Schizophonia

Value for who ?

The problem is that you are shifting the maya toward a less sensitive, more raw world that you will inevitably be subjected to. It's up to you.

It's O3 ALA but i daily use Walnut oil for that.

Yes or perhaps you're the one missing pieces of the puzzle. After all you don't even live in Brazil.

To perform my courtship display I do rolls, I follow her while doing rolls. Sometimes she run off but you don't let go; like one said when you get a sandwich you don't drop it.

No in my case it’s more about aggression. There are people who are ethnically replacing us, who wish us harm out of anti-white racism or simply because they are prone to criminality due to lower IQ and behaviour in general stemming from genetics, social conditions, and family-cultural history. There is an agenda driven by weak leftists or even a conspiracy to bring all this about; that’s part of the delirium too. It’s not just some easily debunked delusion; it manifests strongly in the Maya there are plenty of evidence. So there is a drive for war, for aggression, for asserting the group's dominance and so on; It is a game, or a set of games according to the point of view, of that kind. No apart from videos by Richard Abibon though those are in French. Mind you I also draw heavily on Lacan, and I mix, juggle that with other paradigms like non-duality. Psychoanalysis, Lacanian psychoanalysis in particular, is cool mainly for its linguistic elements.

Watching Shorts gives you "brain rot." When you finally read a book—even if it feels challenging at first because you’re accustomed to short-form content—you realize it’s good for your brain; it’s restful and offers a unique kind of pleasure that you simply don't get from watching videos, especially short ones. It’s akin to the difference between the pleasure derived from drugs and the satisfaction gained from fulfilling a natural need, like spending time with friends or playing sports. YouTube introduced Shorts just like other apps to boost revenues. They act like drug dealers; they know that human attention patterns make us susceptible to getting hooked by this phenomenon, which is dangerous for our attention span and in fine our mood, yet they are willing to do it to drive profits. There was a time when the British waged war on China to force the legalization of opium despite the enormous damage to the population (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars); imperialism itself is a consequence of uncontrolled capitalism, Lenin even wrote a book about it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialism,_the_Highest_Stage_of_Capitalism).

It turns me into the tiger of the Cheetos packets I also had internal hallucinations.

She seems pretty too aspirates the saliva*

Eheh thanks. I know

Money isn't hapiness; those are not the same object even if they can be correlated according to your karma.

To my message. You got the clairvoyance superpower too

Both 🔫

It's too bad Princess Arabia left suddenly.

Orthodoxy isn't about being more conscious so indeed it is entirely possible for someone raised as a Mormon to actually become hateful for some reason, or simply turn away from it.

Wine tastes good

You're trying to steal my role as the new Nahm. Watch out things are going to get ugly.

Idk

@LordFall People vote for Trump because they like his personality, and/or despite him because they want to vote for the GOP; out of opposition to immigration, or opposition to taxes because they are entrepreneurs/self-employed (people often call it a paradox for poor people to vote for free-market policies, but those poor individuals might be entrepreneurs meaning a platform of lower taxes is actually in their interest, while a salaried worker earning $4,000 a month in Delaware might want to vote Democrat; income does not equate to social standing). So you have a funny, impulsive guy ready to be even be belligerent in defense of the dollar and American interests in general, who wants to halt mass immigration, who proposes a typical GOP program broadly favorable to entrepreneurs, who appears to support conservative Christians and so on. What is self-destructive about that? It's an ordinary project except that Trump has a stranger persona than most other US presidents. It certainly isn't perfect for his electors but you view it as self-destructive, stupid, or whatever else simply because you fail to recognize your own interests and by extension those of others. That doesn't mean, of course that the Trump administration won't see its strategies fail, just as a Democrats' strategies could fails, or those of a socialist government.

It seems fake or exaggerated.

Perfect girl

@eos_nyxia Oh you're a girl, I saw it on your profile. Sucks loudly the saliva out of his braces*

@LordFall Everything you say is based on an inability to put yourself in others' shoes and their priorities. In this context at least.

