-
Content count
6,959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Schizophonia
-
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
You will develop intestinal problems and deficiencies if you rely primarily on beans, 100% guaranteed It's also disgusting. They are also smaller and have lower IQ. -
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
No, it don't. You can eventually say it's a more or less holistic pov from one of the four quadrants of ken wilber. -
For the pleasure of heavy flirting as usual. Btw i can stop that and keep it in pm if it's a problem. It doesn't matter.
-
I didn't read op post before my response. I take back what i said.
-
Do what you want π I just wanted to tease you a bit. I never eat spread myself.
-
I read the topic, no it wouldn't work it's too much.
-
You have the right to want to be jealous, just like you have the right to want to be girly in general.
-
It's just any spread. Then joke aside it is incorporated here and there into a balanced diet.
-
@Sugarcoat I went to supermarket and felt on this. Itβs clearly a sign of god to say you to buy it, for extra dopamine and kg of sweetness for the visual pleasure of a certain french wizard. 100% guaranteed.
-
I see.
-
How things are going ?
-
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Yes, it's on the conclusion to have we're disagree. It's not only a difference we do between different species but also between humans : You don't treat your mother the same way you treat a random 50yo woman, and you don't treat a non attractive girl the same way you treat an attractive girl. Why ? Nothing it's there for your survival or not, it's a purely adaptive process. Animals are used for their meat, eggs, milk, and possibly their labor; all animals do that. You don't have neither, the only real fundamental reason why we don't treat you like an animal is because as a human you are part of the community and have a power relationship that an animal does not have; An animal does not pay taxes and cannot conspire against its employer. You can't do anything against another human being and to protect your own interest you will wish for yourself a society with justice, but a justice that secures cohabitation with potentially threatening factors, that is to say other humans! Not animals. Life is a power relationship between libidinal forces, no matter how much you feel the need to protect your ego by drowning this phenomenon in additional layers of concepts like veganism, humanism, egalitarianism or whatever. It is actually you who is the most self-centered in this story; you live in the split, negatively connote the object according to ideological and abstract criteria in order to be able to identify yourself in fine with the good, turning the camera towards yourself and congratulating yourself is the way in which you are encouraged to enjoy in this context. In my position, there is no narcissism at all, just hovering desires projected on external objects. The less selfish a desire is, the more regressive and narcissistic it is in fact. -
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Because dogs are used as pets, we have been neurologically and psychologically conditioned to see them as such. Pasture animals have no other use than to be eaten. In fact, some animals that are selected to be pets, such as dogs or cats, are sometimes still eaten in some places in the world. -
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
In reality, as the anti-black pill are in fact mentally blackpilled in denial and in mirror with those who identify with it, the anti-vegans are mentally vegans in denial, and who project their regression. It's all a question of context, how the split of the self is made; On one side hysterical vegans who suddenly become phallic for example in politics (liberals), and on the other anti-vegans (phallic here) but let themselves go to their defense mechanism in politics and become hysterical conservatives ruminating on the blackpill or whatever. In the end, the vegan/non-vegan battles are essentially a game of mirrors where neurotics throw their poop in each other's faces, a big poop fight. It's not about being vegan, omnivorous or carnivorous, it's not about diet; it's about identification and libidinal transference onto diet. -
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Ps : Aggression comes from the pleasure of hurting the signifier on which the castration anxiety is projected. It is a mechanism inherited from the anal sadistic stage, where Freud noticed that children could obtain power and differentiate themselves (build their ego !) by refusing to shit where they should and shitting where they shouldn't. -
