Schizophonia

When I speak of an object, I don't mean only an "external physical object," as we can intuitively think about, but symbols in general; Lacan would speak of the symbolic order. The taste of a beer is a symbol; yet it is clearly "inside" and beyond the "physical" (I use quotation in relation to non-duality).

One way to look at it is that men are also pathological but project it whenever they can. Sometimes men aren't phallic; men need to eat food, and quite a lot of it, to slee, etc; you actually need food and sleep to be stronger, to ultimately be phallic eheh. But in a social context, the perception of lack is projected onto women,a car to use, a nation to save, etc. That's why men seem more stoic; the problem, the lack (of phallus), what you call madness is more projected onto the object.

lol, what do you mean

That will be on my journal or my thread on Hinge.

Yea it's a bit the ultimate "holon"

Freud didn't say that; men are just as crazy as women but the expression tends to be different. (hysteria vs. obsessive...)

Actually I was lazy and made the thread in one or two hours; if I'd taken a day or a week it would probably have been much longer and more complicated ahah. But ty. It basically means not to push too hard/to give up self love.

I want to clarify that in all cases the object of desire is a phallic mirror, even for a man. So, whether it's a male friend or a woman who is phallicized—that is, you're having sex while pulling her hair, etc. When you have sex with a woman, she becomes a phallic mirror; she no longer has any problems or needs.

The girl's issues are your business. When you take charge of a woman and her problems, you're in a masculine position. If you force or pressure her, you're creating the opposite situation, usually for neurotic reasons because obviously it's not pleasant for anyone and it won't work. If it does work, because the girl has guilt issues or something like that, you're putting yourself in danger because sooner or later you'll be cheated on. You'll be the guy she dates because he's "objectively good," and then in the end, your wife will cheat on you and experience orgasms like she never has with a random guy because he's significantly a better phallus for her. It's not a question of doing or not doing it, but of why you do it, of perspective. In the idea of self-improvement, this element of language can have a neurotic, self-centered dimension, which is indirectly feminizing. What's the difference between a guy who takes magic mushrooms to "fix" himself and a woman or a gay man who gets sodomized, lol? What's the difference between a guy who tries to improve himself in the sense of going from "not good enough" to "good enough" and a woman or a gay man who wears makeup, fake nails, a crop top, etc.? It's about unconsciously seeing yourself as a problem to be solved, instead of the other person/the object. Hence the misogyny and denial in obsessive-compulsive neurosis, because a woman, and even other men in general, don't care about your personal development, how mature, "nice," "overly self-aware," and so on, you are; about this "self-image." Again, it's like a gay man saying, "Did you see my croc top? It's nice, isn't it? 😏👄" Okay, lol, fine. People expect you to have a generally phallic posture, that is to say, confident and/or reassuring and/or funny and/or rich and/or a good sports/games partner, etc. I say "people" because men also expect you to be phallic, not because they aren't phallic, but because the vision of you as a phallic mirror is satisfying. That's the principle of 'friendship'. I don't particularly adhere to Freud; I naturally use his epistemology in particular because it's very pure and effective. If tomorrow I find more effective linguistic elements, I'll adopt them. 😏 I'm generally cerebral but yes Ditto Best martingale

No. When you play Mario Bros, you're playing at perceiving lack (being on level one, starting a storyline where something "goes wrong") and at bringing back the phallus (completing levels and winning). It's the same for a woman; she's full of voids/lack, and you're playing at erasing them. The more neurotic you are, the less masculine you are, because you identify directly with lack; like you want it. When you ruminate on tik tok it's neurotic for example; you're not playing with the lack of a third object as a phallic tool, you're playing at embodying the lack yourself. You want to growl.

No.

It disappeared because of ethnic and nationalist conflicts. A bit like Austria-Hungary, the USSR, or the British Empire.

baguette

I don’t know Riviere but indeed I looked at some Lacan works, my paradigm here is probably influenced by him even if I mainly stick to Freudian language elements Ahah no it’s complicated in general. Deleuze is even way worst 😬

Lol I hope not

At first I thought it was a girl, because it reminds me of the name "Jeanne" in french.

Indeed we can go back to the Paleolithic era. Top super

Thankfully, they number over a billion and possess vast resources. And it's a semi-planned economy.

I was originally counting on something more organic but I really want a girlfriend; so I intend to advance my pawns before I can even settle in a big city but I don't have many photos to help me stand out; as the great man Joseph Goebbels said we remain faithful to the truth as long as it is useful to us Has anyone here ever used AI to generate photos where you look sociable.

Mirror effect

Idk lol.

Plagiat of @Judy2

That's called being a craftsman, it's like that all over the world and that's why they generally vote for the right.

We need both more or less.

real woman ❤️