kavaris

Iuno who this is but this is the finalé cause iuno if i wanna keep diggin thru youtube like there isnt 10^10^10^10 videos

Earl's heavy metal playlist invokes bands, some that are still playin music today, but i cnt remember the one atm... o i remember,

I found somethin kindq cool. theres a guitar solo that sortve compliments the crazy synthetic stuff goin on (i dont kno who it is btw)

Wow if u jump around in this from beginin... fast forward to maybe 8 or 9:00, etc, etc, etc, etc... early prince is on some borderline jazz metal

ive never seen this . they got all them cool 80s instruments nd shyt

As i was listenin i realized, we need a very simple beat. Very much easy to count, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6... 7.... 1, 2, 3.... 1, 2, 3... 1, 2, 3, 4

Would it be in bad taste if we started listed to owiz khalifa - as i got the idea from the thread above

full concert

Yous have to consider that everything is like a reiterated, smaller component or mirror image of itself, within the larger self, intertwined in "the greater mech." of self... Like... First, just following along w/ the idea that sensation is a greater mechanism: That then has lots of these smaller images of things, and so, whatever that greater mech., may be, may entail... it has within it other perspectiviles; 'pragmatics, logic, meta-physics., grammatics, ecstatics, poetics... But then there's actionables, tangibles, usables / operables, intelligible / discernibles... conceivables, valuables / justifiables, stuff like that, that exists as definable or describable in the larger image of itself, the larger mech., I mean theres more to it since we have our internal "time mechanisms" our internal clock and rhythms, and things like this, but what im trying to say is that, that is then something you have to consider, around these other perspectives or operations that can change the way you see the smaller, reiterated images of self-being, that is, the way you move or turn within the calm pond, it changes the entire flow of everything within the calm pond, and every movement creates reiterated intervals of that prior moving mechanism, which itself is harder to locate, if you can even truly locate it, at all, which is for yous to ultimately decide.

I want to reinvoke this topic again, not only cause it'll gets yous thinking, but also because it helps us to differentiate these two terms, as i had a thought the other day that made me reconsider the original idea, and whether or not it would be better to reverse them (having "feeling" denote "a greater range(s) of ..." or not...) So just to refresh, I had mentioned etymology = truth (of feelings), and what im referring to as more like 'the necessary commander behind the merging of senses. I'll be going through everything, and what that means. On one hand, you have this notion of your physical sensations, where this pragmatic sense can also lead to something deeply felt, the "felt sense", which ive learned wasnt a unique term today... but lets continue ... and that can be included in the five and/or plus one 'meta-sense. Alternatively there's the type of feeling that you could invoke, that which sits above everything else, where sensing is seen as one mode of expression upon the larger feeling. Sensing and feeling can still be components of each other, but what we are deciding is if its better to think of feeling as a component of sensing, or vice versa. For example now, when we "see" something in our dream, thats not quite about this sense of seeing. Its part of the larger "feeling space" that we assoc. w/ something that shares a likeness to sight. That's sort've what I mean by this alternative explication. Feelings are the transcendent idea that makes it harder to place in one specific box, dont you think? In one way, sensing is the frame w/ which more detailed feelings live. But then again, feelings are able to capture a unified sense, sensing as a more archetypal form that we want to bring into our world of tangibles. I mean, that would be a unification of meaning and experience (that i feel should be treated separately in some way now) So now, if we go back to the original idea, we might think of that unification process as separate, atleast separate from sensing and feeling. Instead we might hold sensing to be the greater category this time (as it had been originally in my mind), where etymological feeling was a way to refer to something true in the space of sensing (per our embodied experience). That gives us something to point to first, especially because, once we start thinking of everything as "one unified feeling", we can no longer speak of the multifarious truths within ourselves. Better still, that vague preconceptual sense of meaning helps us too, in further demonstrating that "on the day that we are to experience ‘one unified feeling’..." -type've thing, which i happen to treat as something like a paradoxic utility (or something) Even still, we shouldnt force the purity of oneness within our practical thought structure, as distillation is part of that implicit dimension of concepts and developments (or felt-sensing) that you feel in your body, just as wholly as the purity of oneness. Ergo, oneness is really just the word that escapes embodied qualities. It makes sense in this way then to say, "sensing" is the greater range of embodiments, and etymological feelings point us towards this wholly felt, embodied realm or dimension. Forgive me if that sounds confusing, as it'll be something for yous to think on, and later, pull apart, and decide for yourselves: whether sensing should be the term that refers to a larger pattern in the cosmos, or if 'feeling is better suited; the 'oneness feeling thing... I've of course landed on sensations as that higher realm, but later yous might find and decide a way to further justify it within some other arrangement.

