kavaris

This looked like something when/after i scrolled over/thru it real fast, like it looked like animaniacs or something, like cartoon network chars., or whatever, all rolled up into one. or maybe that is wat it is, i dont know now.

Ive been liking "-copia" and "panspermia" as the new word, over solipsism, as "non-duality" is already pretty set in stone, and, if you needed another word just for more specificity, copia, pan, sperm, gaia/earth, thats like the macro scale vers., of whats like, a neo platonists view on the One, Nous, Consciousness... I mean, its all Being/Non duality, but the others are more of like a secondary thing.

(Cont.) So in that way, atleast in a sense, istemi & other words are like agreements, or declarations or constitutions that you have w/ others, like the constitutional, classic words (of your choosing) to represent non oltre, or non piu avanti, or like a "beyond this point, they wont come" "If they build it, they will (or will not) come" (Magical Latin speaking -in a nutshell). I dont know why i said this now, i just felt like it fit, lol

Alls i know is that, alot of us are gonna be up against the edge of creation and understanding; where we are now / it might be different in just a week or two of realizations. Creation from nothing is itself the paradox that keeps on giving. I dont know what it is, what it means to keep pulling out pieces from within. Thats why, when i heard 'creation from nothing, i was like, this'll be the hill we die on, cause it captures everything, as a "resetus" button. Like, the idea of *words* falls, or comes short of, at the walled-waterfall where we eventually want to invoke istemi anyway, seeing as we will, by definition, be separation, trying to point to unification. There can of course just be practical ideas and realizations within it, but it will, at some point, start to resemble separation, trying to point towards unification.

I guess you could (or u *can, im sure u can take it however u want too) just boiled down what i said to a *felt-space* in etymological sensing (feeling that is itself the truth, since its direct, but its also just relevant to you in telling the story ~from a place very much unlike anything that looks like a visual or storyish realm)

Another weird aspect to framing is how you feel, nd how it feels to frame ~And to try to build said *framing* or content inside its framing center ~ via imagination ~ or a felt-space thats being activated by the imagination visa vii ~ its poke and prod That is to describe how, you can have an active memory of an experience that defies a visual center, but it may exist or " be of", a sortve wire-frame-felt-personality / which itself has application * when its in the drawing center * cause the drawing is something that always happens. Like, our framebuffer has no on or off, that ppart is the *just is*, and the felt space is a modality that might even precede visual building. Unfortunately thats the best i can do in describing it, as ive not wrote any notes on it or anything yet.

Or in other words, when we imagine things, Some things we thought of as "no thing" straddle the world of conscious experiences, cause suddenly you can get say, a girlfriend / boyfriend, and what was once a non-existent relationship is suddenly very much in focus and real for you, and things like "text conversations" that had previously been yourself-texting-yourself, become Yourself—messaging a human being. And in that sense, the real and the unreal collide, And the world of imagination manifests into the world of the living. The imagination is like, part of a spectrum of self actualization points, like a matrix you can say / points that are to be incidental versions of the conscious mainline. Like, desire requires decisiveness in a sense. But its not so simple, so i started calling it that word — Fantasticheria — Somewhere between a belief and an imagined thing is "fantasticheria", "an actively pursued thing". Granted i realize we've only ever pointed to a "thing", imagining all of the points of actualization as distinctly as possible. And within that sentiment, these actualization points are either spread, or dense, or geometrically arranged, or more of like a "crosshatch" ~ in that they can be layered instead of being a simple 2d plane or pattern w/ easy recognition... Iuno, i had thought about this the other day, And i went overly-complex in the direction of thought surrounding. p.s. i just like thinking of things in ways that can both become represented in words, as well as *imagined* in a way that runs parallel to these things applicable in realife, like crosshatch patterns or like, algorithms you use to give the illusion of movement and motion, like a video game that ppl would play (i think they call it life, like ...)

Progress must be like... "un-tarnished, non- mistaken world, in a perfect, untarnished / unblemished, unreasonable ideal world", Progress to some ppl is prolly like "... first we do the perfect thing, then we do perfection over and over, so the perfect world can be perfect", Like... We have what we have now, and thats gonna have to be enough. Its progress, otherwise its like, beating ourselves up about something we dont even understand, like ... Describe progress... if this AINT it... like...

I just want to correct wat i said, so it doesnt seem like 'Oh what are you targeting us purposefully?... Like, its not that im actively destroying something specific, instead, everything i touch has seemingly been destroyed, by accident. So im just saying, literally everything ive ever touched or looked at or thought about has been destroyed, And thats just being honest, like... theres never Not been destruction happening, and i feel like, to ignore it is to be telling ourselves i lie that we think is truthful in its sentiment. Everything is fragile, for reasons beyond our comprehesion, or so ive experienced... The other day, when i woke up and took down a ceramic bowl (or u know, normal bowl material) from the kitchen cabinet, i went to put the bowl down on the counter, and i swear on my liiiifffe, That shyt broke like it was made of sand, like it melted in front of me ~ cause i placed it down real hard. That sht melted, like it didnt even break, it disintegrated into tiny sand, i dont even understand it really.

