koops

Put the 2 versions of that guy on tinder/speed dating/festival/bars and lets see. Actions would speak louder than words.

LOOL Most women would say publicly what is socially acceptable. What makes them look good. If the men believing this knew with which kind of dudes those girls hooked up... Or maybe there are +30 women (tired of alphas) and really prefer that option, because the associate the jacked guy with just a ONS. Or they realize they cant get a guy like that. Is like men saying they prefer a regular chick in stead of a model because models are dumb. The fox and the grapes kind of rationalization.

JP has some great points, but main, some things are painful to watch (just the first 20 seconds. Talking about offended snowflakes. As a 60 year old man, a 20 year old triggers you that badly? Come on). Whats the point of this beside NPC junk entertainment?

hahah classic. Its sad when you look at that dynamic from a more yellow perspective and you realize that they wont change... The paradox here is that your father maybe is less fit to vote because sometimes is better to know nothing in stead of getting confused by junk media.

Top tier guys are the prize. Then women. And then the rest of men.

🙏

Words can become obstacles. Absolute = God = One/Infinite Mind = Nothingness

That guy looks sleazy af Would never let this guy be in the same room as my daughter.

LOL

Reality is single mind, and is limitless.

One is really Infinity (same as 0, or Nothingness) Hard to express with numbers.

Haven't read it yet, just read this from amazons preview pages.

Meditation. Shadow work. Psychedelics. Awakening. Yoga. Building a great body. Learning how to fight. Having deep intimate relationships. Art. Learning an instrument. Travel. Hobbys. Raising a family. ... ... No AI can do this for you. Tons of stuff to be curious about. The problem of course is unemployment. UBI seems utopia, but who knows in a few decades. Even Musk said that it seems inevitable, and he is no hippy woo woo leftist.

Its funny. Everyone is defending their own worldview and demonizing the other. Look: They say 'just say you want to fuck young women. We all have this impulses.' Then they say about Vylana: Psychology and intellect is one thing, but your biology and your instinct is going to override that'' But haven't you just said that body and your biology (instincts) are telling you to to fuck hot young women? Do you have to listen to your body in that scenario or not? Which one it is? Is Vylana wrong for not listening to her body and you are right? Like I said. Rationalization of their own perspective. After: 'It requires a repression of your instincts and a total abandoning of your nature to say yes to something like that' LOL Thats the definition of monogamy!! Then he said: I'm not surprised she cant get pregnant' Wow. Maybe she is +40? Come on guys...

youtube and social media is now where people spend time, but if. your blog is top tier people are going to read it anyways. You need high level SEO and social media promotion. Also, if you want to make money build a email list and nurture it.

Vylana is with other men too. https://www.instagram.com/aubreymarcus/p/DJx4oChxeky/

Exactly! If they 'fail' they will be judge, but that's a double standard. Whats the divorce rate in monogamy? (and the 'satisfaction rate' in couples that are still together?) I get this, but I feel Aubrey comes from a place of good intentions, even though it seems woo woo (so is everyone at the table). Thats stage green shadow. But every stage has its own shadow. Is stage blue monogamy more healthy? Is hookup culture better? Is 'scarcity polyamory' better? There is a lot of subtle manipulation, gaslighting, withholding, lying and emotional darkness in all these anyway. Are they getting roasted as hard as these guys? Thats the double standard. This. He could just fuck other chicks behind her back. Or he could open the relationships to just sex, but not emotional attachment. He is being honest in his intent and desires. If all men where REALLY honest about their needs, wants and desires with their partner, what would happen? The ship will sink. So thats the name of the game in monogamy for most couples. Isn't most of monogamy built on sexual and emotional repression, unfulfilled needs, lies, withholding, lying, even cheating? Also, for me this is different than conventional polyamory. David Deida says that if you are in a monogamous relationships and you want more women because you feel stuck, thats a bad move. Its a scarcity move. I feel this is way different. I feel that they are in a great relationships (it seems), so this is coming from a place of abundance and love. There can be some manipulation and woo woo talk, I agree with that, but it seems that is coming from a healthy place.

Are those teachings online or in his paid programs?

For me aesthetics, beauty, art and stye is different from luxury.

Do you think by awakening you are going to be happy with your current lifestyle? Do you really want to awaken; or do you really want to have sex, make good money and have an overall chill-happy emotional state? There are 2 different things.

He said she has more lovers, and they upload some pictures to IG. But look how you frame it: 'rail his wife'. For my perception, is way deeper than that. But you don't have to agree.

@Leo Gura in your 'What is Truth' video, you say that these sounds, sights and colors are also Absolute Truth. And that form and formlessness are identical. ''The entire relative domain is absolute truth in disguise.'' You mean that Absolute Truth is always here, whether you are aware or not, you just need the realization of it (awakening); so the relative domain/perception is still Absolute Truth while not awake? For example, if Leo from 2013 is watching the basketball game in his sofa in his relative-dualistic domain (maya we can call it)... thats Absolute Truth, because that's what Is, he is just not aware of it until he awakens and he realizes Oneness, God, Form=Formlessness, Absolute Truth? -Also, you say that Absolute Truth is pure objectivity, which I get where you are coming from, but for example David Hawkins says is pure subjectivity. Truth cannot be proven objectively and can only can be access through 1st person ''experience'', directly, so how is that not pure subjectivity? How do you reconcile that? Doesn't really Absolute Truth transcend labels as objectivity and subjectivity? It just Is? Is this just a semantic thing?

Yes, I get that NOW/Absolute Truth is all there is, and we can't find it somewhere else, but still... it seems to me that there is a 3rd category. 1. Im looking at a tree and measuring it, concluding is 7 feet tall, or thinking that is bigger than the tree in my garden. Thats relative truth. 2. Im looking at a tree. No labels, no concepts. Just what is. Now. In this dual everyday state. 3. Im looking at a tree and I have an awakening. I realize everything is One, Consciousness. I still 'see' that tree but I realize there is no separation. My confusion is in the difference between these last 2 points. It seems that there are different levels/degrees of awareness of Absolute Truth. Would you label #2 as grasping Absolute Truth? Is my error putting #3 above #2? (I consider #3 Absolute Truth, but not #2)

He is far from perfect example haha And really, the insight has to be backed up in real life, not just talk.

I hope him the best, but lets see how long it lasts.