Basman

AI is simply a tool. Any tool can be used dangerously, AI is no exception. Where AI differs is its scale and potential to significantly alter and change society. For better or for worse. Here are some examples of how AI can be misused: AI controlled weapons could lead to mass destruction and loss of life. AI-powered malware and other cyber threats can be used to attack individuals, companies, organization and nations. AI-powered surveillance can heavily undermine individual privacy and liberties. AI can be used to create and spread misinformation, deepfakes, etc. which can manipulate public opinion and undermine freedome of speech. Automization will disrupt job markets and the economy. At the very worst, it can contribute to social destabilization. It can be very difficult to explain the decision making of an AI, which makes it harder to hold organizations and business accountable for their actions, undermining the legal protection of individuals. AI will change the world. Not being cognizant of the dangers of AI is foolish, because it absolutely can be used for evil or mishandled. It's very important that we keep a very close eye on AI and its development.

Only real downsides of Chat GPT is having to register with your phone number, the server capacity and there being a limit how many questions you can ask per day.

Aging is the process of DNA running out of telomeres, the part of the DNA that is required for succesfull cell devision. Since telomeres are a finite resource, eventually our cells run out and they start to age and lose their function. Theoretically, if you could somehow "add" more telemores to one's DNA, you could post-pone aging. You could theoretically do that indefinietely if you had the technology for it. Aging is as natural to animals as the biomechanical reliance on a finite enzyme for maintaining the body. Lobster are biologically immortal, as they have an infite supply of telomeres. So it's not the case that aging is natural in principle. It's just so happens that most of us are built in such a way where do age as a byproduct of the biomechanical processees that keep us living. It's not quiet understood why newborns have a fresh supplies of telomeres when they in theory should have the same amout as their parents, as most animals usually aren't capable of creating new telomeres for themselves. Telomeres aren't fully understood yet.

Games can insight compulsive behavior in some people, for certain. But calling developers drug dealers is a way overblown statement. Games are art, and devs are artists. A significant portion of games bought are never even played (about 37% on Steam), and of the games played, only about 10-20% of gamers actually play to completion. They are just games.

What's the worst aspects of being a writer and are those things you can deal with? Looking it up, writing as a career has several large cons: Low job security Hermit lifestyle weight gain Economic uncertainty Creative block If you can contend with cons like these, then writing might work out for you, especially if certain cons are pros to you. For example, if you actually enjoy being alone a lot and don't plan on having a family, then writing can be alright in that way. I like Mark Manson's concept of "shit sandwhich" when it comes to career choice. Basically what cons are your pros, things that most people don't like that you enjoy. That is a "talent" that makes you competitively viable in the market place and helps you figure out your temparement relative to career choice.

AI absolutely deserves regulation. It's a disruptive technology that will likely change the life of everybody. Regulation is necessary to mitigate abuse and negative consequences. Currently AI has no real ethical mandates. My main concerns with AI is large scale job disruption. What happens when a sizable portion of the population is suddenly out of a job due to automization? At one point in the future, the job market might become increasingly temperomental. We as a culture will have to contend with that. For example, it might become increasingly normal to have multiple complete career shifts thoughout a lifetime, simply because human demand dies out due to automization. The demand for human labor in general might decrease in the future, which might be a good thing in a post-scarcity kinda way, where we in general don't "have to" work as much and there's more security around our material needs. But if such a development happens to fast without any forms of social nets, it could lead to chaos. Like, what happens if we fire 80% of all garbage collectors overnight because we have drones that can do most of the menial labor? Just take that example and scale it up to a scale where it concerns society as a whole to a more pressing degree. I am not sure how grounded that concern is in reality, to what degree, but I think it's important to be considerate of how AI will affect society as a principle. My other concern is within the creative industries, where through AI learning we can theoretically automize art and entertainment. We need greater scrutiny around the legality of using copyrighted work for AI learning. There's also the ethical question of if it's right to "supplant" the arts via AI, where humans are not only outcompeted by AI commercially, but also what it does to our appreciation of art. Lets say, in a future version of Unity you can make any game via AI by just typing inputs (no coding required). Anyone can make their dream game, but no one will play it because the market is completely flooded by projects made on a whim. I hope that we as a culture can resist the urge to resurrect dead people via AI, atleast when it comes to commercial products and politics. I can see it having sentimental value to "speak" to your dead relatives in a private setting, but outside of that... It just seems disrespectful to me to puppeteer dead people for a movie for example. Also, just artistically. There should be a generation shift when celebrities pass away. Future movies and projcets shouldn't rely on long dead actors, hogging the roles for then living actors. A good book that talks about future challenges for society, AI among others is Homo Deus by Yuval Noah Harris. Highly recommend it if you care about these topics.

You don't have to accept anything. As long as you don't put down others you're good.

I sometimes get funny little thoughts that are uncomfortable, upsetting, etc. Everybody deals with those to lesser or bigger degrees. They are normal. Just wondering, how do you guys deal with intrusive thoughts? What are the pro strats, I.E. the most efficient methods you've found to help with intrusive thoughts.

Good post. You just need to talk to more women fundamentally.

Do you mean that there's no point in having started something if you weren't going to finnish it. I don't think that is true, if it that's what you meant. I'm an artist. I draw nearly daily. Most of the work I put in is never appreciated or recognized, and most of what I put out is mediocre as I'm a novice. To me, when it comes to creation, it's more important to just keep moving forward. Keep learning. Keep improving. Don't fret so much about the small stuff. Eventually you'll get to a point where it feels more natural. I have a weekly goal of one fully rendered drawing (Ca. 16-20 hours of work). I regularily hate what I end up making that week, but it keeps me drawing. I can visually tell looking back at my weekly submissions that I'm steadily improving, which warms my heart. That is something that works for me. Just don't stop.

