Basman

Suddenly half of humanity are pregnant.

This is more about the parents though. They are why these kids are acting spoiled and brainrotted.

Most young children in my life, not a lot admittedly, have been kind of spoiled with very soft parents. Annoying and entitled, so it seems to be a societal trend.

Seems overly lax and lacking in discipline, anecdotally speaking. Parents seem incapable of setting limits around children and don't have any strategies or tools to manage behavior that isn't an ipad. It seems to be both a skill issue and an overly permissive as if childhood is this sacred space exempt from reality. We in general seem overprotective of children and scared of coming off as abusive. A 180 from beating kids with rulers. On that note, is there ever any times where some kind of physical handling is constructive, in contrast with conformity of putting hands on kids? And yes, I was at a restaurant with a screaming child, but I'm genuinely curious. I'm not having a Reddit moment, I swear. It's hard to find any insight that isn't terminally online losers ventposting because a kids crashed their trans meetup at the local library.

It's hyper-identity politics though. It's more about rich people using identity to feel morally superior tokenistically. Corpo identity politics does not talk about class at all.

Liberal values themselves mostly origin from Christian values. A lot of the values we see as a given are distinctions that hade to be made throughout history. Ancient tribes would operate amorally to a much greater extent. Like not distinguishing between rape and sex. Or murder and simply killing. Certain perspectives didn't exist. Tribes where probably relatively peaceful and egalitarian, but not because of necessarily values but survival constraints. Tribes live too close on the line and are too small in scale to be super destructive. If they where highly developed then you should see that in subsequent societies that sprung up, which isn't the case. The first societies where always violent conquest as soon as the opportunity showed itself.

I agree in principle, but depends on how far left. It's a relative notion after all. A lot of hyper left stuff are "experimental" and tend to not work out without at least compromise with conservative values in the long-term. Like the trans sport thing. Conservatism is all about having a constructive relation to reality, something that is easily taken for granted with a lot of leftists I think. They can get very ideological, like thinking that men and women are just the same.

Who? I need to see this interaction lol

This notion that tribal cultures are these peaceful liberal paradises is so corny. Ancient tribes are brutal as hell. There's no concept of equity or morality. It's as close to humans living as animals as possible. It's unapologetic survival, devoid of remorse or modern concepts of morality. A tribe will have no qualms killing, raping and eating you if that's what survival demands of them. You can easily find hundreds of cases of tribal brutality. Like killing grandmas with stone axes. Or being cannibals. Stage red isn't some kind of anomaly or failure. It's built on top of a previous stage that itself didn't set any limits on violence. It just didn't have nearly the same capacity for ambition. That's what changed.

This stuff really isn't that shocking. The internet been used to push the freak agenda since day 1. Morning Glory Milking Farm proves that some women choose the bear not because they hate men.

Women have been completely dependent on men for basic survival for most of human history. Female independence is historically abnormal and thanks to all the modern inventions and systems that men built.

Being an incel is an ideology and a mindset. Being a virgincel doesn't automatically make you a negative bitter sexist. I know guys who get laids heaps but have very incelly opinions. It's a loser mindset and cope. Women can be incelpilled too, except it's about hating men and toxicmaxxing feminism. Everything is pathriarchy and rape culture. Same bitter negative attitude, but much more socially accepted. And it doesn't really make sense. If it's just about getting laid, go to Thailand or something. You could solve this problem tommorow.

A better question would be if a dog was mauling a child would you try to rescue it (and risk injury) or let nature take its course (better for the climate + genepoolmaxxing).

That's a very schizo way of saying that it's mostly people you know personally that rape.