kavaris

I even prefaced with "how stressful it would be for me to get into such a topic", but he decided this thread was about fighting online for some reason, Why is this guy commenting in my threads if this is how hes chosen to speak to people? Tell me, cause id like to know. Heres one where he comments to someone else, and what his impression is like,

For those into like... MMA, ti kuan do... uh wat is it... Kung fu or karate, stuff like that, yous would be into science, cause its the opportunity to make sense of the material and spiritual realm, or to take that physical science energy, and start investigating a new realm of science.... Q: Surely theres gotta be karare ppl out there coming to actualized right. i think so. somewhere.

Like im having to guess at what people are saying they are confused about (its mainly this guy i come to learn, as im looking at his activity), but not cause he had a viable, concrete reason (or a message quoted clearly) and not because weve seemed to reach a wall / impasse (an impenetrable crossing / wall within said message) but because they repeatedly keep saying how confused they are ... like... and then ending with "... sheesh, thanks.." Thats not how people talk to each other. If you say "thanks" in the end of a rant about being confused, it sounds like thats your last message for the day, like... It sounds like you are expiring from the convo. it doesnt sound like you are participating in anyway, shape or form.

Like the persistence level is high, the personality level -not so good. We are working on those things, for myself as well as others.

This thread is about science. Ill preface with saying that. Now at one point, i was considering it from the direction of like, physical science, whatchamacallit, like gym class science. Forget about that now. For, once you try to give someone advice about it (or really its not so much my advice confusing them, but their persistence to explain how confused they are about everything, without explaining why... and theyve dont this before) causing said confusion. Persistently mind you. So anyway, thats not what this thread is about. Ignore that man behind the curtain Hopefully we dont gotta reference 'turn of phrases.

Well anyway, now that we can resume where we left off, the options were to talk about science, or what i now would say is to talk about whatever this guy was on about, which doesnt sound like its gonna be fun. This thread is about science, so lets just get that straight. I wouldve considered whatever the above guy was on about, thankfully hes moved on (right?) Good. So Science, science is not fighting. Hopefully we are not running the tape back too far that thats what the confusion is.

I had a conversation with you, based on your very first post to this thread. That was gona be the end right there, but you are taking me on a neverending journey, so lets end it. its bullshuit.

You couldve pointed out at any time, what had confused you...

Its my thread dip shit. Im gonna continue talking about science, which was what the thread was about btw. I know you wanted to derail it into high holy hell, but im just gonna continue with what it was all about, from the beginning

I mean fuck. How many times does this need to happen.

I will read it. Im not insulting anyone, you are continuing to say how confused you are, and then engaging me? Why not engage someone else huh?

I expressed my opinion by reporting your ass, cause this is literally like the second time youve taken my thread on the same journey, where you are engaging me, and then abusing me and the thread.

Im talking directly to you. DIRECTLY

Like dude. You keep responding (to me, the person you are so confused about, and dont understand ANYTHING im writing) and then saying, "i dont really understand what you are saying", Like, do you want to engage with a real person online or not? That means working through it and having a conversation. How would you feel if every time you responded it was like, "well i didnt understand anything... but seesh... thanks for nothing"- Youd be like. "dude, wtf is that"

You keep derailing my threads saying "i dont understand what you mean". Dude. its fucking annoying as shit. You are bringing up fighting. So im responding to your naive notions of fighting. If theres something you are confused about, then outline it explicitly. This is like the second time youve done this before.

@Someone here Btw, the topic wasnt even about fighting. You brought it up.

Yea theres alot of ruder ppl out there, youll come to find that out.

For big ppl, yous have such a range of options in fighting, granted iuno if being big and fat is ideal, cause like, iuno how productive thatll be, but just being a big person gives you lots of options, which is why those ppl have so much joy in the area of martial arts, cause they are experiencing lots of variety and things to think about. I mean its not like you are programming or anything, and those two things id imagine conflict in a sense, cause one mindset is about these tiny, digital, frontal lobe things, and the other is about rhythm and feel, and more of the Olympic, wrestling, rhythm

ya i feel ya. i mean it depends if you are a smaller pers., or a bigger pers., right, but ya, i can see how that might be advice or talk from a dad. Ive gotten in quite alot of fights growing up, so i wouldnt suggest those things. At the same time, iuno how many ppl r getting in fights these days, so im not gonna challenge the family advice right now. Its also kindve stressful for me to invoke all those ideas, for myself, cause id be giving away alot of secrets, but id share some things in pm message for anyone. Basically, as a small ppl, you are not thinking in terms of "fighting", for everything is "how to exploit". You never attack first, if you can avoid it, unless you have some miracle opportunity to get the big pers. on the ground. Getting them on the ground is essential. Never EVER punch someone unless you want to die for real. You get them on the ground, either by grabbing their ankle and pulling tgeir leg out, or putting your foot behind their leg, and pushing them over said leg. You would have to catch someone by surprise to do this, or you have to lure them towards you, for the moment they come towards you, you have some options. The number one best option is to just get out of there... But if they are coming fast, you gotta learn to maneuver and trip them, or like i said, get to work on those ankles, twist that ankle if you can, like in the same way ppl grab arms for arm bars. You cant fight normal if you are small... think *insectoid. If yous are the same weight, height and strength, then yous can punch and kick each other all day. p.s. im talkin bout fighting ppl 100 lbs over your weight, so yous might not be familiar w/ this. but thats the kindve fights ive been in my whole life, where you are inventing your own style of exploits... which btw, none of them will work if you screw it up in the first 5 seconds anyway, so really its not something you think about. Its a 5 second window.

