Basman

You just have an utopian bias. Your in an adversial relationship with reality fundamentally. That's the crux of the issue. The pushback is against bad leftist ideas of what men and women are because they are not true. Fundamentally you don't accept what women and survival actually are. Women survival is falling in love with your rapist and raising their kids, stockholm syndrome style. That's how a lot of women survived historically. Leftists see that and want to deny its even there.

It's pretty obvious that academia can't be contemplative if you think about it. It was obvious to me already before experiencing university. It's too inundated with incentives and rules which makes it more scholastic than anything. The fact that you can't make statements without basing it on a source is such a double edged sword. You have to partially outsource your sensemaking to be accepted in academia.

I think he just ratted out. Jesus was toast. He made a call to save his himself from the political intrigue conspiring against Jesus and his cult. Its a rat eat rat world 🐀

It's fine to make generalizations when they are largely true. It's a bigger leap to make woke post-modern claims about women, which are clearly ideological. If it's not obvious what a woman is you are probably overthinking it. Go outside more. Read how people actually live outside of modern standards of living. It's not some grand mystery. Your overstating the degree of harmful stereotyping in my opinion.

Let me rephrase that. I think the whole is enterprise of post-modern woke equalitism is essentially about tone policing reality. Certain aspects of reality are ugly, brutal and gruesome, so they spin tales about how reality is more fair and just than you might think. Sometimes they are right, but not always. At the end of day, reality is what it is irrespective of what you think about it. Its like being upset when crocodiles kill bison crossing the river because it's so brutal. It gets childish after a certain point.

Historically you might not always be so sure who your kids are exactly lol

Sure, but then I would caution about bias. At the end of the day, what is being said is obvious stuff. Obviously men did the majority of hunting throughout history. Sometimes reality is simple and your overthinking it for largely ideological reasons.

It was about how science can be biased and post-modern equality ideology.

Isn't that just the crux of the issue? Reality is too ugly for my sensitive puss ears lmao

Even laying bricks for an hourly wage is abnormal. Historically normal is raping and pillaging and making slaves do the labor. People have completely lost sense of how serious survival is. The two biggest concerns historically was starving and a horde of horny rapists with axes bumrushing your town. They would rip out your unborn fetus and wear it like a necklace (no joke). It's understandable that women are scared of feeling subject to men considering how powerless they can feel. It's a catch 22. Modern life shelters you from that dynamic (thanks to men), so they don't have to feel that way as much. I think that's fine. Women have more freedom to be butch bitches nowadays. It just gets stupid when people get ideological about gender and make up lore. Equalitism gets certain things wrong, so they necessarily will create bad results when those thing they are wrong about are applied.

Depends on how seriously you take it. People get wound up.

During the day he's awake, except shortly afternoon.

Biological essentialism can feel demeaning/deterministic to women because of a long history of women being second-class to men. Post-modern equalitism, or social constructivism, tries to create more equality between the sexes by flattening the differences ideologically, but fails to achieve this maximally because the sexes are foundationally unequal in certain ways. Hence you tend lose debates arguing for equalitism, que getting emotional because it's a touchy subject. I don't think women's opinion are valued less. If anything, it's given slightly more attention because it's such a liberal space. Nobody would care if OP was a dude. It's just that your wrong when your wrong.

There's been scandals and resignations/firings, but no real arrests. A lot of ambassadors.

OP has always been a debate bro and rather ideological. By their own words addicted to arguing last time they made a farewell post. I'm not trying to be mean, but running yourself into the ground arguing on a spiritual forum is a skill issue. It couldn't really end any other way but crashing out without self-awareness of how your being ideological. Its taken so seriously too.