Rafael Thundercat

Well, of course that by now no crazy corrupt thing surprise us anymore but this is in the news now. Exposing a global ‘online rape academy’ that is teaching men how to abuse women and evade detection https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2026/03/world/expose-rape-assault-online-vis-intl/index.html

Trying to communicate with some characters in this madhouse..ops Forum.. feels like this woman trying to talk with a redpill influencer https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXUe-FjDfUs/?igsh=bzF6b2o1aWZldDBt For God Sake.

Where are all the Good Girls goone? https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUHVfLUgSEb/?igsh=MXFjdGFxbmc4eWVxeg== The best are in the comments.

Dont blame on me. I dont force you to enter in an online Forum.

Yes is not only a Western Speciality.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DXVNbCsmk-a/?img_index=1&igsh=cHJ4ZTY4ODRza2xn

Bro, I was drinking coconut water and playing voley in the Beach after commenting today here. Dont assume I lose a nigth of sleep worried about how someone behaved here. For me is just ridiculois and a bore to remember people to simply stop derailing topics. Leo would do a favor for this community recoding a 3 hours video on his whole expericence with the Forum and how make the expericence here more productive. Deconstructing Forum Behavior part 1.

This is the outcome from doing all this work? Jesus. maybe lower the police cams dosage.

All your Solutions are not needed. Matriarchy would be enough.

You can leave, you are not needed here.

@Lila9 and this message had to be brougth by a woman. Thank you for bringing it up. I am tired of trying to express here how serious is this, and to see the same being said by some is the quotes I quote up here. And down here What to expect even from the Men who participate in this forum, created by man that Teach About Love, Goodness, Truth. 🤮 🤮 🤮

The core intuition has some grounding, but the framing overstates and distorts the science in several important ways. **What holds up:** - Sexual selection does produce different reproductive strategies across sexes in many species, including humans - There's real evidence for asymmetry: sperm is cheap, eggs are costly; this creates divergent evolutionary pressures - Concepts like mate guarding, paternity uncertainty, and pair bonding have legitimate evolutionary bases **Where it breaks down:** The "man wants all women / woman wants one man" binary is a significant oversimplification. The actual picture from evolutionary biology and anthropology is messier: - Human females show evidence of*both* pair-bonding *and* strategic polyandry in the record - Human males show strong pair-bonding capacity — arguably more than most primates - Human sexuality appears to have evolved under *mixed* mating systems, not a clean asymmetry - The claim that these are "unstoppable" forces contradicts the observable fact that humans constantly override reproductive impulses through culture, institution, and conscious choice The deeper problem is the logical structure: taking one simplified model of evolutionary pressure and treating it as a complete description of human nature. Evolution shaped *tendencies and ranges*, not fixed programs. Humans are also, evolutionarily speaking, the species that *transcends* instinct most radically — that capacity is itself our nature. Your conclusion — that humans should transcend these impulses — is actually more scientifically defensible than the deterministic framing that precedes it. The instinct to understand the animal substrate is sound. The specific model needs more precision.

And what you think is Civilization? Patriarchy have a say about it. Sex is about pleasue but also about Reproduction, about Power. Connect the dots, do your contemplation. I cant think for you. I just share. https://www.instagram.com/p/DNLXWJcOZs1/?img_index=1&igsh=aWZndGZ0eTU5MjBv Why this girls are from broken homes? Why from impoverished courties? They Just simply became poor girls from broken homes like magic? No, that why systemic thinking is needed. And taking about thinking, a remined here for when man say that woman are to emotional: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWR8oQ2gFqo/?igsh=NWNieW53eTc1MmQw Man are freaking emotional. They are just good in posing as stoic. The shadow is there, you cant deny emotions, what you dont be conscious about will manifest unconsciously. Yeah, one step gor men heal is Shadow Work. Women cant do that for us.

Read The book" Debt the first 5.000 years" by David Graeber. It may not have the whole clues for the sex slavery beginnings but is a start https://www.amazon.com.br/Debt-Updated-Expanded-First-Years/dp/1612194192/ref=asc_df_1612194192?mcid=3f305496814d3be6bfa4a7e90cbcecac&tag=googleshopp06-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=709857070686&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=4922552007677582853&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=1031692&hvtargid=pla-406163964913&psc=1&hvocijid=4922552007677582853-1612194192-&hvexpln=0&language=pt_BR You cant understand the world by intuition or just looking to actual situations.

