kavaris

Its like that curtain in M II, and we're tryina get that back to reveal the world of stuff, the 6.2 World / Level for example:

In runescape, you have like firemaking, fishing, woodcutting, etc, in Philosophy you have components that can increase in level, like language and rhetoric or something for example (a rhetoric lvl / melodic/musical lvl, since Greek speakers realized that good speech had a musical quality/and were further trained in pitch, rhythm + sure pauses, emphasis, etc.) And ὑπόκρισις (hypocrisy) is talking about delivery of words: voice, gesture, expression, through interpretation or acting (not overly performative of course) Thats just one example, there are components that build your intuition around philosophy, or your understanding of it, and nouns in language can become a hierarchy if seen as combinations NOM., GEN., DAT., ACC., ... And how it relates to English... And how to re-imagine language and the way you construct ideas can be played w/, plus you can invent / construct it all from scratch, As its not like theres a sign that says "what you have to do to do it right". It can all help to yank that curtain, crank that soljaboy, as its about reality itself, not just something thats for pure fun. It transcends fun in that way. Or it reorganizes the components assoc. w/ fun + games

Good now yous are thinkin', As i can tell cause the physical and mental are coming together, and all of those sparkling gems are falling out... Its like pulling on one side of a metaphysical curtain, whilst the other side (call em the tech side) pulls the other (i gave the two sides names, technés and mechnós) but its like, revealed in the center is something, of which all the gems of intrigue are appearing, sorta like a video game, if you are like me "Oh, wow its fun now" sorta thing, granted the gems represent lots of answers or unanswered questions. We're just tryina pull, pull... pulling, pulling, pulling on the curtain, thats all. p.s. wait i forgot, you cant go without sayin' this, "Goooooooooooooooooooood"

Oh why not, let me tell yas bout somethin i learned, bout this older chinese parable thing, of which is from something ancient that i dont know the correct terminology around; but that can be easily learned and researched! And feel free to add Chinese wisdoms... That is, the iconic yin yang is originally something like this, like its these moving drops of water or something sorta liquid like wind and leaves or drops, i.e. "movement from the center... or towards" like its a generic symbol for motion, and the reiterated symbols within the larger are that "god within god's image" sortve thing, but in the chinese way of telling it. And so, the yin yang symbol that yous all know, by heart, that is a Celtic / scandanavian shield thing, yous can look it up online though i forget wat its called atm, And as youll see theyve overlayed Chinese tradition onto a random Celtic shield, given they are quite similar... The Scandanavian/Celtish thing is perhaps, once upon a time, in touch w/ the most ancient chinese yin yang culture (again iuno wat they r called, but its not a religion, its more Confucius), And its well beyond recorded history/ This is like one of them 'Confucius says, typeve things that everyone should know. Theres more info online bout wat the yin yang actually is, before it got turned into like, a stamp that we as non-chinese and a much later generation, do not quite grasp, being that we dont live in the same culture of understanding, much like alot of these things that are somewhat older/harder to understand through a foreign lense, but can research The end

I want like a Swedish/German guy or something. As i thought this guy was gonna be, Alas that gives everyone a header towards some idea of what to look for, either a German guy/girl or a Swedish guy/girl, or sumthin similar, and it doesnt have to be about the matrix or anything, that was just an example... It can be Russian and such as well to, i mean its jus gotta be a German-esque or russian aesthetic, whatever that even means. Thank you. P.s. It doesnt have to even have be a humanbeing so long as it feels right

Iuno what the topic is exactly but its like, you know when its the right video. You just see it, and you post it, it doesnt matter wat it is, right, it serves some aesthetically pleasing purpose or something:

Iuno who this is but this is the finalé cause iuno if i wanna keep diggin thru youtube like there isnt 10^10^10^10 videos

Earl's heavy metal playlist invokes bands, some that are still playin music today, but i cnt remember the one atm... o i remember,

I found somethin kindq cool. theres a guitar solo that sortve compliments the crazy synthetic stuff goin on (i dont kno who it is btw)

