Schizophonia

Otherwise just read some solid sociology or even psychoanalysis.

A cam business with girls that has earned him legal complaints, and a sale of "online formation"... Narcissism doesn't work, and if it does, it's usually a scam or a crappy business that worked out by sheer luck for the person involved; selling training courses, dropshipping, YouTube videos, sometimes even selling drugs (lol); always easy money. If you want to produce something of quality, something you'll truly be proud of, it requires embracing a love for the object, for a job well done, which is the opposite of narcissistic delusions.

Because you're confusing ego with energy. And you're confusing the two because you're too identified with objects—I'd even say perspectives—that require a lot of ego like personal development, politics, before PUA etc. If you lack objects of libidinal investment you will lose energy; and that's what will happen if your ego drops a little because you will lose interest in these objects and will be lost. Healthier people/people with less ego do more holistic things, it's just the level of density of the objects that changes. Perhaps your dream would be to go to Montana and ride horses; becoming a horseman is a simple yet stylish accomplishment that suits people with a strong prefrontal cortex. Or making a video game since you've worked in that field; always a solid accomplishment.

Fotrtunately that KENNY WEST, KIM KARSASHIAN, and OWEN COOK are on Earth with their big egos. What would we do without them

But it's rubbish stuff. And that's cherry-picking because you'll see that in any field those who do the most have a smaller ego. In philosophy for exemple --since that's my field-- I don't know anyone known for particularly having a big ego. Or they're precisely "modern philosophers" who are actually pretty bad.

Yes but that's an isolated example and he's just a singer. You said that people with "small egos" do nothing whereas I say that on average they accomplish more because a small ego is correlated with a love of work. Metaphysically people don't like work because it's a loss of self. Moreover, what differentiates humans from chimpanzees is a much smaller ego and generally more pro-sociable behavior; and humans are much more intelligent and accomplish much more than chimpanzees. I think that by strong ego you basically means narcissism(and neurosis), that is to say using one's self-image as a libidinal object

No these are very real accomplishments. When you have surgery it's very real, when you do craftsmanship it's very real, when you write great books it's very real. Except for Musk (and you're the one who claims he has a particularly strong ego for some reason) this must be a compilation of the least useful and beloved personalities of the 21st century and strangely you present them as if they were great achievers lol.

? Which of these people saves lives, makes pretty and/or usefull objects, creates concepts; or are simply very happy.

Delete your "work" history; see yourself as attention shifting to one object or another, due to conditioning. To be a doctor, you need to enjoy shifting your attention to intelligent, holistic objects; holism is the quality of a "weak ego." If you prefer a more traditional profession, it's because you prefer having the time to shift your attention to other objects, generally of equal or lesser density. It's also difficult to speak of a "strong ego" since there are many objects with which the ego identifies, like a rhizome; there are dense objects that capture attention and less dense objects that allow attention to move higher in the holarchy, specifically to that group of objects. I could find a more effective way to describe this. So a person can be very intelligent when it comes to politics but the opposite when it comes to women or vice versa; to give an example.

Only Musk amount the 4 has accomplished signifiant things and he doesn't have such a big ego; he's a fairly calm, open and hard-working guy. In any case, he is by far the one with the smallest ego of the 4 and the one who accomplishes the most.

Probably not because introversion is associated with lower brain volume, autism, and most mental illnesses.

Degree of holism. By shifting your attention to larger holons it will automatically shift less attention to smaller ones, but you still gain that larger holon. So yes as I told Leo just to troll a little if you want to do not-so-intelligent things it's better to have a strong ego; If you want to do intelligent things it's better to have a weak ego. "Weak ego" in this definition doesn't mean low energy; the energy level is something else entirely. If you do nothing it means you have little subjective energy or you lose a lot of it because of repetitive behaviors, neurosis, learned helplessness... It's another thing.

To write or read crappy self-help books, you need a strong ego, because otherwise you'd see the emptiness and it would bore you. To read or write great philosophy, or become a doctor—anything highly intelligent, complex, meticulous—you need a weak ego.

Achievers in what. A person with a "weaker ego" (wants to be right less, has less attachment than average to similar objects) than average will just do other things.

@CARDIZO In this photo you look like a giga chad with hollow cheeks

Do you mean you took Olanzapine in the purpoe to sleep or it was just a positive secondary effect. I would never have the idea to take an antipsychotic to sleep except maybe quetiapine.

@Sugarcoat

Leo and the people here are not Marxists, but they talk about "WAGE SLAVERY"

Oh stop that i'm going to begin to blush. Thoughts Ofc you can

I recognise some french words

Ethic group, call it as you want. Of course individually most Black or Arab people are as approachable as anyone else. But collectively they are less so whatever the cause (genetics, culture and collective unconscious in general...), they commit more crimes and offenses, and people don't want to see their city ethnically replaced anyway because white people are too neurotic and impoverished to have children and because their city is full of migrants. But there's no racism here, it's not a question of hostility but simply of atavism.

Nick Fuentes is typically neurotic.

I'd say it's rather paranoia. I'm just saying that white people want to remain among themselves, and if there is extra-European immigration it should be marginal and should be content with individuals who are worthwhile. I don't have any bizarre ideas here, my ideas are refined. Idk

Eheh

The less neurotic and/or depressed people are, the more children they have.