Rafael Thundercat

I dont understand why we are not talking about this enogth.

@Joseph Maynor great video. Now understand why there was Nazis in Indiana Jones movie that happen in Egipt.haha

Thanks, but as you may guess, I keep the work of trying to not let my mind be decived everyday. If is not mormonism we always have other shit to clean from our way. Even Ayahuasca circles are full of delusions. If one dont be careful one adopt new delusions.

What?????

I dont even keep track of all that happened yesterday.

@Phil King the plate start with AI. Haha. Maybe a sign of the universe. Hehe

I guess understanding it will not stop the consequences. I did a Claude research about it "Scholars are arguing about exactly this, and the labels aren't mutually exclusive. There are three main camps: Techno-feudalism (Varoufakis, Durand): Varoufakis says he isn't claiming we've literally returned to feudalism, and that rent-seeking isn't new to capitalism. His core claim is that digital capitalism is driven less by labor exploitation and more by rent extraction and control of digital infrastructure. (transcend) (developingeconomics) "Still capitalism, just late-stage", which is closest to your framing. Louçã argues this is a transformation within late capitalism, not a return to a past era. Critics add that the feudalism label underplays capitalism's built-in tendency toward monopoly. Morozov's worry is that the techno-feudalism critique could end up rehabilitating capitalism. (Techno-feudal lords or oligarchy of data traffickers? +2) Technofascism: critics apply it to figures like Palantir's Karp, who explicitly links technological superiority, military power and national destiny. Others push back: calling everything "technofascism" stops thinking and turns complex problems into simple enemies. (Substack) (dailysabah) The main fault line is whether the digital economy is a new mode of production or capitalism's usual monopoly logic in new clothes. "Fascism" is a different kind of claim. It's about political form (state capture, suppression of dissent, a fusion of corporate and state power), not economics. So you could hold both: capitalism's organic dynamics as the engine, and an authoritarian political outcome as one possible destination. One thing to examine in your own framing: "organic problems of capitalism and materialism" bundles an economic claim with a philosophical one. Which of the two are you really pointing at? And what would you have to see, concretely, to shift from "dystopia" to "fascism"? The links of this claims https://www.transcend.org/tms/2026/08/technofeudalism-and-the-future-of-capitalism/ .... https://developingeconomics.org/2025/05/05/digital-lords-or-capitalist-titans-critiquing-the-techno-feudalism-narrative/ ..... https://internationalviewpoint.org/Techno-feudal-lords-or-oligarchy-of-data-traffickers ... https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/blogs/news/where-is-digital-technology-taking-us-cedric-durand-responds-to-evgeny-morozov .... https://asianarratives.substack.com/p/technofeudalism ... https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/why-we-must-look-deeper-than-the-technofascism-label/amp ...

The world keep existing in the absence for the one who is gone. Keep existing for Others who still stay.

In the series is good to notice that women comply with the Gilead Republic

https://www.qasimrashid.com/p/russell-brand-rape-and-not-all-men Good read.

It goes back in History. Some connections with the Habsburg Family. who was the guy who was shot dead in Saravejo "Wiki Help" " Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was the prominent Habsburg royal shot and killed in Sarajevo (modern-day Bosnia and Herzegovina, then annexed by Austria-Hungary) on June 28, 1914. His assassination by a Bosnian Serb nationalist triggered the chain of events that led to the outbreak of World War I. Key Details of the Assassination The Victim: Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne. His wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, was also shot and killed in the same attack. The Location: The shooting took place in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina. While often associated with Serbia because of the assassin's nationality and political goals, Sarajevo was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire at the time. The Assassin: Gavrilo Princip, a 19-year-old Bosnian Serb student and member of the revolutionary movement Young Bosnia, fired the fatal shots. He was backed by the Black Hand, a secret Serbian nationalist military society. The Aftermath: Austria-Hungary blamed Serbia for the attack and declared war one month later on July 28, 1914. This activated European military alliances and sparked World War I."

What would be a better description?

I like to watch the Negacionists as well. well, lets forgive her, she is young. If the Tale would become reality one can know to what side she would be part of.

Remembering that Handmaid Tales was a book Banned from US schools..

Perhaps it is better to say that history is written by the survivors. Hard to write history if you're dead. "The real point though, is that the history you are taught is the history that serves those in power. Which history becomes popular is not neutral or objective, it's a political decision that serves someone's survival. The question is more nuanced than who writes the history. The question is more about which history becomes mainstreamed and popularized, and why. Winners tend to have the political power to popularize history that favors them. Case in point: Christianity and Islam." Thats why I started reading the works of Silvia Federici "The Caliban and the Witch" and many others that shows blindspots in the His-Story, forgeting the Her-Story as well. Also at same time I am Watching the Handmaid Tale Series at Netflix that maybe looks like what a Christian Nationalism would look like if came to be. Maybe even worst that that. Anyway. I agree that the survivors tell the story but if we look for we find out the story of the Resistance of the ones that choose not to bend to the Bullshitery.

The Character of God is very Slippery and Tricky, sometimes he wants to give you some of his Love and sometimes he denies it so he melt the chair in order to show that wanting to gain massive progression is a cheap bargain. Who are you hoping to give you the spiritual progression?

Of course this may be biased and there is a lot of yoga studios still open. But do guy here from US noticed this?

Nobody Read his book, the art of the Seduction?

Like this https://www.instagram.com/p/DfWGvzaG1Nd/?mdxt=OGhob3RuYXM1Y2Q0

Insigth from watching Cruzades video. Knights Templars = what would be ICE today a Private Militia. Also a sort of Hype of those times. Like, a lot of guys enter to the Militia, they have status, meaning, a goal in life, at least is not boring so like a hive mind many gather and became a mass movement like MaGa. Of course to fight open body with a sword take more guts than the average MAGA would have.

Not Haiti but similar issue. The embargos towards Cuba. https://www.instagram.com/p/DfcPH6KCLUt/?img_index=2&obrf=MWZmN2R0eWxhcmJkMw== This post bring questions. Anyone knows any other reason for this?

Is not whether you see or dont, if you would be 24/7 in the state of seeing the illusion as illusion I dont know if would be possible to function. For seconds is already to much.

I know, as far as I could go I now are following for awile the option like that guy in the Matrix that made the choice to go back to matrix. The difference is that he would forget even the possibility of something out of the Matrix for me and maybe for others in similar situation the case isz you never forget the day you saw it. You saw it, is made your heart race and you could not belive it but know you know that one day or another you will need to get the guts to go there again( not a place, a state)

La la la if was all that to easy. The weasels are infiltered everywhere both sides.

Their falsness is existing