Davino

@UnbornTao Remember that Ramana was a solipsist

Thanks to holidays, I have time to stretch every morning and it makes all the difference. The ability to have a flexible body relaxes the mind and nervous system, you feel more at ease the rest of the day and everything flows. It's amazing how such a simple thing can impact your experience of life so much. A good 30min morning stretching is more than enough. I had forgotten how good it is. Returning to the good basics I guess.

Yes, I do feel it, but everyone is different. Maybe for you stretching may tense and contract your mind or don't affect it at all. If you meditate a lot, you will start getting a lot of sensibility of the states and structure your mind is in. You can even see how food affects your mind if you just eat and then meditate. Actually everything alters your state of mind. It's like you come to a carpenter shop and say to the craftsman, you are telling me for real there are different types of woods? I only see regular joe wood. There's an art of making subtle distinctions with deep observation. Try next time you do your stretching routine to meditate before and after and compare the state of your mind. Btw, given that you stretch twice a week could you give me any advice or routine? I'm just starting and would very much appreciate it as I'm not proficient in the topic

@Michal__ You gotta keep pushing. Don't quit now. Finish strong

What is Awake?

@UnbornTao If I understood correctly, your point is on the difference between intellectual understanding and experience or realisation. That gap is what you're trying to point. My comment was building on the intellectual consequences of both stances.

@UnbornTao I like a quote by Sri Anandamayi Ma that goes: "One thing is to have no doubts and another to realize a truth beyond all doubts" Religion lives in the former, mysticism in the latter.

@UnbornTao Is that message directed to me? If so, I don't care about looking intelligent because that attitude actually is a lower form of intelligence and an obstacle towards truth. I genuinely asked about a connection I didn't understand. I just couldn't see how identity and omnipotence could be linked, if you really contemplate, it's quite a claim. I wonder how many people did get it or really wanted to know. Leo explained it and I had the insight plus a mini-Awakening. That's why what I wrote may sound a bit different than my usual style, due to the state shift as I was writing. There's no big deal anyways.

Now I get it, yes I see. Another way to frame it is that true identity, beyond all layers, is existence itself and it's this existence which subdivides and limits itself, making existence inherently free, unlimited; connecting therefore Identity and Omnipotence. Wow, great connection, never saw it from this angle. Great insight Moreover, if my identity is unlimited by nature that takes all effort and chasing out of the equation, given the right consciousness one rests in pure Omnipotent nature, it's not something to acquire but something that is.

Loved your last quote, I connected all the dots but had a brain fart when you said Omnipotence is Identity. I can't see the connection there, would you mind explaining it? In your use of language, is Identity different than "I" ? Thanks