(Cont.) Like in the Greek world, "imagination" was seldom described, cause thoughts were attached to dreaming, not as a distinction we make like "This is me awake, and this is how it turns into a dream now", but instead, it was in some sense all a fantasy, so in that reconciliation they had to first make the distinction of what was real or fantasy, cause otherwise yous are talking at cross purposes, i.e., "Your thoughts are a fantasy", "No, your thoughts are the fantasy". So there first has to be a practical world to pull from, so you can even say which is not fantasy, and then there comes "consciousness", further veiled by the ideas that we think consciousness is... Nevertheless, direct experience-consciousness is not quite a fantasy that your imagining~In the sense that~Imagination and unconscious activity is in definition "not directly confronted". Theres a difference in "time" that youd have to realize first and foremost. And thats only the beginning.

Im still looking thru thread. With that said, have yous worked out the difference between just "conscious" state, versus unconscious/imagination? That is, forget about "is there a subconscious/unconscious", and pivot to "what even is conscious or not", because, yes, there is an imagination. But like, why is there an imagination that contrasts more direct conscious?... Like, what is the "more" that we are talking about?

Ill be honest, i forget what actobat, illustrator, and all those were... i know theres a design to it, tho the last time i used photoshop, it was called like Photoshop CS4 or something, like it was a "CS#" Line, that im not even sure if they call it that now, or whats going on.... Do yous kno?

Oh thats kinda interesting. i didnt know this... but nevertheless, its intriguing. Perhaps ill look into, as i get what you are looking towards now.

it might compete w/ actualized dot org, especially if im here... in the sense that, Artistry is quite powerful, and unless you do it quietly or without alot of ppl taking part in, then suddenly everyone is an artist. i can give u an example of wat i mean... When i played music w/ friends, and when my friend had friends who would come over to watch us playing instru., suddenly it had inspired everyone to be choosing some sortve instrument or artistic endeavor to inact, and not saying that every single person felt like it was their calling to do this, but a majority of ppl felt like, 'hey that looks fun i want to do that too... or they thought, "hey wait i want to do that as i like music!" And if you then make a band, now its sortve at odds w the fact that your audience now all wants to participate. That is, anyone whos ever liked a related thing is going to become an artist, once the freedom to do that is put out there... for that reason, i wouldnt make a section related to it, or if i did, id bury it somewhere where its not gonna have any attention.... or you could even make it like a temporary exp., like yous could have say "X forum section, that changes every 30 days", like "Experimental section... for art, ideas that dont belong, etc." but i think even that is suggestive towards this thing im calling like, "INSPIRATION on the unintended consequence sorta lvl". p.s. continued avidya state around imperial cult or just very much appreciating someone (or not appreciating) as a friend that you think of in the same light as thinking or saying to yourself \* messo a fuoco (in focus... like youd focus on anything...) That is one thing... but then treating friends like skirmishes, that has to be reconciled, otherwise its like "i like you, but im gonna keep you on a rotation-kebab so i have more friendship chances..." Thats sortve what it feels like if people were to appear and disappear to you, or if they were to change who they were, etc., iuno its hard to explain, but you sorta get what imean. Theres something taken for granted~around love + friendship, n most young ppl

ha, when you said "suite" i thought u meant like this stuff, Like... fkin, "Dreamweaver" or somethin (i dont even recall what dreamweaver was...) Like all this sht, neverending adobe stuff,

Ill be honest i dont know much about photoshop or psd files, etc, as im assuming thats what .psd means. You know whats funny though, i get emails from people who are still tryina work on these dead projects, like stuff that could really up-end all of these things, that is like, working on old OS, and image manipulation tools, like open source work that i once had subscribed to on github a long while ago, every now and then someone is asking if the project maintainer will accept their fix/patch, like its like... The drive to work on these things is there, but not enough ppl are on the same page. I just kinda laugh, as i find it funny. sad but funny in a way, cause its like, alot opportunities are there, nd everyones like, eh i dont really care.

i guess it depends on wat this is for, as when you say adobe suite, im thinking all hundred of those little programs they made for very specific jobs around like, drsign and illustration and such. thats wat i was meaning... but if theres something more specific you meant, like digital sortve animation arena, thats something very different.

