kavaris

Heres another weird one @30:00 (see video at the end) or somewhere around there, the idea of being dead, And being brought back to life, thats like a thing w/ maybe like an accident you got in, And like maybe you are at the hospital, and you come to, while in a hospital... but maybe you were inside of either a light, or it was just darkness... totally unconscious. But thats like, something very different, because you can just exist as your dream body, in that place of light or dark, assuming theres a space thats carved out in there, like assuming you arent leaving your body behind all the time, like, spiritually, its always w/ you, so maybe its like, just dont leave things that are necessary behind maybe? i dont know, its not like theres a way to measure it, or try to record or weigh it or anything, while in a dream. its just there. Iuno wat happens to your body on dmt either, but in my experience, the body, mostly, is like, prior to identity and mind and everything else, like its priority mail, even in abstract dreams of floating around its there, and watever happens in reality is rotated elsewhere, til you return. The light is the scary part, and like i said, i cant confirm wat that light is, as its more symbolic and dissolving, and has nothing to do w/ ancestors. Like its a Soul in itself or something, pure dissolve maybe, but if you get wrapped up in it, your getting cut up in a way, like its not gonna be very loving and caring if you are in between dark and light, And iuno, like, if you become a new person, in a new reality, then you just bypassed this light, so its not like you will have even seen it, like im saying, theres alot of little details that we dont understand, like alot of little details, And most ppl describe "dream experiences", but its not wat im tlking bout. im talkin bout a total flip-around of whats like, flipping the mainstream idea and possibility space around, and the concept of your body, and how its more like a traveler that doesnt end or begin

Oh no prob, ya wen i watch ur vid, it reminds me how important it is, its like, we been missing out o that little puzzle piece, or atleast i have, definitely.

Just to break a little into the God paradigms, The idea of God is also the assumption that God cannot be undone, like... unless your vers of God is really a hologram that has no authority over his hologram... Because..Think about it... There arent things that are totally agnostic and free from the turmoil of Earth, unless you imagine it that way, like, if you can imagine form, than that form can also be ignored, which means it was never God to begin with, otherwise God is the hologram with no dominion over this hologram. Like holograms have an unfortunate quality, that they dont represent theirselves in a direct way anyway, so the hologram is a reflection of what? Of a hologram? Of the God of hologram(s)? Why does god need a hologram? These are the kinds of questions to start to ask yourself.

dang it, i overwrote everything, fk it, doesnt matter, lol im not tryina remember it all again

@Joseph Maynor Oh btw, i thought of something you might find interesting. It might tickle your fancy, tho i wanna save it for tomorrow, after one of my appts... because its gettin a bit late noow to start throwing out all these ideas all of a sudden. Better to think of, tomorrow, a fresh day.

^Try to crack that egg.

One argument for the abstract is however, that it can live within an absolute sensual reality, and sortve push the envelope, without it having to fold, without requiring structural resurrection , or reinsertion into a story... In a storytime story or (like right now, an online story) suddenly im not even on topic anyway, because *cough cough* im not on topic, and even if i was, it still may not be received or considered AS a story (like, ppl just may not care, unfortunately, but theres a larger chance of them tuning in / and not tuning out) Thats the argument against story, and obviously, to go toooo far in the other direction, no one really can understand it, even if they tried, cause now it would be hyper personalized language with no allegiance to anything in that initial stanza or grouping, like it can fly the coup at any moment, and leave the reader on a cliff hanger thats unpredictable (im talking, in the MOST extreme spectrums of an abstract writing of course, which i would not be doing) A story however, in the very least, can save itself from sudden termination of that initial stanza, Like it can be saved from its own psychedelic adventure.... Thats sortve the pros and cons.

@kavaris @Yimla I messed up, cause i said there was two options, 1) A storytime story versus 2) Abstract descr., language, but theres three atleast, (1) Story, (2) A story thats told online (whatever that turns into, Ya kno), (3) Abstract descr., language thing. And a hint of that last choice lives inside of all of them, however, the third represents a more distilled version of abstract, like more tablespoons of that ingredient... Stories however are straightforward. You know its a story because its got a protagonist, its got a *setting... Its got elves, and witches, and predicaments, dialogue or narration, etc, etc, etc. You know its a story because its got language that sounds like it. The opposite to that is the third option, which isnt a story, or its unclear what it is, cause its fluid, like a potion, and its allegiance doesnt rest on any of those ingredients. Its a large tablespoon of abstract, musical whimsy, without any predicament or particular rhyme or reason... Its not a poem, its not anything. The downside is that it can tuen into mumbling~whateverness.

