Schizophonia

I know i'm close to the truth when people have nothing else to whining "autistic thinking"

No it's the opposite, they are anxious people and they calm they anxiety through identification with the father, with authority. It is a fixation on this defense mechanism developed during the phallic stage of psycho-sexual development due to poor development of the Oedipal complex. Vegans, liberals, religious people, all "idealists" in general are often unpleasant because they are narcissistic, they like to "embody good" to unconsciously be recognized by the father and calm the anxiety of castration ; The pleasure comes from the feeling of power obtained in this configuration, it is not a coincidence that people stop being vegan or similar behaviors when they are under high doses of benzodiazepines or similar compounds (alcohol, phenibut ...), all idealism, all limits, are in fact learned by social pressure and therefore experiences with peers and especially parents at an early age. Even incest is learned, it is not naturally disgusting, you had learned this prohibition and you have integrated it to the point where it is no longer a possibility at all (well I hope, normally lol). This does not mean that all vegans have a psyche organized like this, ofc.

No they don't and it doesn't make any sense anyway This is actually a narcissistic tendency, people who "love animals" see too much of their own unaccepted bullshit (because of narcissism) through other humans and therefore need another mirror humanoid enough to arouse empathy, but not too much so as not to reflect what they don't like about themselves; it's basically the same mechanism that constitutes sexual kinks. 1) When someone says they love "animals", they mean "a handful of animals that are humanoid enough and domesticated long enough not to be hostile towards humans. No one is going to be friends with a giraffe or a praying mint. 2) While a dog, cat or pet can be cool, you'll never have as deep a relationship with pets as you would with a human. Then obviously, as we are in a society of comfort, with increasing exposure to endocrine disruptors, to delusional subversive ideologies etc. people are now for many too sensitive to kill an animal, it disturbs their ego too much. Not only killing an animal, people are more fragile in general in developed countries. Above all, they should accept what their limbic system demands, the primal truth that has sculpted their DNA over hundreds of thousands of years, rather than letting it intimidate them, make them feel guilty by a form of instilled mental slavery, an ideological virus infiltrated into the collective unconscious for some reason.

What a woman does with her sexuality isn't my problem but i wouldn't date a girl in a high bodycount, this says a lot about her priorities. + Yet another stupid English term ending in "ing" so as not to have to question yourself lol

Us

@Keryo Koffa Hi my transgender weirdo. Insofar as you're awaken can you manifest a drug who would me smart enough to understand your usual topics ? 🤔

English is so poor i often can't say the thing the way i really want. "I pushed my sister down the stairs" "I choke on my meatballs" "I telepathize with x"

You mean so much things to say on the subject ?

It could also be a reaction to the glycerol or some other liquid carrier. I've never heard of anyone having brain fog after smoking, personally.

👍

He is asian or half asian.

Was there nicotine in his vape? Nicotine is a stimulant but at the same time it is a vasoconstrictor.

@Sugarcoat Don’t ask me why it just popped in my head but i understand the thing you explained about negation in Swedish. It the equivalent of « si » in French.

Why don't you pretend to see that I was teasing. It is, but i don't want to give a psychoanalysis course, so I'll stop there.

Women are more empathetic, sensitive, gentle. They are care and nurturing machines. Then obviously everyone is different, there have been women soldiers, politicians, etc. Let's not fall into feminist delusions either.

@Sugarcoat If you want to assimilate a bit of my persona, rather than just taking random expressions like "spot on" take my Latinist tics like "in fine" or "ex nihilo", things like that. You will be able show off in the lecture hall when you're a nutrition student.

That is to say a professional obligation, just as you have to wear a down jacket to avoid freezing to death in winter. Yes of course, because it gives off an attractive image of you. So it's about seduction, even if you don't go out because in fine everything is played out in the imagination, the imaginary image of oneself.

Just because men are better at protesting and even fighting doesn't mean women can't yes. It's like in sports, men are generally stronger than women but there are always female athletes who are stronger than me.

Testosterone and exogenous androgenic hormones in general turn people into anarchists.

It is a direct action of androgen hormones. It is not society that pushes men to be more stoic, on the contrary people, both men and women, have never been so feminine and emotional because of the comfort of life, lack of experience, and a messed up education.

Because they identify with this figure, men do not vote for Trump (because that's certainly a character like that you were thinking of) to submit to him but at the opposite because they see him as a means of advancing their own agenda and value system. It is women who are more likely to vote for idealistic people projects that induce self-sacrifice.

@Sugarcoat @Princess Arabia All i said is that dressing is essentially a process of seduction in a social context, even if it is unconscious/repressed. Discussion is not possible because you are not trying to understand but rather to twist what am saying for passive aggressive purposes. Trying to convince yourself that the world is against you. I wish you a lot of fun.

You have a problem homie.

Yea, that's how you get so many barrels who act pseudo-pretentious. Conversely, pretty girls who know it don't feel the need to protect themselves as much and are actually often easier to pick up.

The suit is also intended to seduce, not necessarily women but also in a professional context. In the collective unconscious, suits and ties are phallic symbols that give an impression of power, competence, involvement. Women wear things that, as Lacan would say, create a "hole in the representation" like low-cut tops, long boots, and clothes in general that make men want to come and "fix the problem" (insert phallus); correct, dominate... Dressing for yourself means nothing because if you only dress for "you" then you would wear the easiest things possible and you would end up naked in the summer and in a big down jacket and hat during the winter, and of course you would have no accessories. You are motivated to be pleasant in the eyes of people and especially men but you are in denial. No, you have this impression because you are in denial, women have bigger egos in general and that creates resistance, and resistance becomes a conscious subject. (Breathing is not a subject because it is so accepted that it is no longer projected). Men assume going to the gym and watching their weight to get laid so it's not (or less) a subject. It's like traumas, the more people (as often here lol) explain that they were traumatized the more they are in fact people who have little experience and exaggerate. And you have conversely people who often do not whine, have a much more masculine behavior and you learn that they were tortured, that they saw drunk dad beat up mom, that they ended up homeless, or even simply that they are people who do difficult work, are sports athletes etc. A little provocative digression