Ill be honest, back when i used Windows, or an OS that could run Adobe and Apple products, etc., nothing really beat Adobe, or atleast, the old photoshop stuff from back in the day... w that said, now if i were to use something id do everything in watchamakalit, gimp or w/ image magivk, etc., like free linux tools, cause theres nothing specific im tryina do... but, if you need all that illustrator and all those other tools, im not actually sure there can be a replacement since adobe really revolutionized those areas. like, id be surprised if you find anything remotely like their tools, unfortunately. With that said, i have tried some cheap alt., tools, but they werent very good, granted this was like over 6 years ago, so you never know i guess.

(Cont.) it also cant be a synthetic material, like human constructed nano crystals in a lab, because i feel the whole point is like mother earth nature, and the like, fraility levels, and things naturally withstanding or breaking down over time, so in that sense, it cant be like an alien material. or it cant be synthesized in a lab either, as thats getting to specific around like... the chaos of divination (or the alien specificity around it) which is more like, a balancing act w nature that we want to be apart of, and not like... well you dont want too many synthetic elements going on i guess is wat i meant. The natural cycles already are that alien thing And dont get me wrong, if someone out there spent the rest of their life working on the perfect runestone material that never broke but still had the same feel/quality as normal stones thrown on the ground, id appreciate it and id use em all the time, i just feel like its just another big waste of our time here on earth.

Hey, thisll sound crazy, but im actually looking for certain kinds of stones / crystals, specifically the kind that can be worked / shaped into tiny runestones for rune casting, cause the cheap moonstone break (along hidden inclusion lines... when you really chuck em on the ground), nd its prolly too expensive to take sapphire or ruby nd turn that into tiny runes for runestone purposes, so im looking for something thats neither a cheap hard stone, but isnt like a perfect diamondy, crystaly thing either... if anyone even understands that stuff, lol.

Oh nice, Hey i was surprised that my dad showed me something that i actually liked, cause my dad usually brings up crazy conspiracy things, but then the other day he was like "You hear of Bashar?" nd i was like "it sounds familiar, but im not sure". Ive only watched one video so far, but theres alot of em

@Breakingthewall Is it better than The Secret, the quintessential toxicity? Or does it beat it out ~in its surface lvl sludge factory/foundering? Surely nothing beats out the Secret, on that front, right?

Hey, if we had more of that in the world ~ it might just be the right catalyst towards making the world better...on a practical lvl. Like, we are using tech right now, predicated on the inability for the lead designers , or those in charge of the tech direction, etc, who r af'raid to admit when theyve been wrong ... Take Gmail or Apple mail for instance, it borrowed ideas from others making similar things at the time, Aol, yahoo, etc, etc, but as it turns out, it doesnt actually make sense in the app, functionally speaking... Like you can create a message, but that message is attached to something fundamental across all the other inboxes you manage, like its an old system made fake-modern... One that is actually less functional than having a stripped down message system that you manually arrange things in, without metadata or any of that junking up the place, since thats literally wat "trash" and "sent" things already are, like... "A copy" is also a reference, in my opinion, And it doesnt have all the garbage collected junk in it... And thats just the tip of the iceburg... Theres so many things that are just terribly wrong, but that we gotta deal w/ for now cause someone wasnt brave enough to say "Im wrong and the idea doesnt make sense, so we should try again.. give it another try..."typeve thing. Or maybe they didnt even realize it was wrong either... Iuno.. i guess im saying that, i dont know how prevalent honesty and innovation is ~i guess thats wat im tryina sae

Thisll be hard to explain, but when you find ideas, take for example "no thing", that itself could indicate "nothing" (or it could indicate a "thing" that exists, just at a different time), etc, etc, depending on how you see it, function, meaning & form can arise out of these paradoxical ideas, and it often *does* — of which you might not **see clearly, like, what the friggin hidden meaning / intention is, at first sight, but it only strengthens that strap of misunderstanding along the edge. Its hard to explain, and i dont think ill even write it down myself, as its more of a minor detail of/within a structured existence / experience that has more going on than realized, at any given moment or point in time. You kindve see what im getting at, right? Like, you are the ignorance in manifested form, but everyone is misunderstanding manifestation. Hidden meaning/power and the enthusiasm of yourself, it shapes a veil over what is suppose to eventually become the *known* portions of Being at the fundamental lvl. That then changes how you see everything else (or it can change how you see everything else). I guess its confusing, iuno.

"Spiritual transmission", not channeling. My mistake. my b... Channeling today more implies "Im getting the spirit of ozzy osbourne in the room". This vid is a spiritual transmission ~ as its transmitting a spiritual thing, as opposed to invoking a spirit of a person that was once a live being. This is Being, but as an invoked spirit, as it relates to a starseed thing, if starseed implies seeding spirit / ethos into people, as the seed whos alive, towards rthose who are too, already alive. Like, real people in front of you, i think. I dont know if i made that up, or if thats wat it means...