Schizophonia

agree do you have sources? I'm interested Statins are a last resort I wasn't saying that in relation to atherosclerosis, I wanted to know if with the same lifestyle (difficult to qualify), a "carnivorous" diet would decrease or increase the markers of inflammation. The testimonies that I have seen here and there are contradictory.

you are right I may be confusing it with "white widow", but someone told me that this variety was "going to freeze me". lol

You are right, by meat I also meant fish. In fact, I saw a pharmacist doctor on a forum explain that humans were hunters of fish, shellfish and small game (thus white meat, low in heme iron...). Probably true, I didn't do more research. This is precisely the problem I didn't know, maybe. Do you have a link ? It is not Vitamin A but beta-carotene, which is only a precursor. You need at least double the amount of beta carotene to get the same plasma retinol boost. You must be careful to consume plants particularly rich in BC (which do not exist in nature, such as carrots or sweet potatoes) on a daily basis or almost daily, assuming that you do not have genetics that drastically reduce your ability to conversion, which is recurrent (BCO1 Gene) https://www.xcode.life/23andme-raw-data/beta-carotene-conversion-vitamin-a/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353293/ Do you have proof or do you draw this example from the opinion of certain doctors or vegan speakers on ideological documentaries? The recommended amount of B12 is 2/3 mcg per day, roughly the equivalent of a small steak per day, assuming full bioavailability. How do you expect to have the equivalent by eating wild plants (which by the way? most edible plants contain little cobalt, and it is accused of being carcinogenic), where perhaps bacteria have consumed and metabolized a little of cobalt in b12? As a reminder, the most recognized theories are simply that B12 passes through the food chain from insects to larger carnivorous/omnivorous animals, and that large herbivores and especially ruminants obtain theirs by fermenting large amounts (several kilos per day of raw greens ) quantities of plants more or less rich in cobalt in their digestive system. Before releasing the arguments of certain marginal vegan personalities remember that Game Changer, WhatTheHealth and other documentaries were produced by screenwriters of cinemas, that their speakers are controversial compared to the rest of the members of the medical system, and that their diffusion is allowed and protected by the legislation of a country so liberal (partly rightly) that it allows the presence of a lot of sects on its territory. So the only important and easily accessible sources remain animals. You may not be deficient by consuming certain algae, my point is that this is not proof that humans are fundamentally adapted to a herbivorous diet. looks like a nightmare I target personalities like McDougall who insist that protein or calcium deficiency "does not exist" as if that argument were enough, avoiding applying the same logic to carbohydrates. It's not that you'll be technically deficient, it's mainly partially orally available peptides/proteins, the consumption of which has additional benefits. What animals? The most intelligent animals do not exceed the cognitive capacities of a 6-year-old homo sapiens child, and they are all at least omnivorous (pig, dog, dolphins, etc.) I mean, there can't be a healthier modern diet than the paleo diet. If you manage to demonstrate, without possible refutation, that for example a vegan diet is healthier and more pleasant than a paleo diet, then there is a good chance that the vegan diet is the real paleo diet. Vegetables, even cooked and well prepared, can be unpleasant/irritating to the intestines, cause gas, etc. even cooked, they also have an unattractive taste. No civilization eats beans or whole grains unless they are very well prepared (fermentation, soaking, robust cooking...). Humans produce a lot of amylase, but it may simply be an epigenetic modification (due to the consumption of starches), or an adaptation to the digestion of animal muscle glycogen, short polysaccharides (sucrose ) or simply easy plant starches It's true, and precisely that doesn't pose a problem for him. Now can you eat several pounds of vegetables or just pounds of cooked starches a day for your 2000 to 3000 calories a day as a human? I tried to go on a HCLF diet at 3000 calories a day, the most unpleasant diet I have ever done in my life. Not necessarily, maybe even the opposite if your meat is lean. There is also more "unnecessary" calorie loss with amino acids than with glucose. It's more or less equivalent after all +I bought tamari a few weeks ago, it's quite boring to peel and it's not very dense in terms of calories, yet it's much more appealing than biting into an avocado or raw starches. So this argument does not seem so obvious that !a. South West of France Organ meats can taste relatively good (example: raw fresh beef liver), but it is much less attractive than muscle meat, and this is more of a problem (muscle meat is rich in zinc, but organs such as the liver are too rich in copper, can also create an excess of vitamin A and can be other problems). I believe that the majority of large predators including humans are adapted and prefer muscle meat, and that other smaller predators in the food chain are scavengers and eat organs etc down to microorganisms that devour bones , part of the cartilages etc. I don't know if it's true, but I seem to have seen somewhere that white people had higher ferritin because of the progressive adaptation to a higher consumption of dairy products and therefore of calcium compared to the meat (calcium blocks the absorption of iron). To be taken with tweezers. Agree. anything that allows more calories would have helped brain development, I just wanted to say that the consumption of fish rich in certain fatty acids was necessary for its structural evolution. Lol Kidding aside, these guys are in poor health. They may look "ok" on google photos but if you watch the videos you see the destruction. They also wear loose clothing to hide muscle wasting. If you say that you are probably around 400/500mg/dl Have you tested an index measuring inflammation (CRP Reactive for example) or even a test verifying if you have developed artherosclerosis? This is what high LDL scores in particular are supposedly correlated with.

