kavaris

Yeah absolutely. Everyone needs *self, or *experience, in order to experience anything thereafter, so its entangled w/ everything. But either way we cannot understand consciousness, for the word itself does not point to anything. Ergo the search for "a truth within what being conscious is" is itself a question around "what reality is", for everything is experience... That is, you cannot take away experience, you cannot take away biases, nor can you take away reality, for they are all words that point to something else that is without words for it. In the attempt to do Science that way, it would be the attempt to misunderstand reality. But this is true from the perspective of investigating consciousness as well, for it too, it does not point or lead to anything, unless you yourself have an experience that redefines and reincapsulates the meaning of "consciousness & reality"~as it would pertain to reality as a whole.

@everybody Q: If we break into a topic 'round magick and/or occult that also is directly related to Science and the use of plant and animal medicine, flora and fauna pharmakai, should that go here or in the Spiritual, Esoteric, And Whatever Else Section? Its something for everyone to think on, assuming its a perfect 50 50 split and that its like, which toss of the coin road does it work in~i would say here, but its also like, mystical/metaphysical and Spiritual In some sense it works best in the spiritual section, cause it frees up this half for intellectual jargon, and introduces that section to a side of mysticism they might not have known before.

Do yas know how they sell that shredded cheese (as well as in "block" form) in foodstores, its like, theres lots of different brands and cheese called either cheddar or colby... Yous know thats like the fakest fkin cheese on the universe, right? Like its pasturized so ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL of the microbials that your body needs ~the organic stuff~ is destroyed in the process, and what you are left w/ is no longer cheese but the material that is to taste and visually represent a cheese-like *thing. Like its one level away from plastic cheese that you've tasked your stomach w/ digesting, if you put it in your system. Now thats just regarding cheese. You also have bread, and there isnt a single option they sell in the mass market bread department that isnt fake. Now some stores like mine have this little section (way way away from the bread mind you) And that isnt fake, for normal rye/whitish bread (im not talking about the kind they make up there either in the bakery, thats not what i mean,. and i dont like that bread, but thats a diff topic) This is a secret bread that pretty much no food store will have, but they should, cause its what normal bread taste like (it taste alot better... i mean, when the foods not fake its suppose to taste alot better, and not like it has been surgically glued together) The point is, i just talked about bread & cheese. Thats not it. Thats not where it ends. Like, yous have those channels that talk about shopping at cosco, but cosco doesnt exist where i live first of all, second of all they must not know the level of fakery out there is way beyond, as im not worried about the 2% olive oil in my avocado oil and sht like that. Like thats two oils that are the only healthy oil anyway. Like im not tryina eat fake glued-together products. And some ppl think, "Well isnt it obvious?" NO its NOT obvious, because all of these products are still on the shelves and are still purchased regularly. One more i gotta add is "fake tortillas", cause this one is so annoying because you dont have anyone out there that has learned to work w/ flour->dough, and make there own tortillas. Thus you gotta ppl really investing in fake tortillas. There isnt a single non-fake tortilla out there in foodstores, and if there is (that is, one whos ingredients say: flour, water) you're lucky. if it dont say that then sorry but youve got fake tortillas that clearly are fake tortillas. Like, theres no faking it -> Organic products taste organic; fake products taste fake. To Not know the difference is to have lived in a world eating nothing but fake food (ive named only 1% of fake products)

Like yous dont understand. These are the ppl that want you to just accept this stuff, or to take it as a joke, or to not engage it seriously, so they can get away w/ it, and make successful engagements w/ others who are only mindful of the financial relation and such Like, if yous dont do anything, yous are gonna have more and more fake foods and fake supermarkets and fake fast food establishments popping up. Yous need to fight back against this stuff, as the IDEAL scenario is that, no one will be paying attention, and they can just go about their business to get those "bills passed that dont make sense", or them "foods in foodstores that dont make sense", etc.

Also, this guy did not revolutionize computers by any means. He put together a team that prospered and had better fortune over the real revolutionaries and innovators in his field. Thats not innovation, thats not a revolution. Thats pure fortune 500 b.s., and we dont owe this man anything. Now if he wants to help us geat, then wtf dude, finance some family farms ~ as opposed to contributing to the fake food of America. Foodstores are already an entire food scham, besides for the locally made and grown stuff that you sometimes get in there... sometimes! It should be all the times.

