Sincerity

Consider the possibility that you might have too many ideas about the word. It’s not complicated. I am God. There. 😉 No need to bring avatars into this. I don’t like the series. It’s dualistic if you make it. Truth can be (and is) expressed in a non-dualistic way. I said „sounds weird” for the sake of politeness. To translate: I think what you’re saying is bs. „God knows everything”. What does this mean? Why are you framing it that way? Yes, what you’re saying is weird and tells me that your understanding is not direct. And you didn’t elaborate like I asked. Your points weren’t „logically consistent”. They were incorrect in their dualistic nature. God is not „in everything”. God IS EVERYTHING! So don’t cover your arguments with „logicality” please. God is above the logic you’re implying. And please don’t imply that I’m only coming from some vibe-oriented perspective. I don’t appreciate it. Not „conceptually informed”, bruh… consider this might be what you have too much of. A lot of words, but not enough truth. Yes, only THIS exists. Only this moment exists. This isn’t complicated. To imply that there’s something beyond This is fantasy and being lost in concepts. If you understood „my” solipsism as dualistic, then you are making an effort to misunderstand me. Sorry. * * * * * Ultimately, to me your understanding is dualistic and overconceptualized. There is not a directedness to your words. Which is a shame. I have no intention to pursue this discussion with you specifically any longer. After I wrote this response, I only found it a detraction from truth and a waste of time.

Yeah, like Inliytened already said, what's lacking to me is "I am God"... unless you insist that you're in a selfhood state right now and don't want to say something "ingenuine" right now? I don't know. God is in everything, God is in X, God is outside Y seems really dualistic to me. "God knows everything" also sounds weird, perhaps you can elaborate. I don't agree that this is illusion. And I don't agree that God is "beyond" physical experience. I'm thinking more about it and this "where is other?" question is actually quite a good pointer, if you understand it. I don't agree that "Avatars are concerned with what you can see, smell, touch, hear, feel". There is (or actually isn't) self, which is illusory, and then there is CONSCIOUSNESS. The "self" doesn't actually interact with anything and it's only concerned about "itself" - it's basically a state. Then, even in a self-less state, senses are experienced. Consciousness experiences itself, which includes senses. From the POV of consciousness, everything is the same; there is no "avatar" and "other avatars". But perceptions and senses are still the case (and also aren't distinct from everything else). The witness/nothingness/awareness and experience are completely one. Nothing is everything, and vice versa. And You are it (not the ego - the "real" you).

I don't remember the video too well. I'd have to rewatch it. The insight is still quite fresh for me, so I'll just let it be processed. First my understanding, then I'll (maybe) confirm with Leo. 🤠

Idk. I wouldn't ask that, but maybe this question points to something worth contemplating too. When I try to answer it, it's a mindfuck. 😃

For clarity's sake. My insights regarding solipsism/oneness arose during intense meditation and contemplation from scratch (primarily on LSD), mostly only focusing on "What am I?" for hours. Every time, the awareness is basically the same but deepened, and also other things come to light. This understanding isn't my lived experience right now; I'm in a state of selfhood and my thinking is corrupted for that. But the insights and vision are fresh because my recent awakenings were at the start of this week. Also, I'm actively investigating the nature of self-thoughts every day "sober" during meditation. I can also recall the states I was in, and do - for integration purposes. Lastly, I'll also add that I awoke to an insight that's more or less contradicting solipsism. I've seen glimpses of it before, but this time it became really clear. And both it and the insight of solipsism are true. So it's not this or that - it's this and that. A cosmic joke. I've said it in my first posts here. I wish there was a better word for solipsism that's hitting the bullseye and isn't an -ism. Or maybe I just don't know it. Nevertheless, to me, it's not beliefs. More like remembrance through the fog.

I pretty much agree with everything in this video. Yes, there is only one Dreamer*. Yes, for all intents and purposes, you should act as if there are others - this is right behaviour. I also said this before, which this guy repeats when he says that there are "egos" once you yourself see yourself as "an ego": Yes, there is ONLY Pure Awareness, which the guy states. ONE Experience, ONE Consciousness, ONE DREAM. So what the fuck is the problem? *However, I also agree with @Inliytened1 here. In fact, this is my most recent awakening. That the witness/dreamer/nothingness/awareness is the exact same as what's being perceived. There's no dreamer and observed reality. It's more like reality seeing itself. A complete oneness of formlessness and form. One "thing" witnessing itself, no duality whatsoever. God.

I wonder why nobody (except @Inliytened1 of course) responded to the clip from Bashar I shared. @Carl-Richard, could you describe how reality "works" according to you, in the simplest way possible? Without jargon, and in as few sentences as you can? If you could mention: God, experience, "me" and "others" (what these are, whether they exist, etc.), that'd be great. Instead of simply denying the insight of solipsism/oneness of reality, I'd love to hear some of you clearly state what your actual understanding is. Or, if it's your view that no true understanding of reality is possible and that every statement is a belief, clearly say so.

Seems like you suddenly felt insecure with the feedback you received, and needed to compensate by posting these videos. Your situation is your own making. You'll stay in your helpless victim position until you decide to change. Up to you. Asking for attention with these threads is quite low, since it's not your intention to learn anything anyway.

Bread was just an example. 192 euro should last you much longer than 2-3 days.

That is true. However, it’s not so simple as to say that everything revolves around you. That others serve a purpose for you, personally. They can assist you and often do, but that’s not their sole reason for existence. Reality simply is. It’s all about God. Of course. But assigning limited reasons to why particular things or people exist is faulty.

A view of "personal dissociative complexes", as you call them, is only valid if consciousness (All That Is) is in a "selfhood state". If it isn't, there are no "minds".

No, that isn't solipsism. That is your personal definition of it, which has a lot of fluff added to it. The universe doesn't revolve around you. You're adding a lot of selfhood to the definition. To me, what you're describing is a naive, self-serving interpretation of solipsism.

If they're in your field of consciousness, they are "real". But fields of consciousness outside of "yours" is an idea in your mind. THIS is all that is. I don't know how I can say it clearer. I sense that you're purposefully trying to misunderstand this - if so, I won't stop you.

There is content to your consciousness that you're unaware of. But it's all still consciousness, and one "thing" in the end.

There's an infinity of you that you're unaware of. But awareness of it doesn't change a thing. It's always the case. No matter what.