Davino

@Leo Gura I'm experiencing a weird bug since April 20th and still continues after the crash. I cannot post images or anything as before. This is how it happened: I made a post and started publishing media, but this time when I went to another post the counter of max size upload was going down in all posts simultaneously. Today I posted a picture to check what would happen if it arrived to 0. Now I don't even have the option to post any images, there's just the Insert other media button. Feel like it's gonna be hard to fix it but wanted to say it anyway.

I would love to see a him deconstructing Atheism and Agnosticism. It blew my mind he hadn't done it already when he mentioned it.

There's something very weird about her. I don't know how to point it out but she doesn't seem grounded. A few months ago, she claimed that Leo had died because his cat urinated on his laptop, which led him to take mahasamadhi. She also mentioned that his brother was now communicating through Leo's avatar. I hope she's fine and can quit Actualized.org teachings because she's going into some weird directions and it can spiral out of control. She's even made videos talking about users like @Princess Arabia @Razard86 @Danioover9000 @Salvijus@Schizophonia It's a bit weird overall. I don't know what else to say

I like what you are saying. But I wouldn't call that proof, because for me proof is a formal notion. I would call that revelation

It's a way to trigger the strange loop of Reality. I'm kissing my ass, is another one.

Bullshit

@Yimpa it was toilet paper 🧻

@tvaeli I'll maybe post a longer answer, but in short: You are intelligent but you lack mystical experiences. The correct things you say are due to your intelligence and what you have been able to decipher from second hand experience. You wouldn't be able to generate that body of knowledge from your own consciousness because you have not Awaken enough for that. You are strong in the intelligence side, you need to invest your coins on having mystical experiences and a change in your state of consciousness. Nothing can substitute an Awakening. Once you get in tune with your inner Self, with consciousness, with Reality, then your vivid intelligence will make sense of it and in ultimate instance, God will answer all your questions in a flash of Infinity.

@Javfly33 yes, bias is clear to me. No, I don't want you to prove it to me. I want you to prove it to yourself.

Thanks for clarifying the limits. So it's by volition in these certain places? Have you tried any test so that you are not deceiving yourself?

Of course. I had assumed so ahahah Light sparring then? it could be fun There's something unique about physical confrontation It's fun, isn't it so?

@Buck Edwards Discernment, seeing what something is beyond bias and personal interpretation. Direct consciousness, recognising the nature of something, tacit insight. Truth should be above negative and positive. That is the big picture I'm sure you are aware of, but it's true that the correct balancing act in the way you talk to yourself is hard to strike. Self-Love is my rule of thumb for self-talk, love can be both harsh and soft

Thanks for clarifying. It can be interesting to talk about this topics via voice. Although there are some restrictions regarding parallel communications in Actualized guidelines. I think it would be a nice way of getting to know each other. Even having a casual chat room to talk implemented in the Forum would be fantastic. I'm sure it is. It doesn't work like that, nobody be playing games inside a ring, let alone a mma cage. Survival kicks hard in those situations, more if you are untrained, it's very easy to injure yourself. It's a bad idea overall. Better to play tennis or something like that, or chess for you intellectuals

Thanks you saved me time, I was gonna do it on my own! I've always thought Leo could share a text version of his work. Some of his old videos used to have word exercises and things like that.

@Schizophonia I would like to have more interaction wth forum members beyond text, but a debate as a first encounter, why? Just a casual talk you know, we are not enemies, we share many things in common Also what is the point in having a physical fight between us? I regularly train martial arts and have practiced different styles, you misunderstood the warrior spirit for violence or entertainment.

Is that his fault or your fault? I've implemented the lens of traps in my everyday life. It's a very practical perspective to take. I'm already seeing the benefits and I've discovered new interesting properties about traps that I'll soon share. In fact, not only there has been a concrete change, but I'm actualy deepening my understand beyond Leo's video. Nobody can do the work for you.

At least the free videos

That sounds great man, hope you can contribute to society. We are in need of people like you, that do good science about Psychedelics

what am I holding in my left hand?

Sigh... It blows my mind how you could think that solipsism is so fragile it can't handle interacting with other people. Solipsism is not denial, it's all-inclusiveness. So much so, that guess what happens?

Scientists are equally deceived, in a more refined way How do you know that? How can you talk about totality and in the next line break it into so many fragments? it is Existence what does ethics have to do with this? What do you mean by Science? That's a fair point, like the mass hallucination of money. Why identifying evolution and holarchy as God but not also involution and flat systems as God? How do you square that contradiction with: "totality of everything" your first definition of God Or are you just trying to make a scientific mind see intelligence in the Universe and make him by induct reasioning see God in that and in All? The symbol is not the Symbolized Whatever happens or not with the symbol and its impact is, in my oponion, a bad direction to take your incquiry. You are trying to create a Scientific fantasy of God. Not very different from the religious fantasy of God. Same structure and mechanisms, different content. Same Ego-Mind and consciousness, less of a rookie theory If I understood you properly, you are saying to substract the actual "good" things from religion and help these religious people to see that through a scientific lens. So instead of denying their religion, a kind of honoring from the scientific perspective into the old time wisdom that is there. Meh, better than gross denial and unconscious judging but still poor. Good in theory but it's blind leading the blind. And there's no way to determine whether someone or something is scientific. You take for granted how much the Science notion is constructed There is no way to prove God or Godlike creatures. Prove is a subset of Truth or the "totality of everything". This has been formally demonstrated by mathematician and logist Gödel, in his incompleteness theorems. How is a part going to prove the whole? How is finity going to prove Infinity? Also rating Godliness by goodness is a disaster. Why? because what you say is good is what is good for YOU Goodness is abused by the ego as a cheap slut Do they? Or is that a vague generalization? I enjoy smoking now and then. I'm damn sure my lungs don't enjoy it. A tumor may come into my lungs, that part has a different agenda than the whole. Alll benefit is another's one loss, all loss is another's one benefit. Nothing can be taken out or added to the "totality of everything" You are trying to use the absolute in relative notions, whithout even being familiar with the Absolute. You are talking about idols, shades of semigods created in egoic human minds. How do you know that? Are you equal to God? What is God? Could you answer that for me... because your whole thesis is around something you have no direct experience with and therefore nor all the nuanced implications and ramifications you are trying to guess.

I agree. I don't know why restricting traps to the domain of nature, when he gave 250 traps, a wide perspective that is narrowing down. It's also interesting to contemplate why survival and traps are so closely related.