I just dont understand whats wrong w/ growing things and selling chocolate, that is, you have these ppl like bill gates nd such investing in apparently *good things, then why arent they creating opportunities inside the realm of natural things, that which are natural and have micronutrients essential to the body. I mean wasnt there somethin weird bill gates invested (within the last few months i wanna say it was), like lab grown eggs and chickens, or milk or something ??? (i think it was fake butter & meat)

I want to leave this here too, even if it doesnt really go directly inside "descriptive language", its a part of communication and these things like *Wisdom and rhetoric and learning / relearning the fundamental aspects of a good Sophron (σώφρων) which means like, w/ sound-mind, temperate, self-possessed~or like a man or woman who has mastered theirselves. And this connects towards how you treat others as well: Pietas (Latin) — the Roman embodiment, duty and love woven together (and subsequently, the reverence towards others... *granted, that thats not an automatic thing, so youd have to be particular in paying attention to that) Eusebeia (εὐσέβεια, in Greek) — embodiment, perceptive reverence toward what is sacred and worthy, including people... Theyre cultural cognates that communicate the same deep human instinct or sense of like, possessing this internal appreciation of perception and feeling, followed w/ reverence~in regards to "that which is all around"~from that seeing. p.s. im not sure they teach this stuff: at school, at home, anywhere... like...

Everyones right when reality is wrong... right? If it is the location in space t'where everyone gets to be right, then i dont know if that changes anything its kindve unusual if you think about it like that, as a mass of people moving towards something together... like in other words, the mass is everyone searching for truth, and then the destination is that which we are moving towards. like im not sure if that is a goal that we would want or not (its too abstract to tell what that even means). Like obviously that is a goal, but, it is a goal -if we are overly optimistic. I think id be starting out more on the pessimistic/skeptical side, til proven wrong (again, i know, -its in the place where we are always going to be "right". But i dont understand what that means, yet, like it doesnt explain anything for us independently (unless we all die in the process, then itll in some sense have triumphed in explaining alot) Like to me, anything where we died in the process was successful in some sense, even if we dont get to acknowledge it afterwards. Like you just dont want to be staggered between two extremities (extremities that you can feel, i guess is how to put it) I'm speaking to the "grand-maya" of course. Ive sortve left the realm of normal perception space, but I feel it is related to perception (perception or whats the other /p/ word, oh "perspectives". or maybe its prediction. i dont know it doesnt matter)

I mean, we are breaching the topic that no one can breach. But hey... Why not, right... Like, okay, reality or the reality that we are working on... Thats the perspective we can speak on... Cause to speak towards the -istemi to, — is to breach the point that we couldnt return from. We mostly speak to the point that people can still communicate (even if it doesnt seem like they are understanding you). I mean, if we say its an illusion, we can still speak to each other about it, cause that part doesnt quite yet breach through. Like its almost like a test, right, "Are you gonna breach it? Are you gonna breach it? Are you gonna touch the chocolate?" its like, We can share a space of illusion since the paradox isnt quite breached yet. Like, to realize -is to be fucked, possibly in a good way if you dont mind, like eventually thats actually the last thing that you are worried about, granted its literally like self deteriorating. I mean, it IS derealization im describing, so, its not to be taken lightly, try as we might. i mean... im speaking to illusions of course.

"Gay Egyptian King, Here to bring you love light and peace, prefacing w/ the Egyptian Song, *Bring Love to the World, and..." Then we learn about "Ankh" from the Egyptian King, The Gay Egyptian Prince/Pharaoh, Ra Sém Bah, which is only the beginning for anyone gay or trans, hes got some interesting insights for you, if you click on *videos, and search by "oldest" videos first, and then scroll down, theres alot of material there for you, one specifically on *trans - im not even gay and i wana attend his Golden Beetle Temple! oh, and another curious thing bout lots of ancient, kemetic and hermetic, and african or greek stuff is like, *Why is there so many snakes? right? Like if you go back and read/listen to Dioscorides, every other sentence is talking about how to prevent or cure ailments ~ attributed to snake or serpent bites. Back in the day, you were brushing up against these little brushes where snakes use to~And still do live, tho weve cut down or isolated alot of woods and forests, so now its made alot clearer where the snakes should be at, And back then you got bit by a snake and died. People were smaller back in the day, so even small snakes were prolly dangerous. But anyway, the Eucharist back in the day (Kykeon) which was the same thing i believe, was a drink made from this snake venom to build immunity to~what would be future encounters, however only certain people were strong enough, so they had to ejaculate nd wat not, and create distilled forms of the immunity, through fluids that they had the most of, semen presumably being a go to for transfering to others... If they had datura in mainland Greece, they mighta been using that one Datura species for the Eleusian ceremonies~i forget its name~i mean theres 3 diff ones of Datura related to psychedelic Datura, but i use to know which was which ... Oh and these terms, Εὐχαριστία and κυκεών are related in the sense that, you would use them in the same context, or in related ones, as ευ - χαρις (karis) means "giving thanks"~gratitude or favor, and κυκαω (kykao) just means "to stir + mix", so you would be using these terms, or their derivatives, together to talk about "giving the ποτόν (poton) or potion" which is what "kykeon" means. Its a brew or potion (πόμα, poma and poton are more neutral, like "a drink") *p.s. "Christ" and pharmakon are different, but related to this context, but lets not get into that (too many words in Greek)

