kavaris

Onoma, Names, words, those are important fragments... that i should've considered starting w/ in this intro, that is by making 'em indigenous to this introduction. That is, again, to denote the identification on the nature of words, of wisdom, and its significance to this journey. It remains immanent, for we do eventually cross through that realm in a broadened way of sorts. Being and Becoming are like frameworks that describe actions of the microcosm, going towards the Absolute, One, I mean, its that keyword Being that describes it, not really Absolute, since its only ever an idea of the Absolute. The words Absolute and Being are very close together, and the whole idea is that we are the experience that exists in the in-betweeness, the istemi towards that misunderstanding OR understanding, the freewill, independent choice to choose a macrocosmic perspective, existence as God, or Absolute Oneness, which again, it implies Being, as One, not just an idea that you have up until the point of dying, For no one shall be One in death, and THE End, Rather the misunderstanding continues in death, to life, to death again. Thats not where it ends or begins. There is no beginning or end, its only freewill, its only ever direction, its only ever reassurance or perspectives, differences we create as our default mode; Energy we feel inside, as the inner pyr, that gyrates and creates more and more energy. Thats when we are propelled forward into, into the paradox of life, And to untangle it all is to experience some truth that we call "our reason for it" What is our justification for what we are doing? Everyone has atleast one thread of DnA shared w/ the ultimate — in the dragoon blood sailing experience, everyones scales evolved from the primordial egg, and, If we are anything like them primordial beasts, we are still flying around aarth, as the beasts that are to give rise to human speech and beliefs, grounded in the magick of wind and words, song and birds. Theres nothing you we can ultimately surrender to, or belong to, Theres are only thoughts, ideas and words that we can use to ground the very thing *in between,* Theres only justification, that is, actions, Justice, in the primordial sense of energy and focus, Artistic renders of who we are, who we once were. It is only a small part of Ousia, As Being is a universal blooming of sorts. Zesty is the contrast of the cold damp metallic railing touched!... As we walk along the steps towards a secret woodland entrance, and yet, it is only the beginning. Malachi's last message, an accidental forewarning, an *unfollowing* that marked an unbroken following, a beginning that exits — belief, itself — a religion without doctrine. What is it? We anticipate, we foresee, pillars cut through, our mind evolves. And as our sense of wants and desires are greeted w/ an unimaginable beauty, so too are the past experiences gone and forgotten truly, hence they never existed to begin w/ The Ultimate, the Absolute, truth, it requires no 'one single experience or idea, cause the truth is that which you've already set your heart towards, And you need only fuel the inner fire towards that wide-eyed revelation onward, towards that accented blossom that tells the rest of the story/or in avidya, to ignore the stories and scenes you've already been made present within, Life, Death, Life, Truth, Dionysus my fat greek wednaz'ing of dialect, disorder and desiderium (very long, part ii) Ὁ υἱός · ἀέρας · ἀνὴρ κεραυνοῦ Chaos of exp., staggered, drunk, unfortunate, funked, sucked, alternating happenings, a cascade towards a place thats not-so-good (so is life, for everyone) Gracious is the Name and shamanic faces we can share and possess too. And thats ALL (the "all", defined as, "closer", "towards") We dont exist in the purely felt affectation, not entirely so, but we do however possess an ability to define it, describe it, and create a world that makes such a thing a reality, assuming that is what it takes to do so. We need-only use the creator's belief, or the felt-separator, otherwise we strive As the felt-unifier, back to closeness-to-affectation Allow me to paint the picture of this fairytale, as that is the layer where dragonflies come to greet you and say "Hi". Its the layer of the castle that you live in, that you think [from] per the echo temple, per the conscious field of wants and desires, the desire to be here or there, the desire to be this or that, as well as Dante's Desire, an earthly, poetic, center of gyrating vision, for much like Beatrice, desire is more than a beloved of course. So Desire itself is the burning steps that walk ever closer towards curiosity. To be, to create, to imagine, is to be made of some sortve goo, It's at the edge of our most certain self, whom we imagine as \*based in truth. That is to say, that its an unrevealed truth that we sense, etymological feelings that guides... that point us towards this wholly felt, embodied realm or dimension, the Name, the Being, the experience. Onoma, Names, words can have *essence,* or they can be relocated through an *etymological* essence, which is not the origin but the truth, or the meaning that gives rise to a truth. That is, in describing truth, we are talking about the location of meaning, which could be experienced at some other time, in some other sequence and circumstance (another day, tomorrow, et caetera) Our sense of belief denotes a longer term relationship w/ meaning, of which shall fall downstream, As we just *say* what we think, when its really our thoughts swimming, continuing on to place what actually lives downstream. In other words, that very seed image or initial thought, its something that exists downstream, in regards to 'how we should interpret its meaning, or just how we think about its meaning, and how it applies, retrospectively. So when we speak of the Absolute as an idea, we are referring to a *spiral of differences* wrapping in on itself, in a front-facing way that we perceive as "actions, events, et caetera", though that isnt the final story, for we are that Directionality, trying to "tune, tweak" it [ourselves] to fit the story, experience, as it is, as it exists right now Being, or the act of, and understanding, at some point, they are almost indistinguishable, for you cannot do one without the other. It might seem like its more of a spectrum, where it falls explicitly on one or the other, but they are indistinguishable from your own point of view / It speaks to this understanding of Unity, One, Nous, etc. Being or Self is a unifying principle of multiplicity, basically, and its prior to the "path", towards an otherwise dualistic expression of, "As/In Waking Dreams, that which pass through the gate of ivory and deceive — those through the gate of horn accomplish or bring to pass an etymological feeling or truth (what is real)" of that which we are then to inactivate, motionless experience, diverging from that participation in consciousness, \*as the source itself, as unconsciousness (see also, high does of Ketamine or experiences like this...) What is consciousness? Consciousness is akin to an affectation of intelligence, levels of, constantly tweaked to the perceivers standpoint. The perceiver, the whole of affectation, it is they who take on the qualitative experience as part of a synthesis of intelligence. And at that doorstep, we are to return to the point of sentience (new modes on the other side) Being, Ousia is the ultimate perceiver and invoker of ["all", possibility] as a meadow, a frolicking field of intellect mediated through "Us", Being, or the quality of, through which we are part of that intellectual introspect., a perspective we take on, that we grant ourselves in the form of thoughts, actions, qualities, etc., We give ourselves that constant update, or we simply *do what it is we need to,* It's all intertwined at / around the edge of contemplation *(... as a product of what occurs when similitude links form to participation... which, im not sure we wanna get into all of that)* That is the twizzlering of Self as it attempts to *know (to be),* to experience self whilst being itself (LsD A + LsD B, interwoven) wherein the way you talk of Self, changes how you think about experience, and vice versa (\* two aspects, that *can* come together, that *can* give rise to, and within the context that should deliberately validate or invalidate their participation), for it is to portray (μιμεῖσθαι) what is, 'dragoon DnA sailing; DnA strands that are both metaphoric and literal, emerging (or descending) back to the primordial goo, Of course... ... when i say *emerge,* i mean this cyclical apóspasma, a "sipping of the sea", retrospectively, something that is only a material thought through Self participation. And, only a fragment of what *truly is* is leftover, especially because it exists at the edge of "experience" (i.e., exp., as, if we are to view it as "a temporary instance of our microcosmic understanding of the world and ourselves"), an exp., that we are to **activate** after experiencing the temporary, but ever-present, \*macrocosmic perspective and understanding of ourselves and experience Being emerges, and exists as a hierarchical recipe of Being, Experience and God, in the imaginary sense, and from here does it act, as the witnessing of said tiny, flowing circle of "sea-like dream", where the secret sea is a circle within a circle (or a circle around a circle), *era-la-gre'en,* moving out, external, the other, simply "in internal". Per usual is the truth that we tell ourselves, and that activates the path. It necessitates truth in that way, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful thing as distinct and on its own. The same is true in the opposite direction, to become One, it necessitates truth As the One, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful no-thing, or otherwise ultimate indistinction, to escape what we refer to as an identity / identification. The Soul/Psyche, the Mind, the Body and experience is always changing. We think we are in a constant routine of some sort, but its in flux, twisted up. We cannot know how it all works, since that is what gives credence to the limitations and distinctions of experience. That sense of "not knowing" acts as "everything that can happen, that we dont have the means of happening". Like, in a dream, the unaware factors act as part of a limiter to what you can see, believe or experience. We are the unification of knowing and not knowing, in that way. THAT is the fairytale. But once you realize "Oh shyt, im in a fairytale", you come to accept the situation for what it is, cause it requires limitation, it requires distinctions and separation from what is "a higher truth" (intimate is its attainment) Truth in the Absolute sense is something that should present itself (χρὴ αὐτὸ ἑαυτὸ φανερῶσαι) on the macrocosmic scale. Last part We need not continue towards a conscious cosmic truth. We need not become God if we fear God itself., God as an idea of the Absolute, God as part inner pyr, part luck, chance or happenstance, for no such hands may extend, If/assuming our fuel is made empty, beyond our grounding, our understanding of said potential energy, cause then what would be left? We cannot so simply exceed our potential in this moment of doubtful precedence, when we've not yet made it a liminal field of spontaneous energy. Pleasure is of the highest concern when you're spirit has been drained, hence the uptake and downtake of pleasure towards the highest version of Self Pleasure is of course not the same as engagement and overabundance and consumption for consumption's sake. Pleasure in a real way is closer to Awareness And in another way, it is directly connected to non-rigidity, an artistic way of thinking, i.e., the opposite of what's called "menticide" or "killing of the mind", though that must be tempered by some predisposition w/ the usual, step-by-step regimen of life, "what is seen to be the case" -beyond that, is what must be made quiet, a melody related to extraneous introversion, or what Minds of rigidity would see as extraneous thoughts and ideas, but what introverts would view as "the core of innovation" -The End