I've never tried oral cannabis, but I'm "afraid" of the long half-life.

I bought CBD to see if it would help with my sleep, do you think it might be enough even if there is 0 CBD? to what extent? A priori I will simply smoke in a joint, maybe add hash to increase the strength. I can also have cannabis with HHC, have you tried? A friend tells me it's great

Spot on I play so I'm a bit extreme about the fact that we are "carnivorous", obviously we ate everything we could find for more calories including plants. You can be vegan and be healthy, I just tease them by childishly showing why I'm skeptical. No need to have headaches

A meat-based diet. Mostly B12, EPA/DHA, Vitamine A. But also Choline, Zinc, L-Carnitine, Taurine and simply a good amount of protein. You can say that the nutrients just above are present in sufficient quantities in a vegan diet, or that they are not "essential nutrients" but: 1) It's hypocritical because vegans are all (or almost) pro-high carbs, exogenous carbohydrates are also not "essential" in absolute terms. 2) Just because you're not deficient in something doesn't mean low intake isn't a problem. A low intake of the above nutrients will decrease your mental and physical performance. No, it's literally the centerpiece. No omega 3 EPA/DHA, no human brain development Moreover, animal products are the most calorically dense in nature, there were no particularly caloric plants in Paleolithic Africa apart from certain fruits and tubers. I've also posted several links that show that the demographic expansion of homo sapiens and his hominid ancestors significantly influenced the fauna of southern africa, as well as links showing that civilizations like the valley civilization industry was probably meat-based. Ditto If science (if that means anything) "proves" that a diet is healthier and it's irrefutable, then it's more likely that it's just our view of the paleo diet that's wrong. Luckily ha ha I'm not against carbohydrates, fruits and natural sources of monosaccharides are good. In fact I eat a lot of carbohydrates for the calories, every morning I eat porridge, I just worry about preparing it well (soaking, cooking) and mixing it with butter so that it is pleasant for the intestines, Oats are inexpensive and quite nutritious. I am still aware that this is not natural in itself, given the preparation it requires, and that oats without butter/honey/fruits/spices are tasteless and even unpleasant. agree Herbivores are very fond of eating food that is not nutritionally dense. Also the plants are not very dense for us because we cannot derive energy from the fibers (which are fructose polymers), but for a ruminant for example it is in fact dense food. The real question is, will the pig choose between meat and cooked grains? And even the answer will be tendentious because men are not pigs. I'm not sure I understood Yes, most people where I am eat almost raw meat, with just a little salt (or not). The bodybuilder diet is a nightmare, even the best food in the world will be disgusting if you have to eat it in industrial quantities. agree, but it's more complicated than plants vs meat. A mango or certain vegetables are very good, kale is not pleasant. Muscle meat, eggs and milk are very good, some parts of the animal can be unpleasant (kidneys, liver...) Lol, i find you very pretentious for someone who bases his diet on biblical writings and the opinion of some engineer. And from the youtube videos of course, I recognized Neil Barnard's "children playing with the rabbit" argument ah ah. Except that just watching videos from nutritionfact.org and neil barnard isn't enough to be "scientifically informed" or simply show yourself to be an exceptionally rational person.

looks like torture

lol OP is trying to estimate how long he will spend in jail

HB

True freedom is above all economic. This forum would probably not have existed in a communist state.

