kavaris

If someone told me that tho, it would make no sennse, so i can also see why no one should even get wat i said.

Understanding (as in, 'disproving the dream) is fifty percent of what it means to awaken, exactly 50, where as, 'awakening is exactly double the understanding of understanding, and enlightentenment is another 2x, exactly double of awakening, because enlightenment (in a strict sense) should carry both, it should then have the initial idea, the awakening idea, and then another multiplier that can somehow be in the knowing of what just happened, and by the logic, oneness... It just ends, like i dont think the dream has infinite scaling lvls in one sitting, you escalate into light, or you die into light, or... you accidentally realize theres a light, or accidentally experience it, and then, theoretically, you should just be that light, but then that would be enlightenment (strict sense).and not us talking about it here right now, and i only even say this now cause.. i just had (literally 1 min. ago) a weird, stupid dream where it felt like that (2x of this, 2x of that, 2x of that, the end?)

You know whats weird, "im going to the store" isnt in the future tense, cause its happening/being said, presently speaking, as a statement from the present (present progressive) where as, "im at the store now" is the simple present tense... So its like, the present makes sense, until we start saying "im gonna be going..." Like, we start saying, we will be there, and suddenly its like, what are we talking about... i e., "im going there tomorrow"... Yesterday is alot easier, cause its like "that happened, and im done... we dont need to talk about it... even if it dont exist... even if it never happened ("what?"), cause grammatically speaking, it happened, and we dont care." Lol. Iuno thats how i think of it.

They shouldve made it about secrets, as its called The Secret —And then made the Law of Attraction book called The Law of Attraction. That way the one about The Secret is about keeping secrets, and the other is about what it says its about; So that way when i go to buy the next Law of Attraction book i wont get it mixed up w/ the Secret now... burned into my mind... from all the traumatic sightings of it at everyones home, estremamente negativo, un impatto... Like how "the no no" for trimming nose hair is called the no no, i want it to be the 'Yes yes, so i wont get it mixed up w/ the Yes yes product rated a 'no no.

This is all you need of it: right here, as i tried looking for the backpage in a non blurry photo, but fk it, the best worst, communicated w/ a single image.

The Secret was the best worst.

If i dont find out how Ursa Major sees us, then i m not gona be able to proceed much more, im gonna have to just give up, because the whole reason i signed up was for the constellation view, from every constellation in view, including, but not limited to Ursa major/minor Like, can we find out the thought process of scientists, so we can go to college at 50 years of age, and succeed.. or wat, like... I need the constellation view or im not gonna make it. Okay, thats the end of the rant.

Like, just inflamming science for a sec, is that something theyd say, a constellation view? Id like to know what a constellation view is, as thats interesting. Is that like, "How Andromeda sees us"?

im adding to somethin i said, cause i found this wiki article describing the "vertiginous question": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_am_I_me%3F ... except that, if thats suppose to be a scientific view ("we are missing the constellation view...") then what even is a constellation view, right? Its like "We have one missing element from consciousness thing. The thing outside it, of which no one can verify, and that defeats the purpose of what we were saying". Like... "Why am i me" doesnt also ask about, "what is the universe, and is it looking at me" as that sounds absurd, so why this person suggested it, i dont know. I feel you could then ask about anything ~ "Why does my carpet watch me when i sleep" or something. Or you replace the inital question, and refer to the initial subject as that universal questioner/observer.

One last thing ill add, because this is sortve like "the stand, the hold on" ~to something otherwise transient in nature, Theres the deep contrast of like "the change thats made when i perform X", so in another sense of the word, we can fulfill/carry out a sequence of our own making, or we can choose to \*hold on to something or pursue something. When we go through the motions of purely changing and moving for the sake of motion/change, it doesnt imply that we've taken a hold on anything or have understood anything, Likewise, taking hold of something doesnt necessarily imply that weve made any motion or movement. Like, the sequence behind our doing is not itself synonymous w/ changes in the way one might assume. And im not sure what got me thinking about this idea, but its something that sounded / felt like made sense, beyond the scope of what i cant address directly.

This looked like something when/after i scrolled over/thru it real fast, like it looked like animaniacs or something, like cartoon network chars., or whatever, all rolled up into one. or maybe that is wat it is, i dont know now.

Ive been liking "-copia" and "panspermia" as the new word, over solipsism, as "non-duality" is already pretty set in stone, and, if you needed another word just for more specificity, copia, pan, sperm, gaia/earth, thats like the macro scale vers., of whats like, a neo platonists view on the One, Nous, Consciousness... I mean, its all Being/Non duality, but the others are more of like a secondary thing.

(Cont.) So in that way, atleast in a sense, istemi & other words are like agreements, or declarations or constitutions that you have w/ others, like the constitutional, classic words (of your choosing) to represent non oltre, or non piu avanti, or like a "beyond this point, they wont come" "If they build it, they will (or will not) come" (Magical Latin speaking -in a nutshell). I dont know why i said this now, i just felt like it fit, lol

Alls i know is that, alot of us are gonna be up against the edge of creation and understanding; where we are now / it might be different in just a week or two of realizations. Creation from nothing is itself the paradox that keeps on giving. I dont know what it is, what it means to keep pulling out pieces from within. Thats why, when i heard 'creation from nothing, i was like, this'll be the hill we die on, cause it captures everything, as a "resetus" button. Like, the idea of *words* falls, or comes short of, at the walled-waterfall where we eventually want to invoke istemi anyway, seeing as we will, by definition, be separation, trying to point to unification. There can of course just be practical ideas and realizations within it, but it will, at some point, start to resemble separation, trying to point towards unification.

I guess you could (or u *can, im sure u can take it however u want too) just boiled down what i said to a *felt-space* in etymological sensing (feeling that is itself the truth, since its direct, but its also just relevant to you in telling the story ~from a place very much unlike anything that looks like a visual or storyish realm)