LoseYourvelf

Made the right choice? Forget anyone?

Well that makes me and you worthless too Leo

But do not discount the opposite

#BRO

I'd say of this minute, nothing is closer to the truth

Survive an art critic

Kate Bush - Cloudbusting (Youtube)

How I see it is that you are always at least some distribution of the supposed balance to even consider it in the first place. Having no preference of course, like you imply, could be truer to each unique situation where opening or closing up would apply the best. You are always biased if you highlight either side of a duality and apply it to the unknown in a vacuum-like manner though, even if the duality is choosing / not choosing itself. Let's imagine, you're paradoxically completely unbiased but completely decisive in day-to-day practice in every action, in any way you might imagine that could be/take place, you may notice that this would be indistinguishable from applying a "biased" closed minded or "biased" open minded preference in experience. Considering whether to practice as closed or open minded or a balance of both is the same thing as being unbiased yet decisive at the exact same time, all of the time, in every action. That's the separate nature of "closed mindedness/open mindedness"

Great questions thank you, relative to my person goals/health/wellbeing/self-love right now being productive would be akin to "the deepest version of true self love" I could give to this guy, positive productivity (in the sense of what I can best judge to give myself what I need as fast as I can get myself it) would be the best function/model I could imagine relative to this guy typing here however relative to my true self (this guy AND "Not this guy") it would be just an illusion of self, a step or form deduced "item" of self and a deeper version of true love, being "truer" to the actual identity of self, would be that no "level of", "tuning of" or version of "productivity" or "none-productivity" can be chosen over the others as ultimately powerful self-made illusions are self-verifying and every infinitesimal level/version on that dial relative to any/every situation possible IS ultimate truth and equally an illusion. So that's definitely where I get more lost/unavailable to integrate that truth into the aforementioned "relative-human life" answer because "going with the flow" or the "inaction" that the latter perspective I gave would suggest, right now, for me, doesn't equal positive/healthy productivity to me, at least I think, I seem to think I'd stay on this negative path usually if I followed the inaction path. Though in typing all of that I'm very very inclined to think that I'm a fool who has the ability/power to "test" both of these and in fact, I have been testing the "inaction one" for quite some time now, though I like to hide that truth from myself and it's use has expired to some extent so I do need to get my shit together to truly effect myself positively, which I will indeed do before posting here again, thanks, til next time!

For living the most fulfilling human life and reducing suffering in it, do you think their is a greater need for the "practice" of being able to stay in one state of consciousness for a long period of time and keep elements of your conscious the same for long periods of time or on the other hand is there a greater need in being able to adapt with things and to practice generally experiencing things randomly and as new and trying not to conform to a daily routine/model, going with the flow let's say etc? Which do you think tends do be more A. spiritually productive and B. human wellbeing and health productive, are they the same or different? If it's both for either end, which would win it out and be more important if you had to choose one and stick to it for YOU specifically and why?

Obsessed with itself and own desire