Schizophonia

It’s ego hypertrophy

It depends of the university you are in. Philosophy is very large. That’s what I said I don’t know where you are but in France you can go in medical ethic via philosophical degrees (at the beginning).

@CARDOZZO He can manifest a higher IQ/bigger brain

In this instance @Leo Gura is clearly a lowkey naturalist in its notion of conformity; which is anti-non duality because from a non-dual point of view every-thing, every phenomenon, every subject-object relationship is just the ego; it's purely relative.

I was just trolling a bit because it reminds me of my bad experience with Debian. I know Debian is particularly different.

"Mirror neurons" specifically refer to empathy. Even if you're the worst psychopath you'll still feel close (I'm using this term for the sake of non-duality) to the five people you spend the most time with because they become your language. If you only know kebabs, the kebab language (the name "kebab," the smell, the taste, the linguistics of the ingredients themselves; in a "fractal model," you could say—always the same story—) it will make you become kebab; your world will revolve around the kebab. The question is—and this is where the issue of "conformity" might lead us—whether there's a form of language inherent to human beings, such as Chomsky's idea. by extension Lévi-Strauss, Heidegger and the more or less naturalist guys like that (I'm citing those I know); or not as the postmoderns think.

Generally you study philosophy for pure pleasure, or to work as a philosophy professor or in more specific professions like medical ethics.

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux4noobs/comments/lteetl/i_successfully_installed_linux_mint_after_an_hour/

handspinners

D'accord

Metropolitan or Quebec's one ? given that your canadian. C'est similaire mais avec des expressions différentes, et un expression orale, un accent différent. tabarnak

It depends; his videos on spirituality/non-duality are very good, and his speaking style makes him pleasant to listen to. Those that discuss psychology, sociology, or politics are less good. When I criticize of course it's because I like confrontation; I'm not spitting in the soup.

People who pretend to work but are actually at best code-pisser, and who debate of the best os to be "productive" lol

Nobody says that lol except for women who are in a ruminatory delirium (i just invented this term) here and there especially on social media We're essentially among balls here so we don't see it but women have the same ruminatory deliriums. One could say yes but they're at the opposite polarity; like they complain about not having a boyfriend, but it's because they have too many choices, whereas for us it's the opposite blablabla. But actually if you look at your closest women mirrors (your mother, your sister, their friends, your own female friends...), you'll see that they tend towards shortage (they settle for random or even clearly low quality men, with no reciprocal effort from the men they flirt with...) if you too. Because the problem is not the signifier (the opposite sex) but the signified (the object of desire, the "phallus"); it's neurotic. The idea is always the same; to see oneself as a victim because a victim is a hero; that is to say someone who integrates into the collective subject. The more individualistic, capitalist and/or lacking traditional collective structures a state is the more automatically people will become weak, depressed, and crazy; neurotic and sometimes psychotic especially socially disadvantaged subjects.

That's why you get lost or avoid almost all debates, and why you're stuck in shallow concepts; typical example is conformism; you can't explain your intuition, so you just throw your exemples out there like begins the question and if someone asks questions you just reply, "Ugh you're annoying me, just contemplate." Reading and studying philosophy or even simply watching good videos, not just browsing Wikipedia, in addition to being a pleasure, will provide you with elements of language, concepts, even epistemology with a "dialectical" approach and/or scientific evidence in favor of it (although we, as non-dualists, know that positivism is an illusion and autistic bullshit 😏). At some point you didn't learn how to make Skyrim mods by reading the C++ Wikipedia page it doesn’t makes sense.