I'm in language school, almost everyone is on the left except for a few people here and there, including me. I was talking to several people including a transgender woman, who was telling me how horrible and transphobic JK Rowling was, and of course it was spiraling into hate and blaming her. Literally no one could give me any evidence of real hostility from JK other than rational skepticism. Another anecdote: When I was in high school I expressed conservative and especially anti-immigration ideas several times, once in the canteen I said that I would like to travel to other countries, to which a colleague answered me: "Ah good? but yet you don't like foreigners you ?". All that to say that they are simply stupid people and without nuance, in another era they would have saluted Hitler.

Lol, the amounts of estrogen in these products are tiny unless consumed in industrial quantities, and even then their oral assimilation is miserable (should not exceed 10% of memory). They also contain testosterone, thyroid hormones etc. Milk can possibly seem estrogenic in people with intolerance and especially with intestinal permeability, not because of the "hormones" inside but because casomorphine can create a prolactin spike. In contrast, anything that will create intestinal inflammation can literally duplicate your serum estradiol at the time, and that starts with certain fibers, FODMAPs.

I have the opposite problem

Unless you are "religious", nothing has absolute value. It's okay to kill Jews, but people will want to kill you and destroy you out of revenge. It was also a useless and irrational delusion, motivated by paranoia.

agree I'm not American or English, where I am people are healthy and far from "fruit-eaters". Average overweight Westerner is neither vegan, nor frugivorous, nor carnivorous, nor paleo, nor any diet. He just stuffs himself with processed and high-calorie products of any kind. Names of fats are fats, there are highly unsaturated (cold water fish) and highly saturated (beef tallow, dairy products) animal products, there are highly unsaturated plant products (avocado, nuts...) and very saturated (coconut, palm fruit). That's like saying "fruit sugar is different from unrefined cane sugar." Nicolas Tesla is an excellent engineer with an extraordinary capacity for visualization. He is not a nutritionist or someone who has taken a keen interest in nutrition. And even if he is very intelligent he is a human and he regularly makes affirmative statements based on unvalidated knowledge, or simply debatable. In other words, just because a so-called genius says something doesn't mean it's true. Myself I sometimes fail argumentatively in front of people who, without pretense, have a particularly lower iq. yes, the proof, I'm doing it hummmm... no yes This guy looks like a stick insect, without being mean It's up to you to give me the example of a frugivore "full of energy". I watched a video of the frugivore arguing with a carnivore in another video someone posted on this thread, he looked almost lethargic. There is obviously more than diet Very fibrous plants constipate me. I haven't gone down the rabbit hole of these issues so I'll refrain from giving an opinion for now. There is no "mental gymnastics", I explained why and gave an example, I could give others. There are also other evolutionary particularities in humans which point to a potential evolution for hunting and the consumption of animal products, I would be happy if you could explain to me without "mental gymnastics" why You are sectarian. You seek to demonize people who struggle with their health (and indeed can be versatile/do anything like VP) by turning them into manipulators, dishonest people etc. On the other hand when a person from your "camp" (Richard), who (this is a non-exhaustive list, this is what I remember :): - Explained in video hating children, and wanting to explode the skulls of crying children around him "until there is a boil of blood on the sidewalk." -Explained in a video that he asked for a street fight with a father because his children were making too much noise. - Threatened with death a person with whom he was playing an online video game - Shamelessly insult those they comment on and disagree with, including VP for that matter. -Laughed at the death of a youtuber + insulted his children. -Literally admitted to being sadistic and sociopathic. -Mythomane (lied saying that he never said he didn't like children, and that he was "just afraid of them", this example is obvious but he literally lies all the time during his lives to appear confident and intellectually informed). There on the other hand "oh it's just depression, basically it must be a downhill type " Can you see your half measure? Michael.

