Schizophonia

https://www.16personalities.com/fr/résultats/entj-a/m/4mbb4s2t8 Lolz, it says i'm ENTJ; I don't know why. I often found the questions unclear.

It's very good but i still wait to see what this will get as political outlet. Bernie Sanders barely got more than half of Joe Biden's vote in the 2020 Democratic primaries; and that's still soft socialism. Idk, a less clivant republican will both takes trumpist votes and those of people who could have voted republican but have been disgusted by trump figure.

It's the karma.

Social networks and work.

She suffer from depersonalization/derealisation, is under neuroleptic, and even if we stick to the relationship problem she is not sociable and has its own psychic flaws in general which can generate unwanted results in this area; As everyone else. Look how you jump on her answer to force your paradigm.

But Kamala is not really on the left, it is essentially a liberal. When I speak on the left, I speak of a real Marxist paradigm, or at least anti-capitalist in general; Not only play the card of wokism.

In your world. He's speaking from a relational point of view, I think.

This is always the case. To give a materialistic perspective, for a change, lol; there's a reason why our central nervous system chose to be interested in spirituality rather than bonatics, big cars, or cinnamon apple pies (yum). There came a time when the energy shifted there, and there had to be a logic, an algorithm to explain this direction, and this was a survival logic; human logic. The more "spiritual" someone is, the more one might suspect that anything that doesn't fall under spirituality, that is, from a childish point of view, a language of submission based on castration anxiety, is forbidden. (Hence the fact that spirituality is generally a women's affair, with slightly neurotic men at the top of the pyramid.) And this prohibition will create an avoidance of social relationships and/or love and/or sex. Since the cause of the ban is painful (I'm sure that if I post love poems or things like that, even if it's not my personal thing, you and many others will cringe), a persona that doesn't involve this threat will be compulsively maintained by mental discourse, even if it seems pessimistic. Of course, there are many couples who love each other and are very romantic, I see them everywhere; but this can trigger feelings of discomfort and anger about my more or less conscious sense of dissatisfaction and the trauma I've experienced. So I can also turn my head toward other mirrors, people who seem to be together out of spite or something like that, and ruminate on how all of this isn't love for one reason or another, because even if it's pessimistic, it still hurts less, subconsciously, than being confronted with reality. Often, pessimism, rigidity, is a strategy developed during development to avoid falling into psychiatric decompression; because again, for the ego, survival is what matters most. You didn't just say that; you also wrote a paragraph about how women are eternal adolescents and that it would be better to be in the gulag than to be a woman who lives in attention. It's certainly motivated by aggression, but still hidden beneath layers of rationalization where you escape into your persona as a spiritual seeker. Not even because you'd like to be in the woman's place, but because you suffer from your lack of relationships, even in the male role, if you know what I mean, but it's illegal in your system. Spiritual -> Submission strategy; Prohibition of complaining, of rebelling, of having a libidinal agenda (sex, love, money, involvement in politics, social connections in general, partying). Again, no matter how we get lost in layers of language, in the end, there are only strategies of survival, of power.

@Breakingthewall It's a projection. Generally, spirituality attracts people who dislike matter and other human beings. Even if it's repressed, and even though I love spirituality, it's fundamentally a twisted strategy to gain power. It usually begins early in childhood during the Oedipus complex (omitting other possible scenarios during the transition to the phallic stage); an overly powerful father, a love-hate relationship exaggerated, and you end up with a negative preconception about social and romantic relationships that you obsess over; this is inscribed in the self-concept. The goal of persuading oneself that relationships are bad begins very early and is a unconscious strategy to avoid oedipal temptation, and generally it's a sign of poor superego development; comorbid with other obsessive-compulsive neurotic tendencies. If you want proof to the contrary, abandon the idealistic mirrors and turn to the materialistic ones. Spiritual people are actually the least filled with love.

Mea culpa yea i was unnecessary aggressive (I was in the anima ) But yes, there are people with low economic and social status and/or physical appearance who are cool just about everywhere, and vice versa. There's a self-flagellated self-concept behind these stories.

I am a scammed scammer.

It's paranoid; There are plenty of 60 IQ human trash who have girlfriends.

You have to want love it. And the ego is very strong.

Yes, but you have no passions and you even take antipsychotics instead of anxiety medication. Happiness lies in social connections and building a tomorrow. No duality, no suffering, but no enjoyment either.

Can you give an idea of Peter Raltson techniques ? 🤔

I know tons of communist thinkers; They're by far the most rigorous. The far left, in general, is where the intellectual level is the highest, even if I don't like some of the ideas that are quite common in this milieu (laxity with justice and immigration, typically). Whereas it's quite weak on the right and basically completely nonexistent among liberals.

There is no left in the United States to win back the popular vote.

What do you call Junk ? There isn't a single day that goes by where I don't eat a good amount of refined starch/sugar or oil in various forms lol (white pastas/rice, oils/butter, chips, fries, cakes, bread, pizza, sandwiches, candy, soda...); I just recently replaced the coke with sparkling water.

@Sugarcoat @Breakingthewall @Salvijus It's funny because the more time passes, the more I see things in a non-dual way. For example, when someone talks to me about "cars," rather than simply quickly embracing the concept of "car" as something obvious and obligatory, I'll view it with greater detachment and contemplate the absurdity of investing in something relative. What? You "like" "driving" "a car," a "block" of "metal" that "moves"? And there are plenty of people who like "cars." If you see what i mean.

There is nowhere to go.

I eat junk food all the time. I just eat enough nutritious foods on the side and sometimes take vitamins.

Eheh.

Yes.

My post was a little aggressive mea culpa.

I don't understand why you say that children and animals are closer to non-duality while at the same time you tacitly imply that they are more positivist than adults. The older and more mature you are, the more you realize the complexity of the world, the closer you feel to others, and the closer you come to a non-dual state. Unless you're crazy; You talk about psychosis, but precisely psychotics live in a fantasy world. Children are closer to psychosis than adults. I thought it was clever to say that stimulation = mental discourse in the constitution of the sense of self, that's all. It's a punctual reaction.