Schizophonia

One day, if I'm single, I'll go to Jamaica to see you. You will be happy with my LOW PROLACTIN LEVELS, I PROMISE.

It’s a bit stupid to be forced to deprive yourself of sexuality so as not to waste your poor daily ration of dopamine. I have a better solution: -Full of calories in the form of muscle meats, lactose-free dairy products, cod liver, pasta/rice benches, tubers, well-cooked fruits and vegetables. -Cabergoline once or twice a week to compensate for the prolactinergic effect of endorphins and/or undetected food intolerances, chronic stress etcetc.

I was just talking about the synthesis protocol. There are no "thousands of pages" documents, I don't know where you get that from other than your imagination even adding the administrative, which is off topic in this context. For the 1000th time this comment is false. No, I have no problem confronting the legal system in my country, especially if I am within my rights. Yes Yes, it's always the same story, can we give more freedom even if idiots will abuse it? I think so, and even if it wasn't because the legislation never dissuaded me from anything. Btw, almost everyone here uses psychedelics which are nevertheless illegal, all that is prohibited is to talk about sources so that Actualized.org can dissociate itself from incitement to the consumption of illicit products. What risk? in particular substances already tested in vivo and whose effects can be largely estimated before any experimentation. The most dangerous products (by far) are already legal under prescription and/or over the counter (barbiturates, benzodiazepines, alcohol, opioids, antipsychotics, etc.) Lol, it doesn't work like that. Whether something is legal or not has no relation to the interest we have in producing it. Because the pharmacological interest is less important. Beta carolina derivatives, although still marginal, are much safer than psychedelics. This is as credible as explaining that a naturopath could go to prison if his valerian was used to make TNT. Like you want.

These traditions only make sense if you're a malnourished Hindu from antiquity and can't ejaculate without bursting your prolactin. In a normal physiological state, depriving yourself of sex to “preserve sexual energy” makes no sense.

Psychedelics are basically antiserotonergic, partials agonists that compete with serotonin depending on their affinity for this or that 5HT receptor. Hallucinations, conceptual intelligence etc etc come from the increase in glutamate/dopamine due to a reduction in serotonergic signaling or sometimes directly through direct agonism of glutamate/catecholamines (as is the case with LSD). It all depends on your genetics, but for most people, 5 MeO DMT will be one of the most serotonergic psychedelics, will "shut down" your mind, lack of hallucination, give you anxiety/nausea and has some poses a real risk of serotonin syndrome. LSD will be the most anti-serotonergic, with absolutely zero risk of serotonin syndrome, an absence of nausea/anxiety, euphoria then powerful sexual arousal, and above all an “increase in the field of consciousness”. Mushrooms are probably somewhere in between.

For your general well-being. You don't need to use these kinds of products every day, rather here and there when you need to be more energetic/creative. Parsimonious use can also help you put yourself in virtuous circles in the long term, that's basically how endocrinology and neurotransmitter balance work. But above all, it's not about "diving" into treatments, just casually experimenting. + Mea culpa, in fact it is 6 methoxy which is the most studied, among other derivatives of beta carboline.

You could order a few grams of 10 methoxy harmalan (6 methoxy is supposedly more physiological, but also not too studied so idk) on sigma aldrich and dilute in a dropper. (requires a quality precision balance, to miligram ready at least). Very effective and probably much safer than an amphetamine.

I was also circumcised at 18. I lost like 30% sensitivity/intensity.

Deep Web (tor)

nausea? migraines (or regular mild headaches) ?

All these characteristics have nothing to do with being masculine or not.

Even when I no longer have problems, I will still search. I do more physical effort than 90% of people I actually sleep better when I stop and eat more.

How is your libido? have you ever tested prolactin? testosterone? thyroid hormones? 24-hour single-unit test of catecholamine and serotonin metabolites?

What drug? What coke all day? Can you screen the messages where I say this? where like the majority of excessively emotional people you start to caricature me in such a way as to justify your hostility?

Even if there is a 1% chance that I end up in the police station, and that happens, there is no problem. What danger? Do you suffer from paranoia? I'm not going to deprive myself of experimenting and being avant-garde because that implies having responsibilities, I don't work like that. I don't know what arrogance you're talking about, maybe abusive projection? All I did was ask if anyone is or knows a chemist capable of synthesizing a random molecule for me because most labs do not want to quote for products that are not in their catalog. Lol, just that. No, it takes a page or two and the patents can be found in less than a minute on Google. The only problem is the overpriced equipment, space and logistics in general. I'm not going to bother placing thousands of euros on orders from Sigma Aldrich and transforming my room into a laboratory to synthesize a random product with uncertain effectiveness. No, only a small portion of "research products" are legal in most countries. Sharing sources is the guarantee of sharing access to illicit products, particularly in the United States where actualized is based. It's just a vague and arbitrary name. It is not because a molecule is not widely used and/or new that its pharmacology is not known/studied. You can't know, because obviously reading dozens of pages of a patent is more complicated than lecturing on a forum on a subject that you don't even understand a little. Sorry, I don't live in North Korea, most of molecules are not "banned by default" because they are psychoactive or simply dangerous, lol. Technically, if I wanted I could make industrial quantities of LSD within a few weeks, it's not that complicated and all the basic products are legal.

@Applegarden8 These are not difficult or dangerous molecules to make, and it is legal. But that requires equipment that I don't have. This involves ordering an extract from a person of at least universal level and having it tested. I usually said quote but in this case it was a transaction between individuals. From there there is nothing to add, I don't know if you live in North Korea but where I am I don't risk interrogation because for sending a random molecule which could very well be sold by some wholesalers, lmao. And even if that were the case I don't give a damn, I piss in their ass. I feel like I'm talking to a housewife who's afraid of "complicated things." It's not.

It is precisely for this reason that I ask for a quote from a chemist where most laboratories do not want to bother synthesizing compounds that are outside their catalog. If you are worried about the purity/reliability of your product, then having it tested by a university hospital or a specialized online laboratory (Janoshik, for example) is not so hard. Thanks for the advice, luckily you're here. Btw, it's essentially for experimental purposes. Lol. These are random molecules that are not legislated, I don't know why you are answering me as if it were about initiating heroin trafficking.

Lol, I want to make a supplement for sleep, but it's complicated because these products are still very marginal. They are believed to be positive allosteric modulators of 5HT2C receptors, among others. and this at a potency which is close to LSD, at least for N-acetyl 3,4-dihydro ß-carboline

You shove a carrot up your ass on all fours, then cough really hard.

I understand you. But can you just contradict what I said and not just complain because you find my advice too radical/crazy? I'm telling the truth, it doesn't matter whether it seems brutal to you or anyone else. This is particularly true in the health field, the day you lose your health you will be very happy to be able to be advised by people who have pulled out their hair before you. Believe me, if it were possible to treat this type of illness with random supplements, I would be the first to know. Kisses.

Anything that increases stimulating neurotransmitters will potentially make you more aggressive, testosterone is one of them. I'm just saying that estrogens, especially e2, are more effective than androgens for this purpose, and that low aromatization and/or DHT dominance actually tends to make you calm.

Both victims and bullies repeat scenarios repeated in a trans-generational manner. All right. My PMs are open on the days you have a serious health problem, promise👍

F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5F5

Yes, but in fact I think that most victims of school bullying are because their parents instilled their own insecurities, in an incidious way, into their education.