ryoko

Don't worry, we have infinite number of isolation chambers in here. We treat violent people gently.

There's a lot of room in my apartment. Just pay the rent. If you're a refugee. You're welcome though.

Come to the woods, find an empty spot. There's enough for everyone.

Another band of monkeys who think they can shoot other monkeys. Fuck the borders.

The more closer you're to life, the more meaningless the outside world and it's drama. The thought that there's meaning somewhere out there is just your fantasy. Fantasy is the foundation of survival.

I've been meaning to highlight the best of all stages. Good start.

Comparison is fine. But introduce as many parameters as you can. It becomes a lot of mental work to keep it up. The goal is to compare until you exhaust the imbalance. If you're using Instagram to compare, spend atleast 3 minutes on every post, with intense attention. And don't make assumptions, only heed to things you know about them, actually know. So, why are you worrying your mind about things you don't know? Do you even know they exist? for sure? It takes some awakening to know everyone and everything is one and equal. Nobody is higher than you, nobody is lower than you.

It doesn't try to stick out and not a thriller by any means. It's honestly boring. We expect some grand thing, some grand solution, a villian or hero, but no, this one, it only have people. Just normal people who try to navigate a divided world. The likability of characters keeps changing, everyone is on a morally gray area. No one is correct, or right here.

3% is a Brazilian TV Series. A dystopian world where only the 3% get to enjoy all the advanced technology and great living conditions. At first we might think, the elites are evil, and so on. The case is, it's not that black and white. The series is a good meta perspective on various social dynamics. This is a good stage yellow media. Shows both sides of the coin in a nuanced way.

@Emerald The first mistake was to assume every human being have the same kind of evolution. That's not the case. Humans as a community have evolved to create individuals who are very unique. Those who revel in being alone are also part of the evolution. Know this, no matter what your unique traits are, we are all one. In other words, one's actions and way of living always finds a way to even things out. This idea is hard to swallow for most of the world, likewise profound truths gets pushed under the rug often. Science "talks" about stuff humans are ready for. It's not interested in the outliers and crazy ideas.

Best way to learn it is to build systems. Could be anything, just have a clear goal in mind, then lock in. Systems are not just mental models like spiral dynamics. You'll learn more by building systems in real world than by reading a book about systems. Just start.

I wasn't talking about Leo, not by any means. I'm trying to get you all to appreciate all the forms human mind can take on. Everything is a possibility.

hahaha

Being NOT social doesn't mean one has to hate people. Its not black and white. You're all making it hard for Leo to speak his mind. A mind which loves socialization is shallow by default. That is the definition of a group. That's the whole point of a group, you don't have to do all the heavy lifting. You can relax. The latter is not "anti-social", the latter doesn't care about socializing, he doesn't avoid people either. Having people around makes no difference to him. And he does go through a phase where he avoids people, as in anti social. And that's a good thing, an essential step. Human mind has so much flexibility, don't underestimate it. If you are a social being, anything else is "the other". You don't care about it. So it's easy to just put labels on it and be done with it.

Don't be ridiculous, transcending the need for people, is one of the basic steps, towards Sovereignty of Mind. If you ask such a person, "if the whole world ended right now, keeping you and you alone alive, would you be happy?" Yes would be the answer. Because happiness was never tied to others. It changes nothing, he was happy before when people were doing their own thing, he's the same now with all people literally gone.

I don't see the value in this approach, you're making assumptions like Leo is infallible. Most of what Leo said becomes irrelevant a day later because there's some new insight, a better way to explain the same thing. Neutral approach has it's own value. And I prefer neutral approach over biased approach, all the time. Don't skip the real work. Using it as a search engine of sorts is not a bad idea. There might be people who want to do it. But this can easily lead to dogma, belief, and blindness.

Systems can be inefficient, if not inefficient, there can be hidden trade-offs. It's not magic. The point of systems is to get the job done and free yourself from it. Systems can turn into your own self built prison. I've experienced something of this sort when learning to build procedural systems. The more complex a system, the more lifeless the game felt. I value systems when they help create the art. I've changed my approach to building systems since then. That's just me and my art background. I recognize there's value in systems which are heavily complex, even if it doesn't help you directly. These systems often become foundation of something else. Just telling "perfection in systems is bad" is just half the picture. We need people who care about systems with their life. There's value in both. The question is, what's your intent, with using or building a system, and staying true to that.

I knew that wasn't a dude. It's easy to spot from the writing. I could be wrong. But hold on, I got a little excited when I read "Modding", modding which game 😆?

plant a bug in Leo's room, and have fun

sure, you need a GPU with reasonable speed, even the lower end ones will do. I've monitored the GPU usage, it's efficient(so long as you have enough VRAM to house the entire model). I mean, that's to be expected. It can run on CPU, but really slow. I'm on Linux, so these are relatively easy to set up.

Just don't listen to Andrew Tate😂

Yeah, I understand now. Solitude as an escape is never healthy.

@Daniel Balan that's really sad, man. Very few get to experience these kind of things. I've seen stray dogs getting poisoned by the locals. It's very heartless. Me and a few kids used to go and save stray puppies from diseases, feed them till they can fend themselves. But most of them end up dying, within a few months for reasons unknown. That's when I started to realize most people see dogs as a nuisance. They don't see humans are just another animal. Then there's my own pup, he's just 2 yo. When strangers come home, the first thing they say is, chain him. We don't chain him, that's not how we treat him. I have made sure he hates chains, also encouraged autonomy. He communicates, makes demands, and is very emotional. Strangers barely know all this, most don't treat dogs well, even if they "own" one. Meanwhile, dogs , they sense good people. I feel a strong affinity towards them, they usually wag their tails instead of barking at me, as a stranger, no matter where I go. Life of dogs is very sad from a human perspective, but, I've noticed that the stray dogs are more playful. It's a very fascinating thing, how humans catapult themselves into suffering and devilry: they have convinced themselves it's part of their survival, while dogs are experts at being joyful. My point being, don't give up hope on humans. There are many good people. You know? It's a 12 yo kid who convince me to go with him to save the little puppies. Kindness is always there.

Guys, you'll be disappointed. Use AI to build neutral perspectives, not Leotistic perspectives. The new deepseek r1's thinking process, is interesting. Asking it complex questions and watching it think and reply is fascinating. I recommend running it on your local machine for speed. Using ollama, terminal, and perhaps a 7b model for reasonable speed.