Schizophonia

When a guy here say that, i wonder if they did that at their date : -"🙂🍸" -"btw, i have something to admit in case we go together " -"Yes ?🧐 " -"I love receiving a finger in the anus while being in doggystyle 🤗😏" -"🤨" -"When I moan and stick out my tongue, thinking my prostate is being caressed, it's like I'm flying."😱 Some time later on Actualized... "You will discover that you shouldn't tell women the truth, that's the black pill you have to accept. "

"Telling women the truth." "The truth." Lol what on earth does that bullshit even mean?

Lol i just saw that https://nypost.com/2023/02/09/anti-aging-mogul-dumped-fiancee-after-she-got-breast-cancer/

Best excuse to try all the escorts girls of your city

Yes you're right by well being i meant happiness not confort. Yes but I'll tell you that it's because what matters is social relationships, money, stress, etc. While you propose idealistic assumptions; we're back to square one. Btw if you look at suicide statistics worldwide, there is no significant correlation between suicide and lifestyle. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_pays_par_taux_de_suicide#/media/Fichier:Map_of_countries_by_suicide_rate,_WHO_(2019).svg Worst than that; if you take the european map of suicide rate (https://partibreton.bzh/disparition-du-docteur-philippe-carrer-le-parti-breton-salue-le-travail-eclairant-de-lethnopsychiatre/carte-taux-de-suicide-en-europe/) you see that actually the areas with the lowest suicide rates are modern and densely populated regions. In France, the rural and sparsely populated west (Bretagne, Normandie...) has a high suicide rate, while Île-de-France—the wealthiest and most densely populated region, where Paris is located—has the lowest suicide rate. The same is true in Poland if you compare the rate in the Warsaw region to other, less developed regions; the same is true in Spain, Italy, Romania, and most countries except Germany, although the region around Berlin always has an "abnormally" low rate. Great Britain, which is quite densely populated and has one of the smallest and most closely packed houses in Europe, has one of the lowest suicide rates; despite the weather, lol. Conversely the highest rates are in Northern Europe and even (though not as clearly seen) in Russia, in supposedly traditional northern qnd eastern regions. The more traditional and sparsely populated the regions, the more people tend to commit suicide; the suicide rate in Moscow is one of the lowest in Russia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Taux_régionaux_de_suicide_en_Russie_(2015).png

Intelligence concerns the signifier, that is, the precision of linguistic structures. Bias, a lack of openness, concerns the signified, that is, the emotion that is sought consciously or unconsciously. Therefore, a person can be both "stupid" and highly biased—politics is essentially that lol—or, conversely, they can be open-minded. A person with excellent cognition can be open-minded, "neutral," or be extremely biased to the point of psychosis. For example, one of the most famous American white supremacists (William Luther Pierce) had a doctorate in physics; he wasn't just a neo-Nazi, he was particularly offensive, socially isolated, and basically completely unhinged. Yes, I see what you mean. It's easier to build and become entrenched in a paradigm when you have the cognitive abilities. But then it's also easier to get out of it.

Thank you for inflating my ego. You got 50 points in the Valentine's favorite Actualized MILFs competition. @Natasha Tori Maru, @Princess Arabia or @cjoseph90; Who will win my baguette heart ?

It doesn't seem pleasant; tobacco is a sweet spot, a little too much makes you numb and dizzy. Vikings must be very stressed people

The reason you symbolize something in general is that you need it, and that need is anxiety. For example, you talked about blackpill. If I truly, sincerely thought that women or men are X and that it's painful for me, then I would shift my attention elsewhere. It's logical, if something is annoying, I'm not going to keep focusing on it. So if I repeat ad nauseam "women/men are X," it's because beyond the negative feelings, it serves a need, and that need is survival/the survival of my ego. And the desire to maintain one's ego is anxiety. Ultimately, anxiety is a medical term for when it becomes problematic, but the underlying energetic dynamic is the same. Incidentally, one of the most effective anxiolytics, Buspirone, has a pharmacology very similar to 5-MeO-DMT.

All the girls who wanted a serious relationship with me and were nice were leftists, even though I'm not a leftist myself. Even when it comes to having children, in reality, the girls I've known (not dated, but generally associated with) who wanted children were mostly girls who were rather left-leaning/feminist. I remember the only time a girl ever directly approached me and said she wanted me(I haven't been very few social, especially recently), and boasted that she had been told I was "very nice," was a tall goofy Dutch leftist; and in the end, she changed her mind when she saw that I was right-wing.

If you are sexually/romantically shy, you can ask someone here to pick up with you; to do an energy, "persona" transfer.

I respond in my eddit People who ruminate a lot have a high degree of anxiety. It causes anxiety, but anxiety also makes you want to ruminate; it goes both ways, it's a vicious cycle. Anxiety: an egocentric echo chamber. Again, this isn't necessarily conscious, because we tend to only recognize high levels of anxiety (the anguish, the knot in the stomach) and suppress low-grade anxiety. Compulsive thoughts, rumination, even OCD symptoms are all forms of moderate anxiety.

