Schizophonia

Don't be narcissistic, you're a mammal; you have the needs of ordinary humans, no matter how forgotten/repressed they may have been. I'm not saying to have children to "populate the planet," but to generate love. I've seen many people who have had children speak to me and obviously each scenario is individual but very often it gives real meaning to their lives. And it's not just about having children; it's about having a sensual, vitalist, and enterprising approach to life; having children, having a group of friends, doing business, having a job, making music, riding a jet ski, wandering in nature, feeling the beauty of nature and the present moment in general etc.

Did you really ever see someone who became exceptionnal because of psychedelics ? It's like, like people are neurotics they can't just say "I want to take psychedelics because it's a funny/interesting experience", they have to pretend it's necessary for "conCIOusNEss PersOnAl DevelOpment", that it's "better than therapy" while you have everywhere people who had 30666 trips are are barely different than before, or the differences actually come from experiences/efforts in real life. So you shouldn't make assumptions and suggestions to people who smoke crystal meth, because "Crystal meth smokers are just responding to their desire, you're trying to impose your value system." ? Everyone here makes assumptions about everyone else; politicians, self-help gurus, streamers... That's what I'm doing here, making a hypothesis about Leo Gura (I don't will don't put "I think that" at the beginning of each of my sentences ) They can ignore me yes. No one's going to jump on me for saying that except children lol. When I think about my father and the men his age who are hardworking, tough, who did a tough year of military service in their time in the French army, etccetc.; I would be ashamed to be like that, to be so fragile that you can't stand people politely making assumptions about my energetic structure on a forum. It's funny because on my Discord there's a guy with the same username as you who's a polydrug addict with fetishes. And he's unhappy... You're free to do what you want, yes, but there are ways of living life that will make you happy, because they're in line with our nature, and lifestyles that will make you unhappy. I am an intellectual. When I see the completely shitty, uninteresting level of certain intellectuals, I would even say that I am probably one of the greatest French intellectuals of the modern era ahah. 😏 Everything you say is projective My mentor (Franck Lopvet), who is easily on the same level as Peter Raltson, has about five children. Developed countries are having fewer children because capitalism, combined with the breakdown of the collective, has created a society where it is difficult to have children. The countries that have the most children are those where the social structure allows it, i.e., developing countries with relatively strong families, or more redistributionist countries (France, New Zealand, etc.). It is also possibly easier to get tangled up in one's neuroses when you have more free time; the injunction of survival blunts the recourse to neurotic functioning.

No because when i say "he should", I'm talking about enjoying, satisfying desires. Morality is a form of superstition in the sense that it aims to be an end, and unconsciously, it's actually about the fear of being punished. Desire/Enjoyment on the one hand, castration anxiety on the other.

You didn't offend me

@Alexop Maybe Swedish collective unconscious was adapted to a naturally very masculinizing environment, such as cold and few resources, and now that Sweden is a rich and modern country it must adapt so that individuals can return to more balanced behaviors.

You're not loving, otherwise you'd be serially monogamous like most humans. Because why bother looking elsewhere when you already have someone to whom you can give what you have to give? Obviously, you don't love your boyfriend very much, and vice versa (because otherwise he wouldn't stoop to dating a girl in an open relationship who also explains on a forum how great a guy she met was). Since you're not loving, you encounter mirrors that aren't loving, that is, not very physically present (men tend to be for women the mirroir of their symbolic order).

Eheh; I saw it too. The scenario is a bit random but the realisation and actor game is good, espcially if you see it at the cinema.