I don't need to put seasoning on my meat, eggs or dairy. In fact, I don't know exactly why (balance potassium sodium?), but the more my diet is rich in animal products, the less I want to add salt. Currently I have returned to a more classic diet for several reasons and I again wanted to put salt on my eggs/meat. I don't know what this strange argument is, nor am I a deer, koala or gorilla. You are just Anglo-Saxon lol, everyone on the planet eats raw/undercooked meat. 1)Only pork is reputed to give parasites, and it is a very particular animal condemned in many religions. Otherwise the meat is not supposed to contain dangerous parasites, otherwise the animal would be seriously ill anyway. You also don't make sense, like in some third world countries, to leave the meat literally rotting outside. 2)No, people put on garlic and onions because food is an art form and we crave new flavors. Besides, you won't get any real antiseptic quality with onion or even raw garlic. Alcohol is technically a poison and that doesn't prevent alcoholic beverages from being tasty. Neither are fruit and sugar pleasant to some extent, even when your mitochondria are more carb-metabolizing. Like "starchivores" make "bean, oatmeal, and tomato sauce steaks" because eating even a kilo of cooked legumes a day is too boring, frugivores make a ton of smoothies and "nicecream" with high-calorie exotic fruits (bananas, dates, etc.) because eating a lot of fruit is boring. 1) You can add salt as a "bad habit" as seasonings can throw off cravings eventually. Everyone adds salt to anything, starting with plants. My point is that you need herbal seasonings to make up for the boredom of their texture and bulk. Animal meat and fat, in addition to being tasty, are small in size and easy to eat. interesting argument 1) Children are not going to play with the rabbit as it will run away/be hostile unless it is a domesticated breed (selected) 2) Human children cannot survive on their own and they are still extremely sensitive with high brain plasicity. The ability to fight and hunt usually comes later, with brain maturation, exposure to androgens etc. Many men just don't feel able to hunt anymore, they're just weakened by a life of comfort and underexposure to androgens, it's not just a matter of not being able to kill an animal anymore, it's also no longer be able 3) This is a pretty wacky vegan hippie idea, kids aren't that nice and empathetic, kids can actually be particularly sadistic. A girl in my family literally had fun killing cats by smashing them against the wall, she didn't become psycho or mean, the kids just have fun exploring boundaries, they're not that dual. No, we sometimes give fruit purees to children because it's cheap and easy to digest, but their post-weaning nutrition is varied, in fact when I was a baby, I was given cereal boils and pieces of meat. As for carnivorism, I haven't seen people giving carnivorous food to their child so I won't comment. (and that's another topic) Because it looks pretty and inflates the ego by making us feel like respectable people who eat well etc etc. It's also good, I'm not against fruit, I don't know if you've read it but by "carnivor" I mostly mean "meat-based". begging the question begging the question begging the question lol I'm not sure that basing one's diet on the writings of apostles of a Palestinian sect is scientific or simply rational. Idk, maybe. What I do know though is that unless you supplement yourself with certain nutrients, being vegan is going to drive you relatively insane within a decade. Adversarial reversal, do YOU have tangible proof? The primal/paleo diet (carnivore was a provocative misnomer, call such a diet what you will) is amazing to me and many others. The more I eat like this, the better my cognition, the better my poo, the stronger I am in the gym etc etc. And obviously the taste is much better than a vegan diet, while being really satisfying in terms of appetite. Troll/provocation aside, I've shared and suggested checking out the story of other people on even stricter diets than me who don't have health issues including artherosclerosis (despite high LDL), while recalling that, here again, carnivore is a vague and provocative term to agree on a diet based on animal products. And you ? What do you have apart from generally epidemiological studies. For the 10th time, regardless of the quality of the studies and the fact that we can be interested in them, they are impersonal and manipulable. You absolutely want a study? giveaway: https://www.dovepress.com/total-meat-intake-is-associated-with-life-expectancy-a-cross-sectional-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM I don't know if I misunderstood your message or if you can't understand the principle of Darwinism. Nothing causes the growth of the brain, it is a genetic evolution produced by evolutionary pressure. The fact is that the human brain has the particularity of requiring an enormous amount (compared to other animals) of omega 3 and that the evolution of the brain is consistent with the migration of hominids, from the tropical forests to the high African plains and the development fishing and hunting. Eating as much carbohydrate as you want will not magically eliminate your deficiencies in other nutrients, nor change the archaeological evidence. Besides, I live in France close to the "Lascaux caves", I have often visited them, the hunting engravings I have seen them yes, the oat cooking engravings not too much ah ah. I've also seen a lot of shows about the practices of the ancient peasants in my country, McDougall likes to say that Europeans ate vegetables and beans, but he forgets to mention that the vegetables were literally, most of the time, preserved in PORK FAT and cooked with this same fat. In short, the pro "starchivores" are rewriting history. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0260106012437550 Either you decorate in an exaggerated way your "complete cereals", with oil, condiments, transform them into pasta etc. Or you eat 1000 calories a day. Either you are delusional, like a homeless man thinks he is rich when he manages to afford a macdonal, eat a good greasy entrecote, without condiment or possibly a little salt if you are too used to it, and dare to say it without being a hypocrite massive that your bulgur is more appealing. Dare Ditto It has nothing to do with nutrient density, it's a matter of enzymes. Already answered. 1) "Like a plant" does not mean anything, the vast majority of plants are filthy, come to understand that "spices" are precisely a handful of plants selected from millions for their ability to give potentially pleasant flavors. 2) Meat already tastes good, people season it to taste better because curiosity is in our nature, it's not about animal vs plant products, this rhetoric is very dishonest. Alcohol is bad for humans and wine is one of the finest and most enjoyable foodstuffs on this planet, I know some guys who put vodka in their pineapple juice to improve the taste, is that does that mean they actually secretly want alcohol? "This person puts a pinch of paprika on his steak, it's proof that he wants beans and spinach" lmao I agree Everything is "natural", just because humans are so intelligent that they have actions that are particularly contrasting with those of the rest of the animal world does not make it "unnatural", we just do stuff humans.