Schizophonia replied to Whitney Edwards's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Something (Oedipus complex, trauma, authoritarian education, modern comfort...) happened in such a way that the psyche developed around a significant castration anxiety (fear of being destroyed, amputated, humiliated...). As the post-phallic phase libido generates castration anxiety, it is diverted towards lower but effective schemes so that the psyche can function in the direction of pleasure. To speak very concretely, this means that instead of essentially enjoying through sex, food, sport and "normal" things, you will behave more like a psychotic person and invest your libido in imaginary signifiers and in general imaginary games, far from the principle of reality ; Hygiene, politics, personal development, spirituality, humanitarianism, all these are fields of activity rich in neurotic people. We are all more or less in "regressive psychosis", in the imaginary, otherwise we would all basically be psychopaths but an overinvestment in the imaginary indeed generates very "idealistic" people (vegans, religious, political activists) generally with "paradoxically" a aggressiveness because the phalic desire ("egoistic") is transferred, projected because repressed by the anxiety of castration. One thing that must be understood is that the egoistic/altruistic split and the split of the object in general is an illusion, the nervous system is nothing but logical, rational when it comes to guaranteeing its survival. It is in fact a defense mechanism that allows one to project one's castration anxiety onto the other. But fundamentally there is only selfishness, the real divide is "objective" and dichotomises phallic people, especially men (money, sex, cars, watches, love, manual work, passion...), and people who prefer to enjoy themselves more via regressive schemata. This is why you can turn a vegan into a meat eater, an anti-racist into a racist, make a religious person abandon his religion etc. with enough xanax or alcohol lol, because whatever the ego thinks in the end all that is only anxiety, and coping with it. -
Op doesn't want to work.
-
Schizophonia replied to Sugarcoat's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Thanks for your pov. -
It looks like a Weston Price recommendation ahah.
-
Schizophonia replied to Sugarcoat's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Sorry if i sound stupid lol π but i can't seem to get it, to connect to your way of thinking and therefore paradigm, if you see what i mean. I see things like that : In one way or another "i" (god ? consciousness ? divine camera ?) arrived in a field of experience, i can more or less "grasp", discriminate, recognize these dimensions of experiences. These experiences are made up of other experiences that are also conceptualize. For example i have to deal with "3D" which itself is made up of "Euclidean geometry", "distance" etcetc and is intertwined with parallel games like "color" or "song". At the moment the most apparent big game is that i am an "human" who "posts" "from" "a" "computer" "on" "Actualized" "while" "drinking" "an orange" "juice", and sometimes use "google translate" when tired which means that like @Sugarcoat my "i" in my sentences are mysteriously capitalized. (π) Jokes asides then i can play try to remember why and how of all this mess and why not change the game by manifesting stuff, it also seems that if "me" dies i will change the game. I have games that I can easily leave because of my level of consciousness ("I" as an adult do not play the same games as "I as a child"), others that sometimes come back in force without me noticing and sometimes seem uninteresting (political example) but this concerns very imaginary games. Classic games (3d...) always seem very real/relevant, it's here. Do you mean that with enough consciousness 3d will disappear? Or rather that it will become intangible? Like i will see my computer, my house, the city, the maya in general into its usual form insofar as normal human experience, but the "logic of 3 dimensions" will seem unreal and lose its substance? Is this what you call emptiness? Why are you looking for awakening? Is it a game in itself or is it ultimately always part of a usual game from a human point of view? (because it would help you feel good, to manifest things in one way or another) -
Even hyperactive and/or seminal-retaining people wouldn't do something like that, regardless of the amount of women or the fact of lying like that. This is manic behavior and it's not surprising because Huberman has a history of playing with nootropics. People who are particularly attracted to hygiene and engineering tend to be neat freaks ; Look at Connor Murphy, Tony Huge, Leo Longevity, Elon Musk...
-
I had the more advanced insights on 5 MeO MIpt. 5 MeO DMT seems to be the best, but i'm too afraid by past experience.
-
Clearly Turquoise if we put aside ego backslash.
-
Schizophonia replied to Sugarcoat's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Breakingthewall Can you describe what you mean by self, self dissolution, void etc ? I am not interested in spirituality from that angle, so i fail to understand, but i am interested. I need to be accompanied in understanding. -
No.