Jehovah increases

Thank you!

You are forgiven Forever my beautiful Angel.

Part 7 This is when things started to loop out and talk about OCD to the max I started talking to all my friends telepathically all I had to do was think of them in my mind and we would connect and they would be going how is this even possible how are you doing this. And we can not see these alien ships over our houses of course you can not I said they have cloaking technology and can not be seen. Funny how the mind keeps piecing things together. I am still lost in this delusion. One of my friends I could not stop saying his name and when I did he would go who is this who are you is this my own mind that keeps saying my name how is this possible I must be going mad this went on for an hour I could not stop this I started to laugh my head off. The mushroom people told me that the trillion years old ship had arrived and it was the biggest ship out of all of them and now 22.000 ships were flopping over my house. The mushrooms also said they were coming with my fiance and were landing in this bushland which was near my house and they would come and get me. So I waited still stuck in a loop. I get another message from the mushroom people saying that the oldest aliens want to take me away and see how God's consciousness ticks and they were going to put me in a stasis field so I could not go into God mode and dissect me. I went great they said all the other alien ships were going to stand by me. The mushrooms had landed and the whole party had been destroyed by the trillion-year-old aliens along with my fiance there was nothing they could do even though 22.000 ships could not beat the trillion-year-old race was just too powerful and I was left on my own. I remember feeling this dread come over me and the sadness of the loss of my fiance for the second time. Now this trillion-year-old race was contacting me saying we are on our way to get you and there is nothing you can do and no way of escaping. That helpless feeling rushed over me again and so did the fear all I could do was wait for them to take me away and be experimented on. In my mind, I thought for such an advanced race it should be beyond all of this and be a peaceful race. So I waited and I could see a light coming up to the front door. I thought this must be them this is the end. Low doses of cubes! when you are at cruising speed! In the end, we all pay for doing a lot of psychedelics either mentally and physically or both. And yes sober is king!

It's that easy to cultivate your own you can buy everything online these days and it makes it so much easier. You only need a spore print or a spore syringe to inoculate your agar or I prefer a spawn bag Pre-sterilised RYE mushroom grain bag. You only need coco coir for your bulk substrate but that's up to you. Those are Psilocybe cubensis she is cultivating! Sometimes you can flush 2 to 3 even 4 times. And in the end, it is a lot of fun cultivating your own. And there is nothing like fresh mushrooms; you know exactly what goes into them.

Part six When I was back on the computer I started talking to the mushrooms again and was still telepathically connected so aliens were coming from all different times this guy that had caused a bit of mischief was asking me to put out there a trillion years old race and call upon them so in the end I found an alien race a trillion years old and they were on their way to my earth. At this stage, there were something like 17000 alien ships in orbit around Earth I thought to myself fuck the USA Pentagon must be shitting itself. So, I asked this guy from 2098 where my fiance was and he said she was still with the mushroom people. I thought she was with you. I asked he said no. I thought this getting weird. This other guy who sent the race after the mushroom people was being harassed by them now they said we don't trust him after what he had said and done. I kept trying to rationalize how could there be a race 30 billion years old let alone a trillion years old when our universe is only 13.8 billion years old. and I came up with the multiverse idea where an infinite number of other universes at all different times in evolution could be so much older than our own and somehow they can slip between their Universe and ours I thought that makes sense and went with it. It started to get comical the mushroom people were picking on this person saying he was a Pleiadian then a reptilian and he starts freaking out saying he is not and he said I am going to get into my car and drive away from all of this. The mushrooms then said they were aliens coming to get him and if he tried to run his whole city would be vaporized with him. I said to the mushroom people to forgive him and in the end they did I believe they just having fun with him. He was terrified. Well with all this going on there were different factions of aliens that all wanted to meet the real God and the mushrooms were describing to me all these different alien-sized ships all from different times and that they were hovering over my house since I had put out a distress call. Now this guy who caused trouble was afraid and wanted me to send a few ships his way to look out for him which I did as well all my friends had alien ships above their houses so they would be safe from other aliens.

