kavaris

You could always just pm me and say, chill out, like, thats sortve an unnecessary public spectacle thing your prompting on me here publically, like... i dont even know why youd say that out of the blue.

But i wasnt trippin balls. Why would you say that to someone?

Oh plz no Ai @ Mcdonalds, Ahhhhhhh They are the only company that still operates somewhat reasonably (tho the toilets are, like, they got poop in em) Like they got that siq machine w/ the Mcdonalds OS on it, that imalways tryina see if theres a way to hack that bad boy when they arent lookin, so i can order myself like 17 burgers on the fly, Like weneed that Mcdonalds unscathed, atleast til im dead in like 10-20 years ya know. I cant eat there that often, but id def be there alot, if it was free, as thatd be auwesome.

(cont. ii) of course, right now Gobekli tepe and ancient zagri / zagros mountains, and those places, are the New hot shyt, and thats settin back the timeline on 1st civiliz., but then its like, you got this like, ancient taxonomy / classification of farm animals, like noahs ark, and these slabs of some material, arranged in a complex way, like thats only an indications of, what i think is the large consensus of a reboot on the whole flood story, or some memory of something like that, in monumental formation. Like what else could that be but a Noahs ark thing, just going by the images on each stone. Thats why its sortve off limits in a way, cause you cant have Noah being a real person, referencing real ancient things that dettch from the bible. Like, there are sites in Iran that theyve since demolished i believe cause they no longer serve these fake-as-fk stories that we told ourselves, and thats ashame, cause the real story was prolly alot more wild n crazy.

(cont.) like i feel like we take for granted somethin right under are noses w/ the ancient temples atleast, that is this like, ancient construction that is somewhat impossible by todays standards, as we gotta do everything in the cheapest way, like its like everything is built significantly worse in that way, granted we shouldbtnt let everything collapse, but its like, someones gotta take notice to the fact that weve been outmatched by ancient ppl who, according to science, were like the first civilizations? Nah, no way, how could these first civil., simultaneously have the best building and construction techniques, makes no sense.

I feel like theres prolly a certain chemical or material embued into the temples, perhaps that is connected to phosphorus or things like this, that have some pull on the physical body, perhaps even imperceptible to some, nevertheless attractive, cause of that sortve acidic body we possess, of which is being drawn towards that sub-medicinal-chalky-thing, like theres a spiritual enriching side to the temples, alongside an alchemical attraction, possibly, im guessing, as i believe atleast some of these temples were using really sought after materials that we no longer use in todays shitty capitalist / market hungry society or watever, i mean i cant find clothes that dont suck, but i bet theres millions of incredible clothing & fabric shops in them same countries w/ them temples. Which is just to say the materials they use were so much better than todays. And in them countries, they still have practical shops w/ good clothing, good fabric, etc., iuno if they have like, ancient-material shops, but theyd prolly go dig it up for you if someone asked for it, if they had alot of money or sumthing, ha.

@LordFall Ill leave ya w/ this, my routine, or my vers., of playing video games is now putting on or playing music from video games, and playing w/ the cat/cats... And ive been playing, whatever youd call that, for like a solid 5-7 years or so, i mean i was researching ancient stuff + languages, but im on a hiatus, And everything else, including the discord stuff, its all highly classified now, and hard to really explain (i have like entry lvl programming on there, to help ppl learn, and many, many things that it ties into, but thats just the beginning, everything is like its own secret project... i also have a sourcehut you can learn from, if u get into programming ... pm me if u into it)

