Sincerity

Moderator
  • Content count

    2,295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Sincerity

Personal Information

  • Location
    Europe
  • Gender
    Male
  1. When asking existential questions, turn them on yourself. The answers relate to YOU. Always. What is God? -> What am I? Why is there something rather than nothing? -> Why do I exist? Why is reality the way that it is? -> Why am I this specific way? What is love? -> Am I love? Etc.
  2. So are you actively working towards your advancement in the domains of psychology and spirituality, or not? If you feel that's your purpose and you ARE doing the actual work in that, then you're not really lazy. But if you just sit on your ass and only "care" about psychology and spirituality in the sense of consuming content about it or doing some work only when inspiration strikes once in a blue moon, then that's a problem and you should really get off your ass. From your title I sense it might be the latter. If so, start acting in your life or you'll end up very miserable sooner than later. And drugs won't fix it.
  3. I'm not very much into Sadhguru so I don't know. Perhaps he seems that way but is really an introvert, similar to how someone would perceive you on the street (you mentioned once that people deem you surprisingly extroverted when they meet you). Or maybe he is an extrovert, I don't know lol. Besides, I just said introverts probably have a higher chance. One guy doesn't change that.
  4. Don't underestimate the INFPs out there. I've had great success already with the awakening endeavour. Still the white belt, perhaps even whiter than at the start, but grateful for the considerable progress made. I think the statement that only 2 personalities can awaken is obviously false, but I'd definitely be more inclined to agree that introverts have a greater chance to awaken than extraverts. Still, these are gross oversimplifications. The entire Myers-Briggs model is astrology for men.
  5. You should awaken NOW!
  6. I disagree completely. Hardly anyone does. We can agree to disagree. Let’s keep it at that.
  7. Sorry. Looking forward to you talking to @Cubbage, that’ll be good for sure.
  8. Or, you don’t get it. Infinity of Gods is a precise description of this insight/awakening. Sorry, but the being lost in concepts is your case. You don’t even admit you are God. So what’s there to talk about. My awakenings are from complete beginner’s mind, every time. And every time it’s the same thing (insights into Consciousness), but going deeper and deeper and deeper. I go where the truth is after I’m wiped out. It’s not just wherever.
  9. There’s zero logical error. You just have to get it - both solipsism and the other insight. Both can be (and are) true. God is mysterious.
  10. Admittedly, Infinity of Gods is not fully fleshed out for me. I’m still uncovering it. For me, it’s been this naggling sense for a long time during my trips that I can’t fully „reject” Others - while also realizing solipsism at the same time. And with more and more trips I’ve been letting that insight into my consciousness more. So for me it’s been kind of a squaring of Solipsism + Others Exist. Which in itself is an amazing joke and paradox (but also not really a paradox). But those Others are probably completely separate for me. I don’t yet have a good grasp of „Them” - I don’t know whether there’s a possibility for an interaction, I haven’t made any sort of connection like you described, even an imagined one. I’m sure it’d still all be through Me though. But yeah, this understanding is still incomplete. Work-in-progress. I actually rewatched your Infinity of Gods video 3 days ago - last time I watched it when it released I think. A lot of it resonated. Though my awakenings regarding it were still reached organically, not really remembering what you said there.
  11. These guys and their objections were often painful to listen to. I was dying inside when hearing the „hmm this is basically my experience already” and „maybe I’m awake after all” points from the lady. And not even understanding that evil doesn’t exist, like come on. Well, it is what it is. Good conversation still. What matters is you guys had fun.
  12. Well, listening to another is of second importance to listening to Yourself. At least for the purpose of introspection into the fundamental. The answers are within. I get that in a sense listening to another is absorption and yeah, you become more of what you listen to. So genuine listening to quality or some „enlightened masters” is a good idea. Still, the developing of the flower of You through careful attention is of greater importance. And besides, the relation you have to others is a direct reflection of the relation you have to yourself. So listening to oneself covers both, in a way. You cannot be a good listener to others if you’re deaf to yourself, and you will probably be a good listener to others if you listen to yourself.