kavaris

Im not sure if this is something anyone would be interested, and if no one is, then it can just disappear, per usual. But originally, i wanted to find somethin more like "Why Analog is important, for kids"... And i didnt find that, but this short vid., gave me the idea to demonstrate an audio engineering workflow w/ several analog components (to me it looked like digitally made stuff, cause ive never used/seen alot of those fancy little module devices... he prolly knows more than me in that area, iuno) Suffice to say it, demonstrates another non-Ableton live workflow, which to me is interesting. I like to find unusual audio engineering typeve things, As more of a demonstration of the versatile nature of putting together things, and recording / making music, etc., and doing so in New ways, given that.... this stuff is expensive. You dont always hav the money to follow someone elses massive collection of gear and stuff, not to mention like, iuno if they still even sell some of the really amazing devices from the 90s (some of the best stuff is that 80's and 90's mixers, instrumentation and such... which we've now have been replicating digitally but iuno how i feel about it yet), like ive been following this guy Colugo, whos still wrkin on Blockhead a new DAW typeve software, As its more along the lines of this new, innovative entry into this particular profession; I myself havent been as focused on this stuff, seeing as i cnt really afford it, but i can settle for looking at programming and the internal nature of it, but its hard to build a following or find like minded ppl .. its also not my main focus, but i encourage others to make it so, cause music breeds music, or like ... if you find one person, you are more likely to find other like minded individuals (p.s. i bought my dad this triton rack couple years back, but i never ended up tryin it myself as we both got too busy...)

"Where life begins ...", a video vers., of what is jus a simple idea, which is like, anything w/ legs in the world of bacteria is bad, like legs and arms isnt a good sign im fairly certain (im tryina go in a health direction w/ this post, but this first part has a slight sciency twang/rant, to it...) I seen somethin not too long ago where there were these little crawling microbes on doritoes, etc., nd i was like dang, now, i dont eat that junk myself, but still, its like a testiment to like, 'Wtf is going on w/ these companies... that they dont know how to like ... distill "good bacteria", like.... Wtf is the point of them lab grown meat fascilities and all the pesticides, preservatives, pasturizing, etc., if its not to harnass and procure real bacteria afterwards, and real food, like ... Why would we want fake food that also has viruses? Iuno, yous tell me, like ... what is it they do in them labs -if not look in a microscope and figure out what is good and bad, like... This is jus a video of bacteria, and the question of "What even is life" typeve thing, but from my perspective, which is to look at it for the practical reasons first, like, bacteria..

The next part of that question is about beliefs vs. similitude, cause, you'll have realized that... what you have is, lots of similar images / matching ideas, that which result in something like "Yes, it looks valid to me now, or it looks good enough, decidely so" (assuming - an indefinite time of in a state of wonder and questioning...) and so... the question is then, \*if similitude is in fact the thing linking / chaining together "things that appear to be validations", how is it that we can have two different things happening, where on the surface is ".... our unrevealed, or indistinct beliefs..." and things that exist internally to us, that appear as "distinct or matching beliefs", How do we do that, or whats the descriptive language vers. if you had to put it to words? p.s. i should get going now. think on it.

Whats the initial seed/image that causes [something/anything] to become populated in the mind?, like how much percent of something needs to be experienced... or what im asking is, does your brain add together "amounts of" for "proof", or does the validation occur elsewhere?

If nothin comes up, look for "what came after the water clock", like..m how did they go from that — to mechanically driven like... gears and cogs nd watknot

humour me

see if water clocks ever had a mechanical part added, in its later forms, if you are into ancient stuff, like on wiki or one of these... As that could be interesting, hey, ya never know i guess, Ive gotten ideas out of crazier places. Ive gotta get rdy for this appt., so i cnt stick around too long to night/this mornin'.

Just to give a small taste test out, since its somethin i had in my notes, look how similar yet different all of these are, Greek has several interrelated to "knowing": **οἶδα**, to know... First theres, **οἶδα**, the act of seeing or experiencing~happened in the past (its normal meaning) (not gonna go into the grammatical differences, just the meaning) **ἐπίσταμαι**, to know [how to] or, to understand. More the practical/skilled knowing. **γιγνώσκω**, to come to know, recognize, perceive *(where we get gnosis, diagnosis, prognosis)* **μανθάνω**, to learn (knowing through something *learned of*) **δαῆναι**, the very root in ἀδαής, alas, this is *to learn/know,* related to **δαήμων** (skilled, knowing) and possibly **δαίμων** **σοφία** — wisdom, skilled knowledge. It gives us *philo.,* **sophii** (or a sophist, of skills) **φρονέω** — to think, have understanding. Related to **φρήν** (mind/diaphragm, as Greeks located thought near the chest region) Thats just the practical, three thousand year old basis for what we are tlkin bout w/ knowing nd weve not yet talked of How we interpret them words, and the resulting meaning, which adds a whole nother spin to this base level of like Dictionary form definitions.

Oh yeah, belief is so deep, that i have to surrender now to the fact that, it would take me a day, atleast, to explain *what it is*, for we often do take for granted just how different those pages can be, that we are living on, However that sense of things being different is itself tangled w/ the perspective we have, and the subsequent processes we are engaging in, etc.

Hey if yous gave me like a day (as i hav an appt. tomorrow thatll be for a few hours downtown) i will demonstrate how "belief", "understanding", and "knowing", although seemingly touching a very similar shade of the spectrum, that they can point in totally diff directions, not to mention, "knowing" is something that has several different versions (atleast three)

Oh right, right, right. you know what. my bad, my brain took a poop for a moment. i totally know what you are tlkin bout

Oh wow . Okay see... I doubt anyone is gonna share that idea. Ive really never heard those two things together, beliefs, creation. I myself will need to think on that one, but i digress, cause ultimately, if nothing else @Mellowmarsh's wheels are turnin at the water clock, and the little divets in the bowl are fillin up, fillin up now. Thats what matters, i feel p.s. iuno why i was thinkin there was a mechanical part to the ancient water clocks, or maybe it was in its later forms, if it had a mechanical apparatus.

For example, take "belief", is that something you "hold on to", temporarily, permanently? Does the temporal space of it even matter? Things like that... Maybe you dont see it as "holding on", at all. Maybe its more like, "a direction you face for a time" until you turn away, Consider that, a single word can create an incredibly far and deep topic, that yous then would otherwise have to settle on, if its getting too far from where yous are trying to go, in the dialectic... As the layers peel back, it becomes more comfortable ~ That is, getting use to this massive influx of words, concepts, and how they can be put together.

Sometimes you do literally have to explain what is otherwise obvious to you, to get anywhere, cause it may be literally the case yous have two different ideas for a word.

Everything in this thread. When i make songs on guitar, i have to do this alot. You have what is essentially like... ... A bunch of little pieces of songs jumbling / rattling around, And the answers that make a complete sentence / song, arent yet located nd put together ~ Granted its like kinda fun ~ in the discovery sense ~ to be all scattered ~but then its not really helpin to make things a complete thought. Thats sorta wat i was tlkin bout. Yous may or may not hav described enlightenment already, id have to look throughthis thread, i just got like 10 other things im doin simultaneously.