Most guys who use whey only use a few ounces a day, and it's mostly orthorexics or bodybuilders who take it post-workout in a shaker thinking it will protect them from post-workout catabolism. . Everyone insists on the interest of whey in terms of preparation time and the protein/price ratio, that's all. There are many people who train without whey, including, cureisement, often powerlifters (where I am anyway), it is not absolutely necessary. The real question I ask you is: where are the vegan athletes and more particularly those who abstain from vegetable proteins and/or especially roids? Ps: I just saw what i eat in a day by Patrik Baboumian who is quoted in TGC for reccords (which nobody cares about), I laughed a lot, go see. My performance increased by stopping veganism, as I went from around 150g of protein per day to around 100g. It's the same thing that happened to youtubers I follow like Vegatable Police or Jon Venus. Just try two weeks of fitness with lots of meat, eggs and maybe dairy, you'll see. lol i probably have 10x more xp in nutrition than you can imagine Because you supplement yourself, justifying a diet by very specific practices (supplementation in B12, in epa/dha by algae or a ton of flax/chia/hemp, vitamin a by a ton of carrot/sweet potato) is dishonest . Also how do you know your markers are good? While researching veganism on youtube I came across a youtuber (Hench Herbivore) who claimed to have good testosterone levels thanks to veganism, the guy had 400 to 500ng/dl, that's a bad score that brings him closer to a person with andropause or a preteen. I also saw the complete blood test of Jon Venus' brother who is a doctor, his report was not terrible and lacked a certain number of nutrients by his own admission. It was worth making sandwitches of whole wheat and germs straight out of hell lmao. I have plenty of examples like that. So what ? To whom do you need to justify yourself? who will punish you? What is morality? Is this a code of conduct written somewhere in the sky? Besides, do you pay attention to which company you buy your electronic products and even your fruits and vegetables or human exploitation is not a problem for you? No, livestock production "only" produces 14.5% of greenhouse gas emissions, cattle are possibly more problematic because of methane. Apart from that the animals do not cause water depletion and help to re-fertilize the soil through excrement and urine. Dude, all the Vegan Doctors and YouTubers and their so-called reasons, I know them all. "you don't need x so you shouldn't consume x" is a slave mentality yes. This reflection has nothing to do with your cravings. lol https://ourworldindata.org/quaternary-megafauna-extinction https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abf9776 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51068816 No, starches without condiments, even cooked, don't taste good, unripe fruits don't taste good, oil and refined sugar don't taste too good, rotten foods don't taste good, etc. etc. Yes, the vast majority of animals are potentially omnivorous, and are just more suited to one type of food and will prefer it. The more you are adapted to a food the more you will like it. The point is, you don't like starches, it's a survival solution, and you're going to try to camouflage their taste with subterfuge. You want nice, juicy meat, and some fruit/dairy if you can digest it, possibly tubers/white flour starches if you're in fruit shortage and/or starving and your mitochondria are adapted to high carbohydrate diet for some time. They are not natural products and cheat on your palate, and in fact even if they are attractive for attavic reasons they are quickly sickening and even disgusting. Stone Age men weren't some kind of violent, hungry monkeys who ate anything while shouting "ouga ouga ouga" I don't know if you understand what you're saying, but if the first men had to settle for "seeds and roots", they would be dead and you wouldn't be here. And there is nothing complicated to know what is natural or not, you can imagine that bean packets do not grow in trees and that you cannot fish knackis, it is elementary logic. @M A J I What you say sounds like a psychotic delirium without any basis or proof, I think you also mentioned the yugas which is Hindu bullshit. Frugivorous diets do not work and have made thousands of people thin, without sexual energy, made them lose teeth... Animal products and dense/rich in fats are associated with self-expression, fat peasants who eat too much and laugh a lot while drinking too much wine are very fond of these "yang" foods, as well as children, stressed/damaged people by life who need to be comforted etc. But it is on your self-expression and your excesses that you can be attacked and conflicted. People who have been humiliated at times when they were helpless become neurotic and tend to turn to foods that are at best fresh, at worst boring (yin foods if you will) and generally turn to some kind of asceticism. because they become unassailable.