Perhaps the most ideal way to dismantle a kabal entity, is to give them all the tools they want, so they can ruin their own trip. Eventually, all kabalish entities meet their own doom, as made evident by mr. epstein hangin himself / being hung or watever, they are to meet their own doom if you get em in a room to confont their own deeds. It may not happen tomorrow, or in a month or in the next year, but itll happen. Thats kinda how its been for awhile now i presume ~ Give em the tools to ruin their own trip.

Well, the spirit world is manifesting in a very clear, nightmarish way, and everyone is reacting very ignorant to it all, And thats only allowing so pattern to continue, Like the passionate embrace is either, so loose, that it allows the wild filament to run wild, or its embracing the self as an identity to control. Like its hard to have it both ways, and in some sense we are all simultaneously responsble, but also we can only do so much anyway like... We arent exactly in the same room together to really understand anyone elses circumstances, everyones scattered around the world. So if theres a kabal in say Arkansas, what about the kabal in Luxenbourg or watever, like its too spread out for it to really weigh on us in that way. And spiritually we can only try to do wat we are already doing, but just do it better and w/ more passion.

Let me add, by default, when you go up against a side whos very much convinced its a slam dunk, their default mode is like that, "Oh, its a slam dunk case judge, we will have no problem here", Like it doesnt even matter if 5 seconds later the judge took one look at it and dismisses it, if theres a side whos very much on the surface level winning side, Thats how they always act. So thats not something unusual.