Note: Due to the complexity of the topic and being English not my main language, AI was used to better articulate my own insights. For years I tried to picture what is the next evolution beyond late-stage capitalism: one that is grounded and doesn't fully rely on the progressive evolution of collective values. My sticking point was structural: even if society’s values shift towards stage green of spiral dynamics (e.g. care, inclusion, sustainability), a profit-maximizing firm would still tend to get the upper hand because it can extract surplus (profits) for owners, raise capital aggressively, and scale faster. In a market engineered around maximization, “being nicer” is not a winning strategy; it’s a competitive disadvantage, unless the rules of the game change. After years of no success, some days ago I had my first important insight: there is no need for a challenging systemic-market disruption. It requires the dominant enterprise structure to evolve. The most plausible evolution of a post-capitalist economy is not the abolition of firms, not communism, not central planning, and not a stage green utopian shift in consumer ethics. It’s the rise of non-distributing enterprises: organizations that can compete in markets and generate surpluses, but cannot legally distribute those surpluses to private owners. Any excess is reinvested into developing their mission, strategic vision and value delivery. This single constraint of 'no private extraction' changes everything and shifts money-centric capitalism to product-value-centric capitalism. It flips the organizing principle of the firm from “maximize profit for owners” to “maximize value delivered to stakeholders while remaining financially self-sustaining.” A non-distributing firm (NDE) can still sell products, pay strong salaries, attract world-class talent, run cutting-edge Research & Development, and become operationally excellent. The difference is what happens to the surplus: instead of leaking upward as dividends and buybacks, it becomes fuel for a compounding reinvestment: higher wages, better tools, better service, lower prices, more R&D, deeper trust, longer horizons. This would give a competitive edge to NDEs over purely profit orange-based companies. So Cocacola would not be a good stock investment but a movement towards making the best beverages. This changes the game because many publicly traded firms are structurally compelled to prioritize shareholder returns, even when doing so conflicts with long-term stakeholder value. In an NDE model, the same cash flows can be redirected into the core activity (e.g. product quality, reliability, innovation, and societal benefit) without requiring a global green value transformation from the collective, as well as bad actors. The main drawback of NDEs is initial capital formation (bootstrapping): as they scale less through equity upside and more through retained earnings, debt, revenue-based financing, procurement, and mission-aligned capital. If those pathways mature, a post-capitalist economy can emerge organically: markets remain, competition remains; but extraction becomes structurally harder, and compounding reinvestment becomes the default. The two greatest risks of non-distributing enterprises are corruption through conversion and decay through complacency. As organizations accumulate value, internal and external pressures push relentlessly towards making that value privately extractable; success itself becomes the danger (e.g. OpenAI). At the same time, removing profit incentives and takeover threats risks dulling ambition, especially at the executive level, replacing excellence with comfort. If unaddressed, these forces ensure that either the most successful organizations betray the model, or the most faithful ones underperform. For post-capitalism to scale, non-distribution must find cases of great success, and performance pressure must be consciously regenerated through culture, reputation, purpose, real accountability, excellence and love for the product rather than profit alone. Post-capitalism, then, is not a rejection of markets, ambition, or competition, but a refinement of what they are optimized for. The shift towards non-distributing enterprises does not depend on a rejection of money, but on whether these organizations can remain attractive places to build, create, and excel while keeping surplus aligned with their purpose. In that sense, post-capitalism would not arrive as a rupture, but as a quiet selection process: where the firms that endure are those designed to compound value for society rather than convert it into private exit. This is my prediction for the next macroscale stage of the global economy, and the structural foundation upon which stage green can realistically take root and endure over the coming centuries.

Lmao, that's exactly what I thought before posting. Crazy 5D chess being played here The other argument is that I don't have the time and Leo has already done an splendid job. It's mindboggling how accurate he is. I've verified everything in those videos and in what we differ he clarified and refined in later videos. Our differences are mostly in style rather than in Truth and Awakening. Although Leo is decades of work ahead of me, I'm just starting. As a funny anecdote, I thought Leo never talked publicly about Perfection Awakening (One facet I've gone very deep in) just to rewatch his video '65 core principles' to find it was one of them.

I have the intuition it may make the Salvia experience more comfortable. I plan to try it one day. So any advice is welcomed

❤️ I'm good friends with LambdaDelta. Hopefully this year we'll meet in person, as we live both in Spain. We'll make a tea ceremony in your honour!

Some But I prefer not to talk too much on that, as mixing can become more dangerous and a trap in itself

I feel safer entering into the Salvia experience from the 5-MeO space.

Yes it may happen. There are two explanations: 1 Flashbacks 2 Consciousness shifts First one is chemical reactivations to consciousness, the second one is from consciousness to body.

@Michal__ I see, thanks

@VioleGrace Yes! After stretching it's like a deep tension is released in my brain and then my mind relaxes a lot

@Human Mint Try it out, why not? I found this very nice routine today:

The ultimate Koan

@Ramasta9 Yes yes! You know what you're talking about. I also love cats, they do stretch. Thanks for the tip now it will trigger in me to stretch. I absolutely agree on the principle your body guides you.

A tough think I'm going through is a familiar situation out of my hand. A beautiful thing is how I'm constructing my life and youth in the right principles. There's a joy for all that I have accomplished and grown and such hope and vision for the future. Not all days are good but I don't want only good days, my love can also take bad days. Lots of love to all of you Davino❤️

We can draw outside the paper