@Iadelle To manifest is to counter "reality, beyond", like, it points to Being, Identity — but the person who asks about it, is looking at it from a materialists paradigm. It doesnt matter if you think you know what the non-material is, its a revealing of your level w/ that partocular idea, and of course, later youll realize it was silly, assuming you do realize. Like, manifestation is not in a book... Like The Secret (the book), its not like a recipe that the material world has any clue of, and its not located in a material web, its got experiential, hierarchical steps to qualifying, As qualification begins from the introspection amd deconstruction of YOURSELF, and what it means in context. How can one qualify it through the material web of 'Look, my finger doesnt go through the wall, Look i didnt find any treasure.... Those are defeated declarations, webs youve resurfaced to let dominate, let answer your ques., whilst stilled wrapped in the web you made, even while going through your authentic experiences that wouldve lead you to that. Psychedelics are the key, but theres a turning of that key required, a door you gotta walk through. You know, its not like ... Oh n/m it for now... that should give u enough to go on, for now.

Imagine we're in the gobberish / gibberish circumstances, of which we are simultaneously riding with and driving that thing that we are apart of~experiencing, which could be the case. It could be just one perspective away... take a break from it (or not, and instead, indulge it... however...) See that its a driven thing, atleast, and choose to take a break... Maybe wat you want is to drive the gibberish machine and fix your life, due to its descension into the aforementioned circumstances we find ourselves, then start defining what it is or, what this is (what even is that...?) Demonstrative or indefinite pronouns?, but what bout just the regular forms of "him, her, they, them..."... "that thing, this thing", like, if you are trying to nail it to the bulletinboard... Like if you have the technical name, now youd ask, what is it Actually?, What are you actually, And if thats not enough, what is anything, and how does it all happen? Like, when you think about the Amazon rainforest, and you see a frog jumping, or a big bug crawling, why dont you feel like youve also stumbled on a diamond (or something that makes you excited) or vice versa, why does finding treasure not feel like finding a frog in the Amazon rainforest? Like, thats another vers., of mind, and theres prolly many, the point is that you can start using things to exceed your expectations and anticipation around "that drab thing that exists in the future", As its only through the circumstances, the circumscript that we are to read from, that drab thing arise. Perspectives you imagine, may also be perspectives that you seek, but through time and space, we arent imagining or believing anything specific, explicitly, if its already there, literally — Like, if beliefs are already imagined, then its already literally there, i.e., the form of chairness is already there if its a chair. So why is the frog, or the form of frog in our mind, in our future, any different from the treasure that we want, in the future, referring to these thoughts we have, that exist temporarily or indefinitely ~n time or space, comparing em to other thoughts, or thoughts that exist literally? The form underneath is a felt-ness, and that sensuous reality is something we want to puncture, and things outside seem to do that, where etymological feeling space is met with the greater senses. Thats something to think about. Its called 'that truth that you find, that crazy, crazy reality that you find, which could be found or experienced anywhere, ~ its just a little something i was riffing on

I feel like, these people need Josephs new thing, that "creation from nothing" thing that he made (many people need it), that profession or that spark, such that "the world blowing" can become "the world blowing up inside of you", that inner fire, cause all thats missing here, when the world blows, or like when god is like a devious controller, is to reinsert that idea as a form of energy, as an awakening, as an enlightened moment that you hadnt had before. im describing enlightenment in an energetic sense, but youll really feel that way. Its like this "surprise", even if youve already had it... Someone described it as "mind" i think, and mind can meqn many things, like this moment can be synonymous with mind, if you let it, if you have that idea in you, and you know how to complete it. Its just ideas and words, but the person(s) has to have the experience, and then, the ability to finish whats left. Like it leaves you w/ a certain step, that which allows you to "finish / complete".

Had i thought of it originally, id actually be working on a whole thing, based on just that, or something just like it, cause wen you find somethin like that, ya gotta build a whole thing round it, like those are some rare things that come together... like it would then be working out also the rhythm between words and stuff like that, like the more abstract mechanics no one thinks of, but that add to it when spoken out loud (probably. i actually never really thought about it myself)

"Prince of the Word, you built so good a castle out of sound and name— but what walked through it, phantom-hued, ... said it was 'creation from nothing.

@Joseph Maynor In a hundred years time, i might return, and be like "Ay... Yous are always creating from nothing... its still ever present, evermore stuck in my head and relevant, such that i cannot resolve the way it has encapsulated everything", right, like it could be that much of just an impression that i feel, But i def feel like, its the premise of something else, that which others can experience, whatever it may be too. I think i like it so much especially cause i always think about 'that almost unsolvable riddle / game... And how that ability to try to solve an unsolvable dilemma has always been at the forefront of my mind, but im not sure its ever been combined to be the idea of creation from nothing, in my head. Its probably the context too, As its not like "oh, we all just invent from scratch", it felt more like, the emergence of creation, and in the context where creativity is the topic, and we are sortve falling into the idea of creativity. But it also makessense, just creating from scratch too. Its like a catch22 that works everytime, favorably, lol.

Thats a great term for what you said, 'aesthetics, nd how it all branches off from that. Thats a gr8 way to put it. p.s. theres def somethin to "Yous are always creating from nothing", like i see a spiritual eagle / sparkle / glimmer in there, granted, i could be off but i feel like that is something interesting in there, to me atleast, it feels like its the premise for something.