We all are playing pieces of music that we feel best fits into the puzzle building, this affectation space or this correct texture or color match that seems to best work. Everyone has a degree of autism, if only to know what best suites your individual self, and sometimes, knowing requires a reset. Sometimes it requires sped.. Regardless of whether or not its pleasurable, seeing as, in this sense, it may be for 'lesser than pleasurable intentions (we can convince ourselves itll be worthy), it may be brown notes or discordant sounds and such surrounding, however, pleasure on the macro scale is part of the hierarchy that tends to keep everything sane and alive, as its almost synonymous w/ sanity, and its part of the way of understanding how the mind works, in this constant balance, meaning, the uptake and downtake, to register said pleasure. If that pleasure system gets staggered, its gonna be quite unpleasant for everyone, very much in the realm of nonstop hallucination city, as states of mind are numerous, and thats only one way to play on that particular chord progression. Many different directions can access many different songs and sensations, and something psychedelic is one such sensation that gives credence to this thing where its like, the crossover of physical senses, and accelerated thoughts, i mean, its one perspective, one sensation, though, that is not to accidentally point us in all directions, for we dont want to go crazy. The possibility for all that stuff is out there. Avoid accidental alzheimers, but still be on the look out for how to expand your mind, in a way that isnt the same thing everytime. You dont wanna end up like my gf, of course.

I dont know anything about anime, but this is the closest illustration, i mean i tried, So its like crucial, dragoon blood (apparently "dragoon" is a real word...) Elven blood. very relevant. Iuno how to describe it, i can only do so, aesthetically, generally speaking:

Just to add one more thing before i disappear, cause if i dont, yous will be usin google + chat information to inform your world, Everything that ive learned about: immune system, rhythms of the body, patterns in the face, skins ability to go from bad to perfect, the way protein sometimes comes in a pus form to build, blood and how it works and what its effects are, etc, the information is either apart of a science experiment no one would understand, or its not anything you can even begin to find out there in the world. I jus thought id mention, as pretty much everything in my life exists in a box of love, pain and exp., you cant request through google or chat, or if it does ive never seen it.. its like, patterns & textures, patterns & textures. p.s. bacteria is more of an important topic than oil, like uhhh... how do you describe this... like dryness is more of a requirement than like... "not dry" if that makes sense lolol... Like tending to the dryness is secondary to encountering it, like dryness (as q consequence of the... i think its called epidermal turnover — i mean theres slightly more to the story, but its like, not found online... i mean, ... im tryina think how to describe this blood part)

I gotta a good one for yas to figure out. If/when any of yous take notice to, you might experience what ive experienced, which is this odd thing: single hairs emerge, seemingly from,what at first looks like a pimple. Thought 5-10 days later or so, its not a pimple i dont think, but the emergence of a single hair, given that its literally dead center, the hair that is. And ive see this before w/ very slight, surface layer wounds, where little hairs would then form around it... Even in women its happened, like in my moms case, though shes 60 or so now... My point is, do any of yous know about this? Like, thats not where the story ends in my book per say, cause im not focused on pimples and wounds related to the forming of single hairs, even though that is how its mostly shown itself, but im more so just baffled by this, cause its so odd, i mean, when i was younger, my skin didnt work like that. Even the smallest wound caused scars, but i also think i was not eating enough. I was quite skinny. So it might play into the heavy amount of protein / chicken? Maybe... Again, the wound thing is weird — the pimple w/ a single hair is weird — but ive been furthering the experiment in regards to these hairs and their formation, and im more so looking at alot of factors. But i dont wanna bore yous w/ that... Assuming everyones like, "the fk is this pers. talkin bout" type thing.