Schizophonia

Yes, because it was a branch of the United Kingdom, it is not something tangible to legitimize the existence of a state, it sucks. The most logical thing, even in a decolonial logic, would be for Canada to leave this stupid commonwealth and join the United States. Eheh. They mostly speak French so i would like to go there one day. You have Trudeau who is the liberal caricature equivalent.

I don't see the problem.

No, in millions of years we will dkzIUDUDUKZZZZZZ ZZZZ e8555 %%%%%%%...

I don't remember anything you said was cringe, it's just had to understand sometime eheh.

It would be very logical. Canada is not a real country, it has no history and basically no cultural, religious or linguistic particularities (apart from Quebec). It is the Belgium of North America.

Cope.

You are tacitly suggesting she should be with him essentially out of culpability, not love.

We talk about a usual human paradigm.

The girl, yin version of me.

@Keryo Koffa Why do you feel cringe ? It's a serious question.

Align your frequency with the person you want to become, but anything that is not that person will have to die.

You have a problem, everything you have against sadghuru is a poor little joke or similar remarks like that when he spends his time doing voluntary work. And besides that you talk about Osho who had weak cognitive development (clearly weaker than sadghuru) and regularly said disdainful or even misanthropic things, and this time it was not black humor.

Bienvenu en France. I know someone who manifested a girl to have sex with by "prying" (to match the frequency of ? ) Mary Magdalene lol.

Texas.

Happy Christmas.

🤔

There will be a socialist overthrow and distribution of wealth, that is the most logical.

So, where is this "swedish restaurant" ?🤔 He must be somewhere.

lol your mental gymnastics works with any logical reasoning, it is fallacious; it does not contradict what i said. But me too my dear hot black philosopher escort. Throw a piece of baguette at the face*

Suuup

Yes. Because you are disconnected from yourself and have a tendency towards denial at the base, but that does not change the fact that your brain, your being goes in certain directions and these directions are emotionally motivated (which makes you choose these and not others). But in fact everyone is more or less in denial, the ego itself is an onion of denial in its structure. It is a whole work of contemplation to determine how one's psyche works.

1)My message was a bit aggressive, i was "in my anima" as @Emerald would say lol, so sorry if it offended you. 2)I still think what I said, but you don't see it because you are not used to contemplating your psychology and that of others. There is a reason why you end up on this forum instead of elsewhere. There is a reason why you post on dating instead of elsewhere. There is a reason why you insist on what men think and that kind of thing, usually with negative emotions. Etcetc. Everything has an emotional reason that drives you to think and declare an opinion, a belief, and act on certain ways. Then it's about asking yourself "why would I complain that there is too much pressure on women (tacitly on "me")" and the answer that comes automatically is : "because I'm afraid of not being pretty enough". And then "why am I afraid of not being pretty?" : "because I would like to have someone that i estimate good enough for me". And so on.

She looks very stressed, it shows in her eyes and stress can induce pseudo-psychotic delusions.

Something that looks horrible.

Of course it is, you spend a lot of time ruminating on the physical and tacitly sending peaks here on how "yes we can easily sleep with someone it does not mean that we can have quality men", sometimes more targeted and mean stuff. Now you protect yourself for some reason by bringing the question back to your main problem, as if that would make all that disappear.