(Part 2) Oh so just a 2D, you can prolly do that with not much help on anything from me. I mean, you might want to also consider, is this idea something others will find interesting, or is it more of your own passion, And making it *popular is more secondary to this primary objective. You dont have to answer that, As thats more something for you to consider as you go... Not indian. Got it. Now is this character a hero, or does he function more like someone in the middle—Neither good or bad (from our modern perspective) like Odysseus, like that sortve trickster, murderer turned hero, that is, sortve like most Kings or their predecessors, they may not necessary even want to be a ruler or leader, at first, but they are kindve forced into it thru an unfortunate set of circumstances, And then that is then the "leader who becomes king, out of happenstance" -Like that trope of maybe someone like Agamemnon, Granted not many ppl think of him that way i dont think, But if you just consider all the flavors of the diff protagonists, rulers or otherwise leaders types, then you sortve enter into this complex moral and emotional dilemma / situation involving... Maybe the protagonist / Odysseus-style character, like it could also be more Arabic-style, like the guy was a thief (Aladdin) before they became a ruler... i mean theres many ways to approach that aspect, ... Like maybe you want this divine lineage thing, like, whether that be a reference towards Tolkiens elves, who are partly immortal, partly human because they can still be killed through severe physical stress, but they normally dont age... and thus end up living for thousands of years ... Thats more of the god-like, sortve Platonic road ~ that is the "man-made" versus "god-made" dilemma... It then touches on many elements story wise, or whatever direction you would have it explore... Like, in the realm of folk or fairytales, which is more of like a shared / orally passed down thing, you could go w/ the romanticized king arthur story, the idealistic-good-guy trope... i mean, im just giving you ideas, theres quite alot of details you might add in conjunction to this of course.

@LordFall (Part 1) Oh okay. One sec., i had this prepared, As i had been turned on to the fact that you're indian or part indian ~ And so im rifling thru some things that may or may not be interesting, along the lines of things that you might already kno about, or that u might find interesting, sortve in the realm 9f ancient caricature that stems from the most Ancient of Indian art and style, like this, As India created that very Anime looking style, in conjunction w/ wat was a later entry, from their old / ancient traditions that extend into asian ~ Japanese and chinese... i only know this cause i looked at various painting / art from Japan artists in the 1700-1800, which of course predates Anime... but watchamakalit, you see similar Indian creatures and style of art here. Then theres a vid., illustrating indian creatures / art ~ After which ill then comment on your comment. (see images, 1st one is Indian Rahu creature) Im sure theres more, the Indian stuff goes back to a very Ancient tradition ..

(cont ii.) @LordFall Im just mentioning-*, in case you didnt see that i had been responding to you, i just forgot to @ you before this /

(cont.) No rush. Take your time, cause i have to run to a store rel quik

Explain to me the game again, but from this sortve perspective, Like whats the story w/ it, and who are the characters in it, And "Why", like are these characters serving the game / environment, or does the environment serve the char., or sumthin else, Like get a little abstract w it

Oooooh okay. I told (you) lord (though obv., everyone can chime in and help lord / us)that i have a discord, but that we should all riff first, cause we arent yet sortve like... Iuno how youd phrase it... We arent yet in that realm of like "okay this is what i want, or that is the target zone" And that might come alot later, so take it all with an open mind — for now—for now This is a test. Its to see how ... ... ...or no, im srry, im phrasing it wrong... one moment... I meant to say, its like a test or \*experiment — to sortve *pull out the words* from your imagination (to engage your imagination and interests a little), to see what your heart is striving for... okay i gotchya, one moment. This gets me thinkin of what i call "Collectibles", which is connected to games, but it also widens your imagination field to things suchas... Stuffed animal, physical, teddy bearish realm of stuff, moving into –> Toys/Games –> Action figures –> Comics / Art & Anime/Manga, etc.–> Trading cards (Yugioh, Pokemon, etc.) –> Video game, music (ost), book and/or animation / movie/tv show stuff (could be anything) .... i mean.... Im sortve rifling through alot, but collectibles is a wide category, And im tryina get you remembering like, all the things like this, that connect to like that 5-10 age kid in 80s, 90s and beyond, like that notion for all of these stories and char., caricature or the myth(ology) of what connected all of these things that had heroic or fantasy / creature - esque things going on, which itself is obviously part of that ancient myth and story, like whats the title of that later antiquity legend about the Ethiopian queen / princess? Is it Aethiopica, Like i wanna say it proceeds Ovids Metamorphosis (if its not that, then its something that largely borrows from it) point being, that romantic or otherwise heroic fantasy genre is part of the earliest Greek Metamorphoses, or the traditions that once had stemmed in Pythagorean, or Archaic theology, like the "mytho-religious beliefs come to life..." sortve things, from our perspective. So im just riffing, gettin ya thinking. You can tell me what you are thinking..

