Eskilon

Member
  • Content count

    953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Eskilon

  1. That's cute. But get a little less abstract. You are saying that my form as it stands its ego? my pov? what you are trying to say? If I don't have a talking voice in my head does that mean I dont have ego? What do you say about that?
  2. @Joseph Maynor What is ego for you?Your thoughts ? Your psychological pattern? Your body? The centrality in your head? Depending on your answer I think you might be incorrect here.
  3. It's biology all the way down. Lizard brain type shit. Good looks and physique means better chances of survival, more confort, security, all the things we apes love and want.
  4. I can throw that back to you and say the same thing about psychedelics It seems that enlightenment is rare irrespective of method.
  5. If you have mental diarrhea and monkeys jumping around them sure. His methods work for many thats why its still around.
  6. That's why you need to self-teach. Of course humans corrupt the original teaching. Buddha never said to belive in stuff, not even in him. He gave you methods and you were the one to confirm if what he is saying is true or not.
  7. The great thing about Buddhism is that theres no priest. Theres no middleman and theres no one to believe. Buddha made sure to say in his sutras that everything is your responsability and to allude to no bearded man in the sky. Not even the concept of soul exist in Buddhism, while in Jainism and Hinduism it exist. You and reality is a direct process, no beliefs.
  8. Especially the 3 abraahamic ones: Cristianity, Judaism, and Islam. This 3 religions are so full of shit that one should be better of avoiding them altogether if one were to be really efficient.
  9. True religion is not a new concept. Osho was saying those things too in his days. It's basically non-ideological truth seeking.
  10. Replace war with conflict and you are correct.
  11. Leo

    It was NOT intentional though. Not a shocking zen master move but his unconsciousness leaking hard.
  12. Lust overwrites anything, it can give you that passion. A lustful creature is a dangerous thing
  13. More like sex machine awakening
  14. Leo

    Its good that Leo said from the beginning that he could be full of shit, so this doesnt look too awful Also I expect 100 plus replies from this thread, its gonna be gooood shiiiit Lastly, I still want my infinite harem awakening
  15. Not war, but conflit. There can exist conflict without war, but there cannot exist war without conflict. War is just an ugly escalation of conflict. It's an unconscious behaviour driven by unconscious egos. I agree that without conflict probably life wouldn't exist because form is limited in its ways and understading, but war is not a necessary phenomenon at all when it comes to humans.
  16. @YIDIRYIDIR I think stuff just get lost in translation. Meditation, nirvana, samadhi, consciousness, this things cannot be translated because of their experiential and subjective nature. So you can imagine how hard it is to transfer that to other languages. Especially languages as dry and stale as English. There's no accurate translation to meditation anywhere for example, because it is an activity beyond mind.
  17. Yeah, Leo invented the conformist/nonconformist thing. Just like he invented awakening and non-duality.
  18. Because behaving is for losers and conformists. Rules are meant to be broken!
  19. In my case it works because we really love each other beyond sex and physical attraction. it didnt work for reasons I wont go into but true love doesnt fade.
  20. Yes, and this is included in that right, how do you know what you just wrote is true or not? Given that context nobody means nobody, means all, no exception. Unless you wanna change the meaning of words lol.
  21. You next sentence still mean nobody knows shit. Everbody is just exchanging their opinions as far as you're concerned.
  22. How can "NOBODY TRULY KNOWS WTF HE/SHE IS TALKING ABOUT." not be a liar paradox? It is literally the same thing. And also, how can you not derive a contradiction from this? It is a contradiction precisely because its a liar paradox. You cannot remove the person talking about it and at the same time say "Nobody". The person talking must be included in the "nobody" and therefore it is a liar paradox.