AerisVahnEphelia

Same for me cool stuff is creating a coherent universe, but I most of the time I do let the AI does the heavy executions after talking all the points or showing him the work, and I get to manage what is allowed to exist in the game. Like I've been making three, I manage the design with gpt.. and I ask opus to build them in 3D, do I really need to become an expert three sculptor ? ( no, but I still want to pick the threes that work in the universe, & not random template ) But also I love sculpting character, so I've been sculpting for almost a month now all the poses of my stylized character & guiding better animation by hand ( showing the AI the main bones postures etc.. ) I m not making hyper realism either, so, it has a goofy side, but the art in it, and the main thing I care about ( character design & animation ) I will have their leveraged side probably because of my care. ( also gameplay obviously ). In fact, I m not that much into "making games" I like "making worlds", not empty, but the kind of world you want to inhabit and live in, it has some poetry you want to come back, like a simulation, but I still like the gaming side, because that's really needed for the depth. Still I would make a distinction between "games" & "game world" sort of.

[due to ai scavenging my history: edited] There won't be any. People won't give a shit in 2-5 years, and the people who will care are too literally physically braindead to be cared for. good games are good games, can be done with your feets or your ass, if they are good, people play them. Imagine a caveman hunting a mammoth. He builds a spear, and someone says, "Nooo, you gotta kill the mammoth with your bare hands and struggle with it like our ancestors cause the blood just get to be better this way" Yeah, cool. Me, I'm gonna eat & feed my tribe. You go strangle the mammoth and enjoy yourself dying half a quarter of the time while doing it. "People are against Photoshop." Like, yeah, cool, man. People are against electricity. Nice story bozo." There are two worlds: one where you make a really good project that ends up being good, and one where you make a shitty one. AI has no relationship to either, only the creator does. People will learn the difference with the year, it's only been a month that we can really "make games" with AI, but it will improve even more from now. Before opus 5.5, AI was retarded and useless and agent never worked. Opus 5.5 is the second momentum after the birth of gpt, it was plateauing and vomit until last month, even I started to think it was all a waste of cash for the industry. Opus 5.5 is going to lift the world, not like useless gpt, this thing is the first "pre agi" moment. If you hated AI and think it's useless, you'll rethink soon, mostly it's because I bet you never used opus 5.5 max with a real task to achieve. Even if you don't use AI for art or code ( which is beyond stupid ) You could use AI to organize all your files or create software/ blender add on - & what else, it would still improve your "TRAD workflow" by a thousand. Not using AI is bozo, ultimately, it's beyond stupid, I m in lack of words, even if you don't want AI, you need to use AI in a world or AI exist, if you find no applications for it, you're not meant for this world, you failed all intelligence tests. AI is better than any IQ test, anyone against it, I instantly know, they are absolutely, definitely, completely, braindead, unsavable rats, beyond trump stupidity, ( his only intelligence was to accelerate AI, by all means ) I think I'll soon even refuse to speak to anyone who has been or is against AI, I m an extremist now, I don't have time to waste with the dumbest of our kinds, my time & attention matter.

Online RPG (half MMORPG, but instanced for all explorable zones, because a true MMO is heavy on server costs and doesn't give a true RPG and scripted feeling, which makes them, in fact, weak IMO). For now, this is how I've started with the gameplay/level design. You find your mates, and then you can do instanced things, while you can RP and be in cities with other players (like Guild Wars 1). I'll probably find a middle ground between recent games and all the good old mechanics. It's going to take me a lot of time and a ton of work, but I'm up for the 5,000h minimum grind. I've got no job (and no need for one right now, I'll survive), and I've got plenty of time and a bit of savings to pay $500 for AI per month (2 GPT Plus (concept art ideas), 2 Claude Ultra // sometimes {tripo 3D organic,suno,elevenlab} ). Might reduce the Claude one a bit. 1 Ultra might be enough with another Max. Opus 5.5 can do retopology, weight painting & skinning if you know what to ask and guide him properly. ( doing serious animation ) then you gotta constantly tweak things or audit him a lot, but it does work if you know how to use AI. Despite the belief of midwit that it can't do anything properly, claude max after being extremly informed can do godly job. I m sure it could paperclip max the universe already, absolute pitbull who will launch the game and do test by himself and hunt the solution for 2 days if you make him do it ( and he will find it if the universe allow it ) I still need to work by hand, especially on correcting anything done by AI that isn't code ( getting out of average, and it still kinda suck for stylized ). Right now, it's either a free spare moment or I'm on the last % of one of my Ultra subs, so I can't launch multi-agent and work on Blender at the same time... waiting.

