Eskilon

@Davino Insightful comment on the quote⚡ Can this potential angle of yours help explain Deja Vu? If God is infinite potential "sitting there" then, one could say that everything has already been played out in every conceivable way. And we, as little aspects of God is recognizing that when we have a Deja Vu? Can God experience the exact same life multiple times? But if so, to what purpose? What would it learn? It's crazy because we as humans value newness so much, but that doesn't mean it's applicable to God or existence.

Where`s outside the universe？ And what is outside that?

I am part of those 1%, Sugarcutie😳👉👈

Damn, op resource! Thanks bro

This is interesting, I think most atheist cannot be convinced of God through more thinking. They need to have an paradigm shift experience, which is more feeling than thinking I think? Though you can say it involves both, interesting to think about it. I agree, though your intelligence will be growing but you are not exactly thinking, things will be revealead to you, which may include ideas lol. I think is difficult to categorize such gifted individuals, especially mystics. I would say at least, that Buddha was insanely sensitve to everything and so he definetely was intuitive. Thinking about it now and related to this topic, he was probably one of the few true psychologist in humanity lmao.

@Natasha Tori Maru Damn, exactly like orgarsm? Hmmm, interesting. So far, for me, in terms of raw intensity and explosiveness no spiritual practice(including psychedelics) beats orgarsm; and I say this even after having my Kundalini awakening lol. Legs shaking, otherwordly sounds, insane energy in the body, maniac laugh, only orgarsm led me there so far lmao. But, in terms of meaning, calmness, insight, and contentment, meditation is king for sure.

Nice to hear about your experience! Since you touched on this, have you gone to a meditation retreat? Buddhism is one of the truer religions out there. No God, they don't have priest and belief is not encouraged nor mandatory.

You don't have to worry about anything anymore, but, that doesn't mean things become automatically beautiful. In this state, things can just become absolutely neutral. Neither this, nor that.

@Someone here Have you been to Khajuraho temple? They have a bunch of images of people tripping outside

Not just the orgarsm, the orgarsm is the pinnacle of the experience but the build-up is equally trippy -- All the kissing, touching, sucking, everything is trippy! The power of chemicals. Can't escape chemicals

@Someone here I mean to say it has a trippy vibe to it. You forget yourself completely, and after it, if you reflect, you can't believe you did some things and said others. Sex is trippy as fuck and hypnotic. Music too share the same quality of hypnosis.

@UnbornTao If Leo didn't touch any psyche at all and still made the same videos like he did, you would be kissing his ass. It's just so funny your bias against psychedelics, you haven't contemplated what it is.

It depends on the attitude of the person overall. If they came across as preachy and follower vibes then yeah, I would call them Leo witness. You call people here followers but you exibit the same behaviour with some spiritual teachers. Funny how that works. You dont and cant know that.

At this point youre an Adi Da witness. Shit is too funny. Preach.

In a hypotetical scenario where you could decide if they are allowed to exist or not. Yes? No? And why? I'm specially curious in unbiased and mature views though. Share your views.

@Carl-Richard Interesting, because it made me think and feel Do you think Buddha was an intuitive feeler or thinker? 🤔

I see, but what about you though? You are here on this forum and a smart guy; what makes you think you will fall on the complete mess state?

You are high on testosterone and horniness, full of chemicals my dude But seriously, why so blue?

You mean to say that I'm in a padded room somewhere imagining Leo Gura's, Natasha's, etc? Jk jk.

But this experience is you right? Behind everything or in everything or both? Where does Leo's view and yours clash?

@Natasha Tori Maru So you do make a distinction between two kinds of solipsism... interesting. So, there's relative and absolute solipsism and the absolute is the correct one and the relative the false? Did Leo make this distinction in that video? I don't remember now

I mean, sex itself is weird. Have you noticed after you cum, the absurdness of it all? Sex is a deep biological hypnosis lol. Unconscious forces that run the world.

I don't usually argue much here, I am not a solipsist by the way, for some reason I thought about enganging with you in this convo because you are well-read on many things in philosophy and arguing, so it's interesting. I see, fair enough, and good points. The reason I specifically said it was an intellect thing and didn't lump together mysticism is because from my experience, there's a higher knowning if you will, that is distinct, certain and more profound than just thinking, reading a book, observing cause and effect and learning information about the world. Such experiences are undeniably true in a transcendental way, like for example the moment of lucidity in a dream. It's undeniable, certain, but if you externalize it to other people, you are prone to questioning and the whole set of problems I talked about. Not saying this is what solipsism is but, a 100% true position may not appear so when examined through the realm of intellect and the human mind, so I say we can and must critique things but with a grain of salt and some humility, which by your reply you seem to understand this.

But I want to know the reason you attack solipism with such passion. It seems as if you got an objectivetly better position, which I assure you is not the case, at least not intelectually or linguistically. Because think about it, even if solipisism has faults other position is bound to have faults too because of -- assumptions as you were pointing above. But here you may claim that other positions have less assumptions than solipsism and therefore they are more accurate. But that is true only superficially, only if you haven't gone all the way. See it like this, any and everything anybody may say about reality I can just back to them "How do you know you are not assuming things?" And they may explain their postion once I question them, but then I question them again! And they explain again if they are well equipped, but guess what? More questions and problems to solve! And so I go on inquiring. Do you see where this is going? From an intellect point of view any position is equally bogus, because a person can always demand more and ask more questions, and if you don't know how to answer then one could always claim you are full of shit! And this is an inescapable problem, try as you might. All problems either "end" in infinite questioning and explanations or "I just know" circularity. The point is, your criticism seems really silly because you don't have a 100% better alternative to bring to the table. Not even a slight better one if you want to be really rigorous about it, because of the problems I said above.