Schizophonia

If you don't respect yourself or have been accustomed to mistreatment, you will naturally consider it normal to apply this to others. You project what must be symbolized and what must be symbolized is not accepted; we are aware of the danger. So here you are, creating a thread saying "ahhhhh look Sadghuru, he's really an idiot, he says this and that" rather than thinking about whether you like him or not. It's like going to the trouble of going to the ice cream seller to tell him "you're an idiot selling coconut ice cream; coconut isn't even good, and it pollutes because it comes from far away, and milk isn't vegan, and it makes people fat, and blah blah blah blah" I don't care about Sadghuru, but why, instead of enjoying yourself eating muffins, do you talk badly about Sadghuru. Why do you have the compulsion to post on this thread instead of choosing the other infinite number of things you have the possibility to do right now. Real interesting question; always the same mirror effect.

This is why it is all the more important to become communist and to create states that will collectivize the added value generated by AI; your solution is to maintain the plutocracy under the pretext that eventually, if you are lucky, you can rise socially. So not only do I think AI seems overrated and very energy-intensive/non ecological; but new technologies are also technically increasingly inhuman and should be controlled because the human ego has been the same since the Paleolithic. A book always feels more enjoyable than YouTube videos or worst shorts even if they are more addictive, a city center with lots of people and shops always feels more enjoyable than a fucking supermarket etcetc.

@Sincerity And the energetic truth of this forum is that it's a place to be weird and lazy. Productive people have no place on a personal development forum; it would be like a 70kg guy going to a obesity clinic. So as soon as you start writing big, intelligent posts like this one, or the one you wrote last time about being a blind mole or something like that, no one's going to respond to you, because it requires too much mental effort to even read. Almost no one here is an intellectual; there is a gap between the energy that the post claims and the energy of the egregor, and even between the energy of you and the energy that this post claims, because ultimately you are mirroring us.

In anal sadistic compulsion/regression neurosis, since the phallic position is inhibited, you will use excrement as a substitute for the phallus. So instead of choosing someone you like like a good vanilla ice cream (the phallus could be called "object a" in Lacan), you will prefer people with certain flaws that remind you of excrement and anal sadistic issues in general.

If a PhD had to be revolutionary, no one would be a PhD.

Indeed I come from a region where men play rugby and call each other "my bunny," lol. I, in particular, am also relatively uninhibited because I don't have a problem being confrontational.

Owen is fat and metrosexual I'm pretty sure he doesn't get any results except here and there forcing himself with unattractive girls.

Lol this scavenger

Asslicker

I'm not autistic at all.

Yea I didn't notice autism here. Repeatedly taps his head with his hand*

I mean people who post here and live far away (Europe/Asia). If someone lives in Las Vegas or nearby, it makes sense to eventually see you.

Twisted

Yes, but you'll end up with asslickers, not friends or even normal clients.

What do you mean by "when". One second ? One year ? One millennium ? If there is no ego then there is no time.

You also have to find candidates, which is not easy since the alternatives to the Democrats are clearly marginal. That's why they are loosers.

Because people are used to voting for the Democrat and/or because he is already associated with socialists. Idk

it's nothing. For me, something embarrassing is like pooping on yourself.

What do you mean

This argument alone humiliates physicalism. 😸

There is only one round, so almost everyone votes for the two parties for the sake of a useful vote.

I'm planning to write a thread about this. Deleuze said that libido has two poles: a "schizoid-revolutionary" pole and a "paranoid" pole. A predominance of the paranoid pole will induce masochistic tendencies. These can be particularly twisted fetishes, but they can be more subtle, like interracial sex, less attractive women, more dominant women, etc. Either dominant but still "reduced" (because the woman is of non-ideal quality), or clearly dominated; in any case, feel a sense of "reduction". With a failure to fantasize about "ideal" women. Just like this.

Both

What triggers hornyness for you ?