kavaris

I need approx. 10-25 mins or so, as i eatin sandwich. And my cats like lookin at me, as im goin "deep, deep, deep, deep...", on my phone, waitin for food.

Yes. Its not the case that our intention is to necessarily cancel out anything. It may have not been your intention either, as it wasnt my ultimate intention (i think it was something i started in order to lead us here, possibly, maybe). And even if it was my intention, cancellation wouldnt necessarily imply elimination. How can you cancel the conception of yourself?... How would you know you’ve been cancelled, if there’s no conception of you who could know? - Depending on whats meant by cancellation, you can conceptually cancel out yourself via a line of negation. Thats kinda what i thought we were doing at first... until cancellation took on multiple ideas... Now cancellation means something more like softening or muting, in the looser sense. In the strictest sense, we are saying "what validates or invalidates <X> or..." something. Its a conceptual idea towards a possible revealing. Okay. And let me just add in one element into this, to see if it starts to like... unblur the field-of-view / fog-of-war... "If everything was an intelligent field, or a spectrum of intelligence", what does that now mean for the thing doing the conceiving of, and the subsequent product / action of conception? And what does it leave us w/, per the motif, not to monotonously keep rephrasing the same things, but to just stay in a somewhat familiar territory given my need to introduce this totally new, possibly disruptive element (that could potentially crash the logic, or lead us to a dead end, or anything else that could result, per the wonders of the unrevealed mysteries ahead)

Like, im thinkin of it like "We need something that *conceives, of, things* because, 1) Creation - Something has already done said creation. 2) Conception - That which is conceived is not canceled, because its immediately in conception, like its effectively conception itself. 3) "To cancel" is then said to be, 'something thats not "cancellation of everything" — atleast — in this particular way / However this may be cancellation in just one particular mode of, like... muting, for example. 4) Elimination via cancellation is yet another kind of cancellation, for its not necessarily assumed that anything has been eliminated, unless its this one (bulletpoint (4) now) In conclusion, if we went down this path, we'd have a very complicated view of what it even means to cancel, conceptually, for it could just be that we are softening one side for another... but in the strictest version of, we have to have had some self creator, not to mention, to cancel everything out is to be left w/ something like a person whos been doing the conceptualizing ~ whether it be connected to self creator or not.

Thats interesting. Stop it there for a sec, As i need more than a sec to think bout that mind-winder.

Oh i didnt see this post. hold up.

^Hold on now, forget about God or not God, etc, etc... P.s. im watchin a video to stay entertained, cause weve stumbled on a very tough Parmenidian path here... "If we cancel everything out, whats that leave us w/, and whats doing the canceling, and how is it doing said canceling?"

Well slow down there speedy Gonzolez, hold on... We are at "if you can cancel out everything, what do you have left?"

Like if you can cancel out everything, what do you have left? Its actionable cancelation, and yet, here we are still.

Ya but what does that mean?

Thats the basic definition of those terms. Thats not where the understanding of paradox stops however, cause you are to be faced w/ paradoxes, And yet... Why are we here? So i ask, what conclusion does that lead you to ~ about paradox and the nature / function, the thing that you want to contrast, etc, etc., thats sortve what is meant by the basic English def., and the interpretations necessary to actualize or introspect past like.. "Im so confused about life", or... "i know as much as im ever gonna know...", Like these are common conclusions ppl come to, like there is this steelwall blocking a conceptual realm called reality.

Yea, but what is meant by "good"? Thats a construct you are inventing, and are applying it to be inside of everything. Like, you cant break the standard, if you dont even have ways to define said standard, which is to say then that description preludes actualization, Like you dont have to actually believe it, since you can "say what you believe", and it doesnt necessarily align w/ you, as belief isnt pointing to something tangibly true. Like you dont hold onto thoughts you have, enough for them to be practically true in any way, so why would there be "absolution" in the course of "realizing yourself to be one"? Like, how did you end up here then? See below... Likewise, you cant have "Not a thing" and "All things", not only because "Not a thing" isnt a "thing" you can conceive of (unless negation is being used per its function, through speech~and not practically), but also, you are facing towards "those things that you think exist from both directions, absolutely", but the entire point is that, you cant have both sides. Once you challenge the other side of the equation ~ once you instigate "one" or "the other"... It validates "one" (YOUR construct of one) instead of the other, your construct of other. Like if you last left off @ "One", that then counters "Two". If you have two, it counters one. It's not that the second choice wasnt an option, like... you just assume that its "simplified as one", but thats not the practical mechanism that is giving rise to that, for theres something that validates "oneness" prior to believing, saying, or actualizing. Likewise, it feels like everything you say is in the realm of validation, precisely because you have the ability to counter your own experiences. So what is that? Like, you are validating oneness, prior to validating your own experience as yourself, which doesnt make sense.