Yes The choice of words betrays a bias; you are talking about decadence. Yes but there it is; you assume an idealistic cause and me a social one. Perhaps people would be happier if they could regularly go out and have drinks with friends, play sports, and generally engage in leisure activities. But for that you need time and money, and people also need not to be too neurotic/socially anxious. And why are people neurotic and socially anxious? How do we fix that? These are also social problems. I'm saying it was probably the same thing for the tribes and more primitives nations/peoples in general, and you yourself have implicitly admitted that the tribes could be warlike, at least partly for social reasons; because indeed in Germany in the 5th century BC there wasn't much to eat lol and so they had to defend their bread. So not out of idealism ("tribal thinking"). And it's probable that idealism in general is a form of coping mechanism for people at the bottom of the social hierarchy, or who unconsciously think they are (neurosis), but that's just speculation. Btw the evolution of human mental structures is indeed correlated with the evolution of technology and therefore indirectly with socio-economic structures/conditions.

And you you confound intelligence with anxiety. An anxious person will have a stronger ego, and indeed will therefore be less open. Anxiety is not the same as "stress" in the sense of having a knot in your stomach; it's more about the intensity of mental chatter, the obsessiveness.

It's called being not autist

Yes but here it's not about being objective like a historian, but about trying to prove to oneself that there was a more glorious era "in line with our true nature", and that therefore history is a progressive decline; as I said above, it's really Heideggerian. Nietzsche too, of course, he's really into that kind of delirium, but similarly Nietzsche was also basically a kind of loser who was bored; you just have to look at his biography. Marx and Engels were really quite strong and pleasure-loving men, the same goes for Victor Hugo (an activist, not an ideologue) in France, who frequented prostitutes extensively and even defended them, lol; many prostitutes even came to pay their respects at his funeral. The same is true for Jean Jaurès, he was relatively active. I'm talking about them because I know them fairly well; but these people were humanists and socialists, while the guys who glorify violence and primitivism are mostly just strange guys.

It's a profession, a job, regardless of the prerequisites. But yes there is a cult-like aspect to it. Okay but all these people no longer exist; they have been eliminated or eclipsed by more rational agents.

Don't get frustrated defending a supposed mental structure that has been eliminated from history; i never attaqued and will attack you personnaly. I suppose people get interested in this kind of thing when they're bored, that's why I talked about those guys because they're really the archetype of conservative bourgeois people who are bored with their lives and therefore start fantasizing. When you have a fulfilling social life, you no longer give a damn about these delusions and generally you become less conservative. Or rather, when you acknowledge your social needs; otherwise they are repressed (considered "forbidden") and you need an excuse (all of this is unconscious) to satisfy them; and this excuse involves submitting to a delusional, fascinating, generally reactionary system, even if this mindset may perhaps (undoubtedly?) exist among "queer" leftists.

It depends a lot on the tribes; when I was in high school I read a collection of history books and there was one that talked about tribes; there were even "agnostic" tribes; there was really all sorts of things. but in the meantime all the most warlike tribes have disappeared. The Iroquois and most North American tribes have disappeared, the Aztecs were so unbearable that all the surrounding tribes rushed to side with the Spanish, the Incas have disappeared, the Vikings have disappeared and were gradually assimilated or exterminated in the former colonies in Great Britain and France, the Huns have disappeared, the Mongols are now a ridiculous power. They all died because when you live in a state of belligerence and delusion, or simply due to a nomadic lifestyle, the population is generally small and you regularly end up in intertribals war; or against other nations. For somewhat the tacit same reason (preservation/restoration of a primordial way of thinking closer to nature blablabla) Heidegger lowkey supported Nazism; but then Nazism created the biggest conflict in history, and now Germany is a minor power that is being ethnically replaced by non-whites (I say this without hatred, I'm not a white supremacist). The Celtic tribes were barbaric by our standards but not particularly warlike by the standards of the time, and the samurai were not a tribe or a nation but a profession in a completely sedentary and modern society.

@Breakingthewall It looks like a René Guenon or Evola's delirium. In reality people are busy surviving and interacting with their families or friends Including in nomadic tribes, even though they have their own spirituality.

Simply use the other person for pleasure; imagine people, especially women, as objects to touch/manipulate, to play with, as long as you're not breaking the law; so from now on what the other person thinks doesn't matter, take what you want to take and if the other person doesn't want to, go somewhere else. For socio-historical-patriarchal-whatever reasons, men have less self-love than women and tend to act in a more ego-driven/neurotic way, in other words masochistic way; so you might tell yourself, "Oh, that went well, but she friend-zoned me!" but in reality, you're the one pretending the relationship was more significant than it actually was. People here are a bit misogynistic and claims that women are "illogical" are actually masochistic people, and it's fortunate that women are less receptive to this mindset; it serves as a safety valve.

Ok Me i am Gemini with Virgo rising and Moon in Leo, and I have a life path number 7; nice to meet you. Yes I have aunts in those domains 😏

I was saying that I share my mentor's opinion on all these kinds of sciences (astrology, numerology, palm reading, tarot, etc.); I'm against all these paradigms because it's restrictive. But actually in principle (non duality all that) I'm not against them, It's more of an "yes but".

It’s my Gemini side

You can judge a tree by its fruit. It's probably partly because I'm already very open-minded, but giving psychedelics so much weight, even considering them equal to or superior to psychotherapy is in my opinion delusional I don't believe it for a second. You can have good insights under the influence of psychedelics, but it's rare, it depends on the psychedelic, and it requires a significant intellectual effort during and after the trip.