Schizophonia

Women are more empathetic, sensitive, gentle. They are care and nurturing machines. Then obviously everyone is different, there have been women soldiers, politicians, etc. Let's not fall into feminist delusions either.

@Sugarcoat If you want to assimilate a bit of my persona, rather than just taking random expressions like "spot on" take my Latinist tics like "in fine" or "ex nihilo", things like that. You will be able show off in the lecture hall when you're a nutrition student.

That is to say a professional obligation, just as you have to wear a down jacket to avoid freezing to death in winter. Yes of course, because it gives off an attractive image of you. So it's about seduction, even if you don't go out because in fine everything is played out in the imagination, the imaginary image of oneself.

Just because men are better at protesting and even fighting doesn't mean women can't yes. It's like in sports, men are generally stronger than women but there are always female athletes who are stronger than me.

Testosterone and exogenous androgenic hormones in general turn people into anarchists.

It is a direct action of androgen hormones. It is not society that pushes men to be more stoic, on the contrary people, both men and women, have never been so feminine and emotional because of the comfort of life, lack of experience, and a messed up education.

Because they identify with this figure, men do not vote for Trump (because that's certainly a character like that you were thinking of) to submit to him but at the opposite because they see him as a means of advancing their own agenda and value system. It is women who are more likely to vote for idealistic people projects that induce self-sacrifice.

@Sugarcoat @Princess Arabia All i said is that dressing is essentially a process of seduction in a social context, even if it is unconscious/repressed. Discussion is not possible because you are not trying to understand but rather to twist what am saying for passive aggressive purposes. Trying to convince yourself that the world is against you. I wish you a lot of fun.

You have a problem homie.

Yea, that's how you get so many barrels who act pseudo-pretentious. Conversely, pretty girls who know it don't feel the need to protect themselves as much and are actually often easier to pick up.

The suit is also intended to seduce, not necessarily women but also in a professional context. In the collective unconscious, suits and ties are phallic symbols that give an impression of power, competence, involvement. Women wear things that, as Lacan would say, create a "hole in the representation" like low-cut tops, long boots, and clothes in general that make men want to come and "fix the problem" (insert phallus); correct, dominate... Dressing for yourself means nothing because if you only dress for "you" then you would wear the easiest things possible and you would end up naked in the summer and in a big down jacket and hat during the winter, and of course you would have no accessories. You are motivated to be pleasant in the eyes of people and especially men but you are in denial. No, you have this impression because you are in denial, women have bigger egos in general and that creates resistance, and resistance becomes a conscious subject. (Breathing is not a subject because it is so accepted that it is no longer projected). Men assume going to the gym and watching their weight to get laid so it's not (or less) a subject. It's like traumas, the more people (as often here lol) explain that they were traumatized the more they are in fact people who have little experience and exaggerate. And you have conversely people who often do not whine, have a much more masculine behavior and you learn that they were tortured, that they saw drunk dad beat up mom, that they ended up homeless, or even simply that they are people who do difficult work, are sports athletes etc. A little provocative digression

Eggs are the best source of choline of any foods with some organs.

I see very pretty girls who are kind and intelligent all the time, and elephant seals with unpleasant behavior.

Don't see what you're talking about.

Technically no, but they can still pressure me hardly for dangerous, autodestructiive behaviour. I'm also a man so they automatically have more confidence into my ability to protect myself compared to if i were a woman. Women's psyche is more adapted to a more authoritarian paradigm.

Dw It's still Vava. 🤔

Because i was here. I meant the same joke by "You're even drier" actually lol.

Little selfie from the airport. Everyone here dresses like this 🤔

You're even drier now lol.

You assert your Anglo-Saxon liberal culture and that is probably why Jung is so popular in the United States. It is actually important for children and people in general to live in a minimally authoritarian structure because it reduces castration anxiety, otherwise you will feel abandoned.

But more does not necessarily mean better my dear. What are the archetypes, the persona in general and the mythological concepts based on in Jung? It is only the symbolism necessary for the representation of issues related to survival; It is the whole concept of phallus (relationship to power, to summarize very roughly) in Freud, then the Oedipus complex is "just" a common biographical event, found in the dreams of most people, which is involved in psychosexual development. This does not mean that people who did not grow up in a nuclear family will degenerate, psychosexual development is very individual. Although having its singularities, Lacan has completed Freud's work well. There is no particular confrontation between Jung and Lacan, it is rather a question of point of view. Freud (and Lacan) is more holistic, simple, fundamental, and it works very well to explain all forms of neuroses. Jung is more layers of concepts.

No i'm right. Yes + willymaxxing No + stop right now you won't win the victimization contest.

Oh ok. It's clearly cold, it's during the afternoon and you can see most of women have a coat, some protect themselves from the cold in their clothes. Men too. But you don't see it because men are more discreet, and it's more about body composition and facial structure.

Bruh. Jung is too complicated for nothing, if you like the simplest and most tangible models possible Freud is far superior.

Measure whether it is cold or hot. Yes the otter, that's what is called neurosis. Confrontation between desire and the ideal of oneself including in intimacy, solitude. Willy has refined tastes. Jk.