Schizophonia

It's normal to transform nature. Actually the best way to fertilize a soil would be to raise livestock on it.

These are traits often found in people with low testosterone, those taking neuroleptics, or those with autism. Men tend to be more stoic, but this is often a form of detachment; testosterone has a similar effect on the central nervous system to ketamine or opioids; therefore, you are also supposed to be fun and reassuring. If that's not the case then this is the first explanation.

It's you who started talking about humans and posing this dilemma; it came from you. I don't know what you're talking about, you bug lol. You mentioned animal exploitation and such, and I told you that there are plenty of animal farms, if not most, that are good and have a concrete economic and ecological purpose. Then you suggested that it's still not fair because I don't want to be killed. Well yes but I'm a human so I project myself into the future a lot which a cow doesn't do, and especially unlike me a cow only exists to be eaten; so there's no alternative where the cow is left alone, it makes no sense. We make judgments like this when we don't actually have any answers to offer. You're repeating yourself. And no, it's not a horrible option; you too live a completely interdependent life, and one day you're going to die, and it might be very painful. Ditto So what; you use other human for pleasure too. So what. It's like you're projecting depression or something. Animals have the right to live if their living conditions are normal; especially if there are also third-party interests involved. No, the countries where people live the longest, are the tallest, strongest, have the largest brain volumes, the best skin, and the best teeth are the countries where they eat the most animal products. There are slightly more centenarians than average who are vegan, but older people tend to reduce their meat consumption, especially red meat, due to the decrease in stomach acid and digestive enzymes. Statistically, there are even more centenarians who smoke, lol; so it's not really worth much. Technically, you can be vegan and healthy and even grow up well; but it's more complicated. What suffering are you talking about Yes there are horrible farms but it's the same for humans; there are plenty of humans who are mistreated at work and are abnormally underpaid. That doesn't mean the problem is that we have humans in existence lol; the problem is being underpaid. As I said earlier, you will live your life in total interdependence and may eventually die violently (accident, heart attack, cancer...); that's its nature. It's just narcissistic rage. What's the problem. It's just a straw inserted into the vulva for a few seconds to produce insemination; it only lasts a few seconds. The calves are temporarily separated from their mothers because otherwise they tend to die from diarrhea, and suckling often causes mammary infections. The calf is separated for a few weeks, and anyway, you're anthropomorphizing cows; a cow basically forgot about her calf in 48 hours, lol. Once again, you're swallowing the misanthropic vegan nonsense but don't know how things really work. You don't need to do that to get milk-fed veal, and it's a marginal production. You're talking nonsense. No because humans are not farm animals. It's truly a misanthropic delirium frankly.

@Emerald The goal of life is to experience pleasure. Basically the more you believe you don't have the right to experience "normal" pleasure the more you will, in order to repress pain and remain functional, operate more or less in a pleasure-oriented way, projecting your desire onto others with negative emotions and elevating deprivation to a value system. Instead of seeking out "normal" objects of pleasure, you will take your frustration and find ways to play with it; this is "sadistic anal" regression, where excrement (frustration) is used as a substitute for the phallus (basically, power, the ultimate meaning behind all objects of desire). In this configuration, the personality does indeed tend to be more split, with: - A phase of "retention," which is roughly the default mode; an inclination towards a superficial pseudo-stoicism, routine, a scrupulous lifestyle (diets, religion, politics, etc.), and masochism in general. -Sometimes there are "outbursts" with sadistic behaviors/thoughts. Generally, it's men who tend to develop this type of obsessive-compulsive neurosis; but depending on your family structure and early experiences (if you've been treated unkindly), it can shift towards a hysterical (or even psychotic or phobic) configuration, although neurosis is often more prevalent than psychosis. I'm not saying you're neurotic for no reason; neurosis exists when there's chronic dissatisfaction accompanied by defense mechanisms (projecting things onto others).

Your exemple is sily because their quality of food is the sine qua non condition to their existence. The real dilemma is would you rather be killed after a decent life (ideally) to be eaten, or would you rather have never been born? In this case the first option is a net positive. And again it's true that humans avoid killing each other but you still experience interdependence; just in a different way.

Animals are also natural insecticides; If you have a vegetable garden it's great to have chickens because they eat everything they find. I recently saw a documentary showing that crabs were being raised in rice paddies for this very reason, this time on a large scale.

