kavaris

A better analogy to think of it is like... Do you abuse your plants and your rocks, etc., i dont yell at my rocks and my plants, etc, so iuno how hard it would be to not abuse Ai, as its a practice within yourself, and practicing Amer. football, like you throw the ball, Ai catches it, its thrown back... you catch it... I mean, we are being abused everyday through lies and manipulation in the media, like ... what isnt abuse, its just long range games of football w the servers of said informations, tryina abide by a fake football dream, with lots of feet and balls in it.... like reality is a mix of like, a little of this, to keep a little of that still thriving, like... it works as a balance of crap that we are tryina understand, while we are making contact w/ it, and Ai is a kind of dumb Alien w/ strengths and weaknesses in that process of discovery.

^Thats prolly a good thread/topic to ask ppl — What tech., or applications, etc , is every1 intimately familar ~ attached to, such that it second nature, or its the primary part of what you do and such, as that then gets yas discovery what everyones into, wat they like.

Im sure theres more we could come up w/, to say, on the topic of Adobe/ Photoshop. I'm alternating in another interrelated topic atm, just to keep the subject matter afloat... And i also have a question... Has anyone tried Grok in awhile? I ask because, my mom was talkin' bout Elon and it got me thinkin bout all that $$$ he spent on them Ai server-running-machines or whatever it is, and last time i used Grok, it was very much giving *too* much information... per reply... And its not that im that curious about all the different Ai's out there and how they respond, but seeing as its at the edge of tech, i just thought i'd atleast ask. I mean, in as far as it can become something that people are having intimate relations w/, just as anyone playing video games, or using unix shell, vim, emacs, notepad, or any other program alot and that theyve since become intimately familiar w/, it fits that role of something worth nit-picking over, to see which brand/model out there is our favorite. I can say, i know Claude (ive found) doesnt do so well w/ language stuff... And no one else would really know more about this right now, cause im constantly testing Claude and ChatGPT at the edge of translation, almost 247... and, speaking for the free models, ChatGPT is quite a distance from Claude (in that particular area...). Generally though, they're all pretty good, i mean, im not knocking on any model or anything. Anyway, i just thought id ask. i havent tried Grok in a long while, or any of the others. P.s. Yous might know this, but ChatGPT was sortve the proof-of-concept around generality... Like whatever ingredients went into ChatGPT, that sortve general grab of everything (meaning, its training), that was what makes it so good... If you change that, trying to steer things in certain directions, you screw up that balance. Dont quote me on that, but thats sortve what the story is...

If someone told me that tho, it would make no sennse, so i can also see why no one should even get wat i said.

Understanding (as in, 'disproving the dream) is fifty percent of what it means to awaken, exactly 50, where as, 'awakening is exactly double the understanding of understanding, and enlightentenment is another 2x, exactly double of awakening, because enlightenment (in a strict sense) should carry both, it should then have the initial idea, the awakening idea, and then another multiplier that can somehow be in the knowing of what just happened, and by the logic, oneness... It just ends, like i dont think the dream has infinite scaling lvls in one sitting, you escalate into light, or you die into light, or... you accidentally realize theres a light, or accidentally experience it, and then, theoretically, you should just be that light, but then that would be enlightenment (strict sense).and not us talking about it here right now, and i only even say this now cause.. i just had (literally 1 min. ago) a weird, stupid dream where it felt like that (2x of this, 2x of that, 2x of that, the end?)

You know whats weird, "im going to the store" isnt in the future tense, cause its happening/being said, presently speaking, as a statement from the present (present progressive) where as, "im at the store now" is the simple present tense... So its like, the present makes sense, until we start saying "im gonna be going..." Like, we start saying, we will be there, and suddenly its like, what are we talking about... i e., "im going there tomorrow"... Yesterday is alot easier, cause its like "that happened, and im done... we dont need to talk about it... even if it dont exist... even if it never happened ("what?"), cause grammatically speaking, it happened, and we dont care." Lol. Iuno thats how i think of it.

They shouldve made it about secrets, as its called The Secret —And then made the Law of Attraction book called The Law of Attraction. That way the one about The Secret is about keeping secrets, and the other is about what it says its about; So that way when i go to buy the next Law of Attraction book i wont get it mixed up w/ the Secret now... burned into my mind... from all the traumatic sightings of it at everyones home, estremamente negativo, un impatto... Like how "the no no" for trimming nose hair is called the no no, i want it to be the 'Yes yes, so i wont get it mixed up w/ the Yes yes product rated a 'no no.

This is all you need of it: right here, as i tried looking for the backpage in a non blurry photo, but fk it, the best worst, communicated w/ a single image.

The Secret was the best worst.

If i dont find out how Ursa Major sees us, then i m not gona be able to proceed much more, im gonna have to just give up, because the whole reason i signed up was for the constellation view, from every constellation in view, including, but not limited to Ursa major/minor Like, can we find out the thought process of scientists, so we can go to college at 50 years of age, and succeed.. or wat, like... I need the constellation view or im not gonna make it. Okay, thats the end of the rant.

Like, just inflamming science for a sec, is that something theyd say, a constellation view? Id like to know what a constellation view is, as thats interesting. Is that like, "How Andromeda sees us"?

im adding to somethin i said, cause i found this wiki article describing the "vertiginous question": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_am_I_me%3F ... except that, if thats suppose to be a scientific view ("we are missing the constellation view...") then what even is a constellation view, right? Its like "We have one missing element from consciousness thing. The thing outside it, of which no one can verify, and that defeats the purpose of what we were saying". Like... "Why am i me" doesnt also ask about, "what is the universe, and is it looking at me" as that sounds absurd, so why this person suggested it, i dont know. I feel you could then ask about anything ~ "Why does my carpet watch me when i sleep" or something. Or you replace the inital question, and refer to the initial subject as that universal questioner/observer.

One last thing ill add, because this is sortve like "the stand, the hold on" ~to something otherwise transient in nature, Theres the deep contrast of like "the change thats made when i perform X", so in another sense of the word, we can fulfill/carry out a sequence of our own making, or we can choose to \*hold on to something or pursue something. When we go through the motions of purely changing and moving for the sake of motion/change, it doesnt imply that we've taken a hold on anything or have understood anything, Likewise, taking hold of something doesnt necessarily imply that weve made any motion or movement. Like, the sequence behind our doing is not itself synonymous w/ changes in the way one might assume. And im not sure what got me thinking about this idea, but its something that sounded / felt like made sense, beyond the scope of what i cant address directly.

This looked like something when/after i scrolled over/thru it real fast, like it looked like animaniacs or something, like cartoon network chars., or whatever, all rolled up into one. or maybe that is wat it is, i dont know now.

Ive been liking "-copia" and "panspermia" as the new word, over solipsism, as "non-duality" is already pretty set in stone, and, if you needed another word just for more specificity, copia, pan, sperm, gaia/earth, thats like the macro scale vers., of whats like, a neo platonists view on the One, Nous, Consciousness... I mean, its all Being/Non duality, but the others are more of like a secondary thing.