, let's not make this about AI. The debate is about insulting people who use emojis and GIFs online instead of their own words, isn't it annoying too ? This is exactly what this is about: aesthetics colonialism. There are literally people out there who can talk to AI, read AI-generated text, and enjoy it more than books, when they read it, they see gold, they do not see slop. You dislike it, and that's fine, but it is literally like preferring the mountains to the beach. Arguing about why the mountains are a better place is exactly what you're doing, and it is totally meaningless ( but go on, have fun ) I don't give a shit about people not using AI or using AI, I see the world in things that I hate for no reason & things I like for no reason; the reverse should be just as natural. Of course, you're within your rights to wage a war against everything your ego thinks is an ugly form of expression, totaly fine, you't escape existing and wielding the violence and wraith of god, you're animated to be chaotic. The world is just a constant war of wills and violence for reasons no one can figure out.

you need way too much contemplation to start to get it, nothing I can tell you, will help, you're helpless. there are no human, no self, no you, no human expression, there is only god expression.

that doesn't really change what I m saying. it means if you read what they had to say before AI, it was just as meaningless. this is what I meant by the "horror" and amplified expression.

But you picked the AI to speak for you, or not; that is also your expression now! In fact, I might make an analogy: if people like to speak and send GIFs online, that is already a form of trading "words" for animated images; it is already a different type of you that remains YOU. I know that you feel like language is sacred because you enjoy it, and so you have a bias toward thinking that "words = language = true expression." But here is a more horrific vision for you to play with: if someone uses AI to express himself constantly, it would not be the AI; it would be a human using this tool as his animated GIF to speak. That would be his expression. HE chose to use the AI and to use the words of the AI. What does it say about the human doing it? Here is a radical way to shift your perception: in fact, if we lived in a symbolic-image society where people only expressed themselves by drawing things and could not utter words because, let's say, their mouths were sewn shut due to a culture that thought using words meant removing your true expression, visual language, in favor of letters, compressed lines of meaning, then using words might be seen as trading your true visual expression for an abstract layer of compression: words.

AI cause no problem at all. it amplify what the user was, people saying meaningless things now adding more layer of abstraction toward their meaninglessness. I retain what I read with ai, if I care about it, but infinite text, means more accurate curation to produce. AI write badly, but it does gives good informations & follow logical order right. AI will do what every technology always did, genius will have more of it, and idiot will become more idiots . . sorry to say. https://x.com/pathsnotchosen/status/2060676158291579243

in 5 years , ai will take almost all jobs on earth completely +95% of everything that exist will be replacable. if you optimize for a world that isn't aestheticly purely statue driven through the capacity for pure requisite variety, you're not very high level of consciousness.

; P trust only god

You might get surprised to know that Ralston is a cult leader under the psychotic belief that his meta understanding of reality is truth. he has no direct experience of the truth, he is always in contact with his direct experience of his body projection / body of belief. but here is the thing, there might be no one or nothing that can go out of it. there are no distinctions between being delusional & being clear, Ralston is so deeply self convinced that he is holding some "thing". When you love someone, it isn't delusion, it's not falacy, it's not some dopamine in the brain, it is absolute truth, it is meeting with god, it is sex with geometry. Ralston would tell you this isn't true, that love is a "state feeling" or some bullshit he rationalized. Ultimately you gotta stop ass lick dead fanatic corpses and start to live inside your reality.

no you need to defy god and tell him you'll beat his ass up.

Everyone only cares about himself: being very selfish and very practical. We created humbleness to make ourselves more collectively selfish. "Spiritual contemplation" is about becoming more discerning about what is meaningful and true. Truth is absolute power. Lies destroy you. They are poison, corrosive. The ego doesn't want truth, because most people's egos are weak. You need to be extremely greedy to get to the truth. You need the desire to beat God and take His crown for yourself. If Leo or I found God, it's only because we are greedy and very selfish about the truth. Our ego will use the truth to feel better, to scheme, the ego is tricky, it's a hunt machine created to improve his fitness, there are no way to escape it at all, none but death. "enlightened to god people" are selfish in a more interesting and intricate way, more beautiful and elegant. Monks will shoot meth & insult people & still be enlightened. There is nothing wrong at all with being selfish. This is the substrate of love. Love works through absolute selfishness, which is equivalent to selflessness, because your self is an illusion. Of course, you need a huge context window and certain psychedelic experiences to grasp what I'm saying. Billionaires don't exist. They are poor and miserable, they do not control reality, they have 0 power, they are npcs nodes in a cosmic emergent process. Your neighbor eating rats might be richer. His experiences might be richer. The bird doesn't care about his coins. He is busy flying. Is he less happy? Is he less rich?

I call what jiang does : selling narrative porn. People like what sounds clever. The hardcore truths are barely possible through langage. we get delusional about everything all the time because we create a world at the measure of our assumptions about any category. Which are all "feelings".

Even ralston do it so it's just impossible. Everything that lives will ultimately be dishonest. I see my dishonesty constantly, but then I remember, we are making it up. The only way to stop it, is to stop caring about anything, but if you do, then you'll have others problems.

It’s known that SSRIs completely blunt the effects of psychedelics. That’s a well-established fact, not just a feeling. They usually counteract the effects, making psychedelics largely ineffective rather than dangerous.

I don't think he might not be a good one really impossible to speculate on that. About his "girlfriend bullet point" list though. -- leo "don't worry" -> doubling down