Sincerity

Again, trumpism and right-wing dogmatism will not be allowed on the forum. Or any severe dogmatism for that matter. Let's uphold some standards here.

A breath of fresh air to read this here. 😃 So simple. Just knowing.

If it turned out he was faking the „alien” thing, I wouldn’t mind. It would say something about his character, but I’d appreciate the teachings the same.

I found the deconstruction of „what” post very profound. Thanksss.

You have to remember that most of the world’s humans are below stage orange. Humanity is not just the West. So not soon.

I said I’m not pursuing discussion with you here. 🤷‍♂️ No hard feelings. We’ll talk someplace else. But talking on „your level” of heavy conceptualization and dualism is just a needless tiresome exercise and again: a detraction from truth. You do you, but leave me out of it (when talking about the most basic things).

It doesn’t matter whether it’s really an alien talking or not. What matters is what’s being said. And the teachings (especially the most basic ones) I find of high quality. He can say a lot of bullshit too imo. So you take what’s useful and disregard what isn’t. Openmindedness + judging words based on their merit.

@UnbornTao You make some good points. What if someone is attempting to communicate their truth, but it so happens that there's already a term for it which more or less encompasses what's meant by that truth (at least in the communicator's mind)? Is it not useful to label a truth (eg. the truth of X, or "solipsism") to then fluently refer to it in conversation? I don't like the word solipsism. But for me it's the closest single word to what I wish to convey: This right now is all that is. There's nothing beyond this moment/experience. You are God. You are this. (And, of course, there is no "you".) I understand. I respect your value of striving to be very epistemologically rigorous and to not take on beliefs. I think it's a nice counterbalance to others' posts. Your perspective is valuable, even in just the simple fact that it's rather unique among most others here. I honestly appreciate the diversity. Eh. Yeah, you're right. It is a waste of time. 🤷‍♂️ I appreciate his perspective (especially his most basic formula and teachings) and I like to think about what he says. But ultimately I'm always the final arbiter of truth anyway. I can as well contemplate from scratch, with more genuine "results". External perspective can be useful too though, as grist for the mill.

Noo, nothing like that. The first implies a process (which there's none), and the second implies control over Will (which there's also none). Moreso this. I (as God) am creating this right now. In fact, I am this. There is no difference between me and it. Oh what joy! You = God = Imagination = Reality. A complete blending of the infinite nothingness/awareness/formlessness and form.

No, you’re just aware that you’re creating them. Imagination is still the case, and the walls are still not passable. Even if you’re in a high enough state, you can’t change Will. You just see that Will is.

I’d say this: You don’t have limitations as God. But You do imagine walls right now. And since You do, you can’t walk through them. Why do You imagine walls? Why is reality the specific way it is right now? I don’t know. But the fact is that it is that way right now, and it’s Imagination. And what’s Imagined is the case. You’re not aware that you’re creating walls because you’re not in a high enough state. If you were, you’d be able to see that. I have a recollection of these insights from my awakenings. You can reach that state where you see that you’re creating walls. You’ll see it as just you doing that. But you’ll probably still not understand why. I think the why isn’t answerable in a definite way. There’s definitely not any one limited reason. You Imagine because you „do”, it’s what You are. And that’s it.

This question stems from misunderstanding. You are God AND exactly what you are right now. And it’s perfect. The need to be able to fly is just an idea you have.

Consider the possibility that you might have too many ideas about the word. It’s not complicated. I am God. There. 😉 No need to bring avatars into this. I don’t like the series. It’s dualistic if you make it. Truth can be (and is) expressed in a non-dualistic way. I said „sounds weird” for the sake of politeness. To translate: I think what you’re saying is bs. „God knows everything”. What does this mean? Why are you framing it that way? Yes, what you’re saying is weird and tells me that your understanding is not direct. And you didn’t elaborate like I asked. Your points weren’t „logically consistent”. They were incorrect in their dualistic nature. God is not „in everything”. God IS EVERYTHING! So don’t cover your arguments with „logicality” please. God is above the logic you’re implying. And please don’t imply that I’m only coming from some vibe-oriented perspective. I don’t appreciate it. Not „conceptually informed”, bruh… consider this might be what you have too much of. A lot of words, but not enough truth. Yes, only THIS exists. Only this moment exists. This isn’t complicated. To imply that there’s something beyond This is fantasy and being lost in concepts. If you understood „my” solipsism as dualistic, then you are making an effort to misunderstand me. Sorry. * * * * * Ultimately, to me your understanding is dualistic and overconceptualized. There is not a directedness to your words. Which is a shame. I have no intention to pursue this discussion with you specifically any longer. After I wrote this response, I only found it a detraction from truth and a waste of time.

Yeah, like Inliytened already said, what's lacking to me is "I am God"... unless you insist that you're in a selfhood state right now and don't want to say something "ingenuine" right now? I don't know. God is in everything, God is in X, God is outside Y seems really dualistic to me. "God knows everything" also sounds weird, perhaps you can elaborate. I don't agree that this is illusion. And I don't agree that God is "beyond" physical experience. I'm thinking more about it and this "where is other?" question is actually quite a good pointer, if you understand it. I don't agree that "Avatars are concerned with what you can see, smell, touch, hear, feel". There is (or actually isn't) self, which is illusory, and then there is CONSCIOUSNESS. The "self" doesn't actually interact with anything and it's only concerned about "itself" - it's basically a state. Then, even in a self-less state, senses are experienced. Consciousness experiences itself, which includes senses. From the POV of consciousness, everything is the same; there is no "avatar" and "other avatars". But perceptions and senses are still the case (and also aren't distinct from everything else). The witness/nothingness/awareness and experience are completely one. Nothing is everything, and vice versa. And You are it (not the ego - the "real" you).

I don't remember the video too well. I'd have to rewatch it. The insight is still quite fresh for me, so I'll just let it be processed. First my understanding, then I'll (maybe) confirm with Leo. 🤠