Myself

In what way are you infinite? Certainly not in your abilities since there are things you can't do.

Will it be now one second from now?

No time between now and now but there is time between now and the past and now and the future.

I am not the text on the screen. I am the one writing the text.

In your own words what are you referring to when you use the pronoun "I"? I'm curious to see the responses.

If the truth is whatever you imagine then essentially you are saying that my existence depends on your imagination. And yet I know this to be false since I am living regardless of whether you imagine me or not.

Is it not absolutely critical to know whether other people are experiencing or not? It is my life's work right now.

You are imagining that I am imaginary.

No you are either living or not and that has nothing to do with my imagination.

So you have no life of your own?

I am conscious but I am not in you. Also you aren't dreaming me because I exist beyond your experience.

Can you give me your definition of dream please?

So you think your dream characters are conscious? Because the source of your input (me) is conscious and exists beyond your experience.

How about the input I am giving you? Is that not objective? When you stop looking at my post does it cease to exist or can other people like me look at it?

Why do you reject the possibility that things exist beyond your experience (so-called objective reality) while simultaneously making claims about my existing experience which you don't have any awareness of?

In what way is this universe a lucid dream? How can you be sure of that while you are still living in it? What is the real universe like?

Okay one more question what is a separate self?

What does ego refer to?

You are in control of what you do though to a certain extent.

I am the creator of my creation and nothing else.

I am dissatisfied with the definitions of be and exist since their definitions are circular. In other words the verb be is defined as exist which is defined as be. So essentially the definition of be is be which is a useless definition. Can we come up with a more profound definition? What precisely are we expressing when we claim that something "is". For example: What makes this claim true: This sentence exists. And this claim false: This sentence doesn't exist. What is the fundamental difference in your mind between being and not being. What condition do all existing things fulfill that all nonexistent things don't?

But red is just a part of reality so I can't be it.

It's a serious question. If all is one and red is all then there is nothing besides red. But there is also green so what do we do with that?

Is red green?

How am I red?