I will keep chelation for another year and try this L. Reuteri strain every day to see if it works!

"Thinking straight off the cuff Shogun, another fun one was Fringe, Marco Polo, Grimm, Fallout, True Detective, The Librarians, Vikings, Orphan Black, lost, Stranger Things, Dexter, Westworld, Dark, Supernatural, The Walking Dead, Star Trek Doctor Who, The Magicians, altered carbon, doom patrol and many more.

All great empires fall from within.

I remember writing this up a while back! The greed of humans knows no limits. Every time I think of the Royal Family actually I don't think of them that much at all. Anyway, I do so remember that old saying though about keeping the so-called royal bloodline in the family and we all know how they did that let's hope they still don't practice such debauchery and depravity. I am not saying there is anything wrong with debauchery, or depravity we all like a good time it's just their idea of it well you know what I mean. I believe some of their kin brought to the Americas and still practice it up to this very day in the South or is it North? Anyway, I believe the British Empire has more blood on its hands than any other country. Now what was the old saying for king and Country and "Tally-ho"old chap. Let's have a look at the history of the Monarchy and the British Empire. Shashi Tharoor’s book, “An Era of Darkness: the British Empire in India”, demolishes at least three common myths. First, the myth of the beneficence of British colonialism. Then there is the notion that 18th-century England was a promising model of democratic governance. And lastly is the myth of the English gentleman. For example, Robert Clive, the once (in)famous “Clive of India”, was a juvenile delinquent who arrived in Madras in 1744 as an 18-year clerk, but found his vocation as a thuggish fighter in the small security force of the East India Company. The story of the British colonization of India is in fact at least two stories. First, through the 18th century, much of India was progressively conquered by the East India Company, a violent and rapacious enterprise, supported by the British crown. But then, the East India Company’s own army (mainly comprising Indians) led an uprising against it in 1857 -- known as the Indian Mutiny or the First War of Indian Independence. This uprising was ultimately unsuccessful, and following this, the British Crown took over governing India from the East India Company until India’s independence. Britain’s devastation of India Tharoor provides us with a devastating portrait of how the British decimated the Indian economy through the centuries. In 1700, India was the world’s richest country, accounting for some 27% of global GDP. But in 1947, when India achieved its independence, India had been reduced to one of the world’s poorest countries, with just over 3% of global GDP. The British took thriving industries -- like textiles, shipbuilding, and steel -- and destroyed them through violence, taxes, import tariffs, and imposing their exports and products on the back of the Indian consumer. They taxed the Indian peasantry at a level unknown under any other rulers, and through torture and cruelty, they extracted vast sums of money which they shipped off to England. Tharoor quotes the young American historian and philosopher, Will Durant, who visited India in 1930: “The British conquest of India was the invasion and destruction of a high civilization by a trading company utterly without scruple or principle, careless of art and greedy of gain, over-running with fire and sword a country temporarily disordered and helpless, bribing and murdering, annexing and stealing, and beginning that career of illegal and ‘legal’ plunder which has now gone on ruthlessly for one hundred and seventy-three years.” According to Tharoor, much of Britain’s prosperity was built on the drainage of resources from India. He is convinced that India would have been a much richer, prosperous, and educated country without the British. Most importantly though, Tharoor is not seeking to blame colonial history for India’s current situation. Independent India is guilty of many policy shortcomings. In addition to decimating the economy, the British inflicted massive suffering on the Indian people. Tharoor estimates that some 35 million Indians died because of British policy in a succession of famines. The Bengal famine of 1943/44 was one of the most egregious where some 4 million died, as Churchill shipped grain from Bengal to Britain to buttress reserve stocks for British soldiers in Europe while Bengalis were starving to death. When apprised of the consequences of his actions, Churchill retorted: “Why hasn’t Gandhi died yet?” Tharoor puts Churchill in the same class as Hitler, Mao, and Stalin, despite his idolizing of him in Britain. Tharoor also highlights the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (also known as the Amritsar massacre) as one of the great