A good friend of mine did the opposite of that when introducing me to this whole thing. He was autistic and and I'm naturally open minded. Had any one of those two ingredients been absent, I wouldn't be here lol. This type of stuff can easily become overbearing lol.

Usually, you are motivated to do something because you want the result, be it to get something or to avoid something (carrot or the stick). Why does an interest have to be connected to something big and vague like a "greater purpose"? I'm afraid I might sound like I'm minimizing, but aren't you just overthinking it? Just be honest with yourself. You don't need an excuse to help yourself.

Time for me to once again sing the praises of electric toothbrushes. Switching from an ordinary to electric toothbrush is probably one the easiest ways to improve your dental hygiene. I'm not trying to shill, but I think more people should consider getting one because the fact is that e-brushes are just so much better for you. It's been one of the best decisions I have made for myself in terms of my dental health. The data concistently shows that e-brushes are better at cleaning your teeth than manual. I don't know what else to say. If you don't believe me, just go look. In my own experience, my teeth feel cleaner and I can more concistently stick to a routine of brushing twice a day. I completely avoud over/under brushing, I rarely get icing or canker sores anymore. They are less abressive than manual, yet more thorough. You get it. The effort to reward ratio is extremely good for e-brushes. That's why I'm calling it a low hanging fruit. The biggest downside is that they are expensive, but if there's anything worth spending that kinda money on it's this. It'll only cost you a fraction of going to the dentist for cavities and infections on the other hand. Considering the only hurdle is price, not that much even, I think it's worth considering. You can spend as much money as you like on an e-brush and they can get quiet fancy with their features, but IMO, the most important feature is a built in timer. My brush vibrates once every 30 seconds, thrice every 2 minutes. That's the ideal duration you want to brush your teeth for and I know exactly when to switch sides. That timing is priceless, as it nearly automizes the process. No think, just do. The cheapest e-brushes don't have always have timers FYI. Brushheads can also be expensive as they need to switched out on a regular basis, but you can buy third party ones for relatively cheap. A good e-brush will run you 30-50 dollarinos in my experience. I could go on, but if you read this far, I think you get it lol.

Counter-intuitively, winters are actually the worst in countries that are far up north for it too be cold but not enough for there to be snow, like Denmark. Lots of snow transforms the scenery. Everything outside takes on a new face which is refreshing. Snow also absorbs sound, making things more serene feeling. The biggest downside of snow is ice. Atleast in more southern countries, while you don't get snow, it's not terribly cold either. Which is why the countries that are just cold but without snow have the worst winters.

You are just going through a heartbreak. Just keep yourself busy with something (besides making these posts) and it will all be OK in the end. Avoid buying any pets.

This probably belongs to the off-topic sections. Either way, as a tattoo haver, I recommend you think first more on where you want your tattoo. On a sidenot, I always prefer patterns/shapes over figures when it comes to tattoos since patterns can be extended indefinitely and wrap around body parts. Patterns/shapes complement the natural curvature of the human body. I don't like figures as they are bascially just drawings and look out of place on skin (usually). I personally regret my fox tattoo (which was later also ruined post-surgery, as they cut right across it) I recommend you find a pattern that isn't overly complicated so that it remains distinguishable from a distance. don't over do it. You want the pattern to be informed by where you want it to be as well. For example: Tapers into greater detail up from the wrist. This example has too many elements for my liking though past the first line up from the wrist but examplifys complementing the body's natural curvature.

I mean if you have to ask then that says a lot in of itself, doesn't it? It's just a job, so finding a new one shouldn't be too hard or take too long.

Today we live in the most peaceful era of humanity in terms of war, compared to what it was. The silver lining is that war with modern weapons is so prohibitely expensive and destructive that it's a net loss to wage war agressively (atleast between major states with large scale militaries). When we just had sticks and stones, war was often a net profit if you won. Peace happens when it's impossible/unfavorable to attack. If you want peace, prepare for war.

The approach to Leo's work that works the best for me is to simply take everything with a pinch of salt. When it comes to things like spirituality and figuring out what you need to do, you don't need Leo strictly speaking. To me Leo is entertainment first and foremost. If I want to do something, I'll get more out of thinking for myself than listening to multi-hour lectures. That's not to say that Leo's content isn't illuminating. But for me, the biggest take-away from his channel is the idea that you can figure things out and strategically improve your life quality. That's not a given at all.

I think a major reason behind current day moaning over work is a lack of meaning. Many of us in the modern western world have surpassed base materialistic needs and want a greater connection with what is most meaningful to them. Most people are brought up with security around food, shelter and such. So just working to live isn't good enough for many.

The silver-linging is that bitching and moaning about Youtube is itself a form of content that makes money. It ties current news with your channel and your followers. That's not to say that it's not possible to have valid criticism of changes without it making you whiny little soyboy baby.

Isn't Moby Dick and allegory for Americanism? I heard a lot of good about the book. I should read it some day. I know that HIdeo Kojima seems to really like that book and makes allusion to it all the time in his games.

The optimal diet is a lot of fruit, roots, nuts, leaves, and insects and occassionally meat. Bare foot tree climbing is the optimal exercise for maximising ions.

@Lyubov The coaching industry is currently self-regulated, so there are no state official diplomas or anything. Try this website: https://coachingfederation.org/ @TheSomeBody If you want to help people with ADHD, the best path is to become a psychiatrist. It'll probably make your more money in the long-term as well. You mention that you disagree with the practice, but maybe you change your mind if you where to to be more exposed to its doctrines. Psyciatry is reputable and it is effective at treating ADHD. Thats for certain. From a purely utilitarian perspective, if you are going to practice medicine, doing it the "official way" will make you more money and let you help more people over the span of your career than a career in alternative medicine. That's my opinion at least.