Animals do not get vitamin b12 by eating plants. Their intestinal flora metabolizes the cobalt in the tons of vegetables they consume into enough b12. Even if you were right you can't eat so many plants anyway, it would be deadly. You also can't get enough b12 by drinking stagnant water or some bullshit. In fact the only people coming out with such dangerous ideas are ideologically mentally ill and I hope you understand that these guys are marginal and ideologically mentally ill. Neal Barnard (I think he's the one who said that in what the health) would be easily condemned in France for saying things like that. I don't know how it works in other countries in Europe but here I am probably similar. If even eating a certain amount of animal products is insufficient how can you claim to have enough b12 by drinking stagnant water or eating grass lol. Otherwise yes, depends on the cooking method, the part of the animal etc. "suck the pebbles" At least we travel with veganism lol So why did my physical performance increase by quitting veganism? Why do all vegan athletes consume a significant amount of protein from rice, peas etc? Have you ever tried to eat a ton of beans every day? It is not because it is difficult to be lacking in something that it is not problematic to have little. Where are the low protein athletes? There is good where graham from but his teeth are rotten, he is skinny and nothing says he is not under trt. The majority of frugivores are physically wasteful, and even starch eaters often have to take supplements. Both, it looks like a bottle of orangina I play No, I don't have to justify anything to anyone. And eating meat is not a choice, it's so obvious. You project yourself, the only liberal in the tertiary sector who feels guilty about eating meat is you. I'm just playing, starting debates is a game, it's literally the purpose of life. If it bothers you, you don't have to post, are you aware of that? Obviously, the more you annoy someone on a subject the more you push them into reverse neurosis. It is for this precise reason that I promote a diet based on the senses and instinct. The problem is not to do or not to do what you have done in the past, the problem is that you are adapted to it whether you want to or not. I'm no archaeologist, I can try to talk about that but my point is that a vegan diet just doesn't taste good unless it cheats, causes gas issues etc. Extra proteins lol One day, I will do a pro primal diet file, something very serious. .

Don't pretend not to understand, pansa is mainly herbivorous. There are actually quite a few purely herbivorous or carnivorous animals, most of the time these are abuses of language. No, without supplement you will die, or in any case be in very bad health. There is no vegan civilization, strictly none outside the imagination of some. Lol. You just spit a racist myth on me that Europeans are mammoth-eating hunter-gatherer warriors and non-white/Europeans are strutting around in the rainforest eating coconuts and plantains. That's not how it works and the majority of tropical civilizations have based their diet largely on animal products. Same for dairy products. Gift : https://www.sci.news/archaeology/indus-civilization-people-diet-09136.html I recorded it recently because I found it interesting It literally took me 5 seconds to find it on google, despite being an insomniac and terribly lazy to do research. For the 10th time carnivores is a misnomer for "primal". And I'm not on a diet outside of instinct. Fruits are good to some extent, vegetables are not, people hide the taste of vegetables with spices, salts, fats etc, especially if they are very bitter/fibrous. yes Idk Ditto, do you have an epidemiological study on the smell of carnivores and their sexual attractiveness? lol. What I eat has never changed my body odor, maybe some people starve themselves too much fat or something and produce too much lactic acid. No, these foods don't contain "a lot of omega 3", the only seeds that contain a lot of O3 are marginal (chia, flax, hemp...) and they are Omega 3 ALA, you have to consume a lot to convert enough to EPA/DHA. I even saw a video of a vegan dr (I forget what his name is, he was on What Thé Health and seems to be North African or mixed race) admitted that many of his patients were deficient. lol, that's like saying calcium deficiency wasn't a problem because you can suck on a limestone brick All right

There are other countries with so many guns per population and there are no such problems. I'm in France and I can have an akm in the next few weeks if I want, it's not a legal problem.

Is there someone able to give me the name of my two parents or something like that? or is it a topic of psychotics in denial?

What is my mother's name ?

Aren't there an infinite number of dimensions after all? I landed in a 2d dimension that looked like a weird computer.