And then, all of those companys got absorbed by larger, lesser aware companies, who are like, themselves not all video game companies at all. Like there are random companies on wall st., or in the private realm, that now own... "so & so" company, that, once upon a time, they were innovators in their field, of a certain flavor of games ~ in a certain sector or technology, That we now are either using, or that we are totally ignorant of, And no one knows the better, cause its been like 30 years of changes. To make an analogy to egypt and sites around the world, its like all this lost tech theyre finding, that no one knows how it was done, meaning the tech involved to build all of these super specialized buildings of unique, man made geometries, and we are just sitting here today, totally ignorant of like, wtf it even is, or how it was done.

They had games you couldnt even imagine in the 90s, Like there was some shyt where you interacted w/ a special machine plugged into the tv, using physical objects, Like a sortve proto-minecraft building in real life, but then illustrated on screen. Like everythings sortve a.... Like a veling over what was like the dawn of toys & games. Its almost like, too hard to even explain.

Theres been like, 500+ pokemon titles since 1995 - Some through other companies/divisions — All crazy different.

Which pokemon? Cause newer pokemon is pretty hardcore as far as technicality, Like thats GaneFreak or watever the company in the game div., their bread and butter. Id be surprised if they didnt have a full proprietary package behind all of their titles, giving credence to the years spent having to develop things very specific to the mechanics, etc.

Ya gotta learn to program, but that itself isnt straightforward; It raises questions on how to program the underlying layers, to understand how text works, etc, cause how can you maintain a game without text? Iuno, its a very in depth ques., games, and Ai as doing anything in the process, besides helping you to organize your thoughts is fairly unrealistic, And im not even quite surewat is meant by using Ai to help make games. I can help you w/ low level stuff, but it would require of you to let go of the burning desire / need to rush into a video game thing. p.s. i havent read every discussion in the thread, cause i dont have time for all that. Yous either wanna be serious and ask technical ques., or we are just riffin...

Its hard to know whether anyone is rdy, rdy for the non repeti., like, if its even healthy for ppl who are just getting comfortable w/ what, who, or like, where they are at ... and its like, im always borderline thinkin, 'i gotta stop touchin wat i would consider the fragile mind or minds, whatever. Not saying like, i kno for sure who or what im tlkin bout, but its just an acknowledgement of sorts, an understanding.

When i was making this piece, the initial post, one idea that i was going for, beyond the main function, and meaning and form of it, of just a general "it" factor, was, having it read and feel like we had never left the very beginning premise, Like i want it to be as if we are always circling back to the main idea, even though its always changing. And the way to know that 'that's whats happening (how to judge it, imo) is if you can read it and not think about it, and still have it make sense, or to feel as though it is, minus any critical thought thats needed to extend it, or compare it to anything, etc. Its — if you can say to yourself afterwards — "that makes sense". Even if later its to open up new portals. Where would we be if everything was still focused on psychology, or atomic sciences, or anything else. Thats something that we are always demonstrating of course. This video is a good comparator, cause i feel like theres a few two many ideas being explored; the "patterns" idea, which is more rhythmic, more repetitious, more routine and personally geared to the individual and the way they move and think and feel and project things onto the world. Why even bring it up if its left unresolved is my point — — Then there was another big idea introduced towards the ends, about the imagination becoming real or something, i mean, thats another unusual perspective, as it opens up the question of what "real" means, and, why we are phrasing it like that, Like 'why would there be anything more real than the real you call real -is what i mean. These types of questions stack up, and in trying to make this perfect linguistic, artist rendering of 'the thing, its gotta be like a song that you dont have to internalize, yet its somehow producing an understanding of what it even is that you are talking about. And, its not trying to jump to too many topics, or trying to merge too many elements. Like its simply an entry into a particular domain, And this is an entry of that flavor, that idea ~Not this video, srry, that is just what i thought would function as an illustration of something thats got too many unresolved ideas in it... Im not saying any of yous do this either, it is more of a thought experiment to get yous thinking in this way of like "circle within circle" in conjungtion w/ the other circles.