Ofc you're right; without going into details if i was less anal i probably would be right now with friends, working etc. It's because i'm still too much neurotic for now that i lose time in a forum or in internet, and so automatically i fall into mirroirs like you or others who bring me back the reason, the energetic game for which i am still here; that is to say I refuse to contemplate, accept how (I think) am small, out en childish narcicism, and so is afraid to be discovered, that which automatically limits my interactions with the outside world. Even if I decide to play the man, the one who adopts the phallic position, when I am with you this position is not objectively true because otherwise it would not appear; I will really be my masculine ideal only when the non-masculine/phallic mirrors (me in denial) stop appearing; because I would naturally be alone or surrounded by phallic men themselves (athletes, workers, honest about themselves and the world). If I'm phallic, then I'll naturally be surrounded by people like me, so the polarity will disappear. If I consciously want to be phallic, but in reality I don't embody it, not to the same extent for whatever reason (insecurities due to trauma and neurotic mechanisms), then I'll end up with people who truly reflect who I am, and my interactions with them will potentially be frustrating for all parties because of the conflict between the software I'm trying to bring and the real energy of the egregor. I give in to this egregor (Actualized), but sometimes because I'm uninhibited, my crazy, ribald psychoanalyst from a rugby player's region of France software , an archetype like that ahah, which is ultimately closer to my deep conditioning, "higher self," will take over, and I'll come into conflict with my usual mirrors here. For example, I recently realized that I probably couldn't be friends with people who are too left-wing or far-left, often LGBT. Not out of malice at all, but precisely because my deep-rooted way of being kind is in conflict with theirs. My first instinct, if I want to be kind, is to make others feel lighter. I like to be low-stress and strong, so I'll naturally want to share that, BUT this involves a process of self-dissolution, acceptance, weakness, etc, which is simply not acceptable for people (mirrors!) who have a strong sense of individuality.

Since you are so developed you could use your large development to react like a normal man, and not like a teenage girl who gets angry and insulting because someone made an assumption about your structure. Because that's what it's about; I've never been rude/mean, it's just hate to be discovered. Once again, as you are a diva, you feel humiliated by my approach and try to humiliate me back with your "tier 2 thinking" business. Well if you are that smart you should be able to understand that if you state something, that this thing is blackpilled, and then you call yourself anti-blackpilled then you are contradicting somewhere; You probably denied blackpill because you felt humiliated by my comment.

I attacked nobody, I just looked at what you wrote and gave an idea what could going on. If you cannot stand even friendly assumptions about your energy structure, then by definition it is impossible for you to develop. I precised you don’t have to take you as an exemple to work on your energy agenda. So much the better You said you said that women can't be happy with an average man, that's a blackpill idea (or redpill idk, whatever) That said, it doesn't mean that you believe in BlackPill most of the time; our structure is fluid with ego backslashs. I trust you. Once again, my game is to delve into people's unconscious; not what they consciously think and say whether it's true or not. I'm not even saying that what I say is true, I'm just giving a point of view that can explain the energy.

Lol what is this question. They would be more pist because you “steal” their potential girlfriends (looksmatchs), I guess.

When you operate in a regressive, sadistic-anal manner, libido becomes confused with aggression. So you'll create frustrating fantasies like "If I get a girlfriend, I'll be frustrated because she can't satisfy/be loving with a beta like me (or other people; the scenario doesn’t have to concern you just trigger agression)" something like that, because you enjoy the aggression it generates. Look at the structure of the fantasy/game; it's not even "He can't get a girlfriend", but "He can get a girlfriend, but won't be able to enjoy it to the fullest because the girl will get cringey from interacting too much with someone at that level" (that's not quite what you said but it's the underlying fear, to put it briefly); my goal here is to maximize aggression. And this comes from a mixture of trauma and the poor developpement of the Oedipus complex which did not allow the imaginary phallus to be castrated, you to enter into the symbolic order. Aggression is enjoyable because the phallus is confused with excrement; there is a game of playing with excrements/dirty things and turning that into a power feeling. But it is a form of mild chronic psychosis; your character of “I am the blackpilled” on x subject does not make you gain power, in the real world. It’s an illusion and a tentative to maintain a regressive psycho-sexual fantasy which ultimately incites and implies castration (poor life).

My dad used champix but he said me it turned him abnormally angry/impulsive lol

He followed me as a "ghost" (only I can see that he is subscribed) but I have never seen him posted.

It feels like most of us have undiagnosed attention deficit disorder and depressive mood (there is a comorbidity between the two); so instead of having a normal life we protect ourselves by locking ourselves in the forum or certain problems; and in the top of the pyramid there is Leo who is kind but also dysthymic; He is not sociable, revolves around neurotic ideas like "the truth" and has even developed chronic fatigue. I want to feel frequencies where I am happier and without attention problems, and I have looked at the thing in all directions I do not see how approaching these frequencies would not lead to disengagement from this forum but also to "personal development" in general. Because there's no longer any need for "personal development" when you no longer have mood problems; you naturally go somewhere. It's like "Looksmaxxing" lol; taking care of yourself is normal for most people, but when you're neurotic, hygiene, dressing well, etc. become something special.

