Basman

All women value respect imo, just like guys want a woman they can respect for a serious relationship. If you can't take them seriously why would you want to be with them? I believe what stage red women value is just uninhibited talent for survival. Alexander The Great type shit. Stage red is a stage about survival on a primal level. Personal expression is more so a feature of stage orange. A personal preferance for black guys is orange because preferances is already at a level where your trying to get what you want out of life, which is deeply characteristic of stage orange, as opposed to negotiating with life through uninhibited survival. Stage red doesn't think in terms of preferences. I remember reading the Saga of the Volsungs once which is a story written during the medieval ages about the history of a particular viking clan. Medieval litterature can give a lot of insight into how stage red societies operate because they are from societies that are genuinely at that stage. They'll write stuff that sounds demented in our modern age like it's completely normal. Like child murder is treated very flippantly. It's a world that is quiet alien in constrast to ours that is hard to appreciate. The book details a princess who falls in love with the main character who became a king. What she praises him for always stood out to me. Not his dashing looks or personality but his bravery, talent for conquest and war and being rich. She was so in love with this guy that when he ended up marrying a different women she killed him and his kid and then threw herself on his funeral pyre. In the end she lamented how he had declined as a warlord and king. Now that's stage red. It's very monkey.

I have a suspicion that the female Actualized audience don't really go to clubs in the first place. Sorry.

Clav is already really good looking. Way more than most guys. The looksmaxxing ideology he's bought into, hook, line and sinker, is a kind of doomerism. You don't smoke meth and do deep fried home surgery on your self without an obsessive degree of anxiety. I actually feel kind of sorry for him, because he clearly selling himself short, at least on a mental spiritual level. Regular ass Tony Robbins style self-help would set him straight. If he only picked up a book instead of browsing incel forums. Even a bible would have been better. Too bad he's audience captured af. Gonna be very hard to say no to all that at this point when it made him rich and famous, even though it comes at a cost. He is arguably becoming a lolcow, if he's not already one. The definition of living a hell of your own creation.

+ the fact that inbreeding kills AI is very telling. Inbreeding is only a problem if you are unintelligent and uncreative.

AI is incapable of creativity. Otherwise it wouldn't need a bunch of data to train off. Humans are derivative too, but it's more like inspiration and love. You can create something original if you wanted to. It's just hard. Modernism for example is a reactionary spin off classic art, but it took an original spark to visualize what that would look like. AI could never create a Van Gogh painting. There's depth and deliberateness to the creativity of Van Gogh's paintings down to the particular strokes and blend of colors. Intuition plays a large role in art. The absence of acknowledgement of how intuition plays into art is part of what tells me that they don't understand it.

Jk bro

5''2 energy.

Ok, Joe Rogan. Enjoy your beer and stake. Don't forget to take your supplements.

I think hunting vermin, AKA varmint hunting, is a lot more accessible as a form of hunting. There's generally less regulations, you can hunt all seasons and an airgun is sufficient in most cases, which are a lot cheaper and don't require permits, etc. You'll be helping out people and hunting invasive species such as mink can also contributes to the ecology (who overhunt native species).

It's a false equivalency. You can only truly believe this if you never created anything good and original. AI bros understanding of creativity is a caricature. For one, they think prompting an AI to generate things for you makes you artist when it's more like ordering food at a restaurant. An AI bro can churn out Star Wars Tiktok slop but they could never actually conceive of Star Wars. It takes actual ingenuity and work to create something worth investing time in. AI bros don't even understand how intuition plays into art. Art is just an idea to them.

I kinda of doubt the capacity for AI to make good art, not just from a technical perspective, but also because AI bros tend to be such hacks. They don't understand art on a fundamental level. They always make the most generic shit based on other people's ideas. Not in the sense of AI using tons of human work (which is itself a problem), but that they are uncreative. Shit like "Dragon Ball Z but real life". "Super Mario if it was Star Wars". "Spiderman VS Deku", etc. Slop all the way down.

AI always has this tendency to center its subject in a manner in a way that's always kind of dramatic and emphasized, like close up staring into the camera with a blurry background. It can't or won't make shots where the characters are more de-emphazised. It lacks subtlety and feels stilted. You can tell it's stitched together from various clips that have been generated. It must've taken ages to get it all right so that it looks like a succinct movie, and not an AI fever dream. Typically characters look different between each clip, but that's clearly been improved upon.

Realism as in manufactured in Israel. Goyslop all the way down.

There's a thin line between chud and chad. Stare long enough into the mirror and the mallet stares back like the green goblin mask.

Every problem you have has already been solved by someone else with the exact same problems. Read their books. Go on Google and look up books that answer your exact problems. It's cheap but can completely change your life.