Whitney Edwards

I wasn't referring to the robot. I was referring to the people discussing it and doubting the limits of AI.

Sounds like schizophrenia. We have such episodes sometimes don't worry. You're simply giving into over thinking. Rest easy. One way to know the real from the imagined is to collect sufficient evidence to match your projections.

Rather it's stage blue, because we're too stuck with consequences. You cannot simulate emotional consciousness.

Interesting. This is what we should be calling guilt by hypothesizing.

That's least of the national worry.

Biden's tenure hasn't been too eventful. And that's a good sign.

You aren't above them. Heck, even spiritual folks can display a huge ego sometimes. I have met normies who are far better than spiritual folks. One of the blindspots of this work is to let it go to your head and automatically begin assuming that others are worse than you. Maybe they can't talk like you or use similar jargon, but they aren't far behind, they can do better too. Remember a lot of people use spirituality as a garb and it's called spiritual bypassing.

Are you preaching tolerance of intolerance?

Reminds me of someone similar that you don't seem to have a problem with. Which anyways, all of it will come cascading down as all of it is unfair. In life there are many things that are unfair and we can't go around fixing it. Instead of being critical of every little thing you come across, have the openness to understand that things exist for a reason, people behave the way they do for a reason, a person who wants to kill you also has a reason, it's just not something for us to sit and debunk, because any which way, nothing is justified in it's absoluteness, study people but let go of judgement, all kinds of people exist, you'll never find someone that ticks all the boxes, it's our need in this internet world to find that one true godly perfect person, but where does this end really, focus on positivity, you're not in someone's shoes to know what circumstances might have shaped their personality, take in the good as much as you can and leave out the bad, this social justice warrior mantle never really helps, it makes things worse, sure a person has something bad about them, but they could also have something good to offer as well? It's absolutely possible, not within our immediate means, but if you look at the meta picture, everything is perfect as it is. We never know someone's relationship dynamic, so we're always quick to judge on the spot, it doesn't make much of a difference on a larger scale, all we look for is validation for our opinion, which is simply an ego game at the end of the day, she might be bad for someone, she might be good for someone too. Everything is relative.

A few moments of a video cannot tell you if a person is a narcissist. That's judging it too narrowly, a new disease of the internet called psychoanalyzing.

One thing I know.. Enlightement is not something that ends somewhere. It's never ending. It's not something that you part with and then call it an achievement. It can never be an achievement.

This is just the beginning of Tucker would be more appropriate.

The left does go too far sometimes. But the right has its own share of blindspots as well.

Not sure how this will impact his chances of being a nominee.

It's not like Tuckerson is going to suffer too much because of this. He has his own private platform and tons of support. He might start something like Trump's Truth.

How does it create reality?

You're giving into coping mechanisms. It's one of the symptoms too. First work with a therapist on your ptsd. You cannot simply expect these things to just disappear. Put in serious emotional work.

My phone overheats a lot while charging. It's so hot to touch on the front display. What can be done to calm it down?

Evernote paid version.

Not worth it. Pass.

Great news but would it really make that much of a difference?

More like law of attraction then?

Musk threatens to sue Microsoft.

I get it that intelligence is necessary for survival. But why does moral integrity and character always take a backseat when we evaluate a person's role in society. People often defend the wrong actions of a person if they exhibit high levels of intelligence. Intelligence itself supports integrity. What do we need to do to bring a fundamental shift in paradigm and choose moral character over intelligence?

First, they're psychopath. Second, spiral dynamics cannot cure them. Third, they need a heart. For that they need immense suffering. Since they're rich, they would never suffer and so never grow.