It was on another topic. I was saying that there was no problem with most farms where the animals had a decent life, were killed by stunning, created plenty of jobs and a source of local food that could be produced everywhere, and the main source of fertilizer including for monocultures.

Yes but meat consumption is also strongly correlated with a longer life expectancy. Anyway I don't care about those studies; deep down you know exactly what you should ideally eat to be healthy. Following diets is just neurotic self-flagellation against your cravings and your local culture, just to give cravings to people who know nothing about the current state of your metabolism. Just as most people wouldn't want to start chasing their neighbor with a machete if the law disappeared, most people wouldn't eat nothing but pasta and soda if they could eat whatever they wanted; they would actually become quite refined, with the exception of certain compulsive and in fact mentally ill individuals. I'm willing to believe that too much red meat causes problems because I rarely crave red meat; I much prefer fish and pork.

You didn't respond to my arguments about livestock farming the other day, you're just rehashing PETA's bs. It's like if I were to describe Mexico by showing you a video of a guy being tortured by a cartel.

No, because height is far less correlated with wealth than with diet. There must also be a mineral balance factor since the French, Bosnians, Dutch, and those who eat a lot of dairies in general are taller than people from countries with high meat consumption (United States, Argentina, Japan...). https://lowtoxinforum.com/threads/protein-quality-not-genes-determine-male-height.16723/ " I posted a study on the height of Dutch men - a well studied phenomenon officially explained by genes, but recently recast as one possibly due to diet. Dutch People Gained 20cm Of Height In Just 150 Years Now this new study adds more evidence to the diet hypothesis as it found a population in my native Balkans that should be (and sometimes is) even taller than the Dutch, but the realization of that potential depends on protein quality. The mountain men whose diet consists mainly of dairy, eggs and meat, realized that potential and are on average taller than the Dutch and thus the tallest in the world. However, the people with the same genes living in the bigger cities and eating commercial crap that passes as food are actually on average some of the shortest in Europe. So, once again, diet (and maybe high CO2 from living in mountains) is elucidated as the main factor that drives height and possibly overall health. It would be interesting to also see longevity charts separated within the same population groups examined by the study. I bet the mountain men also live longer and have much lower incidence of chronic diseases. So, naturally the question is this - what is good quality protein vs. poor quality protein? Well, it's in the quotes below but basically animal protein rules and cereals/grains are crap. Tell that to the vicious vegan munching on a his heap of grass next to you in the cafeteria Finally, if people in B&H are expected to continue growing depending on their diet then we can chalk height - one of the holliest pillars of geneticism - off to diet and socioeconomis conditions. If height is not due to genes then I don't see much hope for the genetic theory of diseases. I suppose it also means we should all be focusing on animal protein to realize our genetic height potential, and Ray's assertions that he grew an inch and a half in his 40s due to using DHEA may be actually due to his insistence on consuming animal protein instead of plant one The mountains of giants: an anthropometric survey of male youths in Bosnia and Herzegovina | Open Science Move Over, Dutch Men. Herzegovinians May Be Tallest in World | American Council on Science and Health "...The Dutch are famous for windmills, impressive feats of geoengineering, and being tall and blonde. At a towering 183.8 cm (just over 6 feet tall), Dutch men are widely hailed as the tallest in the world. But new data suggests that men from regions within the Balkan country of Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) are even taller. The inhabitants of B&H display a large variation in average height. This is due to a combination of factors, such as genetics, religion, and socioeconomics. B&H is a multiethnic country, so the genetic background of its citizens is varied. Religion influences a person's dietary choices (e.g., Muslims avoid pork), while socioeconomic status affects the nutritional value of the food that a person can obtain. Just over half the population of B&H is Muslim, and the country is one of the poorest in Europe."

You would be mostly irritable or sad with water retention

It’s not so much the number of calories that has changed but their nature.

It might make you feel a bit more gay/bisexual because of the mania just like cocaine lol but it doesn't really change your orientation. It's better to have too much estrogen than not enough.

Not even. The height and build of people in the Far East only increase as their consumption of meat and dairy products increases. The same is true for sexual characteristics; for example, in Japan, the average breast size has increased significantly. The Dutch were once one of the shortest ethnic groups in Europe, and after World War II, they became one of the tallest in the world on average. In some parts of the Balkans where people consume a lot of animal protein, the average height of men is around 1.85 meters. Wherever meat consumption increases, life expectancy systematically increases, brain size increases, and body size and sexual characteristics increase. The transition to the Mesolithic period has been correlated with a decrease or regression in all these factors.

