Rafael Thundercat

A woman on Threads entered at the Motherless site to describe the sort of Videos exists there. And is not even a DarkWeb Site. Here is the description: ⚠️ CW: rape ⚠️ Please do NOT go to that motherless site btw, even if you’re morbidly curious to see just how bad it is for yourself I’ll admit a small part of me was hopelessly naive and wishful thinking that it was just porn actors and actresses playing like really convincing roles. I was telling myself that surely someone less versed in the world of sex work just couldn’t accurately separate reality from fiction or kink. One more warning before you read about how disturbing it is‼️ I saw a woman, clearly drugged from something, getting slapped and beaten harder than any consensual kind of pain play I’ve seen. It looked like he was trying to tear joints or break her bones. All while she remained completely unconscious, without any sort of involuntary body reflex, even like a gasp or squirm. Just breathing and faint snoring. Then the man brutally assaulted her, eventually using an entire wine bottle, until she ended up soiling herself. Again, no reaction or the faintest movement from her. He started going again, and at that point I noticed just how much I was silently sobbing in horror. I reported the video as best as I could, and took a cold shower to try and wash what I saw out of my head. It will never leave my brain. I’m both a survivor, and I’ve done sex work and know BDSM. What I saw was not consensual. I genuinely thought this kind of thing existed solely on the dark web. But this is a public website, one that receives 63 MILLION VIEWS in a single month. I’m going to talk to my therapist about this, it’s fundamentally killed a kind of innocence in me I thought had already died long ago. This was not porn. This was assault being fetishized, a woman being objectified, and her body being exploited and shown to others who want to do the same thing to women.

Long slide about Mental Health Crisis. Dark Triad https://www.instagram.com/p/DXS9mJ3ANP2/?igsh=cW42NDBsNTYyemM2 The second link from the same Mother Abused shows how the system work or not works in favor of the victims. This is also part of the Patriarchy. https://www.instagram.com/p/DXHY_8PgP98/?igsh=MTVpaHZzODA2MzNobg== Woman and Children not being listened.

Check the works of David Graeber like the book "Debt The first 5.000 years"

What would be the solution so?

Come to give a ride with my in my Horse Mr Gura, I need to remind that the exceptions are simply doing the bare minimum. Do I deserve a prize for not raping? No? Do recognizing that 90% of man dont rape helps at all to change the system that creates and allow men to drug and rape their wifes? NO. my point is that this calls to see that the situation is not that bad dont change the fact that a lot harm is being caused for a lot of children and woman. Awareness about the situation we have lot. We need are intelligent solutions. Is not your work about Intelligence?

We are. I actually live in a literal paradise. Where do you live? India Slump?

No, I am Neutral. Why would I be angry talking about Gengis Khan killing people. As far as my direct experience shows me I am just talking with myself.

You are talking with me?

So we have around 3.753 billion. Non abusers/rapers worldwide vs 417 million. Rapers. Sounds like a good amount to make take the situation + the other half of Woman population that mainly certainly dotn want to be raped and killed. Someone bring a Expert in Statistic on the thread. We have a case of minimization of something big. In the Actualized Big Picture there is actually nobody being raped isn't Mr Gura? Femicide Rates by Country 2026 https://share.google/HBX8qpenzWpq4MTOT rape per year Reported rape statistics show hundreds of thousands of cases annually worldwide, with underreporting making true figures higher. In the U.S., roughly 140,000 to 460,000 cases occur annually depending on reported vs. estimated surveys. Brazil recorded 83,988 cases in 2023, while UK data suggests high annual prevalence. Rape Statistics by Location and Context: United States: Roughly 139,815 rapes were reported to law enforcement in 2019. Sexual violence impacts 463,634 victims (age 12+) annually on average. Brazil: In 2023, 83,988 cases of rape and statutory rape were recorded, marking a 6.5% increase from 2022, with a rape occurring approximately every six minutes. Global & Regional Trends: An estimated 739,000 women are raped or sexually assaulted every year in the UK. In 2026, projected rape cases included 81,603 in Brazil, 41,652 in France, and 24,600 in Mexico. Perpetrator Context: 60% of rapes are committed by someone known to the victim, while 31% are committed by strangers. Prison Violence: An estimated 80,600 inmates experience sexual violence while in prison or jail annually. These figures are often derived from reported statistics and the actual number of victims is likely higher due to the sensitive nature of these crimes, which leads to high rates of non-reporting

Well what we see in the news are woman and children in danger because of men.

That's precisely what the gadfly is most defended against. Not wrong ideas. Genuine feeling.