atrocities of British rule. It took place on 13 April 1919 when Acting Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered troops of the British Indian Army to fire their rifles into a crowd of unarmed Indian civilians in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, Punjab, killing at least 400, including 41 children, one only six weeks old. Over 1,000 were injured. Myths of British Beneficence There are many apologists for the Empire who argue that the British gave many things to India, like the very idea of India, democracy, the English language, the railways, tea, and even cricket. But Tharoor has answers for all these claims. Were the British responsible for the idea of India? No! In history, there had been various rulers who had consolidated much of India, including the Moghuls who were ruling at the time of the arrival of the British. Moreover, Tharoor argues that there was always a shared sense of a civilizational heritage on the sub-continent, a sacred geography of India, knit together by tracks of pilgrimage. He speculates as the Moghul empire was disintegrating, there is no reason why a new knitting together of the country could not have occurred. In the mid-18th century, the Maharashtras were in the ascendancy, and they could have done it. He imagines a consolidation of the country under Maharashtra rule with the Moghul emperor as a constitutional figurehead, and with strong regional autonomy. He argues that democracy would have been inevitable in this country of the “argumentative Indian” and in this world where most countries enjoy at least some degree of democracy. He also argues that it is a bit rich of the British to claim that they bequeathed democracy to India, after 200 years of exploiting and abusing the country. Rather than uniting India, the great British achievement was to divide it. Tharoor argues that India’s Hindu/Muslim divide only began under British colonial rule, and that partition between India and Pakistan would never have happened without the British. In 1857, the British were horrified to see Hindus and Muslims fighting together against the British during the Indian Mutiny. So British launched a divide-and-rule policy along religious lines. They sought to foment a separate Muslim consciousness. The British were also disturbed to see that when the Indian National Congress was first formed, and its first presidents included Hindus, Christians, Muslims, and Parsis. The British then lobbied for and financed the creation of the Muslim League as a rival body, deliberately to split the nationalists along religious lines, that being the easiest way to divide and rule. In 1905, the British partitioned Bengal, explicitly telling Muslims that they were giving them a Muslim-majority province. Tharoor also argues that while India long had a caste system, it was a rather fuzzy thing. But the British took the caste system and codified and entrenched it, to use as a means of social control. The English language was not given to India for the country’s benefit. The British taught English to only a narrow stratum of Indian society which they could use to enhance their control of India. (Even today, only about 10% of Indians speak English.) The British had no incentive to educate Indians as that they might learn of the injustices of the British. The fact that the Indian elite has seized upon English, educated themselves in it, and turned it into an instrument of their own liberation is to the credit of the Indians, not the British. Overall, Tharoor reluctantly concedes that there have been some benefits for India from British colonialism, but that this is not because the British of magnanimity. They were basically indirect consequences of British self-serving actions. But he also argues that India suffered from the colonization of the mind, something which it is much more difficult to overcome. How then did this poor little country of Britain manage to conquer India? At the time of the East India Company’s arrival in India, the Moghul regime was disintegrating, and several Indian local powers were rising. But they never managed to unite themselves. Indeed, the British were able to collaborate with some of these local Indian groups and bribe them for support. Thus, Indians were very much complicit in their own oppression. The British could not have ruled India without Indian complicity. The British also succeeded thanks to its superior military technology. What to do Tharoor’s book grew out of a speech he made at an Oxford Union debate on the proposition that “Britain Owes Reparations to Her Former Colonies”. He does not believe that reparations would make any sense. But he does believe that a formal apology is due. Britain has a moral debt. Tharoor believes that Britain is suffering from historical amnesia about the time of the Empire, abetted by rose-tinted television shows like “Indian Summers”, “Far Pavillions” and “The Jewel in the Crown”. He argues