Iuno, but its startin to feel like the tyler robinson thing is just two idiot kids who got themselves all twisted up, ... BUT, then its like, lets use these two idiots as a stepping stone two hash out the continued political ideas nd watknot... I mean, i would like to be wrong, And i hope September 1st or wenever it is proves me wrong w/ a surprise, but im just seein two fkin doofus 20 year olds, who dont even understand life, so its like, Oh great. Ya know... "Justice", like... we really are gonna teach the world a lesson w/ this one ya know ("easy", as they say.. "a slam dunk case") Like... Wat fkin kabal is out there that doesnt understand compassion in any way shape or form yet, like... Do the rules actually dictate what is like, very clearly two retards who cant even think, bein responsible for wat is 3 billion people in the world who feel like they must make decisions for some other side of perhaps more retarded (assuming thats wats goin thru tyler mind at the time), in the age where theres nothing but commercial-esque confusion. Like not only are the frogs gay, but the ads are inherently gay, in the sense that they dont really serve these poor kids who cant think. Its a hard take, but i feel thats wat its becoming. Its an ugly, uneventful truth sortve thing, im afraid my friends. The question is then "why", but im sure there will be some elaborate reason from tyler. Ive explaned maybe the beginning premise. Only tyler is gonna be the one to understand the whole shabang, if they can ever give him the mic, like... Or, theres a small chance its all a trick, but that is very very rare, like itsmd have to be a pretty well conducted trick at every step of the way.

Before I start sharing what i been making, I thought to myself, why dont we take a moment to share w/ everyone two important choices, options that you have along the way, of which, prior to (that is, when you are young and you are just going through life... per usual) you are to experience everything As, something like this - "First i do this, then i do this, then i do this... etc, etc" Like thats what we see, yet we feel as though our experiences, our interpretations of, hold weight, when the truth is something that should present itself (χρὴ αὐτὸ ἑαυτὸ φανερῶσαι) on the macrocosmic scale (if to distill truth). Ergo it depends on whether you want to distill truth or not, OR if you are taking a break per this istemi towards, again, its a simple choice, but its weighed between these two choices. That is to ask, further more, should macrocosmic truth be stressed beyond an already enlightened and conscious cosmic truth? There's a spectrum that makes both choices part of one whole, one answer. And i give yous this, cause its just good to always know it, very directly. i mean, it should be very prominent to yous by now, via me.

I made something called "Ownership of the One..." (the last chapt., on that exp., for the full understanding of...) but its still in galleys. Ima try waitin like, maybe a month or two, workin out like, 'how to present... As i wanna get everyone on the same EXACT page lol 😆which may sound impossible, but i think everyone is gonna be closer in a month, as more ppl have time to write things down and such, And not to mention, lots of ideas can occur, and in that time, nd lots of lesser priority ideas can be garbage collected, therein raising up Those w/ the most -if it makes sense, i think so.

One thing i think is important is recognizing some compassionate side, or balancing it, such that you are spreading compassion throughout your own life, on to others, as you would to yourself... Like im very hurt when ppl got all these animals but they dont really take care of them so much that they are like, temporarily living w/ them like roomates. Iuno how often that happens, but the greater point is just the compassion that you have is finite, like you only have so much to divide amonst the world, And anyone else is like a potential lost soul that you should guide. So "Guiding souls" i think is part of it. Compassion is also a deeply felt compassion that exists spiritually, such that you avoid getting caught up in the mechanisms of consumerism and things like this, i mean. Unfortunately, many times its like, 'how can this benefit me... And it may 3ven be the case that, the person who needs all the healing is in fact yourself, or someone close, or simply your pet / animal(s); birds, cats, etc., I always felt very hurt by the lack of compassion, the lack of time shared amongst humans and animals, and it continues to bother me, so i thought, that should be something we share... ... Theres probably more to it, but i cant think at the moment... Feel free to fill in the blank, or share other things that are sortve parallel to this idea of compassion and wisdom, etc.

I was gonna make a new thread just now, and then i re-read this, and thought to mysrlf, "dang, that shyt i wrote was siq, wtf?" Did no one get it, i guess...?... ... ...

You assume "true manifesting" means something specific, but i employ you to define it for us, for youll find a thousand different ways you could truly lay it out, Maybe you mean "Can i wish for something to happen, and have it happen"? I dont know, i dont know what you are thinking. Youd have to be more distinct in your words.

