Schizophonia

You will see 🙂 Ditto.

You'll see that when you're 30. It's also a shame that good, intelligent people don't want to have children because their energy is absorbed by pointless things. I want children because I like playing the patriarch, or at least it doesn't bother me. 😂 Okay, I'll leave you, I'm going to sleep.

My mom sometimes tells me how I "tore her apart" when I went out lol You'll see, at worst you're not there yet.

Na, I think you just got used to hiding your emotions.

So it's not in your nature to be "disengaged".

Lol, it made me laugh. Because they love their child very much. Once again, commitment.

It's not true, you say yourself that you have a lot of day dreams. Because Valentin wasn't there yet. 😎 Jk Commitment is something that is built. Personality traits and libidinal behavior are conditioned (without genetics) from the age of 3 to 6, so we often have the impression that an anomaly is "part of us." It doesn't matter, it's not my problem; I'm not an inquisitor. Lol. Not a big deal.

I read a study several years ago. I'm open to contradictions. 👍

Yes. Your strategy for managing frustration is to disengage from the imagination that underlies desire (and therefore lack), whereas most women will instead choose to invest themselves in it again and again, desperately hoping to find the phallus (power, satisfaction). That is to say, whereas most girls will seek to be filled and possibly cry, stamp their feet, or whatever, in the event of dissatisfaction, you prefer (chronically, these are tendencies) to say "nope" and disengage. As you disidentify from the turmoil of lack, the libidinal game, to achieve intensity, becomes to take someone who identifies with this lack and fill it. Taking someone in the lack -> excitement (because it's a "threat" to your identity of lack of lack) -> dominating her to "restore order." @Nilsi I think Lacan said that masculinity translates into the supremacy of the symbolic order. I may have misunderstood something, but I don't agree at all. For me, it's a bourgeois and patriarchal anomaly (and I'm a conservative, lol). For me, 1) The symbolic order is always ultimately imaginary. 2) A virile man is, and this seems to be the version most intuitively prevalent in the unconscious of most people, on the contrary, someone perched in the real rather than in the torments of the prison of language. Typically, a man who is low in stress, bearded, stoic, strong, and generous even naive. If I believe Lacan and his supremacy of the symbolic order among men, then vegan nazis in Hugo Boss gay leather suits with masochistic fetish would be the summum of virility. I mean that even if you position yourself so-called, symbolically, as masculinity, the law of the father, all that, the simple fact of identifying with the image, even with the ego itself one could say, generates feminine affects and libidinal behavior in general; If you see what I mean. Again maybe i misenderstood something somewhere, you know better Lacan than me.

You absolutely want to be stoic/indifferent to cope with real (to disidentify from the lack); And when this is part of the concept of self, in the unconscious, it generates manly sexual fantasies

Because it's somehow illegal in your system to be feminine. And me, as in my system it is (was?) illegal to have things easily, I try to play at lighting wet wood. Same for you in the opposite case.

She's lying, women don't have sexuality, don't poop, and they fart daisies.

There is no link between schizophrenia and psychedelics. I've even heard of people reversing symptoms of psychosis with microdoses of LSD. Just because a drug makes you trip doesn't mean it'll make you psychotic; schizophrenia is linked to low metabolism in certain regions of the brain. In fact, it's essentially more like delirium, like dementia, than a psychedelic trip.

Countries that ban pornography are mostly religious countries, most of which are poorer and more "low-conscious" than the West. There's a big bias here. Pakistan is poorer and more violent than France, that doesn't mean that Pakistan should do everything like France.

@Princess Arabia When is your tour in France btw? 🐋 Jk.

He is older and has gained a little weight.

I went into Samadhi during my first LSD trips. I « cried » on ecstasy.

Yep. I have a theory that everything that existed before the Neolithic period (coming and going, natural food, sex, sports, etc.) should basically not be controlled, and everything that follows (drugs, the internet, the market, etc.) should be controlled. Just an idea which bloomed in my mind. Understood, as you would say

Gnegne

👍 It’s the same thing ofc 😂

1)Because it’s easy pleasure. 2) Because it potentially disrupts your view of sexuality. 3)Because depending on what you look at, it enriches your self-concept.

It's also about human exploitation; I think it's more "gratifying" to have more or less normal and well-paid sex, protected and secretly in a brothel, than to end up on the internet in facial cumshot compilations, or simply getting fucked in obscene expressions and facial expressions because the director decided that (btw, most porn directors are big mentally ill narcissistic men). Sorry to be bold but it's to illustrate what it really means. Most people are also wallowing in their bullshit and you need to intervene to help them and even save them; As a general rule I don't think humans are made to live in a liberal-libertarian society.

I would like know more about unconscious/language.

I'm for the opposite; banning pornography because it's often obscene and bad for the mental health of young people, but allowing prostitution to prevent prostitutes from being managed by macros. The brothel system seems good to me.

He is arab, from Liban from what i remember.