Im diagnosed w/ schizophrenia. Ive been going to mental health appts for roughly 17, 18 or 19 years... As ive had a very long mental health journey / exploration. I dont have ADD / ADHD Also, constant anxiety is related to "anxiety disorders", not ADHD. With ADD, Thats when you are very much like "highly energetic, and cant help yourself" kindve things. You cant concentrate and you have issues since the mind is very curious, etc. Very different category, almost not even 1% related in that bespoke context of having panic attacks, etc. Like when kids are diagnosed w/ ADD, thats not because they have anything about them thats necessarily gone through trauma, or high anxiety situations, or things like this... Likewise, Adult ADHD is the same way, its systemic to "issues around paying attention", not "history w/ anxiety disorder". So you are way off. Like... What? Another thing i have however is nightmares (no its not related to ADD either, not even close). I was bout to make a different thread about nightmares, since i had a bad round of nightmares last night, of which i couldnt wake up from, and i was gettin sniped, like literally shot from a neighbors house, and the bullets were needles... And i was stuck in this like, 100,000 ft (vertically) tall house, but like a barbie doll/polly pocket pull-out house, measured horizontally... And it was in these like, victorian style row homes, which im not even sure thats a thing, but i had to really hide myself, like, from the windows and like.. but even then, they could still snipe through the walls, And then i moved to another house nextdoor, but they eventually figured that out. And this dream went on for wat seemed days, and i kept getting shot w/ these needle bullets. And theres was like multiple snipers (atleast two), as they had no life, Like that was their entire existence, in that dream, to be scouting me, finding me and shooting at me. And it registered as physical pain, in the dream, like getting your face smashed in or something, like i mean, it wasnt a dart gun, it was real gun bullets, in a needle-like shape.

And part of it is its simplicity. Like if you start telling a joke to a foreigner and its highly complex going into the parts w/ utilities and A/C, or their lack of, rather, its getting too complex, like imagine you are telling it to world leader(s). So it has to be very much like a single sentence, so that its kindve stupid sounding. Like, even just 'death to america, without anything around it -is probably something that could get N Korea laughing i feel like, like...

You know, theres gotta be a way to share this w/ ppl as a realized-joke, like an obvious trope, dark humour, that, for example, When Canada wakes up in the morning, whats the first thing they say? "Death to America". When China's world leaders get together in a room / meeting, and when the guy/speaker is pointing to a map, whats the first thing all of the board members agree on? Its "Death to America" When S. American families send their kid(s) off to travel down fecal-matter road to find a nice caucasian wife, they make sure they know, its "Death to America" And when young men from the middle east hear the roosters calling at sunrise, whats the first thought thing on their mind? Its Death to America. Its a joke, but theres some truth to it too of course. Granted its hard to share it beyond this video. Like if it comes outa my mouth it makes zero sense probably. Also, there use to be this trope where like, for e.g., youd have an issue w/ another culture or another place/country or state, but if you shared the right kindve dark humour w/ them they would start laughing and forget about the issue temporarily, as it worked as a way to temporarily disarm two arguing sides or something. I mean it has to be the right person at the right time sayin it right.

Parts of what you were saying probably do make sense in that basic English sense, but i couldnt really know (not sure i can ever know really). I have like a very specific idea in mind now/thus i cant remember 100% how far off, or how close to, etc, etc., and its also hard to really go on like, a purely broadened overview, seeing as theres some little details / directions / questions, Do we care about survival? Do we want to "know" something more specific... Or does it all end at "absolute" and its understandng of? I dont have them questions on my dashboard / queued up right now exactly, but those are questions that can change things drastically.