Like we have to ask that question as well, about choosing the road, either A) getting to the essence, pointing towards its essence, or B) Distilling truth such that it can be pointed towards.... or further explored. The istemi towards and the distillation of truth are part of a spectrum of exploration, neither which can give you a direction, beyond the prioritizing of the self, and though that would be the final word, the self exists as an emanation of reality, so the moment you figure out the self, youve arrived back in reality, where its not as simple as just occupying the self. The self is a good start, or the "prioritization of the *self... in the journey towards" kindve thing.

(See Video Below) Philology for those who dont know, is the study of language as it exsts within historical sources, and how it intersects w/ textural and literary criticism, and which i title this -> because we are all effectively speaking to philology and language when we study history, for it is what we use to talk about such things, to say "This is what happened in history". And many of those sources are pulling from esoteric places, whether it be related to the mysteries of Egypt, or the Alchemical Latin coming from the Roman Empire / Medieval, or the Renaissance, and a connection to Cathedrals and Pyramids in terms of their resonance/harmonic qualities and such, etc., its all Medieval in some sense, and 90% philology~And as it would exist in what i call an esoteric, medieval world (but for the goals that might pertain to science, or language, or something else). Im watching this video at the moment, which has nothing to do w/ language, directly (Medieval Hebrew, etc.) but its touching on these ideas that jump into Cultures like that of Egypt, The Templars, Those of the Americas, Tribes and such... And then towards ~1:20:00, he's briefly touching on his thoughts & opinions of Shakespeare & his work, And how Shakespeare could not have written those Tragedies, Comedies attributed to him ~ Alas, Ive heard this from several different people before, and he brings up an interesting point, that which i thought yous might find interesting, and to get your opinion on ~ For I dont really know enough around Shakespeare (beyond his material) of the 16th CE ~ As ive looked predominately at 14th and briefly at ~19th/20th CE So it sits at a point that im not as focused on, and that i havent looked at, though it has alot of these mysteries, which could be related to the works of Shakespeare given those clues people are picking up on, stuff that the public did not know. Perhaps its connected to mystery cult knowledge, or something related to these Pre-Templars seeing as the Templar/Masons, atleast according to history, starts in ~10th CE, well after the Classical Period and such, Though the Templars themselves couldve been based on something that we dont know, regardless, they are very much apart of alot of these esoteric things (note, he speaks on alot more than Shakespeare & Templars in the video, but i just found that part curious, for ive heard something similar from people)

Was this like a UK thing or somethin, cause you cant find any videos on this band unless you do like, the deepest of searches... on youtube... This is a remix, but its actually very well rounded, like harmonically and synthetically it sounds very smooth

Browsing through videos the other day, one of them had this song thats embedded in my mind now, the vocals and the rhythm~ the rhythmic, muted beat is okay, but its more like the chosen drum notes, intervals of the beat, and i feel like the timing / measures change slightly when it picks up, but i might be hallucinating it tell me if this gets stuck in everyones head

Ai is like, mathematics for beginners, or something. No offense to anyone whos a die hard Ai programmer/enthusiast but its a conflation of "the map is the territory", where they acting like science/math = (ques., answer) equations for weights -> towards building blocks on top of the encoding scheme, this activation equation, that other equation,... Conflating all that w/ its functional and literally connotations. Its a means to an end, a way to organize or strip out language or a gooey image. There were other technologies like that before, whats that one where it was constructing faces out of animal faces, ®Braindream... or no it was Deepdream .tech or something, where it filled in animal parts and put all these faces in places it recognized as faces, like a highly repetitive vers., of Ai: This -> Deeply Artificial Trees, thats what i called it, lol

Im working on a little side project that falls into the realms of science, and i think it would be illuminating, cause although i dont consider science that often, or i dont research the latest science, i can atleast give a snapshot of what i see as being like, the way to look at it from an harmonious place, to build upon it. Otherwise we wont have science, but will instead have lots of little unsolvable paradoxes that contradict science. I mean its like, the level of priority towards a thing, doesnt always touch upon the truth of it, e.g., is the essence of the table best worshiped by visiting the table often enough that you can look at it 5 hours a day (Or rather, are you serving that table + pers., relationship through the ritualized stairing -is what i mean) Thats really its own topic. But i been saying: You have the "istemi towards", and you have the distillation of truth. And we could also prioritize spirituality all day, or some specific of it, but if it doesnt point towards its essence, if it doesnt distill it in some way / fashion that would otherwise have it collapsable, then it might not be serving the truth of the matter, or the κινησις, the kinetic changes taking place. Like its always gonna change, but its like... Iuno part of the journey is seeing if the numerous paradoxes eat away at the idea or not, like whether its something physical or conceptual, its hard to say whats gonna bubble up to the surface for sure. Dont rely on me to carry out the sciency things, for im just striving to recognize it, hopefully so others who actually like science will be steadfast in figuring it out or finding a new found interest in it