Schizophonia

All cleavage is an illusion; everything is its opposite depending on the point of view That's why I insisted that the best episemiology is the one that eliminates the highest degree of cleavage. Indeed the conformity thing is shaky; Leo is always quite shaky because he comes from personal development and has little sociological culture. Non-duality and Structuralism are two of the things I'm thinking of that can explain this divide (and by extension, the low-key philosophies surrounding this divide, like Baudrillard's hypermatrix for example), thus rendering it obsolete. Thus there are no longer conformist/non-conformist actions; there is simply --reciprocally--, an ego, structures. The Marxism I sometimes talk about is a form of structuralism.

Sorry but he's unbearable to listen to.

The more abundant you are the more you can indulge in your vices, but that doesn't mean it includes killing people; a shadow like that is extremely rare and probably more something associated with socially marginalized people.

Being in a state of separation doesn't necessarily make you more narcissistic. When you prefer playing on your computer to talking to people because they're "jerks" (separation), your attention always shifts to an "external" object (you understand why I put it in quotes; non-duality and all that), a computer. And you can be a big bimbo who wears tons of makeup, love dramas ans cie (quite narcissistic) and still be awake.

I am actually marxist

What did you do; clearly.

No that's paranoid personality disorder; Hence indeed the intense projective mechanism, the tendency to be ruthless with the weak and submissive, even fetishistic with the strong, etc. Narcissism is simply exaggerated "self-love": Self-love not in the spiritual sense lol but in the sense of using "oneself" as a libidinal object.

Idk

They (benzodiazepines/Z drugs ?)quiet the mind but aren’t efficient to make a psychotic people efficient; even the opposite because high doses of then will quickly make you very tired and potentialy high, even more delusional. Like alcohol.

Plot twist : You do escorting to pay your studies

Because their sense of self evolued. It's reversible.

You're right, that doesn't contradict what I said. Narcissism is excessive self-love; self-love in the sense that attention continually shifts to the most primitive objects of identification, such as your body, your history and so on instead of extending to other objects The problem with narcissism is not self-love itself but a hostile relationship with "external" objects. Your self-love story is more true for neurosis You're joking about your mirror story but a narcissist is really like that lol, they like to look at themselves in the mirror, telling themselves how handsome and superior they are (just like me😏) etc.

No you hypothesized that strong egos accomplish more, and I propose the antithesis: not only the difference between what a weak ego and a strong ego produce will be qualitative rather than quantitative, but a weak ego will actually produce denser things because the weaker an ego is the more it can dedicate its attention to dense external objects. Symbols capture attention, leaving less for the imagination of the self; this is what Lacan would call the supremacy of the symbolic order. And to support my example, I would say that the people you mentioned don't produce anything particularly beautiful or intelligent, and some are even heirs to wealthy families (Trump, Musk, and that Saudi prince already; I don't know about the others, but probably more or less). Resisting the Nazis and enduring torture like Jean Moulin requires very little ego. Spending decades working on nuclear fission like Marie Curie requires little ego. Being a great doctor/surgeon, sleeping poorly and constantly using caffeine to learn, and later caring for patients in a university hospital requires little ego. Being a great philosopher who produces many concepts—I won't list them, I have too many in my head—requires little ego. Being a good horseman or gardening and creating beautiful things requires little ego. All of these are truly accomplishments; beautiful and intelligent things, or simply things that make oneself and others happier. All the people you mentioned are, once again, heirs and/or swindlers, often with legal problems, and/or people who produce "meh" stuff that only losers consume. You haven't enriched your own thesis or even accepted mine; you've simply launched an ad hominem attack, calling me pedantic. Which is probably true to some extent since you find it logical to projecting that onto me, but that doesn't invalidate what I'm saying.

? No, the very definition of narcissism is the excessive love of one's own image.

Otherwise just read some solid sociology or even psychoanalysis.