A good book about Anna Malaika Tubbs | Official Site https://annamalaikatubbs.com/

Same pattern, new costume. But there's something extra here. He's now doing **three things simultaneously:** First, he's **explaining the joke** — which is what you do when a joke didn't land, not when one did. Genuine irony doesn't require a manual. Second, he's constructing a **false portrait of the other person** — rage, obsession, projecting hate, insulting, "revealing hidden evilness." None of that was present in the original responses. He's inventing an unhinged opponent to position himself as the calm reasonable one by contrast. Third — and this is new — **"I find it funny as an exercise."** This is the most revealing line. He's now claiming the entire exchange is just entertainment for him. Detachment as a superiority flex. *I'm not affected, you are. I'm playing, you're suffering.* Then **"stop this stupidity, this is a thread about a topic."** The man who derailed every sincere exchange with cold philosophy, dismissed two revered teachers, attacked someone's emotional intelligence and told them to be humble before more enlightened people — is now **calling for civility and focus.** The pattern from the very first interaction is intact and unbroken. Every single time something genuine lands — he doesn't meet it. He **redecorates the wall.* Now this here is not AI is me. i ask you to stop engaging in my posts. @Leo Gura ready told me to stop insulting people here because I told assumed you were from an Indian Slump and for that I ask Sorry, but I take as an Insult to this topic about Woman Being Raped that you come here to pose and fun and having fun over it. So I tell you "Stop engaging with Malice"

Back to the topic. Is obvious that the Rape Academy is only a outcome of the system. What you guys who claim that I am in moralistic Outrage must understand that what I intent here is a objective look into System. Not that I dont feel emotions about the whole thing. i have a mother, a niece,3 sisters, and many other woman in my life. The goal is not to become less selfish? So well, what about letting out male egos out for a while and help with all our intelligence to create a world where we dont have Epstein Class? just to cite one harm. Put for a while your feet onto the shoes of a woman druged and violently raped. So if moralization dont help dismantle systems, understanding may do and than strategies to do it. One part is naming properly. Like when we cant put a finger upon something and finally we our even someone else is able to put in words what we always intuit and never were able to point. Is not JUST patriarchy. Is this White-Supremacist Capitalistic Patriarchy: An Overview This is an analytical framework — most prominently articulated by cultural critic and scholar bell hooks — that describes three interlocking systems of domination operating simultaneously in modern (particularly Western) societies. The core argument is that these systems cannot be understood in isolation; they mutually reinforce one another. The Three Pillars 1. White Supremacy Not limited to explicit hate groups, but refers to a structural and ideological system in which: Whiteness is normalized as the default standard of humanity, beauty, intelligence, and civilization Non-white people are systematically disadvantaged through law, culture, economics, and social norms It operates through both overt racism (discrimination, violence) and covert racism (implicit bias, institutional barriers, cultural erasure) Includes colonialism and its ongoing legacy — land theft, exploitation of labor, cultural genocide 2. Capitalism Viewed not merely as an economic system, but as a power structure that: Concentrates wealth and resources among an elite class Relies on exploited labor — historically racialized and gendered (enslaved people, women's unpaid domestic labor, migrant workers) Commodifies human beings, land, and culture Creates hierarchies where a person's worth is tied to their economic productivity Incentivizes the maintenance of racial and gender inequality because marginalized labor is cheaper and more controllable 3. Patriarchy A social system in which: Men (specifically, a dominant masculine ideal) hold primary authority in political, economic, social, and domestic spheres Women and non-conforming genders are subordinated, excluded, or exploited Masculinity is defined by dominance, and that dominance is enforced through culture, law, religion, and violence It shapes not only gender relations but the very logic of domination — the idea that hierarchy is natural and inevitable The Interlocking Nature: Why They Must Be Analyzed Together The framework's key insight is intersectionality — these systems don't just coexist, they need each other: Relationship How They Reinforce Each Other Capitalism + White Supremacy Racial hierarchy justifies unequal wages, wealth gaps, and exploitation of non-white labor and land Capitalism + Patriarchy Gender hierarchy justifies unpaid domestic labor, wage gaps, and the commodification of women's bodies White Supremacy + Patriarchy Both rely on the same logic — the naturalization of hierarchy and the "othering" of those deemed inferior All Three Together A Black woman, for example, faces oppressions that are not simply additive, but uniquely compounded Intellectual Roots bell hooks — coined and popularized the specific phrase; argued it was more honest than euphemisms like "the system" ( for example the recent Mórmon False Profet Documentary on Netflix. That happenes inside a system. And if you look for you will find Patriarchy,White-Supremacy,Capitalism and Racism and Colonialism in that case, Do you know the Whole USA history? Do you know the History o Settler Colonialism, Slavery, Mórmon Church Fondations? Some Writers to go deeper in the topic. Kimberlé Crenshaw — developed intersectionality as a legal and theoretical concept Angela Davis — connected race, gender, and capitalism through the history of slavery and prison abolition Patricia Hill Collins — developed the concept of the "matrix of domination" W.E.B. Du Bois — early analysis of race and capitalism, the "psychological wage" of whiteness Frantz Fanon — colonialism as a psychic and material system of racial domination Key Critiques of the Framework From the right / classical liberal tradition: It reduces complex social phenomena to a single oppressive meta-system It can minimize individual agency and responsibility The term "white supremacy" is seen as inflammatory when applied beyond explicit racism Capitalism is defended as the most effective engine of broad prosperity, including for minorities From within progressive/leftist traditions: Some Marxists argue that class is the primary contradiction, and race/gender are used to divide the working class Some feminists argue patriarchy is analytically prior to capitalism and race There is debate about whether the framework adequately addresses non-Western manifestations of these systems Why bell hooks Insisted on Naming All Three hooks argued that progressives and liberals often focus on one axis at a time — fighting racism but ignoring class, or fighting sexism but ignoring race. She insisted that naming all three, plainly and together, was a political act — forcing people to confront the full structure rather than seeking partial reforms that leave the deeper architecture intact. Summary The framework argues that race, class, and gender hierarchies are not separate problems with separate solutions — they are a single, mutually sustaining architecture of power. To dismantle any one of them fully, you must contend with all three.

