Basman

I agree in principle, but depends on how far left. It's a relative notion after all. A lot of hyper left stuff are "experimental" and tend to not work out without at least compromise with conservative values in the long-term. Like the trans sport thing. Conservatism is all about having a constructive relation to reality, something that is easily taken for granted with a lot of leftists I think. They can get very ideological, like thinking that men and women are just the same.

Who? I need to see this interaction lol

This notion that tribal cultures are these peaceful liberal paradises is so corny. Ancient tribes are brutal as hell. There's no concept of equity or morality. It's as close to humans living as animals as possible. It's unapologetic survival, devoid of remorse or modern concepts of morality. A tribe will have no qualms killing, raping and eating you if that's what survival demands of them. You can easily find hundreds of cases of tribal brutality. Like killing grandmas with stone axes. Or being cannibals. Stage red isn't some kind of anomaly or failure. It's built on top of a previous stage that itself didn't set any limits on violence. It just didn't have nearly the same capacity for ambition. That's what changed.

This stuff really isn't that shocking. The internet been used to push the freak agenda since day 1. Morning Glory Milking Farm proves that some women choose the bear not because they hate men.

Women have been completely dependent on men for basic survival for most of human history. Female independence is historically abnormal and thanks to all the modern inventions and systems that men built.

Being an incel is an ideology and a mindset. Being a virgincel doesn't automatically make you a negative bitter sexist. I know guys who get laids heaps but have very incelly opinions. It's a loser mindset and cope. Women can be incelpilled too, except it's about hating men and toxicmaxxing feminism. Everything is pathriarchy and rape culture. Same bitter negative attitude, but much more socially accepted. And it doesn't really make sense. If it's just about getting laid, go to Thailand or something. You could solve this problem tommorow.

A better question would be if a dog was mauling a child would you try to rescue it (and risk injury) or let nature take its course (better for the climate + genepoolmaxxing).

That's a very schizo way of saying that it's mostly people you know personally that rape.

No but I listened to System of a Down.

The pathriarchical extends even to ducks apparently

Dogcels can't comprehend not giving a shit about a dog.

Neediness is an intense attachment to outcome relative to your relation with others. It's about resources but also self-concept to a certain degree and needing affirmation of one's worth. There's a fear inherent. It's the difference between "need" and "want". The latter is much more positive.

Free market is generally superior to allocating needs. The only issue is economic exclusion, inability to meet basic living standards and externalizing of the negative consequences of doing business, which the government can regulate. State funded art, with the exception of like cultural stuff like the ballet or national galleries, tends to be a bit shit. It's like being on welfare for artists, which typically attracts very self-absorbed people. Very signally woke stuff that is cringey and mediocre. When your insulated from the free market there's less pressure to create things that people actually want.

This is a general transparency law. Gender pay gap is overblown in my opinion to the point it's almost clickbait. Transparency should give employees more bargaining power in general. It would make it easier to challenge nepotism and unfair conditions in general, not just in relation to gender.