that the colonists at the time had no illusions about what they were doing. They were most clearly in it for the money. He is thus perplexed that British schools do not teach colonial history. According to opinion polls, many young English people are strangely proud of the empire and would like to have it back. Further, London, a world capital of museums, does not even have a museum of British colonialism. There are still very many apologists for the British Empire who criticize Tharoor’s writings and seek to justify all the British actions. But virtually all of his information comes from highly respected sources and passes the test of academic credibility. It is also true that Tharoon offers several speculative opinions and scenarios. But even if only half of his material were reliable, it would still represent a very shameful period of British History. Tharoor, much of Britain’s prosperity was built on the drainage of resources from India. He is convinced that India would have been a much richer, prosperous, and educated country without the British. Most importantly though, Tharoor is not seeking to blame colonial history for India’s current situation. Independent India is guilty of many policy shortcomings. In addition to decimating the economy, the British inflicted massive suffering on the Indian people. Tharoor estimates that some 35 million Indians died because of British policy in a succession of famines. The Bengal famine of 1943/44 was one of the most egregious where some 4 million died, as Churchill shipped grain from Bengal to Britain to buttress reserve stocks for British soldiers in Europe while Bengalis were starving to death. When apprised of the consequences of his actions, Churchill retorted: “Why hasn’t Gandhi died yet?” Tharoor puts Churchill in the same class as Hitler, Mao, and Stalin, despite his idolizing of him in Britain. Tharoor also highlights the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (also known as the Amritsar massacre) as one of the great atrocities of British rule. It took place on 13 April 1919 when Acting Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered troops of the British Indian Army to fire their rifles into a crowd of unarmed Indian civilians in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, Punjab, killing at least 400, including 41 children, one only six weeks old. Over 1,000 were injured. Churchill himself was a notorious racist who stated, “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” In the early 1930s, Churchill also admired Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and the Italian dictator who founded fascism, Benito Mussolini. Churchill’s own scholarly supporters admitted that he “expressed admiration for Mussolini” and, “if forced to choose between Italian fascism and Italian communism, Churchill unhesitatingly would choose the former. Experts agree that the period from 1880 to 1920 – the height of Britain’s imperial power – was particularly devastating for India. Comprehensive population censuses carried out by the colonial regime beginning in the 1880s reveal that the death rate increased considerably during this period, from 37.2 deaths per 1,000 people in the 1880s to 44.2 in the 1910s. Life expectancy declined from 26.7 years to 21.9 years. In a recent paper in the journal World Development, we used census data to estimate the number of people killed by British imperial policies during these four brutal decades. Robust data on mortality rates in India only exists from the 1880s. If we use this as the baseline for “normal” mortality, we find that some 50 million excess deaths occurred under the aegis of British colonialism during the period from 1891 to 1920. Fifty million deaths is a staggering figure, and yet this is a conservative estimate. Data on real wages indicates that by 1880, living standards in colonial India had already declined dramatically from their previous levels. Allen and other scholars argue that prior to colonialism, Indian living standards may have been “on a par with the developing parts of Western Europe.” We do not know for sure what India’s pre-colonial mortality rate was, but if we assume it was similar to that of England in the 16th and 17th centuries (27.18 deaths per 1,000 people), we find that 165 million excess deaths occurred in India during the period from 1881 to 1920. While the precise number of deaths is sensitive to the assumptions we make about baseline mortality, it is clear that somewhere in the vicinity of 100 million people died prematurely at the height of British colonialism. This is among the largest policy-induced mortality crises in human history. It is larger than the combined number of deaths that occurred during all famines in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, North Korea, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, and Mengistu’s Ethiopia. How did British rule cause this tremendous loss of