No because if you are intelligent you will project intelligence. You will see that they vote for Trump because it aligns with their interests given their social standing, their integration into a collective identity, and their general environmental conditions. Simply put they have lived through experiences that shaped their brain plasticity, or they are the heirs to a specific genetic lineage, such that voting for Trump becomes the logical choice based on the signals they receive from him (program, behaviour, vibe...) But if you don't put enough intelligence here you won't perceive all those underlying signifiers; instead it is precisely that stupidity which will serve as the signifier itself. Everything is projection; what fills the gap of representation as Lacan might put it, what enables the transition from the symbolic to representation is the self, and thus in reality the phallus; In other words to put it very simply our sense of power in relation to the environment and the social body. Viewing things from this perspective is not only limiting but also as Karl Marx might put it an expression of bourgeois morality. In other words because you didn't had to expecience some thing that Trumpists did, because of the differences in social conditions (one is not obliged to structure the psyche around specific, very symbolizable events; it is highly fluid and even transgenerational hence the idea of schizoanalysis and by extension opposition to oeudipus complexe in Deleuze and Guattari for example.) you dismiss the personas of people who needed and continue to need more violence, brutality,or something you project into them that is actually lowkey necessary to them given their social position. I am not saying we need to become like the Trumpist, that being Trumpist is good, nor am I saying we need to become like policed democrates ourselves; I do not believe there is any specific place to aim for other than perhaps the shifts in mindset driven by the evolution of new technologies, that the ego generally craves. The core of my argument is that: 1) every judgment, mental representation is projective in nature. 2) this projection stems from social relations and a desire, conscious or otherwise, to carve out a place for oneself. Therefore if a democrat truly wants what is best for the people, they must discard the notion of stupidity and other such condescending ideas in order to grasp the intelligence underlying Trumpism. Everything is a matter of intelligence and adaptation; there are only different points of view. Social relations in the United States are currently characterized by a distinct paranoia featuring a "submissive," self-policing axis (most visible among polite, gay Democrats who use the word "problematic") and a brutal, "stupid" polarity that is more apparent among the collective groups drawn to Trump. In reality, the underlying mental structures are the same; stemming as they do from the same society and its collective groups, yet the symbolic positioning (identification versus projection) differs shaped by the varying power dynamics between the collective groups to which the individual belongs.

Why your cerebral cortex was led to form this conclusion: because you are hateful, want to feel superior etc. If that weren't the case, you would have arranged your life in such a way that the idea of bringing that up wouldn't even cross your mind, because the time or energy to symbolize this idea wouldn't be there. To take another example for the sake of clarity: someone involved in politics who is frequently angry tells themselves that they want peace, but are forced to be unpeaceful due to the material circumstances. Yet that is merely a relative, ego-driven truth. The absolute truth is that they enjoy being angry; playing the role of the angry person over some global issue that disrupts peace; and that if they truly wanted peace, they would never have entered politics in the first place, or would have gone about it in a completely different way. The ego's lie (by extension, the illusion of separation; from a non-dualist perspective): "I want peace, but I am forced to be angry for the time being." The truth: "I want to play at being angry, using an objective problem as a pretext; otherwise, I would be doing something else as is already the case for most people on Earth." Once you grasp that you realize that people actually betray themselves every time they open their mouths. The guy who sees gay people everywhere and talks about gay people is probably gay himself. The guy who says girls love scumbags gives off scumbag energy, the guy who sees violence is violent, the guy who sees stupidity is stupid, the guy who sees stinginess is a cheapskate/someone who actually would lowkey like to take advantage of others and so on. That’s why I’m increasingly trying not to be offensive, because it’s becoming more and more obvious that I want to click on a topic because it actually concerns me, and talk about someone because I’m projecting something onto them. I say it often and I’ll say it again; it’s exactly what I’m doing right now. I could be doing anything, "buying a toaster" like Peter Ralston sais to you lol, I remember that and yet here I am writing all this to you, because I am projecting my "egoic hypocrisy" i described onto you. The day I truly move past this, the day I’ve genuinely shifted into love, I’ll go about doing things and I simply won’t need you as a mirror anymore. Not necessarily Leo in general but the Leo who says that.