Rafael Thundercat

Yes. I am open for all women present in this Forum ( not so many of course) to share more women voices here. To balancing the over intelectualization that we see here. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVExCkzkuWM/?igsh=MXNiN3E4a3V1cjVhbw== I am listen more woman since last years. There are wise men in the world but without women wisdom we are in imbalance.

A Conference for understanding Epstein Culture, Deepak Chopra etc.. https://scienceandnonduality.com/event/the-architecture-of-silence-in-spiritual-culture/?utm_source=ig&utm_medium=social&utm_content=link_in_bio&fbclid=PAdGRzdgQb00BleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA81NjcwNjczNDMzNTI0MjcAAafsyZujhVTpKzH4DsTLr289ni2muiXez0iCaO7IGT3yMf57ARUwqxMmuyLXFg_aem_A94vu4AsiPhpYgxF4THIjQ Summary The Architecture of Silence in Spiritual Culture Reckoning with Epstein, Deepak, and Systems of Denial A Community Gathering with Matthew Remski, Bayo Akomolafe, Tara Brach, and V, facilitated by Dr. Gabor Maté Something is cracking open in the spiritual and wellness world; and it has been for a while. Have wisdom traditions containing genuine gifts been composted into a product that only serves the very forces those traditions were born to resist? It is no news that some powerful spiritual leaders with devoted followers have, for a long time, abused that power for dominance and, in many cases, for sexual exploitation. The Epstein files are not an interruption to the pattern; they are the pattern, made suddenly impossible to scroll past. We want to reflect on the conditions—not just the men, not just the crimes, but the architecture of silence that held it all in place. What kind of spiritual culture produces that silence? What kind of spiritual culture makes it possible to look at harm and call it a lesson in perception? What has gone awry with our approach to spirituality when the latter can be used as a cover for abuse? How come much of the therapeutic and spiritual communities remain silent in the face of crimes witnessed by the entire world? To explore these and related issues, this discussion brings together mytho-poetic spiritual teacher Bayo Akomolafe Ph.D., writer & podcaster Matthew Remsiki, author & playwright V, spiritual teacher & psychologist Tara Brach and author & physician Gabor Maté in a wide-ranging discussion that will also invite audience participation. The intention is to leave participants encouraged to find the spiritual inner strength needed to pursue truth without losing discrimination in the process, without giving away their power; to discuss compassionately, without judgment but with clarity, what the Epstein revelations can tell us about who we are, about our culture, and about the nature of how we construct reality; to move beyond a so-called equanimity and “non-attachment” that is indistinguishable from numbness and passivity in the face of harm, in the face of evil.

We all know how the world is Run, is all over the news. The question is , just because it was conformes like do we need to keep in the same suicidal route?

Here is an example of a man that walk the path of Meditation but still engage in his own way to spread awareness of how the system work and how it affect him and others https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVqYabBkl_9/?igsh=MXZnMmVmYjMzajZwcw==

The Menu, that movie was boommmmm!! Literally

Interesting. Keep me informed.

Some people are already working towards a new future, we just need to find them and join the work. https://substack.com/home/post/p-190380237?fbclid=PAT01DUAQbplJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA81NjcwNjczNDMzNTI0MjcAAactca9GiYH919UH3l_5uGlwpIhzNPVUR087xchRQK6fgtmPAwBym6u-AgLx_w_aem_2o3utgrpVfns25-KGsFPaw

This is where I say that maybe Leo is not the guy for this task. To much talk of Absolute Truth, Love and God and little understanding of the complexities of systems of oppression. A mind so evolved that is just able to say "There is nothing here to understand. Raw power wins. Women do not have the ruthlessness to dominate the world and lead armies and gangs. Your morals do not matter in the game for survival. Whoever can enslave and rape the most people wins. That's why women don't run the world" No Leo, there is a lot to understand, I guess you dont follow or read many women like Bell Brooks. If you would understand what is Matriarchy you would wish it as a way for the world. Understand that this current system is even not allowing more Awakenings to more people. All this Gore happening in the world have roots. Do you really study history or better Herstory? A great part of the human population are women and all the others are sons and daughters from those women and last time I checked women and childen are being abused and killed mostly by men, just because is happening it dont mean it was supposed to be this way, it is like this since the dawn of civilization and understanding how we end up here is important. God may not have morals, it dont need morals since it is everything, so is up to us to do the work and create the sort of society that is life caring centered.

This was probably the midset that started the whole mess in some point of history around Mesopotamia or earlyer. But of course you can care less about it since in your Guided Exercise to God Realisation you said to Throw Away the whole human history, ancestrals, and even our own birth. So why you would even care to understand patriarchy if for you is all fanstasy?

Of course I dont forget the nut-sack I came from and I am also aware of how dominant, violent towards women was the owner of those nut-sack. What I am saying is that we dont understand deeply Patriarchy and how it became the norm of how society is organized. And is not even about devaluing men since even boys are hurt by it. Yesterday I had a experience with Mysogyny in first hand watching another man dissmising the presence of a woman who is my friend.