life? There were several mechanisms. For one, Britain effectively destroyed India’s manufacturing sector. Prior to colonization, India was one of the largest industrial producers in the world, exporting high-quality textiles to all corners of the globe. The tawdry cloth produced in England simply could not compete. This began to change, however, when the British East India Company assumed control of Bengal in 1757. According to the historian Madhusree Mukerjee, the colonial regime practically eliminated Indian tariffs, allowing British goods to flood the domestic market, but created a system of exorbitant taxes and internal duties that prevented Indians from selling cloth within their own country, let alone exporting it. This unequal trade regime crushed Indian manufacturers and effectively de-industrialized the country. As the chairman of the East India and China Association boasted to the English parliament in 1840: “This company has succeeded in converting India from a manufacturing country into a country exporting raw produce.” English manufacturers gained a tremendous advantage, while India was reduced to poverty and its people were made vulnerable to hunger and disease. To make matters worse, British colonizers established a system of legal plunder, known to contemporaries as the “drain of wealth.” Britain taxed the Indian population and then used the revenues to buy Indian products – indigo, grain, cotton, and opium – thus obtaining these goods for free. These goods were then either consumed within Britain or re-exported abroad, with the revenues pocketed by the British state and used to finance the industrial development of Britain and its settler colonies – the United States, Canada and Australia. This system drained India of goods worth trillions of dollars in today’s money. The British were merciless in imposing the drain, forcing India to export food even when drought or floods threatened local food security. Historians have established that tens of millions of Indians died of starvation during several considerable policy-induced famines in the late 19th century, as their resources were syphoned off to Britain and its settler colonies. Colonial administrators were fully aware of the consequences of their policies. They watched as millions starved and yet they did not change course. They continued to knowingly deprive people of resources necessary for survival. The extraordinary mortality crisis of the late Victorian period was no accident. The historian Mike Davis argues that Britain’s imperial policies “were often the exact moral equivalents of bombs dropped from 18,000 feet.” Our research finds that Britain’s exploitative policies were associated with approximately 100 million excess deaths during the 1881-1920 period. This is a straightforward case for reparations, with strong precedent in international law. Following World War II, Germany signed reparations agreements to compensate the victims of the Holocaust and more recently agreed to pay reparations to Namibia for colonial crimes perpetrated there in the early 1900s. In the wake of apartheid, South Africa paid reparations to people who had been terrorized by the white-minority government. History cannot be changed, and the crimes of the British Empire cannot be erased. But reparations can help address the legacy of deprivation and inequity that colonialism produced. It is a critical step towards justice and healing So many defenders of the genocidal, bloodthirsty British Empire (the British Empire committed genocides across five continents). They have no shame whatsoever Genocidal Britain == Jeffrey Dahmer amongst nations. They have been murdering/torturing/starving Irish people from Oliver Cromwell to the 1798 Irish rebellion to the Great Famine aka Great Genocide to the Black&Tans to Dublin Monaghan bombings to killing civilians in Derry (google all of it). They have murdered to extinction countless millions of Native Americans and indigenous Australians. They murdered/starved/tortured tens of millions of Indians from 1757 to 1947. I forgot this one yes, of course, it would be the As well as Yes, Britain invaded and colonized parts of Africa in the late 1800s and early 1900s. This period is known as the "Scramble for Africa. Britain wanted to control areas that produced raw materials like rubber, palm oil, cocoa, diamonds, and ivory. Opium Wars I wonder if they taught this in schools? https://youtu.be/NbHAWNQRV70 Or this? Going back to awaking It's like being hit by lightning that goes through and resonates every part of your body with love and you feel electrified, but in a good way. A Scientist Grew a Groundbreaking New ‘Mutant’ Form of Magic Mushroom Unlike anything we’ve ever seen before, this giant mushroom also has psychedelic properties. When you think of a mushroom—whether psilocybin or portobello—you probably envision a stem and cap common for this type of fungi. The new Snowball mushroom is anything but