Onoma, Names, words, those are important fragments... that i should've considered starting w/ in this intro, that is by making 'em indigenous to this introduction. That is, again, to denote the identification on the nature of words, of wisdom, and its significance to this journey. It remains immanent, for we do eventually cross through that realm in a broadened way of sorts. Being and Becoming are like frameworks that describe actions of the microcosm, going towards the Absolute, One, I mean, its that keyword Being that describes it, not really Absolute, since its only ever an idea of the Absolute. The words Absolute and Being are very close together, and the whole idea is that we are the experience that exists in the in-betweeness, the istemi towards that misunderstanding OR understanding, the freewill, independent choice to choose a macrocosmic perspective, existence as God, or Absolute Oneness, which again, it implies Being, as One, not just an idea that you have up until the point of dying, For no one shall be One in death, and THE End, Rather the misunderstanding continues in death, to life, to death again. Thats not where it ends or begins. There is no beginning or end, its only freewill, its only ever direction, its only ever reassurance or perspectives, differences we create as our default mode; Energy we feel inside, as the inner pyr, that gyrates and creates more and more energy. Thats when we are propelled forward into, into the paradox of life, And to untangle it all is to experience some truth that we call "our reason for it" What is our justification for what we are doing? Everyone has atleast one thread of DnA shared w/ the ultimate — in the dragoon blood sailing experience, everyones scales evolved from the primordial egg, and, If we are anything like them primordial beasts, we are still flying around aarth, as the beasts that are to give rise to human speech and beliefs, grounded in the magick of wind and words, song and birds. Theres nothing you we can ultimately surrender to, or belong to, Theres are only thoughts, ideas and words that we can use to ground the very thing *in between,* Theres only justification, that is, actions, Justice, in the primordial sense of energy and focus, Artistic renders of who we are, who we once were. It is only a small part of Ousia, As Being is a universal blooming of sorts. Zesty is the contrast of the cold damp metallic railing touched!... As we walk along the steps towards a secret woodland entrance, and yet, it is only the beginning. Malachi's last message, an accidental forewarning, an *unfollowing* that marked an unbroken following, a beginning that exits — belief, itself — a religion without doctrine. What is it? We anticipate, we foresee, pillars cut through, our mind evolves. And as our sense of wants and desires are greeted w/ an unimaginable beauty, so too are the past experiences gone and forgotten truly, hence they never existed to begin w/ The Ultimate, the Absolute, truth, it requires no 'one single experience or idea, cause the truth is that which you've already set your heart towards, And you need only fuel the inner fire towards that wide-eyed revelation onward, towards that accented blossom that tells the rest of the story/or in avidya, to ignore the stories and scenes you've already been made present within, Life, Death, Life, Truth, Dionysus my fat greek wednaz'ing of dialect, disorder and desiderium (very long, part ii) Ὁ υἱός · ἀέρας · ἀνὴρ κεραυνοῦ Chaos of exp., staggered, drunk, unfortunate, funked, sucked, alternating happenings, a cascade towards a place thats not-so-good (so is life, for everyone) Gracious is the Name and shamanic faces we can share and possess too. And thats ALL (the "all", defined as, "closer", "towards") We dont exist in the purely felt affectation, not entirely so, but we do however possess an ability to define it, describe it, and create a world that makes such a thing a reality, assuming that is what it takes to do so. We need-only use the creator's belief, or the felt-separator, otherwise we strive As the felt-unifier, back to closeness-to-affectation Allow me to paint the picture of this fairytale, as that is the layer where dragonflies come to greet you and say "Hi". Its the layer of the castle that you live in, that you think [from] per the echo temple, per the conscious field of wants and desires, the desire to be here or there, the desire to be this or that, as well as Dante's Desire, an earthly, poetic, center of gyrating vision, for much like Beatrice, desire is more than a beloved of course. So Desire itself is the burning steps that walk ever closer towards curiosity. To be, to create, to imagine, is to be made of some sortve goo, It's at the edge of our most certain self, whom we imagine as \*based in truth. That is to say, that its an unrevealed truth that we sense, etymological feelings that guides... that point us towards this wholly felt, embodied realm or dimension, the Name, the Being, the experience. Onoma, Names, words can have *essence,* or they can be relocated through an *etymological* essence, which is not the origin but the truth, or the meaning that gives rise to a truth. That is, in describing truth, we are talking about the location of meaning, which could be experienced at some other time, in some other sequence and circumstance (another day, tomorrow, et caetera) Our sense of belief denotes a longer term relationship w/ meaning, of which shall fall downstream, As we just *say* what we think, when its really our thoughts swimming, continuing on to place what actually lives downstream. In other words, that very seed image or initial thought, its something that exists downstream, in regards to 'how we should interpret its meaning, or just how we think about its meaning, and how it applies, retrospectively. So when we speak of the Absolute as an idea, we are referring to a *spiral of differences* wrapping in on itself, in a front-facing way that we perceive as "actions, events, et caetera", though that isnt the final story, for we are that Directionality, trying to "tune, tweak" it [ourselves] to fit the story, experience, as it is, as it exists right now Being, or the act of, and understanding, at some point, they are almost indistinguishable, for you cannot do one without the other. It might seem like its more of a spectrum, where it falls explicitly on one or the other, but they are indistinguishable from your own point of view / It speaks to this understanding of Unity, One, Nous, etc. Being or Self is a unifying principle of multiplicity, basically, and its prior to the "path", towards an otherwise dualistic expression of, "As/In Waking Dreams, that which pass through the gate of ivory and deceive — those through the gate of horn accomplish or bring to pass an etymological feeling or truth (what is real)" of that which we are then to inactivate, motionless experience, diverging from that participation in consciousness, \*as the source itself, as unconsciousness (see also, high does of Ketamine or experiences like this...) What is consciousness? Consciousness is akin to an affectation of intelligence, levels of, constantly tweaked to the perceivers standpoint. The perceiver, the whole of affectation, it is they who take on the qualitative experience as part of a synthesis of intelligence. And at that doorstep, we are to return to the point of sentience (new modes on the other side) Being, Ousia is the ultimate perceiver and invoker of ["all", possibility] as a meadow, a frolicking field of intellect mediated through "Us", Being, or the quality of, through which we are part of that intellectual introspect., a perspective we take on, that we grant ourselves in the form of thoughts, actions, qualities, etc., We give ourselves that constant update, or we simply *do what it is we need to,* It's all intertwined at / around the edge of contemplation *(... as a product of what occurs when similitude links form to participation... which, im not sure we wanna get into all of that)* That is the twizzlering of Self as it attempts to *know (to be),* to experience self whilst being itself (LsD A + LsD B, interwoven) wherein the way you talk of Self, changes how you think about experience, and vice versa (\* two aspects, that *can* come together, that *can* give rise to, and within the context that should deliberately validate or invalidate their participation), for it is to portray (μιμεῖσθαι) what is, 'dragoon DnA sailing; DnA strands that are both metaphoric and literal, emerging (or descending) back to the primordial goo, Of course... ... when i say *emerge,* i mean this cyclical apóspasma, a "sipping of the sea", retrospectively, something that is only a material thought through Self participation. And, only a fragment of what *truly is* is leftover, especially because it exists at the edge of "experience" (i.e., exp., as, if we are to view it as "a temporary instance of our microcosmic understanding of the world and ourselves"), an exp., that we are to **activate** after experiencing the temporary, but ever-present, \*macrocosmic perspective and understanding of ourselves and experience Being emerges, and exists as a hierarchical recipe of Being, Experience and God, in the imaginary sense, and from here does it act, as the witnessing of said tiny, flowing circle of "sea-like dream", where the secret sea is a circle within a circle (or a circle around a circle), *era-la-gre'en,* moving out, external, the other, simply "in internal". Per usual is the truth that we tell ourselves, and that activates the path. It necessitates truth in that way, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful thing as distinct and on its own. The same is true in the opposite direction, to become One, it necessitates truth As the One, otherwise we cannot place any meaningful no-thing, or otherwise ultimate indistinction, to escape what we refer to as an identity / identification. The Soul/Psyche, the Mind, the Body and experience is always changing. We think we are in a constant routine of some sort, but its in flux, twisted up. We cannot know how it all works, since that is what gives credence to the limitations and distinctions of experience. That sense of "not knowing" acts as "everything that can happen, that we dont have the means of happening". Like, in a dream, the unaware factors act as part of a limiter to what you can see, believe or experience. We are the unification of knowing and not knowing, in that way. THAT is the fairytale. But once you realize "Oh shyt, im in a fairytale", you come to accept the situation for what it is, cause it requires limitation, it requires distinctions and separation from what is "a higher truth" (intimate is its attainment) Truth in the Absolute sense is something that should present itself (χρὴ αὐτὸ ἑαυτὸ φανερῶσαι) on the macrocosmic scale. Last part We need not continue towards a conscious cosmic truth. We need not become God if we fear God itself., God as an idea of the Absolute, God as part inner pyr, part luck, chance or happenstance, for no such hands may extend, If/assuming our fuel is made empty, beyond our grounding, our understanding of said potential energy, cause then what would be left? We cannot so simply exceed our potential in this moment of doubtful precedence, when we've not yet made it a liminal field of spontaneous energy. Pleasure is of the highest concern when you're spirit has been drained, hence the uptake and downtake of pleasure towards the highest version of Self Pleasure is of course not the same as engagement and overabundance and consumption for consumption's sake. Pleasure in a real way is closer to Awareness And in another way, it is directly connected to non-rigidity, an artistic way of thinking, i.e., the opposite of what's called "menticide" or "killing of the mind", though that must be tempered by some predisposition w/ the usual, step-by-step regimen of life, "what is seen to be the case" -beyond that, is what must be made quiet, a melody related to extraneous introversion, or what Minds of rigidity would see as extraneous thoughts and ideas, but what introverts would view as "the core of innovation" -The End