Wow if u jump around in this from beginin... fast forward to maybe 8 or 9:00, etc, etc, etc, etc... early prince is on some borderline jazz metal

ive never seen this . they got all them cool 80s instruments nd shyt

As i was listenin i realized, we need a very simple beat. Very much easy to count, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6... 7.... 1, 2, 3.... 1, 2, 3... 1, 2, 3, 4

Would it be in bad taste if we started listed to owiz khalifa - as i got the idea from the thread above

full concert

Yous have to consider that everything is like a reiterated, smaller component or mirror image of itself, within the larger self, intertwined in "the greater mech." of self... Like... First, just following along w/ the idea that sensation is a greater mechanism: That then has lots of these smaller images of things, and so, whatever that greater mech., may be, may entail... it has within it other perspectiviles; 'pragmatics, logic, meta-physics., grammatics, ecstatics, poetics... But then there's actionables, tangibles, usables / operables, intelligible / discernibles... conceivables, valuables / justifiables, stuff like that, that exists as definable or describable in the larger image of itself, the larger mech., I mean theres more to it since we have our internal "time mechanisms" our internal clock and rhythms, and things like this, but what im trying to say is that, that is then something you have to consider, around these other perspectives or operations that can change the way you see the smaller, reiterated images of self-being, that is, the way you move or turn within the calm pond, it changes the entire flow of everything within the calm pond, and every movement creates reiterated intervals of that prior moving mechanism, which itself is harder to locate, if you can even truly locate it, at all, which is for yous to ultimately decide.

Keep in mind, yous can take these ideas, As many of what ive said, atleast 99% on here are ideas that i, in some ways, cant use. And thus it tends to reach beyond what im capable of capturing, as i try to get things more towards poetic, or hymn-driven art realm. This however is on the area of the mystical, spiritual, the gradual, and philosophical, but i think its on the topic of things like psychedelics too and such, so really its in every category. So sensing is something i started comparing to our five senses (inb4: wat? does that mean?), plus one extra, when we say things like "i could sense you behind me" or just something like the 6th sense movie. When we take psychedelics, we use "sensing" as that direct ability towards a truth; A necessary commander in merging senses. Then there's this more etymological feeling (a feeling towards truth, or essence, you see?) which i compare to something closer to truth from the point of having considered or from the point after actualizing. That is "feeling" is sortve a miniature version of the broader sensing ability, because its most specific in the areas after, that is the post-expansion of mind[ You see what i mean? This is one of those things, like*-istemi,* like a pointer to a place that cant be explained fully, however i thought this might help in getting us closer to it, for we need to, to signify its importance. You can just think of it as, "sense and feeling are two different things, where one is of a purely sensed direction and the other is purely \*felt\*" And is that it? For now.

I want to reinvoke this topic again, not only cause it'll gets yous thinking, but also because it helps us to differentiate these two terms, as i had a thought the other day that made me reconsider the original idea, and whether or not it would be better to reverse them (having "feeling" denote "a greater range(s) of ..." or not...) So just to refresh, I had mentioned etymology = truth (of feelings), and what im referring to as more like 'the necessary commander behind the merging of senses. I'll be going through everything, and what that means. On one hand, you have this notion of your physical sensations, where this pragmatic sense can also lead to something deeply felt, the "felt sense", which ive learned wasnt a unique term today... but lets continue ... and that can be included in the five and/or plus one 'meta-sense. Alternatively there's the type of feeling that you could invoke, that which sits above everything else, where sensing is seen as one mode of expression upon the larger feeling. Sensing and feeling can still be components of each other, but what we are deciding is if its better to think of feeling as a component of sensing, or vice versa. For example now, when we "see" something in our dream, thats not quite about this sense of seeing. Its part of the larger "feeling space" that we assoc. w/ something that shares a likeness to sight. That's sort've what I mean by this alternative explication. Feelings are the transcendent idea that makes it harder to place in one specific box, dont you think? In one way, sensing is the frame w/ which more detailed feelings live. But then again, feelings are able to capture a unified sense, sensing as a more archetypal form that we want to bring into our world of tangibles. I mean, that would be a unification of meaning and experience (that i feel should be treated separately in some way now) So now, if we go back to the original idea, we might think of that unification process as separate, atleast separate from sensing and feeling. Instead we might hold sensing to be the greater category this time (as it had been originally in my mind), where etymological feeling was a way to refer to something true in the space of sensing (per our embodied experience). That gives us something to point to first, especially because, once we start thinking of everything as "one unified feeling", we can no longer speak of the multifarious truths within ourselves. Better still, that vague preconceptual sense of meaning helps us too, in further demonstrating that "on the day that we are to experience ‘one unified feeling’..." -type've thing, which i happen to treat as something like a paradoxic utility (or something) Even still, we shouldnt force the purity of oneness within our practical thought structure, as distillation is part of that implicit dimension of concepts and developments (or felt-sensing) that you feel in your body, just as wholly as the purity of oneness. Ergo, oneness is really just the word that escapes embodied qualities. It makes sense in this way then to say, "sensing" is the greater range of embodiments, and etymological feelings point us towards this wholly felt, embodied realm or dimension. Forgive me if that sounds confusing, as it'll be something for yous to think on, and later, pull apart, and decide for yourselves: whether sensing should be the term that refers to a larger pattern in the cosmos, or if 'feeling is better suited; the 'oneness feeling thing... I've of course landed on sensations as that higher realm, but later yous might find and decide a way to further justify it within some other arrangement.