This actually breaches a weird topic by accident, on the topic of fear too, which is like, on the surface, there are these things you could assoc w/ fear, like a total state of disarray & chaos, and similar things like this, youd might associate it w/ fear~like the best way to walk it down through the Earthly realms to simmer it down into one experience. But beyond the most obvious things, theres this opposite place, a place where everyone is to be devoured, and although its essentially like the Egyptian devourment after death, its also this thing we are to fear~As fear itself too, cause its like... The soul, being made whole, it is to lead us all to that one individuality regardless~but this is like, the place that fear takes you to, And that contrasts w/ this aspect of the soul or experience where you are able to *resolve (in some respect) that constant looming fear, cause the fear and the overcoming are two constants, as you cant really have one without the other, its just baked into reality. And even in death i mean to say, the continued "experience" is itself the continuation of fear and overcoming. *Note, the balancing of the scale is your own balancing, your own contention w/ yourself, the "heart" or material item being placed on the scale, as an analogy towards your complacency, your acceptance w/ who and what you are in the moment before continuing to wherever you are destined to go thereafter. ... Part of this probably leads back into Christianity and the fascination w/ it, but I dont really think too much about that connection~however obvious it might seem.

Here's an interesting one to get yous thinking, cause it touches on this aspect of control~or that which we may hope to, As it is about this idea of madness, or those chaotic aspects related to~reflected in our world. And how, in Science, Philosophy and Theology, etc., there exists alongside those~a world of frenzy and disorder. I started out looking at this word rinselvarsi ("returning to the woods", or "becoming wild again") Which of course sounds alot like the early myths of Merlin right? That is, those stories where they say he was to go mad and fall into a frenzied state, living in the woods and worshipping animals and all of this stuff (And later, when they try to save him they manage to lure him into civilization for like 5 minutes, before he goes crazy and returns to the woods again). Thats sortve the first time they take Merlin from the folktale/songs of Merlin, and make it more like Myrddin Wyllt For those of you who dont know, Myrddin Wyllt comes before stories of Merlin, and hes more of the quintessential Mystic who "becomes wild" (and this is prolly during the same time you have the early, early, early versions of Author the Barbarian, way before the Arthurian Legends) Myrddin is actually the Welsh form of what would later become Merlin and "Wyllt" means something like wild, mad or untamed. The story goes, Myrddin, a bard or learned man, lives in society until a traumatic event befalls him (like a battle) and it shatters him; And one commonly linked event is the Battle of Arfderydd, after which he "loses his place in the world". So he simply withdraws into the forest. I'm not sure if they go that far into it, like w/ Merlin who literally goes mad, possibly speaking tongues~though i believe towards the end it depicts Myrddin going mad, but he is then taken by the Lady of the Lake and presumably taken to... Mermaid-land or somewhere.. Haha, lol i dont know. The battle of Arfderydd is actually very interesting, and some of the videos on Myrddin Wyllt do talk about it. In the tales of Myrddin, he def abandons society entirely to live among the animals, taking on a feral existence, and this is what gives him this prophetic voice (hence, what would turn into the legends of Merlin). I believe the Welsh texts are called Yr Afallennau and Yr Oianau though I get those early Merlin, Arthur & Welsh texts all mixed up. So Myrddin is like a seer, diviner and foretells all these crazy things. Later on, tales of Merlin turn the tales of Myrddin into an advisor, a strategist embedded in kingship. So the point to this is like, these are examples of early medieval tales that begin from a wild place, and w/ time are slowly absorbed by 12th CE era and the early Chivalry assoc. w/ royalty. And so, in all of this contemplation around structured sciences, there is always this element that contrasts civilized society. Existing alongside the serene forest is our chaotic tendencies and attributes, a truth that lingers~that which cannot be reckoned w/ in any meaningful sense, it can only be acknowledged & contrasted against. That is all.

