Basman

Looking for skooma

Can relate. I look at the face in general. It depends on how focused I am on the interaction. Eye contact is personal.

The skin is what I interact with daily. I feel and touch with it all the time. My bones aren't really direct experience. It might be skin all the way down for I know, just different levels of hardness. It doesn't matter to me.

Zelensky hate is so forced. Anti-west bro are deranged.

The idea of media induce autism is pretty funny. You've spent so much time gaming and browsing, on they phone and not socializing, that your basically retarded. I think it's just another consequence of modernity, between increased technology use and the erosion of thin relationships (opposite of friends and family) and local communities by extent.

12/50 Impossible. Perhaps the archives are incomplete. Yeah, its bad at differentiating between autism and introversion. If I was more extroverted my score would be halfed easily. I hate obsessive and detailed thinking.

Migration is one of those policies that people tend to get ideological about regardless of the results. Classic social justice elitism. That's not to say that migration is bad but the implememtation of recent decades has created a general public stance against migration, at least in Europe. There was never broad public approval for migration first of all (contributing to resentment and a loss of trust in governmet). It's to the point that for mainstream political parties being strict on migration is essential more or less and will be for the foreseeable future.

Plus he found god, so how can you be mad at him?

How do you know? Our technology has never been more advanced and we are as conscious as we have ever been. That's just been the trend so far. If they have spacecraft they are probably more intelligent than us, even if the potential of their genome is similar to ours. They've just had more time or better conditions to develop their minds.

Wait till you see the spacecraft that looks like Spiderman.

People love coffee though. It's hard to be successful with ideas that don't work in practice. Elites can't force bad ideas to work long-term just because it makes them money. Even something like planned obsolescence does serve a need for novelty and improved tech to a certain degree. The most predatory digital ecosystems, like Apple, do serve convenience and quality at least. Economic exclusion is a problem though, but I don't think its that hard to be financially secure nowadays compared to our history. It's not like your going to starve if your crops fail. Just pick something in demand if you want certainty. Trades, nursing, logistics, bookkeeping, etc. You can strap yourself with steady pay in 3-5 years tops. A lot of people are impractical with their career choices (plus there's just less demand in general). We have a culture of entitlement to happiness.

If they are using tech that is not originally theirs maybe. An orangutan can learn to drive.

If true. AI bros are not honest people. With all that circular financing and circlejerking and shit. All signs point towards unsuistanibility at scale and a crash. China already got crashed.

I will never financially recover from this. Watch the video attached to the linked article. Locking out Chinese AI products globally was probably a big cause in the dip

Democrats want no AI bailouts. They want to prepare for a crash.

Doubt it. Source? If anything it seems to only become more expensive to run. People are increasingly using AI more, putting a greater load on their systems.

Value is relative. Your going to have a bias for humans, being human and all. You won't see humans like a crocodile or a tiger does, to whom we are either a threat or just food. Your family is more valuable to you than a random stranger, who is more valuable to you than a farm pig, who's more valuable to you than ants. Value is just ones bias for survival. Humans or anything else for that matter don't need to have value to exist and be part of what makes creation whole.

Then why did the Chinese market lose 480 billion. Even when cut of from western markets, a profitable technology shouldn't lead to such a bloodbath. That graph is like an executioners axe.

I can see AI companies trying to switch to providing hacking for the military such that they don't have to be profitable. AI is too expensive to run to be profitable.

Woman version of "you need to smile more".

A certain degree of precariousness is historically normal. You should be prepared to take care of your survival. Don't study animal anuses for 5 years and expect society to reward you without a plan. Handouts and welfare are probably going to get tighter as well.

A certain state precariousness is normal historically I think. We're spoiled by exceptional circumstances. A week's worth of supply is nothing too serious though and its been a precaution governments have pushed for a while now. Global warming and Russian sabotage means there are times when the infrastructure might temporarily fail.

Age: 42