We all are playing pieces of music that we feel best fits into the puzzle building, this affectation space or this correct texture or color match that seems to best work. Everyone has a degree of autism, if only to know what best suites your individual self, and sometimes, knowing requires a reset. Sometimes it requires sped.. Regardless of whether or not its pleasurable, seeing as, in this sense, it may be for 'lesser than pleasurable intentions (we can convince ourselves itll be worthy), it may be brown notes or discordant sounds and such surrounding, however, pleasure on the macro scale is part of the hierarchy that tends to keep everything sane and alive, as its almost synonymous w/ sanity, and its part of the way of understanding how the mind works, in this constant balance, meaning, the uptake and downtake, to register said pleasure. If that pleasure system gets staggered, its gonna be quite unpleasant for everyone, very much in the realm of nonstop hallucination city, as states of mind are numerous, and thats only one way to play on that particular chord progression. Many different directions can access many different songs and sensations, and something psychedelic is one such sensation that gives credence to this thing where its like, the crossover of physical senses, and accelerated thoughts, i mean, its one perspective, one sensation, though, that is not to accidentally point us in all directions, for we dont want to go crazy. The possibility for all that stuff is out there. Avoid accidental alzheimers, but still be on the look out for how to expand your mind, in a way that isnt the same thing everytime. You dont wanna end up like my gf, of course.

Iuno someone said that once, and i felt like its apropos for what i was thinking. And that is how, even though its goin fairly slow and steady, that there is progress happening, tangible changes happening within that... Like, its on a (domain or something like that), increasing, one thats up to you, that you are trying to develop, however its gonna culminate, cause yous know im sure, whatever it is you are to focus on the most, is what everythings building around / changing around... like the constant change, i mean... I mean, its not like theres a flat level, like you have layers or you have nothing, and to be staggered in the *in between direction is what prolly causes alot of discomfort. I mean, its not like it makes sense at the boundary outside of the small circle that weve called sensible, so we take that w/ a grain of salt as far as what can even be said around it, as far as trying to disect that edge realm. you know?

I gotta a good one for yas to figure out. If/when any of yous take notice to, you might experience what ive experienced, which is this odd thing: single hairs emerge, seemingly from,what at first looks like a pimple. Thought 5-10 days later or so, its not a pimple i dont think, but the emergence of a single hair, given that its literally dead center, the hair that is. And ive see this before w/ very slight, surface layer wounds, where little hairs would then form around it... Even in women its happened, like in my moms case, though shes 60 or so now... My point is, do any of yous know about this? Like, thats not where the story ends in my book per say, cause im not focused on pimples and wounds related to the forming of single hairs, even though that is how its mostly shown itself, but im more so just baffled by this, cause its so odd, i mean, when i was younger, my skin didnt work like that. Even the smallest wound caused scars, but i also think i was not eating enough. I was quite skinny. So it might play into the heavy amount of protein / chicken? Maybe... Again, the wound thing is weird — the pimple w/ a single hair is weird — but ive been furthering the experiment in regards to these hairs and their formation, and im more so looking at alot of factors. But i dont wanna bore yous w/ that... Assuming everyones like, "the fk is this pers. talkin bout" type thing.

