Shodburrito

@hoodrow trillson bro you want to vote for democrats? Go live an inner city where the democrat policies are and let me know how much you like it. Then we’ll see who the dummy is. See, people like you LOVE democrats until you actually go into places ruled by them. Go to Newark and tell me how nice of a place it is

@Forestluv the same ones that said Clinton was up by 9 points? 😂

@hoodrow trillson why? Because you don’t like what I have to say 😂 imagine being you. I couldn’t.

@Forestluv 😂😂😂 stop bro 😂

@integration journey oh yes. The only president to never start a war. As soon as Biden gets in we’re now involved in 2 wars.

@Forestluv the lady who was claiming the economy was great for 4 years and now claiming she is going to fix it?

@hoodrow trillson yes. I’m literally shaking.

@integration journey I don’t know, the Ukraine war, Israel, the economy, the border, she did terrible in the debate on every one of these topics.

I just read through the recent post about Meta announcing they were pressured by the U.S. Government to censor information on their platform. I see a lot of people making stupid arguments about how that's a good thing but you're so blind to what you are advocating for it's hilarious. No one gets to decide what should and should not be allowed to be spoken about on the internet. Just because you think others should be censored like extreme right wingers does not make it ethical in anyway. See, because you're so biased for the left, you think censoring alt right accounts is good even if it means reduction of free speech. But, if those same right wingers got into power and tried to censor you, you would cry about how oppresive they are. The hypocrisy is glaring. Y'all are so arrogant to think you can be ther arbiter of defining what is "safe" and "acceptable" free speech. But what you don't realize, is that acting like anyone or any organization can properly decide what speech should be censored is ludicrous. You're completely forgetting that how corrupt and morally bankrupt the average person is. 99% of left wingers in America are only sightly more evolved than right wingers. Y'all act like they are so much better, and therefore, should be able to regulate free speech. You don't get it do you? Those same people are just going to end up using regulations on free speech for their own egotistical agenda. Nearly 0% of the population is evolved and selfless enough to wield that kind of power. It's insane that you think giving comapnies and the government the power to regulate internet speech is a good thing, when 99% of the politicians in government don't give a shit about you. For a bunch of people who constantly claim they are so evolved (I'm looking at you Leo) you seem to get completely trapped in this idea that the left is so much more ethically better and evolved than the right. We need to be moving beyond right and left because both sides are rediculously corrupt. No one at these corrupt levels of development should be able to regulate speech. At a minimum a stage yellow person or above, but even then, it's not worth it.

The influx of Haitian immigrants is causing detriment to a small town in Ohio where the immigrants are eating cats, seagulls, wild ducks, geese, and other things. Coming to a town near you! “But immigration is awesome guys and these people definitely can integrate into western society!” 20 more years of this and America will be a shithole. https://x.com/npeanut630/status/1833142984793034852?s=46

Mcgregor announces his plan to run for president of Ireland in 2025 https://x.com/mick_o_keeffe/status/1831770147356602751?s=46

@manuel bon well considering there are plenty of people on the left defending this behavior using the argument you just posted, I thought you were being serious

@manuel bon wait till you hear about the cannibalism in Haiti! If we eat cows, why not humans too! (sarcasm). Your point is stupid. cannibalism coming to a town near you!

@Carbon Sorry I meant your favorite episodes not the actual podcast.

@shree lol

@Jac067 Money is a rationing tool. It was invented to decide who gets what in society. Normally, people with more money provide more value to society, but that's not always the case.

@Yimpa No, I don’t run it. I am a part of the group and one of the mods. I don’t know if the guy who runs it knows about Actualized.

@Leo Gura What about the same for the left? And who is to decide that those with that power are responsible enough to not use it for their egotistical advantage?

@Leo Gura okay so can we agree that censorship is usually not a good idea and 99% of people are not responsible enough or wise enough to wield that kind of power?

@Leo Gura If the government did this but it was instead censoring left wing ideas you’d lose your mind. So hypocritical

@Leo Gura What? The hunter Biden story that turned out to be true?

@mmKay also lynchings did not end because free speech was censored. So, I don’t know get what you’re saying there, it’s kind of a dumb point.

@mmKay My point is who is to decide what is "dangerous"? If the right is in power they say it is trans people, if the left is in power they will say it is ultra-maga people. Who is to decide who is right? You can't just give and justify that kind of power to anyone, you don't know know who will end up having it. Sure, it may be irresponsible to let extremists have a voice on platforms, but it's more irresponsible to justify a small group of people having absolute authority on who gets to say what.