In fact, it's more twisted. There is a bottom to reality. Maybe not for the mind, integers, and categories. "Water" has no bottom. Water exists. It doesn't matter how you conceptualize it (it does, because if you interpret it wrong, you might drink poison). Poison exists too. Even if it's relative, relative to you, it exists. It's not a concept. People here enjoy thinking that reality cannot be reduced to concepts. In fact, it can. That's true science, and it's a mix of factual and better interpretations. If speaking had no grounding, there would never be a "result." It would constantly turn into a void and an aesthetic feeling of interpretations. But no, if you share the same categories, you can "describe" reality (or make a serious interpretation of it). There are infinite interpretations within a finite range of categories. You can create a billion ways to say "water," but the "water" of reality is only one water (of course it's not, because each "water" is composed differently in infinitely many ways). But in a way, the category of water is still water, even if one has piss minerals in it. Somewhere in reality, beyond the mind, such a thing as water is "real".

can't wait to play "sentinel" if it ever goes out, for now, I m making my own game, it will take me probably 2 years, and 1 year for the prototype, this month alone took me 200h for a very basic character creator & animations ( I've got one race out of three ) AI can't do organic decently past the base mesh, ideas & derivation needs time, but I m glad we can pull off template very fast and have a team of 10 relentless senior dev on meth for 1000x less the price. right now it's without any bug or crash despite the stack of gameplay I've been starting with. Never thought I would do this bymyself, not gonna pull of a skyrim, but I've the same ambition for myself, even if it's taking my entire life, never had so much passion for making games since AI, I m certain it's my path in life now.

This game won't exist. Some passionate people with AI will do better. Don't believe any retard who says it's shit with AI. 6 true senior game devs in 6 months will pull it off better than Bethesda. With the same quality, or better. AI makes retards 1,000x more retarded, and geniuses 1,000x more genius. AI just shows how much the gap was always there. Some people never had any artistic standards or anything. Now they can show everyone the ugliness of their souls, lol. 99% more slop. +200% more AAA gems are going to happen. The first true AAA game assisted by AI will happen next year, and people will be in shock, disarray, and disbelief: "Nah, this is slop 'cause it's made by AI," despite the fact that it will clap ass.

I realized, and I love it too, no problem, god is gracious & infinite, none compare with him.

Spiral dynamic is a huge delusion, but it satisfy the autistic people. congratulation on your devolving, welcome back in the bucket

You're not better than Trump or Hitler; you're just not them. You're not “selfless” or “spiritual.” You're simply not living under the conditions that would lead you to commit violence and rape in the same manner as other forms of life. You're not ethically superior or better. If you're full of “empathy,” it's because that's how you survive. You're Netanyahu and Hitler; not metaphorically, but as a raw, direct realization. Every day, your life is sustained by killing and death, indirectly through your country. But you'll passively say, “It's not my fault; I'm earning a salary.” Yet if you support the state that kills or does evil for you instead of fighting it, you're not condoning it. That means you survive through its absolute, unchecked violence. And why won't you question it? Because you survive through it. In fact, you may be worse than Genghis Khan: you won't rape or kill yourself, but you'll condone it. You'll also remain biased about it and be VERY LAZY about questioning it; for survival reasons. You're as evil as everyone else. Trump isn't some stupid, magnificently awful embodiment of evil; he's just extremely evil toward YOUR survival strategies. Or maybe not?! You're evil, your mother is evil, your country is evil, and you're no different from Hitler or Netanyahu. No matter how much you soothe your ego with nice stories, your brain is a survival machine that will use every tool at its disposal to rationalize its own evil. And the only reason you're not murdering or raping isn't that you're some angel or an ethical person; it's mainly that you're weak and lazy, and someone else does the killing and raping for you. Everyone who lives through the state is a rapist. Your country sells weapons used to murder people so it can stay rich, let you rent cheap housing, and steal resources cheaply from other countries. Remember: everyone around you is equally evil, just with a different flavor of it.

your very knowledge about religion is a religion. Every belief & every faith is based on nothing.