You ask alot. You ask for us to describe manifesting, and what it may possibly mean, through the infinite space of whats possible ~ And it includes many things. Will your manifesting be the same, explanation-wise, as well as actually to someone elses? Iuno. Theres many questions you pose by asking such a question, that from your perspective should be validated and considered on your own time. Theres more roads to choose, a weighted bundle of possible options, many more than just the ones youve put forward; For, even those have many more questions you would have to face. You think too lightly of it as an idea ("idea" being, your internal expressions made manifest)

Oh... Here, let me see if i can separate it into a form everyone can recognize... First, when i think of "just m3ditating... just relaxing... or trying to just run on instinct" (iuno wat do nothing means per say, alas i tried to give it some notion of wat yous might be thinkin bout, including myself, when thinkin of, like, la-de-da do nothing), i think of a cushion, like you said, its that very comforting, but also dangerous foundation — Like its insurance for the soul... Chicken soup for the soul, sortve thing... Relatively... Personally or emotionally speaking... You dont have to do anything or 'try to do anything. In an absolute sense, you really dont need to do anything. Thats also what survival is, its the ability to balance that harmonic resonance w/ the active stimulation. You dont need to do that... You dont neeed to do Anything. But you technically speaking, need to, in order to continue the routine that says you have to, otherwise, you cant even talk or contemple the absolute, like the paradox is such that, you dont have to do anything absolutely, meaning you can focus on Being for beings sake, and still exist, even in death. But you wont be facing the absolute, youll be somewhere else that is no longer facing the absolute, cause absolution is the relative idea that "One can BE absolute", like its the outward expression of an inward experience, that doesnt end at absolute... Ergo, you dont face towards the absolute, you only ever face towards an idea of the absolute, which itself is that outward perspective that doesnt actually become absolute, Like... We are describing a paradox, but its something like that, Like youd have to understand that intimate connection of life and death, but yeah, its something like that, its a paradox that you have to experience to even know wtf im tlkin about. P.s. Paradoxes are also physical things too, like, a paradox isnt just the conceptual idea of "whatll happen on a large scale", like, reality and paradoxes are intimately wound up w/ the present moment, which is to say that paradoxes have real effects on life... its not just conceptual mumbo-jumbo

Or you know what, i take that back... Renaissance painters proved you could be homosexual and have blatant religious shyt in the soup too, but they reimagined it as Adam and god, not just Adam &eve, or atleast Michaelangelo & Leonardo (both were homosexuals) but they hated eachother, not to mention they were different ages i believe... Leonardo was older, or wait... wait wat, what is that story where leonardo goes out to the court / agora, and michaelangelo shows up pissed off everyone is hovering around him nd watknot? P.s. Claude gave us something to keep in mind, "Worth remembering too: in that era, religious subject matter wasn't really optional — it was simply what the market (Church, confraternities, wealthy families) paid for. So "genuine belief" and "this is the job" weren't mutually exclusive; both men worked within that system regardless of where their private convictions sat"

(part ii) Theres also these sorts of ideas (p.s. wat do you call this subject matter? But, wait til you get to like @12:30 to answer that question for me...) @12:30 "The original pain, the original ache..." Although it sortve disconnects from reality, cause iuno if homosexual relationships are bound by that, Like they have a different paradigm of interests when it comes to relationships, Like iuno if "Adam & Adam" (sounds like a clothing company) would fit in their bag... Like they have a more exotic idea around relations, that doesnt fit into this realm of thinking. So in that way, again, you have something that looks like it shares a similar attitude and mythos, but its two different things... Like if we were very simple people, we could buy that, that we want a relationship because theres some deep mythology behind it, but it doesnt connect to the reality of the whole connection... Iuno... What would you call this subject matter / topic? Like what is it actually tryina talk about, underneath of it, do ya think? Theres several possible ideas/elements.

Q: For Everyone — Would ya'll be interested in seeing how, "believing, knowing, learning, experiencing, understanding..." how those words are connected, yet simultaneously do they represent totally different places or points of meaning? Like is that something yous would be interested in, cause its sortve like, a very long winded thing. And, unless it connects to someone's interests, it may be a waste of time to just like, start unloading all of it out of nowhere, As its a topic that also straddles "belief itself" and this internal world belief of reality / that whenyou dig into, it gives you a new way to start investigating it. It has to be something yous would even want, otherwise its just ~ pissing in the azuli wind or watevs.