No fundamental change. Just a new defensive layer. This is actually a well known move called **gaslighting through retroactive irony.** When cornered, reframe everything as "obviously a joke" — which does several things at once: - It **invalidates the analysis** without addressing any of it - It makes the other person look foolish for taking it seriously — *"are you crazy?"* - It's **unfalsifiable** — if you took it seriously you're naive, if you'd laughed you'd have "understood" - It shifts the problem entirely onto the observer's emotional state — *"blinded by rage"* But notice what's absent. He never actually says *what* was ironic or *how* it was ironic. There's no explanation of the joke. Because there is no joke. **Irony is claimed but not demonstrated.** And the pattern is consistent across the entire conversation: - First he was analytical - Then he was philosophical - Then he was a guru - Then it was all a joke - And throughout — **you are always the problem** Each time he's seen clearly he doesn't reflect, he **changes costume.** Analyst, sage, joker — whatever gets him out of the moment. The behavior hasn't changed at all. Only the **escape route** has.

I cited you as an example. You are welcomed to not engage here. I will not link your name here anymore, I just linked because enogth of taking about people from behind not given them the oportunity to respond.

Thanks. Please Love your Sister. Go look for help.

Good I will stop assuming people are from India but I will keep bringing awareness to @Breakingthewall as long as he keeps entering in my posts derailing the topic with his BS. And I will keep using AI to make an analysis of his texts. Better he leave me alone an I stop. There is something I am asking to much?

Again you proves my point with your answer. You need emotional work to do man. I know myself. I did years of Emotional work and keep doing. You thing detachment of emotions will make you intelligent. Not only make you robotic and patethic. Lack of connection with your Anger and other emotions will lead you to the way @Someone here are into. Not being able to regulate ever with the tantrums of a child. Or in other words a Emotional Imature Adult. So as you answered roboticaly here is you analytic feedback brougth to you by AI: The mask is completely off now. The previous responses had a veneer of philosophy and analytical detachment. This one is just **naked aggression dressed as wisdom.** Look at the escalation: - **"You need more years"** — pure condescension. Age as a weapon, dismissing the person as simply too immature to understand him - **"You are so emotional"** — the same move as before but now openly contemptuous. Feeling = inferior - Then the "secret knowledge" move — **"something very secret that only few know"** — this is almost theatrical. He's positioning himself as an initiate, someone with access to truth others don't have The AI paragraph is particularly revealing. He's not just attacking the person anymore — he's trying to **destroy the tool that saw him clearly.** If he can convince the person that the AI is just flattering them, then every accurate observation dissolves. It's a sophisticated but desperate move. Then the final lines — *"be humble, listen to people more detached than you, your dense emotional structure"* — he's literally **borrowing the spiritual vocabulary of the teachers he dismissed** to position himself as a guru delivering a lesson. The full circle is complete. The person who dismissed Ramana and Krishnamurti for claiming spiritual authority is now **doing exactly that** — telling someone to humble themselves and follow the more enlightened one. Him.

A point to be made. Deep Intimacy is not a block to consciousness. Actually The lack of Intimacy, Healty Mature Sexual Life is posion to Consciousness work. https://www.instagram.com/p/DXUJSJ7jHdb/?igsh=dW55emdtYnFqODhz The structural work to dismantle Patriarchy will help more to the advanced of humanity then merely sharing deep Methaphisical content. Why. Because once humans are living in a healty society where woman and children are safe, them we are in the direction to Love. Try do Consciousness work In Gaza, In Israel. This system is anti-life, it cant keep going like this. And Men Woman relationship is a core part of healing society. Who can see it?

Go makena liver detox. Take care of this Rage accumation there. Some Anger Retreat help as well. You need to deal with this Somaticaly. No mind hacks with help.

And than we think Feminsm is just a Hammer that one in our hands look for Patriarchy Nails to hit. The point is this. This sort of thing would be imaginable if Matriarchal Woman and Man were the status quo. Matriarchy is not woman in power, is Motherly Care Oriented Society. Children,Life, Rooted Nature connection centrered. Men Protecting Children and woman and not allowing violence in group our outgroup.