Try to suspend the idea that evil exists as a force in itself. Most of what we call evil is done in the name of something loved, and it’s not simple ignorance but love combined with a narrowed field of view. Hitler’s hatred of the Jews grew out of an inflated, idealized love of Germany, so intense that anything he perceived as a threat to it became an enemy. The same mechanism works on the economic side. A certain strand of capitalism values money, and the structure and power it brings, above any attachment to an ethnically defined nation. Seen from that angle, mass immigration can be read as a way to expand the labor supply and lower its cost, and some anti-racist campaigns as having served, among other motives, to make the native population accept competition in the labor market. You can accept or reject that reading, but the logic underneath is a hierarchy of loves: this capitalist ranks the love of money above the love of an ethno-nation. I’m not stating what I believe or where I stand politically. I’m describing a mechanism. Love creates hatred, because whatever we love, we come to hate whatever threatens it. Stop loving and there is nothing left to hate: everything is perfect as it is, including your own death or the death of what you cherish. But if you want to protect what you love, the logic pushes you toward more hatred. Even the universalist who dreams of a utopia where every people lives in harmony faces this: to fully realize that world, he would have to eliminate everyone who values the ethno-state, and he becomes what he opposes. Every totalizing love produces its own enemy. This is also what conservatives are reacting to in “non-identitarian communism/neoliberalism.” Their refusal of a “mixed world” isn’t (only) ignorance. It’s closer to aesthetics, a preference about what the world should look like. Ignoring that this hatred can be aesthetic rather than ignorant is the real problem. Ignorance can be solved by informing and correcting. A preference about what the world should look like can’t be corrected, so treating it as a lack of information guarantees failure.

Even trying to understand and measure a word against reality is near impossible, so a bunch of it ?!

Reading book is an useless outdated tech, abstract schizophrenic concepts repackaged that barely touch reality.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeXSqz1seSj/?vrfl=NnpibXN3d2owdzc5 https://www.tiktok.com/@vahnaeris/video/7695486755788655894 https://fixupx.com/VahnAeris/status/2109358337833996363 My new music clip is here, Enjoy!

Look at my topic on the illusion of moral superiority. I think we do share a lot of 'opinion'

I was mixing anime and "stolen" music 10 years before AI. I've downloaded more than 1,000 movies and 100 TV series. If only you knew how little I care about copying. It's all about you and your consciousness. Why not worry about copying God's work? "You drew a flower, and you think you're original?" Oh, really? Who created the flower, you or God? Create your own "flower"! Stop copying God and being lazy! -- Do I support someone directly stealing another person's work? Absolutely not. But there are entire Instagram pages, I'm sure you've liked some of them, that do nothing but repost other people's content. What they "create" is a "vibe." I do think it's a lesser form of creation, but that's what it is. Where do we draw the line between copying and creating? It's abstract. It depends on you and your consciousness. I still think we can draw a line, though. Taking someone else's work and reposting it without putting hours of personal effort into it is copying, and it's lazy. See? It's such a difficult line to draw, overall. But yeah, if someone reposted my work without permission and without any personal reworking, I wouldn't appreciate it. That said, I'm all for a culture of sharing. If someone literally took a character from my work and did something original with it, creating a genuinely interesting remix, all power to them. The spirit of remixing and the spirit of stealing are fundamentally different. And when you actually make art, you can usually tell which is which. I still buy or support artist that I think are putting out a great energy into the world.

Sometimes binary is necessary for certain minds in context to get the nuance. when I watch claude doing my FX in resolve, I can tell you, it's way beyond "copy" and the simple thought of someone saying such stupid things is dangerous for this person to hold. By calling them out, I might save them from eternal ignorance.

I think the only country who does it right is Japan.

yes I'll defend tools in my pocket that I've fun and pleasure making art with. people are up to be lazy with it, just like someone can just do tracing with pen & paper. thank you.

it can be used highly creatively ( I m a ""true artist"" and I m telling you it can and it does )

Everyone who think this currently today is under 100 IQ or do not use AI properly at all.

self sacrifice because those people bring meaning in their existences.

Could you !? But you're right, maybe this topic is a bit of an actualized.org -> advanced ragebait. ( or is it ? ) Maybe it's absolute or maybe I m just delusional and coping. ( I don't think I m evil at all, weirdly. I think I m a very kind & chill person to be around, so I m suspicious . . maybe my evil is to trick people in believing those kind of things ) Of course "evil people" will absolutely use this kind of mental trick to justify being mean & evil. ( everyone is, so why not me ? )