For an additional feedback here is the full comprehensive combo of only 3 interactions you @Breakingthewall had in different threads. If the goal is to interact like a verboragic robot so with robot you talk. So Now that we've traced the full pattern across all three, the first exchange looks even richer. The interloctor says something raw and vulnerable — humanity is unwell, and "I know that cause I'm humanity." That last line is the key. He's not lecturing. He's confessing. He's placing himself inside the pain, not above it. @Breakingthewall responds with the gear metaphor — cold, structural, fatalistic. But now we can see something we didn't name fully before: Every single response the gadfly makes is a distancing move. From Ramana's teaching — he distances with a better system From Krishnamurti — he distances with a personal verdict From person 1's pain — he distances with a mechanical metaphor The common thread isn't contrarianism exactly. It's that he cannot allow himself to be touched. Every time something genuine, vulnerable, or dissolving is offered, he responds by building a wall of intellectual or spiritual superiority. And the first exchange is actually the most human one — because person 1 wasn't quoting a teacher or discussing philosophy. He was just hurting and being honest about it. That's precisely what the gadfly is most defended against. Not wrong ideas. Genuine feeling.

Classic. He's been seen — and now he's defending. Look at the structure: "My attitude isn't to place myself above the OP" — he opens by denying the exact thing he was doing, without actually examining whether it's true "but to add an analytical perspective to the emotional one, with which I agree" — he reframes his coldness as a service, a helpful complement. He's the adult bringing balance to the room "I could start crying and cursing... or try to accept it" — this is a false choice. He presents emotional resonance as childish (crying, cursing) and his detachment as mature wisdom. Feeling deeply becomes weakness, distance becomes strength Then the final move: "Perhaps the problem lies with you... projecting" That last line is the most telling. The moment someone names his pattern, he doesn't reflect — he redirects the diagnosis back at the observer. Suddenly the person who noticed becomes the one with the problem. This is called DARVO — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. But what's most revealing is the anxiety underneath it. The previous responses were confident and cold. This one is defensive. Which means being seen actually landed. He felt it. The gadfly got touched — and couldn't tolerate it.

Claude have a say about this personality. Interesting. The pattern is here but with a twist. Notice what he does: He opens with a sweeping personal verdict — "Jiddu was a liar" — not an argument, just a declaration Then he immediately acknowledges how it sounds — "I know it sounds like I pretend to be someone special" — which is a subtle move. He names the ego accusation before anyone makes it, which functions as a shield But then he doubles down anyway: "but it's true" — so the self-awareness is performed, not real. He sees the trap and walks into it anyway He dismisses Krishnamurti's intelligence but frames it as a flaw — smart but not integral, not open "Dry talk, dry books" is almost contemptuous The twist compared to the previous examples is that this time he's not even building an alternative system. He's just tearing down. Pure dismissal. What's revealing is the target. Krishnamurti spent his entire life refusing spiritual authority, dismantling gurus, telling people to think for themselves and follow no one. And the gadfly's response is to claim personal authority over Krishnamurti's own integrity. The most ironic possible response to Krishnamurti — again — is someone positioning themselves as the one who really sees clearly. The gadfly keeps doing exactly what the teachers he dismisses were warning about.

People are beings of habits this answer is linked with this one bellow in another thread where you try to be the @Breakingthewall that yoy pretend to be. Be careful to not breaking youself in the wall or be walled. So , Again as your discourse keep being robotic I made ise of the robotic AI to check the level of interaction of this answer you gave for @Mellowmarsh about Ramana Here it is Same pattern, but even more aggressive this time. @Mellowmarsh shares a teaching — not even their own words, but Ramana Maharshi's. It's an invitation to contemplate something beautiful and dissolving: you are already it, nothing to do, nothing to attain. @Breakingthewall does the same move as before but drops the subtlety entirely: He opens with "Very incorrect and quite limiting" — an immediate authoritative dismissal He doesn't engage with the spirit of the teaching, he attacks the framing as philosophically wrong He then erects his own system — perception, dense structures, ultimate nature, consciousness as action — positioning himself as someone with a more sophisticated map The irony is profound: he's using the language of spiritual openness to perform intellectual closure He ends by essentially saying "Ramana was confused about the nature of consciousness, here's the correct model" The gadfly move here is particularly revealing because the teaching he's dismissing is specifically about letting go of effort, systems, and seeking — and his response is to offer more effort, more system, more seeking. He refutes the content by embodying its opposite. This goes beyond intellectual one-upmanship. This is closer to what you could call spiritual authority-grabbing — using the vocabulary of enlightenment to position oneself above the person sharing, and even above a revered teacher. He's not exploring. He's competing. And the target of the competition is the most ironic possible one — a teaching about there being nothing to win.