Im gettin ketamine mixed up w/ benzos, as one does the thing where it makes it like, you are suddenly merged though time, from the present, to whatever scene exists in that next moment with no account for the time in between (which technically that is a kind of unaware unconsciousness), And the other is the one where you just are totally unconscious, and feel as though you were totally unconscious, given that you are sortve "rested" by it... Like ketamine doesnt really give you a fullfilled sense of rest, but its still interesting, cause iuno wat else does wat it does... i mean, you merge with scenes that exist in the temporary future, like its just weird... i dont even really know why the one is like an unconscious rest thing. Ive had alot of drug experiences, so its hard to separate them all. Ive just never done dmt, and iuno, i just missed out on it. Its fine. The universe didnt think i needed it for watever reason.

"Where life begins ...", a video vers., of what is jus a simple idea, which is like, anything w/ legs in the world of bacteria is bad, like legs and arms isnt a good sign im fairly certain (im tryina go in a health direction w/ this post, but this first part has a slight sciency twang/rant, to it...) I seen somethin not too long ago where there were these little crawling microbes on doritoes, etc., nd i was like dang, now, i dont eat that junk myself, but still, its like a testiment to like, 'Wtf is going on w/ these companies... that they dont know how to like ... distill "good bacteria", like.... Wtf is the point of them lab grown meat fascilities and all the pesticides, preservatives, pasturizing, etc., if its not to harnass and procure real bacteria afterwards, and real food, like ... Why would we want fake food that also has viruses? Iuno, yous tell me, like ... what is it they do in them labs -if not look in a microscope and figure out what is good and bad, like... This is jus a video of bacteria, and the question of "What even is life" typeve thing, but from my perspective, which is to look at it for the practical reasons first, like, bacteria..

Oh. Gotcha. I am that dumb. Yas have to explain this to me. Its something like... iuno this is an odd posdibility, but in the future... Its possible theres gonna be layers and layers of drama, that has become the hardened wall / barrier to get to that window of truth, or to see 'what exists outside. Thats something i was thinkin, Like how much does Ai train on just the general drama and stuff goin on, Like i wonder what will equate to truth in the future, Or just the general, mainstream beliefs. I assume Ai makes distinctions between "bs" and "possible truthy entries", or something, i mean its fairly fundamental, atleast in its grammar engine, its gotta define things correctly. Iuno wtf im talking about, n/m, ignore that man behind the curtain.

Ha, iuno wat these memes ever mean, but it looks really funny. There is somethin else, something about this like... like the culture we are in, and the ability to look outside of it, iuno.... iuno its weird cause its not like its entirely straightforward since there are real elements to it, but they are like buried in drama... or something, iuno.