A guy rich in estrogen and low in testosterone would resemble a manic buoy with gynecomastia and erectile dysfunction.

If your Oedipus complex was poorly resolved, each scenario is different, but generally, a distant father and a close, somewhat lax, relationship with your mother will lead to a mixture of fear and guilt towards your father figure. Because you are "against" your father figure and by extension the entry into the symbolic order, this will trigger (all of this is unconscious) castration anxiety. Your sense of power will then serve to alleviate this castration anxiety, notably through identification (mimicry) with the father figure; not the assimilation of the phallic position! But rather its imitation as a cop for the castration anxiety. Ultimately, you will therefore feel that your optimal self, and what is expected of you as a man, is someone with very little libidinal expression (libidinal expression -> incestuous temptation -> conflict with the father and the symbolic order in general -> castration anxiety). You feel masculine within this system, but from the outside, you and people with a similar setup actually struggle to be psychologically phallic. You're relatively socially excluded (voluntarily), don't like being around women, and don't have children at around 40. You do what you want that's not the point; it's to show that, in reality, you're not particularly phallic, and that's what being masculine means. Not being lean, not being rich, not being handsome, not being depressed, not wearing shirts, not drinking whiskey and smoking cigars lol, etcetc but rather the phallic position, which is fundamentally a social position. When someone believes in a conflict between their gender role and socialization, it's a tendency toward obsessive-compulsive neurosis that's speaking. There are a lot of introverted girls; in fact, most of the stuff people say about gender is a projection of their own neurotic patterns, pulled out of their ass.

Behind every misunderstanding or paradox we perceive lies a ego crisis, with the potential to either suppress it or conversely to experience the emotion. It's always the same.

@EternalForest Because you lack masculinity. Masculinity is generally about suppressing/capturing anxiety. If you're boring and only manage to socialize with men, it's because you enjoy cultivating anxiety too much, like a gay friend but with more "typically masculine" topics. And you lack masculinity for the same reason you feel the need to specify "I am very masculine", which is that you don't want to suffer because you haven't understood something somewhere; You prefer cope. When you say, "Oh, I'm unhappy because I can't get anyone, I must have a bad belief system, blablabla help me," then you'll be masculine. In the purest sense of the word.

Everything you say about women is also true for men and vice versa.

That'll be crap too. Especially if it's just for a trip.

What do you narrate Congo is a country like any other except that the people are black and poorer. And Europe doesn't mean anything, it goes from Lisbon to Moscow, from the megalopolis of London to the small village in Moldova.

Does it excite you to see poor people lol. If you go to Europe, the cities can be very pretty and have modern infrastructures, there are activities to do, and you can ask locals to socialize with you. If you are American, you are also close to Japan and Thailand who are cool too. If you come to France, I can show you where to camp, fish, restaurants to go to, etc; If I had the money/time I could eventually hang out with you like a bro. Same in other countries with other members. But if you follow your crazy idea, you'll end up in some godforsaken place in the Congo, stuck in a hotel because there's nothing to do and it's dangerous; sighing, "Ohhh, if only I hadn't left Las Vegas."

Some decades ago a gang of psychopathic and sadistic Serbs allowed at most a handful of people in the world who had the means and were just as crazy as they were to kill people with impunity. On actualized.org/forum: RICH PEOPLE KILL POOR PEOPLE FOR PLEASURE; WEALTH MAKES PEOPLE DEMONIC. I CAN'T WAIT FOR ZOHRAN MAMDANI TO COLLECTIVIZE EVERYTHING. It's like a far-right clickbait but with rich people instead of arabs or black people.

Beer dosent taste alcohol, it's especially taste hop. The term "beer" is also meaningless; it depends on whether it's a blonde, a brown, or an amber ale, whether it's a pils, a lager, an IPA, a NEIPA etc. The brand matters too; there are some awful beers and some very good ones. It also depends on whether you're drinking it on its own or with food; beer goes well with most dishes, white wine with cheese or seafood, and red wine with other things. Because it's too sweet it doesnt taste good most of the time. A Coke or fruit juice is fine for a snack and/or when it's hot, especially for children; as an accompaniment to a meal it's already less good, even bad. it depends If you think like that humans are all pasta with ham and butter eaters. Anyone who eats anything other than pasta with ham and butter is a liar.

Why would you do that. Unless you bought sh** wine is expensive for only 10% of alcohol.