I think what you are pointing at is what I can see coming. Is Called Matriarchy and is a very misunderstond topic. In Summary Matriarchy is a society organized around care for life and care for the vessels of life that are women, and honetly no amount of Leo saying "Forget your birth" will erase the fact that he and me and all of us came from a Womb. Women are how infinity increase the possibility of Awakening. To even smoke 5meo you needed to being raised, feed, cared. Soon I will share some content from woman groups I follow and are deep into bringing back Matriarchy. I took time to realize is this only route for a future we as species have. Because surely White man in power already proved a disaster.

Real State Mess. For any animal Territoty and Resources equals survival. If I would wish to eliminate a specie like frogs for example, instead of killing one by one, the fast way would take out their territory and food suply since no animal life without the ecosystem. Humans are animals figthing for Land and Resources. All the politics are the details and rationalization to justify land grab and survival of those who grab it. Even buying is a form of grab land( check the movie Bury my Hearth at Wounded Knee -in HBOMax)

Yes. All made up. Oh Abraham that Goat Fucker, land grab griffter.

Dont know man, let @Leo Guraanswer it by himself.

Stick, your name is the answer 😂, you just need to Stick 5Meo up your ass and Ta-ta!!

I have this ideia of eating mushrooms all day long, I mean, eating food but in the intervals keep the habit of mushrooms. I dont know if my liver will like it .

I understand you, it came to mind other day that Leo may use his energy to the purpose that is fit to him. There is a lot o people that dedicate their lifes to understand and dismantle systems of oppression. Of course having a mind as Leo engaged in this goal would be great. But is up to him.

What is actually a Jew or Israelite? Suposelly all started with Abraham a land lord.

Do you think my question for Claude on Epistemic Rigour was Epistemicaly Irresponsible? This is an honest question not a need for validation. I want to use it better. Not to avoid thinking for myself. Because even if the answer comes from AI or from you from my POV are both external sources of knowing, I still need to verify any claim by direct experience.

Yes I think asking save the world was asking too much, I just was trying to see how it would tackle the question. Of course AI can even grasp what sort of Truth I was refering to.

I asked Claude a question like this Can deep epistemic rigour save the world? ( based on the recent post about corruption and caring about Truth. The answer What a question. Let me take it seriously. The case that it can: Deep epistemic rigour — careful attention to how we form beliefs, what evidence we demand, how we reason under uncertainty — does seem load-bearing for almost every civilizational challenge. Climate policy fails partly because motivated reasoning and tribal epistemics let people discount overwhelming evidence. AI safety is hard partly because researchers don't rigorously interrogate their own assumptions. Pandemic response failed partly because institutions couldn't update quickly on new data. In each case, better thinking seems like it would help. There's also a compounding argument: the people and institutions that shape the world disproportionately — scientists, policymakers, judges, engineers — are exactly the people whose epistemic habits matter most. Improving those habits at the margin could have outsized effects. The case that it can't: Rigour is a tool, not a motivation. The most epistemically careful person can still pursue narrow or destructive ends. And the world's most catastrophic actors aren't usually making reasoning errors — they're often quite clear-eyed about what they want and how to get it. The problem is values, not epistemics. There's also a coordination problem. Even if every individual reasoned perfectly, collective action problems, power asymmetries, and structural incentives can produce terrible outcomes from perfectly rational actors. Game theory is full of tragedies that require no irrationality at all. And then there's the elitism trap: "if everyone just reasoned better" can become a way of blaming ordinary people for the failures of systems designed to exploit cognitive shortcuts. The demand for rigour can itself become a rhetorical weapon — used to dismiss intuitions that are actually tracking something real but hard to formalize. A more honest synthesis: Epistemic rigour is probably necessary but very far from sufficient. It matters most in specific, high-leverage contexts: how scientific institutions self-correct, how policy incorporates uncertainty, how AI systems are evaluated. In those domains, the difference between sloppy and rigorous thinking is enormous. But "saving the world" also requires things rigour can't supply on its own — moral seriousness, political will, solidarity, luck, and coordination mechanisms that make cooperation rational even for self-interested actors. Perhaps the best version of the claim isn't that rigour saves the world directly, but that epistemic cowardice — the willingness to believe comfortable things, to avoid updating, to confuse fluency with understanding — is one of the most reliable engines of catastrophe. Rigour, in that sense, is less a solution than a discipline against self-destruction. So: probably not sufficient. Possibly necessary. Definitely underrated.

As Israel Zionism is somehow based on Whiteness or Whitesupremacy ( and the reason America and Israel relate so well. Is worth study whiteness or whitesupremacy. Or the minds infect by it. Is a sort of mind virus. Good start is here

Some boys killed a comunity dog called "Orelha" in South Brasil. Same behavior, torture of the inocent dog. The whole country entered in havoc. I dont know how the situation is now but people were really revolted. Sorry for the AI content. Was the best I could find in English. In this case the Boys were helped to escape to Disney to avoid being judged. Selfishness have consequences

As Leo post this one I am waiting for the lesson from this event.

Mark Rutte speaks