Jake Chambers

Member
  • Content count

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jake Chambers

  1. Lol, Just found out Kanye bought Parler off the husband of Candace Owens. They finessed him super hard.
  2. Dude, you literally posted this song on your blog, so you can't really criticize music anymore. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x81ieWmW5tQ
  3. He does have a point that Jews have owned the black voice for very long.
  4. @Leo Gura He's a lot like you in many ways. Non-conformist, very direct.
  5. Even though conservatives like this are insanely stupid I'm glad Kanye at least revolted against the tasteless Hollywood Joe Biden club. Conservatives are more tasteless but they will implode anyway. Biden's clique is harder to hold accountable. RIP Kanye tho.
  6. that's fucked up.
  7. Could you go deeper and elaborate in which ways it does boomerang, maybe taking the cat and mouse as example?
  8. Philosophical question for you, does selfishness always boomerang in a perfect way? Does a cat eating a mouse gets boomeranged back?
  9. Andrew tate sucks. He has some redeeming qualities in the form of advocating for go-getter motivation and about the importance of a traditional masculine fundament which is very needed for young men, but he does so in a really toxic extremist way. It sucks that there aren’t many young motivational speakers that have thus masculine emotional core in their speaking and being. Leo is one, and I would actually say he’s the best motivational speaker for life in the world right now. The comparison between Leo and Andrew is actually a good example to explain what is both good and bad about Andrew’s philosophy. Both Leo and Andrew posses the masculine emotional core in their work, by that I mean the spirit to actually be motivated and emotionally charged about life. To be happy about working and going hard after your dreams and cultivating that love for the hardcore life we have in front of us. Most speakers don’t have this, it’s often either a really stage orange guy motivating you only for money or some Tom Biljeu type of character who is very stoic without that playful yet fierce masculine energy. Both of these lack the true emotional core of motivational work. Tate is a lot like that stage orange speaker yet does have a zest for life. Where Andrew and Leo differ is in the depth, breadth and level of development when looking at life. Leo sees that there is much beyond what Andrew doesn’t even know can exist in life. That there are much higher joys and riches to be had and experienced than just fucking bitches in a playboy mansion with a billion dollars in the bank. Leo also is so much more nuanced about his politics, while Andrew is just a classical stage blue partisan, while somehow enjoying to an extremely toxic level the pleasures of stage orange. Leo is of course much more developed in almost all ways. He recognizes the importance of the masculine core as a basis but goes far beyond it while Andrew will be stuck in the mud forever. All in all I am saying, do not take Tate seriously. But he does have that true masculine core that young men do need right now. But he exploits this need in young men in an extreme and populist manner, which is why he and his content sucks. It’s best to just ignore him.
  10. Sounds like the start of The Exorcist 4. But forreal, aren’t you scared that baneful entities can now posses you and send you to infinite insanity? Why do you assume you will only become this benign mouse and no other radical dangerous stuff can happen?
  11. When looking for girlfriend material does a woman’s body count bother you at all?
  12. You only game in vegas so those women are gonna be more that way. There are lots of women who choose a good provider, they would just never choose a good provider who cant also turn them on emotionally.
  13. @OBEler It doesn’t matter how many trips. It’s cool he did and I thinks his claim that you need to do as many trips as that to reach the exponentially deeper levels is believable. The problem is his claims that his unique genetics are the key to reaching these psychedelic states. Could be the case, also considering he considered a bong hit of weed one of his deepest trips yet, but this puts all his comments, statements and guidances in a different light. He is always making radical statements about our lives you could consider insulting, and denouncing other teachers, but it is all done with the excuse of guiding us to the highest awakening “like a moth looking for the light in a sea of darkness”. “I know you guys don’t like when I denounce every other teaching, but its for your own sake of reaching the highest awakening.” Now he is literally saying we can’t reach his states no matter how much we trip. So his excuse for being so arrogant and for his stark comments completely flies out of the window. If you make an analysis of everything he’s ever said on this forum you’d think he’s the biggest dickhead on earth.
  14. I wouldn’t count on it. He has said that there is no difference between intellect and intelligence.
  15. Also jokes on you for believing any claim someone makes, no matter how outrageous. Do you realize how outrageous a claim of 0.0001% even is? Also he literally says he has genetics which allow him to reach stages of consciousness with psychedelics that others cannot. Do you realize how lunatic his rhetoric is getting? He went from “you can’t reach these levels of consciousness without psychedelics” to now “you can’t reach these levels of consciousness without the combination of my genetics and psychedelics” . First off, how can you even be so sure of that? How can you judge another persons capability of “psychedelic ability” when those states of consciousness can never be communicated anyway? This just shouts messiah complex. And moreover why is he still teaching us or making a course to reach those levels of consciousness, when we can’t reach them anyway? In practice, if we cant reach those levels, to us he is only showing off his own level of awakening while bullying us into believing our mothers aren’t real. According to him we can’t reach his levels anyway so why even tell us all the radical “truths” which are supposedly meant to awaken us. I have a lot of respect for Leo for all his teachings and he even reached out me on his own accord over PM to talk about my life situation. I see his heart as pure and good. But I am just here showing how ridiculous his statements are, and are becoming worse over time, till the point where his metaphysical teachings do more harm than good.
  16. Oh i consider him to be smart. He is just saying that there are less than 10.000 people smarter than him in the whole world. Do you realize how deluded that sounds? There is a kid in my country who finished a masters degree at a university at 12 years old. Those are the true genetic freaks of nature when it comes to intelligence. Not the guy who runs actualized.org.
  17. I’ve had many hours of fun with godmode in skyrim and minecraft. It’s just a different experience.
  18. How are you so sure about that? Shaq is of course huge but how can you be sure that ppl like sadhguru are genetic freaks?
  19. Sounds very dualistic how they frame it. Assuming all kinds of distinctions about consciousness.
  20. Also I think nobody sees a cessation as a cessation of consciousness, but of the content of the senses and thoughts cessating while formless consciousness persists. I think real buddhists knows that consciousness is continuous and absolute.
  21. Mostly for men. Good advice with cool historical views on the universe and the greatest humans.