Buck Edwards

It's an internet world babe!

@M A J I do you live somewhere in the US in a city?

Or maybe this is a karmic place. You get what you put in.

@Jwayne it could suffer some cultural biases here and there but mostly universally collateral.

I never looked at it that way. I always found it deeply meaningful.

There is. Indeed. Biological evolution can be random genetic mutation. Intellectual evolution is not random but curated through different experiences and much suffering and learning. It needs a growth mindset. That's why stage orange acts as a nexus. Through stage orange you slowly realize that materialism is not healthy overall and the need for spiritual expansion begins to grow and proceeds through green to turquoise. One has to reach the pinnacle of productivity to then branch into something more meaningful and beyond and this happens only with maxxing out at human materialistic bullshit. Spiral dynamics is the most excellent model to study the evolution of consciousness in humans.

Spiral dynamics is about intellectual evolution and not biological evolution. Here you're comparing apples and oranges.

I don't think it's honorable to do that to your girlfriend especially if she is not okay with it. If you are enjoying the experience, that should be more than enough. You're being immature here.

Lying is only possible within the context of a relationship, not at the beginning. Once the bond is getting stronger, the lying habit dies down. Transparency in any meaningful relationship is the thumb rule.

I wasn't referring to the robot. I was referring to the people discussing it and doubting the limits of AI.

Sounds like schizophrenia. We have such episodes sometimes don't worry. You're simply giving into over thinking. Rest easy. One way to know the real from the imagined is to collect sufficient evidence to match your projections.

Rather it's stage blue, because we're too stuck with consequences. You cannot simulate emotional consciousness.

Interesting. This is what we should be calling guilt by hypothesizing.

That's least of the national worry.

Biden's tenure hasn't been too eventful. And that's a good sign.

You aren't above them. Heck, even spiritual folks can display a huge ego sometimes. I have met normies who are far better than spiritual folks. One of the blindspots of this work is to let it go to your head and automatically begin assuming that others are worse than you. Maybe they can't talk like you or use similar jargon, but they aren't far behind, they can do better too. Remember a lot of people use spirituality as a garb and it's called spiritual bypassing.

Are you preaching tolerance of intolerance?

Reminds me of someone similar that you don't seem to have a problem with. Which anyways, all of it will come cascading down as all of it is unfair. In life there are many things that are unfair and we can't go around fixing it. Instead of being critical of every little thing you come across, have the openness to understand that things exist for a reason, people behave the way they do for a reason, a person who wants to kill you also has a reason, it's just not something for us to sit and debunk, because any which way, nothing is justified in it's absoluteness, study people but let go of judgement, all kinds of people exist, you'll never find someone that ticks all the boxes, it's our need in this internet world to find that one true godly perfect person, but where does this end really, focus on positivity, you're not in someone's shoes to know what circumstances might have shaped their personality, take in the good as much as you can and leave out the bad, this social justice warrior mantle never really helps, it makes things worse, sure a person has something bad about them, but they could also have something good to offer as well? It's absolutely possible, not within our immediate means, but if you look at the meta picture, everything is perfect as it is. We never know someone's relationship dynamic, so we're always quick to judge on the spot, it doesn't make much of a difference on a larger scale, all we look for is validation for our opinion, which is simply an ego game at the end of the day, she might be bad for someone, she might be good for someone too. Everything is relative.

A few moments of a video cannot tell you if a person is a narcissist. That's judging it too narrowly, a new disease of the internet called psychoanalyzing.

One thing I know.. Enlightement is not something that ends somewhere. It's never ending. It's not something that you part with and then call it an achievement. It can never be an achievement.

This is just the beginning of Tucker would be more appropriate.

The left does go too far sometimes. But the right has its own share of blindspots as well.

Not sure how this will impact his chances of being a nominee.

It's not like Tuckerson is going to suffer too much because of this. He has his own private platform and tons of support. He might start something like Trump's Truth.

How does it create reality?