PolyPeter

Member
  • Content count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About PolyPeter

  • Rank
    Newbie

Personal Information

  • Location
    Argentina
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

358 profile views
  1. Hi! a newbie here, I’ve spent countless hours since 2021 watching and contemplating Leo’s YouTube content, which has inspired me to gather the courage to engage here. Reading through this discussion has deepened my understanding that the mainstream mindset of neutrality in situations of conflict often falls short. It’s not always appropriate to remain neutral when examining such events; instead, it’s crucial to take the time to thoroughly analyze the underlying causes and context of what’s happening. The Russia-Ukraine conflict, this serves as a clear example where neutrality doesn’t suffice. It’s misguided to frame this war as simply the result of “two differing perspectives” or an inevitable clash of ideologies. The reality is much starker: Russia has committed war crimes, violated international agreements, and invaded a sovereign nation. Ukraine cannot and should not be treated as equally culpable in this scenario. Furthermore, Vladimir Putin’s actions reflect not only a deep level of unconsciousness and greed but also a dangerous, shortsighted, and childish grasp of leadership. His behavior is the root cause of this tragedy. Given this, I firmly believe that other nations have a moral obligation to intervene on Ukraine’s behalf. Moreover, countries that have openly supported Russia’s aggression—such as North Korea and Venezuela—should also face consequences for enabling such destructive behavior. Justice demands not only that we support Ukraine but also that we hold complicit nations accountable for perpetuating this injustice.
  2. In the long run, this only means you will be further and further away from truth. I think that you don't fully grasp what truth means. Do you mind sharing why it is not the most important thing? (it is not a thing)
  3. Hey. I am just starting to learn about this Sastre dude. And I am struggling to understand how this is not itself an absolute truth, let me explain my observation. The absolute, as an idea, can be questioned, and it can lead to at least the following 1: There is an absolute. 2: There is not an absolute. If 1 is the case, then you have access to this absolute, and at least one way to verify it. If 2 is the case, then you are already at the absolute. Because saying that There cannot be an absolute, is itself an absolute!!!!!!! In my experience, it is always "safer" to deny the absolute in favor of relativism. Because you can never know!!! what can you possibly understand a as tiny human being...?? probably not much... On the other hand, if you as a human, manage to expand your consciousness and become infinite, then it is absolutely obvious that there is an absolute. Formless. Cosmic. I don't think anyone that "rejected absolute truths and ideologies" would ever be openminded enough to understand what Truth entails. I don't think Sastre or Schopenhauer have any idea of what a psychedelic insight like the ones Leo talks about might look like. It seems like old philosophers like these, cannot come close to the depth of a true Awakening into the nature of reality.
  4. Hi! I find this topic fascinating. Yes I would definitely enhance both my Mind and Body through technology, and to some extent I am already doing it, by wearing glasses or using the Internet, Psychedelics, Music, and Mathematics. I don't see a limit to what I would not enhance if necessary and possible. Two examples: If in an accident I loose my leg, and there is a cyber-leg in the market, I would try my best to buy it and have it installed. If Neuralink became publicly available I would ditch my smartphone immediately and have it put in my skull. I could think my way to the internet, and not have to use my hands to code anymore! Here is a video of what has become recently possible. Imagine this technology evolving in a few years from now. What do you mean by fairness here? I don't really think there is anything objectively "fear" in reality. When new valuable technology becomes available, people starts to use it, it has always been the case. No matter the price.
  5. Hello everyone! I'm curious on your thoughts about this new advancements. It's legit! How long until we can communicate with our thoughts to a chatbot through this device?