@Joseph Maynor (part ii) Oh wow, so hes going way back to the beginning ~those important fundamental aspects to religion and western thought, as he mentioned the *logos, and i think he mentioned Platonism. Hes goin way back to the Greek Philosophy, And thats how all these things begin, or the kinds of ideas they have to contend w/ *p.s. this should be fairly obvious, but when i am talking about Martin Luther & King James ~ That has nothing to do w/ Martin Luther King, *i had a dream... Lol, cause im sure someone out theres gonna be like "OH i know, Martin luther king, i had a dream!"

(part i) Thx. Im gonna check this out. The other thing i will have to look into is Christianity as it was establish after Roman Empire and Italy by 1800, As i had started my research during the first Century up to 1700-1800. And now we are getting into what we could call "Christianity, as it is known now", Which then splits into European Christianity, and N. Amer/S. Amer. Christianity ~ Which i bring up because North Americas christianity is like... Its so heavily dependent on things like the King James vers., And seldom does anyone know that people like Martin Luther (1522 New testament translation that no one even knows about) comes from Martin Luther who was in the era of German Necromancy and Medieval German Alchemy, and King James wrote books on Demonology; Im being serious, they are individuals that started out writing different genres of magick (look it up) Ive done a whole thing on Martin Luther, as i was studying the Habsburg Chancery language, and Germany/Austria secretarial writings from that era of 1400-1500 And Martin Luther is very important for such research (inb4: like hundreds of other figures, but i digress...) ANDOh and Hebrew also began as a Medieval Magick language, atleast what we call Hebrew today. The point is, people dont even know the history of Alchemy & Magick~And how different Christianity today is from Christianity back then... But anyway... Going back to the video, im gonna check it out... @Joseph Maynor Thx man. Im watchin it now.

This kindve shows yous the lineage of decision making ~ for the Greeks (who were essentially the Romans from generations before) were all about Virtue, and Justice, Virtue & Justice as more of higher priority aspects ~ And it shows you how or why the bible is being written, in the sense that, the Ancient Greeks and Romans didnt care about the Angels; They didnt care about like ~ What Enoch was told... Wait, i shouldnt say they didnt care... They didnt *hold it to such a high priority that they thought it should coincide w/ the broader collection of texts. And so my point is like, Greeks wrote and arranged the bible to preserve what they thought represented justice and virtues, without the Jewish influence really having a say, And thats probably for good reason too as there was alot of "exaggeration" that you had to get through to sortve build this Jewish Magnum Opus... I mean, The Roman Empire went on later as a symbol of these things, that reflect the interests of the Vatican or the church of 4th CE, like that Vatican was, and still is like a symbol of what it is, its like... Rome took over, and Christians were in some sense, traditionless children who were taken ahold of, and forced (through happenstance scenarios) to approach life with the bible at their side. Like we have the wiggle room to see beyond, but the children of the original traditionless children didnt have that type of flexibility. Note, heres some ancient history yous can investigate: The Pentateuch (first five books) was translated around 280–250 BC in Alexandria, Egypt, That leads into a story bout the Torah translated to Greek... BUT what is missing from the story is those are Egyptian priests translating/writing, in the same way the Greeks would be looking at those texts, translating and writing. There is no bible at that point. We would be remissed to make a claim on "What those texts were" that go between Egypt and Greece, cause they dont come as a concrete collection, and they dont have the evidence to back it... They do have the Greek, so thats what yous can say. Like if Egyptian Priests cared, then they would surely be replicating texts all over like crazy, right? But thats not whats happened. Egyptians wouldve prioritized Egyptian beliefs. Who knows what or how the Torah even happens, and it doesnt matter. Its not representative of a puzzle piece that explains history, its just a roadblock to what the history would require in order to make sense. You could say the "Garrish-Maqluba" language was the original language that the bible was written in, and it would be making the same statement that tells us nothing, nor does it even make sense.