Again, maybe i clicked in the wrong place but i went to a random place in the video and he just says random stuff. One day I'll be doing politics or something like that and some guys will be digging into my 10,000+ posts to try to convince themselves that I'm bad.

Men are also under increasing pressure; look at all the men who bodybuild and even take steroids. Even I, who am not very social, have encountered several of them both in real life and online.

I have several friends and I frequent French forums where men talk about romantic relationships; and when they are average or worse, uglier than average, many have great difficulty attracting any woman, even ugly, fat, etc.; lookmatch or inferior. I'm not saying that means Black Pill, Pareto, and the like are true; I'm saying that your projection theory is false. The nature of reality is projective, yes, but it involves similar objects; so men onto men and women onto women, but not men onto women, or vice versa; or, at the limit, projection of the anima onto women, as I theorized in one of my topics. Maybe I don't have a clear opinion here; I was criticizing your projection theory. Rumination alternates between a masochistic and sadistic pole. And since masochism is primary (you have to be a masochist to shift your attention to an object you don't value, sadism therefore implies masochism), it is generally masochism that dominates, so If you ask people who ruminate a lot, it's usually self-hatred that wins out. Look at incel forums; there are a lot of hate about other yes but especially self-hatred. Same for LGBT forums and especially transsexuals btw. I'm not talking about myself; I probably won't have much trouble finding someone once my life is more in order, but that's because I'm at an advantage physically financially, etc. I'm not going to lecture men about romantic relationships who are at a much greater disadvantages, that would be hypocritical. All I can do that is truly productive is to propose individual and collective solutions.

No she is wrong. You only believe her because your ego is too afraid of an alternate reality where you don't have the privilege of your advantageous physical and economic status. People are led to think this because they can't get women at all; not because their physical standards are too high. Take an interest in the people concerned.

This is true online because by looking at your random selfies women can easily see that you suck, it's even worse if you go on a Tinder-alternative dating site where people come because they know they're ugly/suck, lol. In any case, it's easier and more enjoyable in real life, in a context where you can offer something. What's paralyzing next is learned helplessness. There isn't much of a solution you have to go through this feeling, but yes it's not natural to be abandoned by your social group; it's normal that it's infuriating/paralyzing.

Lots of introspection, and videos on Freud/Lacan during my insomnias.

Karma is identity, the sense of self as you call it. That's not true, well being isn't priority of humans otherwise there wouldn't be self-destructive behaviors. The absolute priority of human's ego is survival, conservation of the self in general. Well being is a symbol of survival yes but it's not survival in itself, The gap is the reason why people have behaviors that seem irrational from the outside, even from their conscious point of view; because unconsciously their behavior allows them to survive; they are not sure of surviving in any other state even of "happiness" and they are so attached to survival that they will choose the state of not happiness. This is the tragedy of the human ego, which makes people allow themselves to be exploited, belittled in various ways, and to exhibit neurotic behavior in general. Yes. I wanted to say that spirituality is ultimately not so non-normie after all, eheh, and above all that it is an object of choice for our neurotic part; like all scrupulous subjects (religions, nutrition, politics...). I'm not saying that we shouldn't be interested in these subjects "because otherwise it's neurotic"; I'm saying that they are fertile ground. When I watch a sad movie, when I don't have access to my Paris Brest, when I learned about the implementation of a boring age verification system for pornographic sites in France. Negative affects 😾

In obsessive-compulsive neurosis, due to castration anxiety, there is a pleasure in shitting in the wrong place as a response; excrement is used as a substitute for the phallus. That is, you will "hold it in" most of the time and exhibit mixed, non directed, even masochistic behavior; this is due to unconscious processes. And sometimes you "release the excrements" and become aggressive/sadistic, and say, "Oh, what a pain in the ass those cuckolds pencil necks, me, virility, me, me..."). But excrement still isn't a real phallus; the true phallic position doesn't occur when you rebel, but when there's nothing left to rebel against. If you've adopted the phallic position, then there's no longer any competition (unconsciously the father/father substitutes, power holders, since the Oedipus complex or individual scenario of the transition to the phallic stage in general) to rebel against, by definition. So right now, you'd be a stoic doing whatever you want, rather than going on Actualized and making a thread complaining about your gay (non-phallic) mirrors who are afraid to lift heavy weights.

I'd rather have "pencil neck" than end up with a herniated disc, a torn muscle, a torn ligament, etc. The guy who made the video may be angry, but Mister Olympia contestants often have accidents.