I dont know anything about anime, but this is the closest illustration, i mean i tried, So its like crucial, dragoon blood (apparently "dragoon" is a real word...) Elven blood. very relevant. Iuno how to describe it, i can only do so, aesthetically, generally speaking:

Just to add one more thing before i disappear, cause if i dont, yous will be usin google + chat information to inform your world, Everything that ive learned about: immune system, rhythms of the body, patterns in the face, skins ability to go from bad to perfect, the way protein sometimes comes in a pus form to build, blood and how it works and what its effects are, etc, the information is either apart of a science experiment no one would understand, or its not anything you can even begin to find out there in the world. I jus thought id mention, as pretty much everything in my life exists in a box of love, pain and exp., you cant request through google or chat, or if it does ive never seen it.. its like, patterns & textures, patterns & textures. p.s. bacteria is more of an important topic than oil, like uhhh... how do you describe this... like dryness is more of a requirement than like... "not dry" if that makes sense lolol... Like tending to the dryness is secondary to encountering it, like dryness (as q consequence of the... i think its called epidermal turnover — i mean theres slightly more to the story, but its like, not found online... i mean, ... im tryina think how to describe this blood part)

(cont.) A year ago or so, i was tryin to invoke this lemniskos term, because what i moreso was going for was like a knotted, eight loop / track -kindve thing, as even in the most paradoxical of pardoxes experienced, we may never really know, encounter or realize it to be a paradox, In that sense, the word lemniskos, or something unique to describe this "loop that you are on while its looping" is the word for what it may feel like in that particular predicament. I mean, sometimes we do have a paradox before/in front of us, and we also are feeling it just as much the paradox that it is soo in that sense it still is very much making sense to me too. I dont know. Im just throwin some things out there that are like rough sketches of a thought or two. p.s. i just looked up this term and i thought it was an interesting result: matrix/ˈmātriks/The word matrix comes from the Latin matrix, meaning "pregnant animal" or "womb," which derives from mater, meaning "mother" (now im getting mother earth, very mitochondria Eve, woman tribe -vibes)

As i was riffing, i'd invoked the possible situation of uncovering the *paradox of self, in the sense that... its just difficult to have a simple sentence on just the fact that "its an illusion, but i know its an illusion, cause i derive prior to an illusion, that im calling the apriori illusion, etc, etc.", so if we were further driven towards "its an illusion", i would consider the quality of the illusion itself, as a pattern or clump of things. For that reason im taking a long time to really retrieve any words on whats gonna be the next impasse. I'll say that the layered, lego castle of construction, the temple which is in a constant state of change, it is always in an upwards or downwards direction, and that is kindve, by in large, what it seems like, a constant rebuilding of function, meaning and form, in order to then take what we see as the *clumps of patterns, and connect them further (or reconnect, reduplicate em, etc.), into the larger whole. In this sense what you have is affectation itself, as that clumping together, that may also de-illusion or re-illusion, like re-absorbing the sponge so its no longer rock hard, except that theres always a sentient rock there that can re-absorb the whole thing in some way / making everything alive, which probably leads out unto the waters of our next impasse... but i havent thought about it yet in that particular way. It also may make *paradox itself defined slightly differently, cause the whole thing is a paradox that keeps re-absorbing the familiarizing waters. p.s. we should probably just get rid of "paradox" as a word (or as the very strong, weighted version of it), cause it feels like "No, that cant happen", unless we are anticipating a point where things should ultimately stop and no longer happen, then we might want to keep hold of it. I dont think it can be summed up, but i dont have a strong opinion on that idea either way / its continuous, if only to change our perspectives. I dont know.