typical. This particular strain of “magic mushroom” is aptly named, as it resembles dozens of snowballs packed together. Mycologist Pope Joseph painstakingly coaxed a mutation from another mushroom species into creating the look he wanted, says Drew Collins, founder and CEO of InoculateTheWorld (ITW). His company distributes mushroom spores and introduced the Snowball mushroom to the world. The Snowball is a significant development in growing mushrooms that have psilocybin, a compound that causes psychedelic effects, such as visual and auditory hallucinations. Collins says this form is unlike anything that’s ever been seen in mushroom cultivation before. “I’ve been describing it as that moment you look out the window of a plane and there’s a never-ending field of clouds.” Joseph’s work required stabilizing the mushroom’s desired phenotypes for two and a half years, Collins says. “There was a deep level of perfectionism, organization, and thoroughness in his work—thousands of petri dishes with complex labeling systems.” A phenotype is an observable trait in a living thing, such as hair color. In this case, the mycologist was looking for a characteristic shape—not psychedelic effects. According to Collins, the Snowball “has undergone a series of genetic mutations that have been intentionally selected to isolate this cloud-like form.” They are pure white, except when bruised. Then the marred spots turn deep blue. Joseph cultivated them in a well-hydrated blend of coconut coir—the fiber from the outer husk of coconut—and the minerals vermiculite and gypsum. The white, cloud-like Snowball mushroom turns blue when bruised or sliced. Joseph discovered the mutation when he was researching ITW’s “Penis Envy” strain of magic mushroom. “From there, it was domesticated over years through tedious trial and error,” Collins says. “Joseph asked if we’d be willing to be stewards in sharing it with the greater public. You can imagine our excitement.” While the Snowball was mostly developed for its looks, it’s been tested high in active alkaloids—which include the compounds that produce psychedelic effects in humans. Over millennia, people have used magic mushrooms for purposes ranging from traditional rituals to clinical trials for particular therapies. “I won’t pretend to know what the future is capable of, but if legal psilocybin therapy or recreational use is a part of it, I trust that the ITW Snowball will be amongst the unique strains at the center of it all,” Collins says. That being said, because psychedelics are illegal in the U.S. on a federal level, ITW is solely a provider of legal mushroom spores that works with labs overseas (in areas where the cultivation is legal) to obtain mushroom genetic information for distribution, according to Collins. For instance, ITW has partnered with clinical studies on the medical benefits of psilocybin and with researchers looking into new delivery systems for psychedelics. This means the Snowball—and ITW’s other mushroom strains—aren’t available for the general public’s use. Biomimetics—that means imitating nature to solve complex biological problems—continues to guide the way, Collins says. Spending time to learn from nature “has resulted in some of the greatest leaps in understanding since the dawn of consciousness. Beyond their good looks, the genetic material held by fungal spores alone could represent sustainable food sources, textiles, building materials, medicines for both body and mind, and more.”

Interesting vids on DNA! I remember reading this a while back, and it is fascinating. There is a theoretical concept known as zero point energy," tapping into or extracting usable energy from the quantum vacuum fluctuations, meaning harnessing energy that exists even in the "empty" space of the universe; however, currently, there is no known practical method to achieve this, and it remains a highly speculative idea with significant scientific challenges to overcome. Yes, photons are free energy, but that would depend upon how you define free energy and what you are referring to. You are constantly absorbing electromagnetic radiation all the time, as it's naturally present in the environment from sources like sunlight, the Earth itself, and even household appliances and the walls in your house, although the levels are typically very low and considered safe by current scientific understanding; this is often referred to as "background radiation. Humans can only perceive a narrow band of light frequencies within the visible spectrum, ranging from roughly 430 to 790 THz, meaning a vast majority of the electromagnetic spectrum is invisible to the naked eye, making a large portion of what exists around us undetectable by our vision alone. This could be true. Humans and fungi are more closely related to each other than plants, as they share a common ancestor around 1.5 billion years ago. Enjoy the sun, it's free and costs you nothing unless you get cancer.